I was born in Mexico City in 1974. After college at
the Universidad de las Americas in Mexico, I moved to New York to become a
photographer in 1995. I'd grown up in a middle-class household; my dad owned a
construction business. But after my savings ran out in New York, I had to do
service work to get by: I worked as a waitress and a nanny, and realized how
difficult it was to be an immigrant. Initially I had a student visa. Before I
got my green card, I also had to go back and forth across the border every six
months. It was a very humbling experience.
Meanwhile, I worked as an English teacher and a union organizer, helping Mexican immigrants with various issues, like landlord-tenant disputes. Through this work, I got to know many Latino workers in New York. I wanted to share their experiences, but not the story we usually hear, if we hear of them at all. In a sense, Latino workers in New York are hidden -- hidden in kitchens, hidden inside houses. Most of the U.S. national news about immigration is very sad: bitter political disputes in Arizona, or images of desperate immigrants trying to cross the border. So much pain numbs you.
It is easy to overlook the practical contribution of immigrants to American society, as well as the enormous financial contribution they make in sending remittances home. A lot of Latino communities survive on that money; some say the sum of remittances even surpasses the income we get from selling oil, in the case on Mexico.
I saw a Spiderman costume in a store in November 2001, and that's when everything came together in my head. Comic-book superheroes have an alter ego, and so do immigrants in the United States. They may be insignificant or even invisible to much of society, but they are heroes in their homelands.
Many of the people I photographed for this series, between 2004 and 2009, were my students or people I worked with as a union organizer. We had a friendly relationship; they trusted me enough to give me their real names and how much money they send home. It was very important to me to include that information. My work is a tribute to them.
Superman (pictured above)NOE REYES from the State of Puebla works as a delivery boy in Brooklyn New York. He sends home $500 a week.
NOE REYES originario del Estado de Puebla trabaja como repartidor de comida rápida en Brooklyn N York. Manda 500 dólares a la semana
COMMENTS (48)


(48)
HIDE COMMENTS LOGIN OR REGISTER REPORT ABUSE
MR.IVAN
12:22 AM ET
May 30, 2010
I found your website through
I found your website through Google fast flip and I'm very glad that I did. It was interesting seeing people dressed as super heroes doing their jobs.
DANIELBROADNAX
8:49 AM ET
June 7, 2010
Hahaha, that guy riding the
Hahaha, that guy riding the bike should read a few weight loss tips, he definitely needs to lose a bit of weight. Anyone else agree?
GUYVER
4:42 AM ET
June 19, 2010
Criminals
No heroes, just criminals who are in the country illegally.
LKAN
5:32 AM ET
May 30, 2010
sending money home
What are the predicted effects of the money being sent back to Mexico from migrant workers? Is it negligible compared to the amount of GDP increase they provide?
MARY M.
9:01 AM ET
June 3, 2010
GDP only reflects profits to the wealthiest
It doesn't reflect the loss of income of the poor and now virtually non-existent middle class. Nor does it reflect the drain of money out of the US, or how the tax rates in the US are rising and making us even more uncompetitive because the cheap wages are compensated by our many welfare programs that illegals demand as subsidies. Or the harm to citizens by displacement, but also through illegals being at the heart of the mortgage collapse that has consumed our nation's wealth, put us in even worse debt and insolvency.
By the lack of spelling skills on display by Ms. Pinzon's supporters, I'll hazard a guess that if they aren't illegals, they are from Latin America and their grasp of English is very poor.
VIEJOVIZCACHA
12:22 PM ET
June 4, 2010
Focusing on spelling skills
Focusing on spelling skills to criticize immigration is so hollow, that highlights the strength of Ms. PINZÓN's characters.
Reflects the loss of objectivity of the lightly educated crust of anti-immigrants' ballyhoo.
I don't think either, MARY M. would dare to criticize the drain of money out of the US, going to Israel, much less compare it with the Mexicans', or to the Medicaid, Medicare, Hospitalizations, Supplemental Social Security Benefits, Food Stamps, etc, etc, etc, welfare programs given to wealthy, let me modify this, Obscenely Rich, Park Avenue's or Williamsburg’s dwellers. MARY M. would never dare to criticize the US Tax cheating of those same. Or the harm to US citizens that those same caused, cause and will continue causing, bringing their businesses to Honduras to pay $0.35 (this is THIRTY FIVE CENTS OF US DOLLAR THE HOUR OF WORK) to Maquiladoras--leaving the US workers blank-staring, poor and desperados and... displaced.
No, MARY M. would not dare to analyze former AIG owner Mr. Maurice Greenberg's wealth after his Mortgage Derivatives invention pocketed a plump $85 Billion from US TARP (how many Mexicans would $85 Billions feed, somebody, anybody?), or how the Maurice Greenbergs "put us in even worse debt and insolvency".
By the lack of reasoning skills on display by MARY M., I'll hazard a guess that if she isn't living in Park Avenue or Williamsburg, she is of some racist background and her grasp of Anthropology is very poor.
