Turkish Dilemma

Once a reliable Western ally, Turkey is now going its own way in the Middle East. And nobody in Washington or Brussels knows what to do about it.

BY JAMES TRAUB | JUNE 15, 2010

My son wants to study a non-European language that's going to matter in the future. He has been contemplating Arabic or Hindi. But after the last few weeks, I'm thinking -- Turkish. All of a sudden, everyone wants to know about Turkey -- and it turns out almost no one does. There's no real mystery in that: Americans tend to benignly neglect other countries until they become a problem. And until just the other day, Turkey was a fun tourist destination; now it's a problem.

Turkey has thrust itself into the American national consciousness by working with Brazil to broker a nuclear deal with Iran, which the United States viewed as unhelpful, at best; by voting (along with Brazil) against Security Council sanctions imposed on Iran; and by assailing Israel in the aftermath of the deadly attack on the Gaza-bound flotilla. Senior Obama administration officials have begun to worry that the West has "lost" Turkey; Defense Secretary Robert Gates recently fretted that Turkey is "moving eastward" and blamed the European Union for blocking Turkey's aspiration for membership. The Wall Street Journal editorial page goes a step or three further and accuses Ankara of throwing in its lot with the fundamentalists and the Israel-haters.

Turkey didn't set out to be a problem. Over the course of the last decade, the country's diplomats seem to have taken a leaf from China, whose doctrine of "peaceful rise" dictated harmonious relations along its borders and a relatively low profile in global diplomacy. Turkey's policy of "zero problems toward neighbors" smoothed away conflict with Middle Eastern partners, including both Israel and Iran. Through a series of bilateral agreements, Turkey has established a visa-free zone, and it hopes to establish a free trade zone in much of the area once occupied by the Ottoman Empire -- without, as a Turkish diplomat pointed out to me, seeking to re-create Ottoman hegemony.

But success breeds confidence and makes yesterday's modesty seem like undue timidity. Beijing, which once hid behind the skirts of the Non-Aligned Movement, now openly confronts Washington on both economic and military issues. And Turkey, no longer content to reduce friction along its borders, dreams of bringing a new order to the Middle East. "[T]he world expects great things from Turkey," Foreign Minister Ahmet Davutoglu has written on this website.

He might be wrong there, but what's clear is that Turkey expects great things from itself. Turkey may well have overplayed its hand by forcing Barack Obama's administration to choose between its two closest allies in the Middle East -- Turkey and Israel -- but Davutoglu and Prime Minister Recep Tayyip Erdogan appear to have decided that they would rather overplay their hand than underplay it.

Perhaps all emerging powers reach this inflection point, where nationalistic pride almost compels overreaching. (See under: Brazil.) But Turkey is the only emerging power located in the Middle East, a region where supreme global conflicts play themselves out. A peaceful rise in East Asia is no great feat, but try living next to Iraq and Iran without antagonizing somebody. The Turks infuriated George W. Bush's administration by refusing to let U.S. troops invade Iraq through their territory. Had they acquiesced, they would have outraged their neighbors instead. Nor could Turkey's remarkably warm relations with Israel survive long at a time when the Israeli government is seen as utterly intransigent toward the Palestinians; the Gaza-bound flotilla was only the last straw. Turkey's aspirations for regional leadership virtually compelled the break with Israel. That had nothing to do with Ankara's rejection by the European Union.

BULENT KILIC/AFP/Getty Images

 

James Traub is a contributing writer for the New York Times Magazine and author of, most recently, The Freedom Agenda. "Terms of Engagement," his column for ForeignPolicy.com, runs weekly.

GUYVER

6:56 PM ET

June 15, 2010

lax standards

So a country is a "problem" if it criticizes the actions of Israel? In that case, I can see a lot of "problem" countries in the horizon.

 

DDSNAIK

12:58 PM ET

June 16, 2010

I can see "problems" right here...

... amongst FP readers that have the temerity to speak out against Israeli actions. Perhaps the term "problem" as it applies in a sociopolitical forum like this will evolve to have a different connotation if invoked in this manner often enough ? One can only hope...

 

EXAVIER126

10:27 PM ET

June 15, 2010

Ankara Rejecting EU?!?

