The Russian Nuclear Button

New questions about the Soviet legacy of three briefcases.

BY DAVID E. HOFFMAN | MAY 27, 2010

In the event of a nuclear missile attack on Russia, three hard-shell briefcases filled with electronics are set to alert their holders simultaneously. Inside each is a portable terminal, linked to the command and control network for Russia's strategic nuclear forces. One of them accompanies the Russian president, Dmitry Medvedev, wherever he goes. It is known as the Cheget, and allows the president to monitor a missile crisis, make decisions, and transmit those decisions to the military. It's similar to the nuclear "football" that accompanies the American president.

But a new book by a leading Russian security analyst points to a surprising disconnect in the system, a potential flaw that has not been widely understood. Under Russia's 1993 Constitution, the president is the commander in chief, and if incapacitated in any way, all of his duties fall to the prime minister. Yet the prime minister does not have a nuclear briefcase at his disposal. The other two Cheget briefcases are actually held by the defense minister and the chief of the general staff, as was the case in Soviet times. The resulting ambiguity, warns Alexei Arbatov, could be dangerous in the event of a nuclear crisis. In today's Russia, neither of the military men has the constitutional or legal responsibility to make a decision about how or whether to launch a nuclear attack. Certainly, they would be among the top advisors to the president at a time of crisis, but they are not decision-makers.

Why the danger? The United States and Russia still maintain nuclear-tipped missiles on alert for rapid launch. The land-based U.S. missiles can be ready to launch in four minutes. Warning of an imminent attack might require a president to make very rapid decisions with limited information. In such an emergency, whether in the White House or the Kremlin, you'd want very precise roles for each decision-maker, without ambiguity or uncertainty.

But it seems like there is still some uncertainty in Russia, where the command-and-control system is shrouded in secrecy, as it was in Soviet times. This makes it all the more interesting that Arbatov is airing his concerns in public. His critique is included in his new book, Uravnenie Bezopasnosti, or The Security Equation, just published in Moscow. The volume, in Russian, covers a wide range of security issues, from Europe to Iran, from nuclear terrorism to tactical nuclear weapons. His comments on the nuclear command and control system come in a chapter titled "Democracy, the military and nuclear weapons."

Arbatov, who heads the Center for International Security at the Institute of World Economy and International Relations in Moscow, is also a scholar in residence at the Carnegie Moscow Center and one of the foremost Russian analysts of strategic weapons and security issues. He has been a long-time member of the liberal Yabloko bloc, and in earlier years served in the lower house of parliament, the State Duma, where he was deputy chairman of the Duma defense committee.

Arbatov wants Russia to bring the nuclear weapons launch procedure -- the three briefcases -- in synch with the Russian Constitution. He wants to make sure it is the president and the prime minister who are making the big decision. He is a strong believer in the idea that democracy means civilian control over military affairs.

The Soviet Union created the current command and control system at the peak of the Cold War in the early 1980s. The three nuclear briefcases were put on duty just as Mikhail Gorbachev became Soviet leader in 1985. They are linked to a redundant network, called Kavkaz, made of cables, radio transmissions, and satellites. The three briefcases are essentially communications terminals to give those using them information about a possible attack, and allowing them to consult with each other. Initially, they were given to the Soviet general secretary, defense minister, and chief of the general staff because, in the Soviet system, the military has historically played a larger role in decisions about nuclear war.  If a nuclear launch were ordered, it would go from the Cheget to a receiving terminal called Baksan, located at the command posts of the General Staff, rocket forces, navy, and air force. The overall communications network is called Kazbek.

DMITRY ASTAKHOV/AFP/Getty Images

 SUBJECTS: NUKES, MILITARY, RUSSIA, EUROPE
 

David E. Hoffman is a contributing editor to Foreign Policy and the Pulitzer Prize-winning author of The Dead Hand: The Untold Story of the Cold War Arms Race and Its Dangerous Legacy. He blogs at hoffman.foreignpolicy.com.

JOHNBRAGG

5:52 AM ET

May 30, 2010

Continuity of Government under Reagan

I don't know the details of the Reagan-era plan, but it sounds very much like the "designated survivor" system used for Inaugurations, State of the Union addresses, etc., where one member of the Cabinet is in a different city--the "designated survivor" should there be a catastrophic attack. The legitimacy of that President would rest on the Congressionally defined line of succession after the President, Vice President, President Pro Tem of the Senate, Speaker of the House, and then Cabinet members.

Not extra-legal or extra-constitutional at all, in the US case.

 

ANTONIO BACIL

11:43 PM ET

May 30, 2010

It`s true

As a resident of Russia, I feel comming back to USSR. It`s not like it was at my childhood, but the trend is obvious. And it`s not about only war and foreign policy, it`s about everyday life of ordinary people, too.

 

LANDDEV

11:54 PM ET

June 2, 2010

The Russian Nuclear Button

I guess the United states doesn't have a lock on stupidity.

Ben Koshkin

 

BARTODEO

8:34 AM ET

June 16, 2010

As a resident of Russia, I

As a resident of Russia, I feel comming back to USSR. It`s not like it was at my childhood, but the trend is obvious. And it`s not about movies online only war and foreign policy, it`s about everyday life of ordinary people, too.

 

ADRIAN888

9:15 PM ET

June 24, 2010

An interesting article

As commented " Arbatov wants Russia to bring the nuclear weapons launch procedure -- the three briefcases -- in synch with the Russian Constitution. He wants to make sure it is the current sports news president and the prime minister who are making the big decision. He is a strong believer in the idea that democracy means civilian control over military affairs. "

 

GREGORY TREVINO

2:12 AM ET

June 26, 2010

Russian Roulette

Some think that, since Russia's warheads are no longer targeted at U.S. cities and military bases (and the United States is trying to persuade China to adopt a similar policy), the world is much safer. But this is simply not true. The difference between having missiles aimed or not is simply a matter of a minutes. hp q2612a cartridge The missiles' computer memory retains their former targets, and they can quickly be reprogrammed. Conditions leading to the possibility of potentially catastrophic mix-ups are becoming more prevalent. The Newsweek article reports that, because of the lack of maintenance of their nuclear arsenal, "the Russians might wrongly think they were under attack from the West and fire their rockets. This danger has greatly increased because the Russian early-warning system is not what it used to be. hp q2612a cartridge It has lost major radar stations in the new nations of Ukraine, Latvia and others. Some of its satellite-tracking stations have gone to Ukraine, Georgia and Kazakhstan. The high command is now partially blind, which increases its apprehensions, produces false alarms and makes good decisions harder."