LEBLANC
1:29 PM ET
June 11, 2010
Remittances
As someone in the local economic development profession, I cant begin to tell you how impt it is to keep income in a local, regional or national economy. $350 a month, $500 a month, etc sent to Mexico, leaves our economy or "circular economic flow. " Guess who benefits (its like importing goods and services, which also send our money to other economies). While it can be argued that immigrants keep our labor costs down and make the US more competitive and improve our liefstyles (by say keeping food bills down or lowering restaurant bills), what is the next effect of all the remittances (and immigrant purchases in the US of ethnic products / brands imported from Mexico). In economic development, remittances hurt the remitting country, as it represents outflows of income.
CHR1
11:21 AM ET
May 30, 2010
Photos
Good photos, and life is not easy for an immigrant. Pasaba unos meses trabajando en el estado de Washington, para que los inmigrantes sabian como ser ciudanos. Es decir: legal. Habian muchos que no podia leer en espanol.
I appreciate the work ethic and frankly, the humanity, of the people I worked with. But honestly, it's the people here, our laws, our hard work, our sacrifices that have made the economy so attractive for immigrants.
If they want to come here legally, like my ancestors did, so be it. I welcome you. If you are illegal, and live in the shadows, well, tough shit. If you plan on going home, and haven't fully commited to becoming an American, then make your money, and don't expect much else, except maybe a trip back home.
INDIERED
3:41 PM ET
May 31, 2010
Pilgrim Hypocrisy
You almost had me with your opening, but you had to go on...
A country established by persecuted Englishmen that traveled across the Atlantic Ocean with wetter backs that any Central American today, who then tricked & forced the Native North American Indian intro trading their land for fire, water, decease and casinos.
This was (IS) their land, explain to me how in the helluva "your" ANCESTORS came here legally and "rightfully" claimed this land as their own? The magnanimous white man even went as far as to mess with the Indian legacy, by taking girls of age and making them infertile.
How many Native North American Indians do you see today, have you seen one lately; besides the movies?
And stop using the word AMERICAN so lightly, like it merely and solely represents the United States [OF] PART of -NORTH- America. America (or The AMERICAS) is a huge landmass that encompasses not one but a whole slew of nations, all of which rightfully call themselves AMERICANS. Yeah, there are close to a Billion people in the Americas, the majority who do NOT reside in the U.S. of Part of A., and they are all Americans; IE: Canadians, Mexicans, Colombians, Venezuelans, Brazilians, etc.
*By the way, speaking of the Arizona Law, I wonder, how many Slavic Illegal Immigrants are currently being affected by it? I’ll tell ya’ how many = NONE. And for the ignorant, yes, there are mass of them around, the only reason YOU wouldn’t notice, is because Slavs are Caucasian.
@ Bumpkin speak
WYCOFF
2:49 PM ET
June 1, 2010
There's a crucial distinction, Indiered
The English (and later, the US) took title to the Native American lands through conquest. They weren't "immigrants", they were conquerors. Like it or not, conquest was a legal means of acquiring land throughout all of human history, recognized worldwide as legitimate at least as recently as the 1950s (when we recognized the ethnic cleansing of the Germans from what once was East Prussia, Pommerania, and Silesia). If the US does not belong to the US, then Turkey doesn't belong to the Turks, Kaliningrad doesn't belong to the Russians, Pommerania doesn't belong to the Poles, most of Africa does not belong to the Bantus, etc. The US belongs to US citizens, and it is up to us to decide who may or may not come here.
Those who try to equate the current illegal aliens with the English colonizers should beware, because that comparison implicitly justifies violent resistance by current US citizens (the Native American analoges in your comparison) against the invading colonizers.
By the way, I think that illegal Slavs (or any other illegal) should be deported . With a looming permanent unemployment rate of 10%, we simply don't need the unskilled labor. We have plenty of idle hands. It's time that we face the economic reality- there should be no such thing as a "job that an American won't do."
ARTUR_M
8:07 AM ET
June 2, 2010
Sorry, you're wrong
@WYCOFF:
"Like it or not, conquest was a legal means of acquiring land throughout all of human history, recognized worldwide as legitimate at least as recently as the 1950s (...)"
Why do you think that conquests and annexations were legal until 1950s? It wasn't legal, but it wasn't also prohibited. In most civilizations, country had to have a solid reason (which, we, the Europeans, called casus belli) to start a war and the war itself should have been declared properly. Nowadays, it might sound ridiculously but before XX century it was a serious thing.
Oh, and one more thing: Kellogg–Briand Pact (1928) delegalized war as a instrument of foreign policy. Although it was signed and ratified by many countries, even Germany and Soviet Union, it couldn't stop Hitler and Stalin from starting a WWII.
"(...) (when we recognized the ethnic cleansing of the Germans from what once was East Prussia, Pommerania, and Silesia)."
Yeah, and the WWII was started by Poland ;) I'm wondering what do you know about European history. There was no ethnic cleansing of the Germans in East Prussia, Pommerania and Silesia - most of Germans fled before the Soviets arrived.
There's only one thing you mentioned I can agrree with: what's done is done. Altough colonization of Americas and Africa, along with slavery and Nazi & communist genocides, was bitter European contribution to the world, we can't turn back time. All we must do, is not let it happen again.