I think you might be begging the question by declaring that Ankara has rejected the EU. Much like what Robert Gates said last week, the blame should be placed on intransigent powers in the EU, like France and Germany. Chancellor Merkel has made no big secret of her desire to push for a "special relationship" for Turkey, rather than full membership, and I recall hearing that EU Council President Herman Van Rompuy is very adamant against Turkey's membership, fearing that it would muddy the waters of the Christian organization. The AKP, on the other hand, has been very eager over the past few years to try to continue its path towards membership. Remember that it was the AKP that originally opened up the membership process in 2004.

 

ANSELL

1:04 AM ET

June 16, 2010

learn turkish, but before you do, take a good look in the mirror

I fail to see how Turkey has done anything wrong in its situation. Turkey joins the overwhelming majority of the world (including the EU) in condemning the flotilla attacks and some people claim they are distancing themselves from the west? Give me a break. We simply can't bare to accept how much WE have distanced ourselves from the world by our dogmatic support for Israel.

Turkey works out a (very imperfect) deal with it's neighbor and we throw a hissy fit about it undermining our sanctions. We act as if we had some illustrious track record in getting our demands from the Iranian regime through sanctions. We simply can't bare to be reminded of our own failure and helplessness, because quite simply, sanctions don't actually work.

 

DDSNAIK

1:29 PM ET

June 16, 2010

Lingering American Century attitudes, methinks

I'm not an American doomsday proponent, but I'm also not stamping my foot and insisting political landscape isn't changing. The further we (we collectively, across the world) get from the fallout of the World Wars and colonialism, and as national identities and government (or whatever passes for governance in a respective locale) continue to mature and evolve, it's incredibly naive to think that they will continue to remain lockstep with America in mere hopes of political or financial handouts.

Sure, there's the occasional Burundi or El Salvador that will facilitate military maneuvers or opportunistic power grabbers (Karzai et.al) that will play along as they get to wield the baton and pass out favors. Let's not be so easily fooled into thinking that every country needs us or every population wants to emulate us or that every team mate/sycophant is sincere in their friendship or cooperation (ahem, Israel).

Everything Turkey and Brazil have done recently is well within their rights as sovereign nations. They're surely aware that their names get further away from the top of the list for country club invites, but why should they care - as long as they're capable of making their own country club or an acceptable alternative ? Assuming no gross disingenuity or malice, who are we to tell them otherwise ? OR pretend that we wouldn't do the same were the positions reversed ?

I recommend The Post American World by Fareed Zakaria. No one source can paint a complete picture, but Zakaria adroitly manages to allow for the rise of other countries, while not threatening America's security or prosperity, and a hint towards the changing dynamics of the world.

 

JJACKSON

8:44 AM ET

June 16, 2010

This administration is in for

This administration is in for a world of pain if it thinks it can allow G20 countries to play and not give any ground. You can either be like the last administration and adopt a 'We are America do it our way or pay the price for disobediance. Your are with us or against us' or you can try and be multilateral but if you start to listen to others but refuse to acept a world view that everyone else shares but does not fit your historical position they you must accept you will be alone and spend most of your time vetoeing UN-SC resolutions condeming your position and actions. Some EU governments have continued to back US FP positions in the belief that confronting the US is not in their best interests but they will not continue to do so indefinately is the US continues to be isolationist - not in the seens of not wanting to play with others but in adopting position that are in isolation to everyone elses. In the long run is it in the US's best interests if Europe & Japan reposition to be closer to the G20 and BRIC states because they have closer views on topics like the ME. The US must start thinking more along the lines Kinzer is advocating or it will end up alone.

 

JKOLAK

9:23 AM ET

June 16, 2010

Barely a hint

Barely a hint in this article that the real problem is that Turkey now has an Islamist government. Expect the drift from western values to increase. Islamic states also do poorly economically, so don't expect the growth this article predicts.

Turkey's only chance is to vote the leading party out of power. That was looking possible until the flotilla stunt rallied nationalism, which was the whole point of the exercise.

 

JJACKSON

3:07 PM ET

June 16, 2010

What western values?