Art
WYCOFF
7:44 AM ET
June 3, 2010
I'm wondering what do you know about European history.
More than you do, apparently, if you somehow think that the concept of cassus belli and Kellog-Briand somehow rebuts what I said, or that there was no ethnic cleansing of the Germans from Eastern Europe after WW2.
WYCOFF
8:06 AM ET
June 3, 2010
This explains why you missed my point so completely
@Art: I didn't see it before making my first response, but I couldn't let this gem slide by once I saw it.
"Altough colonization of Americas and Africa, along with slavery and Nazi & communist genocides, was bitter European contribution to the world, we can't turn back time."
You have a European guilt complex. Slavery was a "European contribution to the world?" Preposterous. Slavery had been used by many peoples throughout the world for thousands of years. There were slaves in the Middle East and Africa before there were cities in Europe. The Greeks and Romans used slaves, but certainly weren't the only Mediterranean cultures to do so. The western Europeans were the participants in the Western African / Atlantic slave trade during the late 15th - early 19th century. Europeans may have participated in slavery, but they certainly didn't invent the concept.
Similarly, Africa was being colonized over and over again before western Europeans set established their modern colonial empires. Two examples are the Bantu, who originated in western Africa and proceeded to violently colonize the rest of the continent, and the Arabs, who colonized Northern Africa. Despite what the left would have you believe, Africa wasn't some pristine, peaceful commonwealth of friends before the coming of the eeeeeeevil white man.
Europeans are somehow responsible for all of the world's Communist genocides? The USSR's I can understand, but Mao's? The Khmer Rouge? North Korea? What's your basis for that? Because Marx and Engels were German? That's like saying the Jews are responsible for the KKK because Jesus was Jewish, and the religion based around him, Christianity, went on to be twisted into the inspiration for the KKK. Indefensible.
You shouldn't try to criticize others' knowledge or interpretation of history when you have such a warped and ill-informed understanding of it. Believe it or not, Europeans aren't the center of the world, nor are they the root of all evil.
WYCOFF
8:28 AM ET
June 3, 2010
One Final Clarification
I want to make clear that I'm not trying to deny or justify the immoral or evil things that Europeans or their New World descendants have done.
What I am doing, however, is objecting to the left's canard that the white man is somehow uniquely evil and responsible for most if not all of the world's ills and atrocity. Ironically, that view point is myopically Eurocentric. A broader look at world history shows that practically all groups of peoples are have been imperialists, racists, colonizers, and conquerors at one time or another (Haven't you heard of the Mongols? Japanese? Persians? Turks? Chinese? etc.). The Europeans may have done some things on a grander scale (though the Mongols and Japanese at least make that point debatable), but that's mainly a function of technological superiority that emerged in the west around the time of the late Renaissance and has continued to this day.
European guilt / white guilt is dangerous because it is based on the assumption that whites have something uniquely wrong. Conversely, the self immolation of people who suffer from this guilt (such as Art, who credits slavery and African colonization as being inventions of the Europeans and blames the crimes of Mao, Pol Pot, and Kim Il Sung/ Kim Jong-il on Europe) provides anti-white racists with justifications for their hate. There were millennia in which Europeans/white people were relatively powerless and practically irrelevant in world history.
MARY M.
9:02 AM ET
June 3, 2010
They aren't immigrants, they are illegal aliens
The two terms aren't interchangeable.
Z DUFFY
11:49 AM ET
June 3, 2010
The two aren't interchangeable
That's true, but if they have legal documentation that are immigrants. This story never explicitly states whether these individuals are in the country legally or otherwise, that's obviously just an assumption you're making.
DHARMAVAGABOND
5:15 PM ET
June 3, 2010
El derecho del más fuerte
There's a crucial distinction, Indiered
The English (and later, the US) took title to the Native American lands through conquest. They weren't "immigrants", they were conquerors. Like it or not, conquest was a legal means of acquiring land throughout all of human history, recognized worldwide as legitimate at least as recently as the 1950s (when we recognized the ethnic cleansing of the Germans from what once was East Prussia, Pommerania, and Silesia). If the US does not belong to the US, then Turkey doesn't belong to the Turks, Kaliningrad doesn't belong to the Russians, Pommerania doesn't belong to the Poles, most of Africa does not belong to the Bantus, etc. The US belongs to US citizens, and it is up to us to decide who may or may not come here.
Those who try to equate the current illegal aliens with the English colonizers should beware, because that comparison implicitly justifies violent resistance by current US citizens (the Native American analoges in your comparison) against the invading colonizers.
By the way, I think that illegal Slavs (or any other illegal) should be deported . With a looming permanent unemployment rate of 10%, we simply don't need the unskilled labor. We have plenty of idle hands. It's time that we face the economic reality- there should be no such thing as a "job that an American won't do."
Para bien o para mal, seguramente no tienes el menor conocimiento del español, centrado como estás en tu creencia de que tu país es el único sobre la faz de la tierra, así que esto te dejará indiferente, como indiferente le será tu suerte a los millones de personas que cambiarán de país, desde America Latina hacia Estados Unidos y viceversa, en los próximos años.
El derecho de conquista, si es que eso existe, se gana con la fuerza, y en este caso no es la fuerza de las armas de gente racista como tú. Es la fuerza del trabajo cotidiano que produce y procura más riqueza que cualquier invasión bélica.
ARTUR_M
5:28 AM ET
June 9, 2010
If wishes were horses beggars would ride...
@Wycoff: Please, spare me your lessons of world history. I don't need them. You simply misunderstood (which is, I agree, in part by my fault - but please, have in mind that English is not my native language) what I meant by "slavery": as we were talking about US history, I thought it's clear that I'm writing about "that slavery"(let's say it's "American slavery"), not the slavery in general.
"Europeans are somehow responsible for all of the world's Communist genocides? The USSR's I can understand, but Mao's? The Khmer Rouge? North Korea? What's your basis for that? Because Marx and Engels were German?"
No, not because Marx and Engels were German, but because Mao, Pol Pot, Castro and many others just followed the European communists examples - not only in economy, but also in i.e. how they treated political adversaries. It was Lenin and Stalin who blazed a trail for the others. Of course you can always say that Mao or Pol Pot could have do what they did without any inspiration from European Communists, but if wishes were horses beggars would ride.
"Europeans aren't the center of the world, nor are they the root of all evil. (...) What I am doing, however, is objecting to the left's canard that the white man is somehow uniquely evil and responsible for most if not all of the world's ills and atrocity. Ironically, that view point is myopically Eurocentric. (...) European guilt / white guilt is dangerous because it is based on the assumption that whites have something uniquely wrong"
Please, don't put words in my mouth, as I never said that - it's overinterpretation! I didnt say that Nazi/Communist genocides and slavery was the only European contribution to the world or that the Europeans were the only "bad guys" in world's history.
Let me ask you again: please, tell me more about ethnic cleansing of Germans in postwar Europe. As a German studying now in Poland I'm very interested in that topic! Please show me at least one reliable source which could back your words.
JIHOBBYIST
11:43 AM ET
June 20, 2010
Learn some history Art
@Art
Stop back tracking, just learn some history, and logic while you're at it.
It's absurd to suggest that Mao, Pol Pot, and all other nuts decision to follow Lenin foot step is some how the fault of Western European policy. These nuts CHOSE communism for their people, and their people suffered as a result.
As for your argument about slavery, if you don't learn anything else from WYCOFF, you should accept this, slavery were traded among African tribes for century before the European show up, and the people extended this trade outside of Africa were the Arabs. So like WYCOFF stated correctly, Africa wasn't one big kumbaya festivity as you may hope it was. It was nasty, dangerous, and corrupt as it is today.
And even if you don't want to accept that fact, consider this, just who do you think went deep inside Africa to fetch those slaves to trade? The white European or more correctly, the Africans themselves. The white European would have been dead on arrival because there was no way they could have survived the local diseases pass ten feet into the jungles.
MITCHELL YOUNG
9:24 PM ET
May 30, 2010
A net drain
Ms. Pinzon sounds like an intelligent and capable woman. Perhaps she should return to her country -- it could use more people like her.
As for the tipical 'migrant' from Mexico, when a true accounting of services they end up using is factored in, they simply do not pull their weight. Let's take this pizza delivery guy. This job is best done by a teenage American, and yes they are our their and willing to work. By essentially importing a worker, this business puts additional stress on the public systems in New York, everything from the subway to the sewage system. If this guy brings his family up, as so many do, then we will have to foot the bill for the childrens' education. Sorry, but a pizza delivery guy isn't paying near enough taxes to ever cover that expenditure.
BOREDWELL
9:27 PM ET
May 31, 2010
Dollares
Given the recession and the cost of living in NYC, it is amazing to me that these individuals could send so much money home! The delivery person, it was stated, sent home $500/wk. This astounds me. These workers could solve our national deficit! To put a personal perspective on this, given all my expenses-all non extravagant-I barely manage to squeak by each month. I'm impressed, surprised and a bit envious of their collective and individual mettle.
OPEMILY
3:54 PM ET
June 1, 2010
I agree, that is what I like
I agree, that is what I like about these pictures. These are people working hard in under-appreciated jobs, yet they are able to send that much money home a week. To their families back home, they are superheros, but we don't see them that way.
Its not about legal status. I have friends who come to the United States and they work hard, not for themselves, but to pay for their younger brother or sister's education costs. Or a mother who leaves her children with their grandmother or other relative so they can earn money and build a better life for them. They don't go visit because the money it would take to go home is money could be used by their families for other needs. Its a lonely sad life (The movie Man Push Cart comes to mind). Superheros indeed.
JIHOBBYIST
11:50 AM ET
June 20, 2010
Did I get this right?
So because they have to feed their families in Mexico, they have the right to violate American's law to do so? Is that what you're saying?
How about this, my family needs a bigger house, how about I go over to Beverly Hills and just occupied one of those mansions. Would you call me a hero?
People can be so stupid.