What exactly is your problem with the Turkish government? That it is representative of its overwhelmingly Muslim population? That it thinks the Gaza blockade is inhumane, illegal and should be ended? That it wants a peaceful and prosperous Iran? The point of the flotilla stunt was to focus the worlds attention on the plight of the Palestinians in Gaza and they have my thanks for doing so, I just regret that it had to come at so high a price. I guess that is the price you have to pay if you want to get the world to see Israel for what it has really become.

 

AR

4:23 PM ET

June 16, 2010

turkey should work on the

turkey should work on the plight of its own minorities, and come to terms with their genocidal past. And speaking of blockades and occupation, have your forgotten about turkey's 16 year blockade of Armenia and 30 + years of occupying Cyprus?
Seriously, turkey is one of the last nations on Earth to be pointing fingers at others.

 

COKBOK

8:15 AM ET

June 17, 2010

@AR: "turkey should work on

@AR:

"turkey should work on the plight of its own minorities, and come to terms with their genocidal past. And speaking of blockades and occupation, have your forgotten about turkey's 16 year blockade of Armenia and 30 + years of occupying Cyprus?
Seriously, turkey is one of the last nations on Earth to be pointing fingers at others."

And Armenians are the ones to do that? Let's remember what Armenians are doing in Azerbaijan... Now, at the time being, in 21st century.

What is more, what kind of person are you is pretty obvious. You are a person who could write his own country's name starting with a capital letter but write Turkey as "turkey". This simply shows your inner-complexes. You and your type of people bring the genocide and Cyprus issues to the table every single time that is it possible.

If you are so much willing to prove the so-called-genocide, may I ask you why would Armenia NOT open its historical archives to public and show us that official historical documents really prove the so-called-genocide?

Forget all, let's say that Ottomans really made the genocide and you are right. So that would make me think that since Armenians are of a nation that suffered from a genocide and would not like any other human being to suffer the same, where have you been when the Srebrenica massacre took place?

And what are Armenians still doing in Azerbaijan?

If Turkey is the last country to point fingers on others, so does Armenia. The rest is, again, all about your inner-complexes.

 

OZRUSOZ

3:08 PM ET

June 17, 2010

Please search instead believing

Before blaming Turkey about genocide one should see Russian State Archives which is full of evidence about how many Turks were butchered by Armenians during the World War I. That is way the first president of Armenia, Levon Ter Petrosyan, said that Ottoman defended their country instead saying genocide. Therefore it is easy to understand why Armenia refuses Turkey's offer about constructing an international comity including scientists, historians from all over the world to search what happened during the World War 1.
On the other hand, Turkey, Greece and England are the legal guaranteer countries of Cyprus. When Sampson took control in the Greece via military coup, they started to kill Turks living in Cyprus. Because they believe that Hellenism idea which says Cyprus is a part of Greece which is bullshit. As a result, Turkey as a guaranteer country (see:4. point of London-Zurich agreements) saved the Turks life.
Please read and search instead believing that bullshits.

 

GEOKHAN

5:17 PM ET

June 17, 2010

Turkey doesn't need a chance

Turkey is an islamic country and it will be definetely natural to act like in terms of Islam. So you are very wrong about your comments. First of all, Turkey's goverment is not a new one, they have been governing the country last 6 years. Secondly, there is no Cyprus but Turkish Republic of Northern Cyprus and Southern Cyprus. Turkey didn't occupy it which was already belong to Turkey. Finally, there is no Armenian genocide. If you claim so, you must be aware of the 50000 innocent Turks who were killed in the mountains of Turkey.
Turkey has one of the most growing economy in the world. While europe is going down, Turkey is climbing to the top.
Why don't you guys check out the history, and turn back to American or European history. You will see the outcomes of their genocide,racism, facism etc.
I am very sure about one thing that Turkey will walk alone from now on. They don't need European Union which seems like Christian Unity. Even if Turkey's part (AKP) changes, Turkey will not give up its foreign policy and economic strategies.

 

ARIF_SAHIN

11:31 AM ET

June 16, 2010

Let me clear the confusion

Let me clear some CONFUSION :-)

What about TURKISH FREE MASONARY !?