WYCOFF
3:10 PM ET
June 1, 2010
Strange pictoral
This pictoral seems to be trying to infantalize the Latino immigrants. It's dressing them up in children's costumes in order to make those opposed to illegal immigration look like bullies picking on child-like innocents. It touches on the weirdly paternalistic racial undertones that are inherent in the socially left-wing pro-illegal immigration arguments.
TRICHARDSON
6:14 PM ET
June 1, 2010
What is the Point of this Article
I thought FP was a serious magazine addressing important issues with some thought and insight and at least a moderate degree of objectivity. This article is more appropriate to Newsweek which long ago gave up any semblance of intelligence and balance. Immigration, particulary illegal immigration is a maybe the most important domestic issues facing this country and the best this periodical can do is dress up immigrants in superhero costumes to demonstrate how nice and harmless these people are. This is one of the weirdest articles, including the title, I have seen in a long time. It must have been an interesting editorial meeting when it was decided to publish this nonsense.
TFERNSLE
8:25 PM ET
June 1, 2010
I get it
and it is made of pure awesome
MARY M.
9:50 AM ET
June 2, 2010
I see no contributions, only increased costs
Firstly, I would like to know if FP fact check's articles before publishing, especially when they come from outside contributes? Perhaps FP doesn't think that it's readers might question the veracity of the statements made in such puff pieces? After perusing the photo essay, I was left with only questions. Ms Pinzon did not elaborate the "contributions" the illegal aliens she holds up as "heroes" make to the US, because they certainly aren't apparent. There is no worker shortage here, and US citizens have always and still wish to perform those jobs, what's more, I believe she assumes that readers might not be aware of the actual wage standard such workers earn, or contemplate how these low wage workers are able to afford such large remittance payments as they are credited with sending to their home countries.
What is the delivery boy delivering that he can afford to send home $500. per month? A waiter in Brooklyn sending home $350. per week, and a minimum wage, not working full time in a laundromat sending $150. per week? That's simply not possible, unless they are being subsidized by the taxpayer. I'm not a fool. Truly, given the fact that illegals have poorer citizens out, and NYC and the boroughs are filled with them, and we're forced to subsidize them, were they to all be deported, we'd see plainly that they aren't making any contribution, only bleeding us dry.
The facts are, that with the exception of the nanny, though we're not told if she lives in with her employers, there is no way that any of them could be sending those amounts out per week, if they weren't being subsidized by the taxpayer, and very generously I might add. When you consider the cost of living in New York, and the fact that our taxes have been rising enormously, and we're told it's still not enough, I can only assume that these illegal aliens are receiving welfare, food stamps, housing subsidies, free health care and much more when you consider the increased crime, costs for schooling their children, translators, city & state documents in foreign languages, increased costs due to unlicensed, uninsured illegal alien drivers and the damages they wreak, unpaid emergency room bills, and so on. That's not even mentioning their part in causing the economic and mortgage collapse due to their taking out mortgages for homes they knew they couldn't afford, and not just in the sand states.
CItizen workers were self supporting, they weren't afforded such subsidies and our taxes were much lower. Even if FP's readership had no feeling for their working poor fellow citizens, they should know that illegal aliens are a large part of the reason why our taxes are so high, including the cost of doing business.
Mexico, a very wealthy country with zero national debt encourages it's poor to come here, for the remittances I'm sure, but also because it helps keep Mexico's taxes artificially lower, as Mexico doesn't have to raise those taxes to provide services for them. Ultimately this will fail, if the US collapses, but it's president doesn't think long term. Even Canada has refused to be pressured into opening it's borders and dancing to Mexico's tune, because they don't want to lose jobs, and collapse their economy.
MARY M.
9:51 AM ET
June 2, 2010
error
I meant to type, what is a delivery boy delivering that he is able to send home $500. per week, not month.
SDUB
2:11 PM ET
June 2, 2010
Lets not get tangled up and
Lets not get tangled up and disproportionate here. The effects of the legal Latino population upon the economy are both considerable and appreciated, however this biased sentimentality is slanted and motivated skewing the picture at hand, which is maintenance of our country, and fair opportunity not just for Latinos, but for world wide immigrants.
MOE66
5:55 AM ET
June 3, 2010
Blanca, is that you? It's been so long.
What costume did Dulce Pinzon select for Diego Pillco, the murderer of Adrienne Shelly?
Ms. Pinzon is something out of a comic book herself. While in Mexico she is a castizo and enjoys the Mexican version of white skin privilege. Yet upon entering the U.S. she becomes a person of color, standing in formation with her new-found Amerindian and mestizo comrades. But not standing too close.
MARY M.
10:35 AM ET
June 3, 2010
Reponse to fraud Indiered
Indiered, As an indigenous US citizen, I’ve come to recognize comments like yours for the gross fraud that they are. You are either a very white left winger, or another example of the typical Latin American who attempts to exploit indigenous history as your ancestors exploited indigenous lives. Let’s have a history lesson, shall we?
First, the English and Dutch settlers who arrived here were welcomed by my ancestors. The situations between the indigenous and those settlers deteriorated and said English and Dutch have a lot to answer to, however, the reality is that those English and Dutch came here to start new lives, not to deliberately displace or harm native peoples. They were worlds apart from the Spanish forces that landed in Latin America about 200 years before the first English & Dutched arrived here.
The Spanish went out deliberately looking for gold and other wealth to fatten the purse of the Spanish crown and it’s aristocrats. Today’s Hispanic people in Latin America have attempted to whitewash their history, but it was well documented by Spanish priests who traveled with the conquistadores, they kept very accurate and honest records of the travesties committed by the Spanish which are that they committed genocide against the indigenous people in what is referred to as Mexico, Central and South America. After that, they invented the trans Atlantic slave trade, bringing over almost 9 million African slaves, and they worked almost all of them to death. They were the ones who introduced African slavery to what later became the US, and the Spanish and Portuguese controlled the trans Atlantic slave trade for almost the entire period it existed.
Mexican illegals are instructed by racist Hispanic supremacist, and Marxist groups to believe that they are indigenous and that the southwestern US belonged to Mexico, but that is just propaganda. Here is the reality. Mexicans aren’t “Mestizo”, in fact, that is a much abused term for a variety of reasons. Hispanic Latin Americans are by and large highly racist, and we’re not talking about the very white Hispanics exclusively, but of all shades of Hispanics. It’s highly racist and a sign of ignorance to think brown skin means indigenous. The peoples indigenous to our lands have bone structure and hair that is distinct from that of Hispanic and other peoples. There is no way you can confuse Hispanic people with indigenous peoples from these lands. The fair skin of some Spanish comes from ancestors who included the Vandals and Visigoths, but the majority of the people of Spain are dark skinned and have dark hair, the same can be said of Portugal. They are European, but not all Europeans are fair skinned.
Nor were there enough indigenous people remaining after the Spanish genocide against them, to provide a shared ancestry, with the Spanish. What’s more, the Spanish, both fair an brown skinned, were and remain so racist that interactions between the two weren’t possible. Indigenous peoples in Mexico, as well as the few surving descendents of African slaves, for example are discriminated against to this day. In 2004, during the mudslides that took place in Mexico, Mayan villages were being drowned in the mud, but the Mexican government refused to send aid to those villages, they sent help only to Hispanic Mexican villages and towns. The foreign press covered this, but the Latin American media ignored it. The big three revisionist attempts by Mexico in the last century to explain away the disappearance of the indigenous peoples of Latin America were the first, claiming that the Spanish lived in “peace and love” with the native peoples, until the English came and killed them all. That was so easily disproved that that lie was abandoned quickly. Then the Mexicans claimed that all the indigenous just disappeared, that too was laughable and abandoned. They settled on the lie that the indigenous didn’t disappear, but “intermarried” with the Spanish, and while that was laughable, and those same Spanish are quick to brush off claims of “Indio” blood in themselves, it was put in their textbooks. Even the “brownest” Latin Americans consider themselves white. When you examine the arrest reports of Hispanic illegal aliens in the US, you see them list themselves as white.
A few years back, an Afro Latino musician was interviewed on NPR, and he spoke to the extreme racism that exists in Latin America. A Hispanic writer, the man who writes the “Ask a Mexican” column for a Californian newspaper was invited to discuss the issue and he attempted to demean and slander the Afro Latino man. It was an ugly thing to witness, but only further proof of the intolerance of those who embrace the Latin American racist and corrupt mindset. Hispanic illegals are committing ethnic cleansing of black Americans from their communities from Los Angeles to Harlem, NY. They kill innocent black American children and adults and their victims are in the hundreds of thousands. Google the names Jamiel Shaw jr., Terrance Aerial, Dashon Harvey and Iofemi Hightower (Terrance’s sister Natasha survived, but was maimed by repeated machete wounds, raped and is now in the witness protection program, her life will never be the same)
Cheryl Green, Anthony Prudhommme, Charles Bowser, there are many more, but the local and MSM refuse to report these and other victims of illegal alien criminals who rape, beat and murder innocent US citizens, black, brown and white because they profit from cheap foreign labor. Nor will they report that such Latin American criminal syndicates like the Sinoloa drug cartel and the Mexican Mafia provide millions to illegal alien gangs to buy them weapons and support their ethnic cleansing of US citizens.
Perhaps Ms. Pinzon should have included Jose Lachira Carranza in her photo essay? Because he is an accurate representative of the reality of the negative, harmful "contributions" her advocacy is in aid of. We don't know how much in remittances Carranza sent home to Peru. Age 28, Carranza was out on bail awaiting trial in two separate cases related to a bar fight and the sexual assault of a 5-year-old girl. Carranza is a member of an illegal alien gang, an initiation of 6 other illegal alien gang bangers, lead the attack on Terrance Aerial Natasha Aerial,, Dashon Harvey and Iofemi Hightower. Lined the four black US citizen students up against a school wall, and shot them execution style. They hacked at their bodies with machetes, and raped both Iofemi and Natasha. Natasha survived and id'd the illegal alien criminals who committed these foul crimes. Those four young US citizens would have been real contributors to our society. Three of those citizens lives were stolen, the fourth now lives with the hellish memories of that night, when they were doing nothing more than listening to music in a schoolyard near their homes, talking about starting college that fall.
Real indigenous Americans are offended when Hispanics attempt to infer otherwise, and speak up that Hispanics who talk about going back to Europe should be the first ones to step up and by tickets to return to Europe, because that is the continent of their origins.
When Spanish Mexico sought to expand it’s territory, they invaded the lands of the Utes, Apache and Navajo, enslaved some of them, to work in their mines and as manual labor. It was those native peoples that built the forts, and much of the Spanish mission architecture, the old mission style churches and monasteries that survive an the tourists flock to. When those Utes, Apache and Navajo attempted to defend themselves and their families, the Spanish would punish them by chopping off a heel or a foot. When those same native peoples sought to escape, the Spanish would shoot them.
When you contrast the histories of the result of the Spanish conquest and the settling and creation of what became the United States, there is no comparison. It’s been the people of the US who have willingly faced their wrongs of the past and sought to remedy them, while Latin Americans not only refuse to address theirs, they continue to be racist, corrupt and despotic.
Lastly, I know US citizens of Irish descent in Boston, who reported an Irish illegal alien to ICE and celebrated his deportation, and who laughed when his lies were caught during his hearing. The citizenry of the US are a good and generous people, they support legal immigration, but are overwhelmingly against illegal aliens, they want current laws enforced and illegals deported, irregardless of their race or ethnicity. Those who claim otherwise seek to violate the rights of US citizens and find the constitution inconvenient. They are the same sort of types that supported the slave trade and Jim Crow.
Z DUFFY
12:08 PM ET
June 3, 2010
wow
"the reality is that those English and Dutch came here to start new lives, not to deliberately displace or harm native peoples. "
You really think the majority of Hispanic immigrants aren't also coming to this country to start new lives. It's easy to pick out examples of horrible people from any background, but to try to use them to criminalize an entire population is dishonest and wrong.
There are still quite a few people in Latin America who can trace their roots to indigenous populations, many of them probably have European ancestors as well.
Also much of the southwest was once a part of Mexico. All of Texas . . . um New Mexico.
It's one thing to have a rational debate about immigration reform. It's another to spew racist hatred because you don't understand the complexities of an issue.
LABARIA
8:54 PM ET
June 3, 2010
Well put
MARY M. : That was a very eloquent rebuttal of all the false and contrived racist history that are taught in the schools or fed to illiterates from Tierra Del Fuego to the South-Western border of the USA. I am from Northern South America and I am black and part indigenous( Carib) and have witnessed most of the the racist ignorance that you have so clearly refuted, due to my extensive travels in most of Latin America.
MARY M.
10:53 AM ET
June 3, 2010
To "Apacheindian"
You aren't an Apache, no Apache would refer to him or herself as an "indian". You're either an illegal or a cheap labor open borders enthusiast". You're a racist who has no right to exploit the history of indigenous Americans because you're too cowardly to engage in an honest debate of the subject.
MARY M.
4:00 PM ET
June 3, 2010
wow indeed
No, z duffy, you don't understand the subject at hand, nor did you read my comments in their entirety.
Illegal aliens are NOT indigenous, nor was Texas or any other portion of the US southwest part of their lands, or Mexico, etc.. The areas that are now Texas, New Mexico, Arizona, California, Utah, Colorado, etc.. were lands were the tribal lands of native peoples like the Utes, Apache, Navajo, the Walapai, (indigenous to what we call Arizona today) and many other native peoples whose tribal names you wouldn't recognize. Those areas were THEIR lands, not the property of Mexico or the Spanish crown. The Spanish that settled Mexico slaughtered all but very few of the native peoples whose lands we now call Mexico. They weren't native to the tribal lands of the tribes who lived in the US southwest. Their languages were and remain different, their food, lives, dress and culture was and still is different for those few who remain. You seek to hide behind a lie, because you can't honestly discuss the subject. You seek to delegitimize the truth, because you can't win in an honest debate. The truth delegitimizes your claims, so you attack those who thrust the truth in your face. You're a coward, and you know it.
DHARMAVAGABOND
5:30 PM ET
June 3, 2010
YOU are very, very ignorant, indeed
You should probably read this before you even try to discuss ANYTHING.
Alexander von Humboldt, Political Essay on the Kingdom of New Spain, trans. John Black (1811)
http://web.grinnell.edu/courses/HIS/f01/HIS202-01/Documents/HumbSoc.html
SILENTSHWAN
8:45 AM ET
June 4, 2010
Backfire.
@Dharma
As to the moral faculties of the Indians, it is difficult to appreciate them with justice if we only consider this long oppressed caste in their present state of degradation. The better sort of Indians, among whom a certain degree of intellectual culture might be supposed, PERISHED IN GREAT PART AT THE COMMENCMENT OF THE SPANISH CONQUEST, the victims of European ferocity.
"perished in great part at the commencement of the Spanish conquest."
so yeah, that essay shores up Mary M's position pretty good actually, she should thank you for finding a good article that validates her reasoning.
MARY M.
4:02 PM ET
June 3, 2010
btw, z duffy
The vast majority of illegal aliens in the US are Hispanic, that means they are of Spanish ancestry. They do not look like indigenous Americans, their bone structure is European, as is their hair, language and culture.
POLONIUS
8:22 PM ET
June 3, 2010
Origins of the so-called 'Indigenous' peoples
Many of the posters here write about the first inhabitants of the Americas as if they somehow sprang up out of the ground. Here's a dirty little secret folks: the 'indigenous' peoples MIGRATED here by crossing the Bering Straits thousands of years ago from Asia! So, we're ALL immigrants here; quit trying to play the white guilt race-card (that mojo doesn't work anymore).
Maybe FP can have Dulce write about the Magnificent Victims of Illegal Immigrants (there's plenty of them in the ER's & crime scenes across the US). Don't forget to include some superhero pictures of unemployed blacks and teenagers (whose unemployment rate is at around 50%)....
ADRIAN888
12:53 AM ET
June 4, 2010
Re;The Magnificent Migrants
That's inspiring.world best news headlines.
HAPPY CAMPER
2:57 PM ET
June 6, 2010
Many millions
I was thinking about what to post against the RACISTS. And then, it occurred to me. There is no need to post. We are MILLIONS of immigrants who will be here FOREVER.
Pick a label. Argue for the best epithet. Fight agains them. Cry of anger.
We are MILLIONS and will be here FOREVER. In 30 years caucasians will be the minority.
God bless America.
HC
ARJUNA
6:33 PM ET
June 6, 2010
Inspirational storty
What is the delivery boy delivering that he can afford to send home $500. per month? A waiter in Brooklyn sending home $350. per week, and a minimum wage, not working full time in a laundromat sending $150. per week? That's simply not possible, unless they are being subsidized by the taxpayer. I'm not a fool. world political news The vast majority of illegal aliens in the US are Hispanic, that means they are of Spanish ancestry. They do not look like indigenous Americans, their bone structure is European, as is their hair, language and culture.
ELEVEN
4:49 AM ET
June 8, 2010
Still better
Article is very interesting,thanks for your sharing. I will necessarily add it in the selected works and I will visit this site.welcome to my site:
www.weddingdressesonline.com
ALEX O
2:53 AM ET
June 9, 2010
Nauseating Nostalgia
Every time I visit the US I have this nauseating nostalgia of Apartheid South Africa. Just like in SA, restaurants are largely racially divided with the wait staff tending to be white and English speaking support by an invisible non-English speaking garrison of runners, cooks and kitchen staff.
Good on you DULCE PINZÓN - give these people a voice and a face (and the photos are arrestingly beautiful).
And as for the rest of America's consumers you should remember every time you stare in awe at how much cheaper service is in the states than it is in Europe or other parts of the developed world... this is only possible because you deny most of these immigrants any legal rights basically ensuring that they are under-paid, without medical insurance, largely abused, exploited and vulnerable.
Interesting to note that yesterday in post-apartheid South Africa a judge ruled that even when people are working illegally they have a right to the same legal (labour) protections as everybody else. A lesson to be learned?
VIVIAN
2:23 AM ET
June 11, 2010
jordan shoes
The post is wonderful! Our companies supply the best lactose shoes, Men and women in Jordan shoes and nike shoes, our store many types of mbt shoes sale .Are you looking for your satisfied Nike Air Max? There is a large products selection of Nike Shoes .You can find them only here, we can supply the best service for you.
AND REW
2:45 PM ET
June 12, 2010
Why are you people so ignorant?
I don't get why Mary M for example is a racist since she hasn't criticized the CEO of AIG. Okay, if someone doesn't criticize something here, it doesn't mean he/she is not against it. What does this article has to do with the CEO of AIG (For instance) or some other cheating people?
Now can I blame you for not criticizing the actions of Israel but what does that have to do with this article?
Whether it's true or false that illegal immigrants are doing bad/good to this country, it doesn't mean if I'm criticizing them, I'm for every other thing and think everything is okay except this issue.
And to those who bring the Native American issue, okay let's say it's totally wrong and an evil act. Now what's your practical solution? Kick 300m people back to Europe? Let every other people in the whole earth to the US in a year? Let's say people occupied native Americans' lands, does this conclude that we should not prevent illegal aliens from entering the US?
I don't really get the logic of some of your arguments and the way you connect things to each other.
And finally my own comment to this article:
The best illustration of the American Dream can be found within these immigrants. Many Americans are too bored now to follow their ambitions but these folks aren't.
BOYTHREEONE
4:28 PM ET
June 18, 2010
Beautiful
Why anyone would want to slander these people who are working and sacrificing in order to help others in need is beyond me. I would guess, Mary M., that the people in these photos are able to send money to those they love because they are saving it and doing with less themselves. That is what sharing is about. Supporting other people and rejoicing when others succeed is what a loving life is about. I can't say if any of the anti-immigrant posters on here are racist or not, but I can certainly say that they aren't people I admire. I don't "want what they have" as they say in 12 step programs. As for those in the photos, I want what they have absolutely.
JPJGAMAS
10:10 AM ET
June 22, 2010
Mexicans who send home money
Are these people wanting a future in the United States? If they send 75% of their weekly income will they be able to retire in the United States or are they just building up a bankroll to retire in Mexico?