Americans had correctly noticed that NOI (Nation of Islam) had Free Masonary influences. I tell you what. Islamic free masonary is nothing new, it is a very old doktrine. Heavily used and abused also before, during and after First World War by the Turkish Empire.

Turkish Special Organization (Teshkilat-i Mahsusa) men were responsible for the spread of it while the Community of Union and Progress were behind it. Everything was done in cooperation with the Germans :-)

There is an ongoing huge criminal court case in Istanbul, called Ergenekon (more than 50.000 pages of accusation for more than 200 suspects). It got internetional attention too because some very influential people of Turkey were arrested (more than a hundred of them).

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ergenekon_(organization)

ACCTUALLY the convicts are not Kemalists, nor ultra-nationalists. If you seek carefully witin the ergenkon related texts you will notice a word, AGARTHA (among the arrested are the heads of Scienbtology and Noeal Baba (Santa Claus) Society in Turkey).

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Agartha

When the first arrests began, two more names circulated in Turkish media together with AGARTHA: MADAM BLAVATSKY and SEBOTTENDORF.

Sebottendorf, who established the Thule Society that brought Hitler to power, was a Freemason and a Turkish Citizen. He knew numerology, kabbalah and Sufism (Bektashi order).

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Thule_Society
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rudolf_von_Sebottendorf
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bektashi

Bektashies are famous of their secret doctrine which is called the Bektashi Secret. Secret Societies are as Turkish as apple pie !

God permeates the whole wide world.
Yet His truth is revealed to none.
You better seek Him in yourself.
You and He are not apart, you are one.

Firm hands will lose their grip one day
And tonques that talk will soon decay:
The wealth you loved and stored away
Will go to some inheritor

Mystic is what they call me,
Hate is my only enemy;
I harbor a grudge against none,
To me the whole wide world is one.

This was Bektashi poetry. Sebottendorf was also influenced by teachings of Madam Blavatsky too.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Blavatsky

Blavatsky had spent some time in Istanbul as well as in the US.

It is believed that Sebottendorf had a Turkish name too, Sefik Husnu. It is well known and documented that someone called Sefik Husnu was arrested for being responsible for the REICHTAG FIRE that carried HITLER to power. Sefik Husnu was Jewish.

Obviously, some jews had to create the anti-jewish movements themselves for the sole purpose to force them to migrate to Israel.

http://www.marx.org/glossary/people/d/e.htm

He was released from the prison with Hitlers personal intervention to leave Germany. Today, the core of the people arrested within the Ergenekon case is Sefik Husnus group of people.

Thule Society, Skull and Bones, Nation of Islam all cary Turko-Iranian cultural characteristics. BUT, cultural cahracteristics of the Bektashi sect of it.

To be exact, I need to mention that Christianity does also cary Persian cultural characteristics :-) The Catholic church was a fundamentalist movement that had risen within the Mitraism and destroyed and replaced it after three hundreds years of bloody struggle.

Bektashi structure is unbreakable, militant and if someone tries to break it, then, it multiplies. It was the official cult of the Ottoman Turkish army.

It can not be stopped untill it comes to power. Once came to power then its own power destroys itself :-) Like it had happened in Germany, like it is happening in the US (Skull and Bones). The Ottoman Turks were using another Turko-Iranian cult to balance it: Mevlevies. Sultans and the burocracy were raised as Mevlevi while the soldiers were raised as Bektashi.

Bektashies is a closed society, it is so closed that if someone tries to join it he risks his property and his life. BUT Mevlevies were open to everybody.

Mesnevi, the holly book of the Mevlevies, is Platonist. Plato is clearly mentioned and written at the very beginning of it. Mevelevies do not like Socrates and Arsito as much. The World famous Mevlevi concept of LOVE is just PLATONIST LOVE. It may sound to you very strange that the Turkish state is ruled upon Platos teaching but it is a fact.

So, after this much explanation, I hope, no one is as confused as before :-)

 

AR

4:32 PM ET

June 16, 2010

You forgot to mention the

You forgot to mention the donmeh. Many of the young turks were donmeh.

 

EVERETT SALINAS

1:18 AM ET

July 15, 2010

Turkey

What we are seeing is the natural evolution of Turkish foreign policy. We are now almost two decades after the end of the Cold War, which was the tie that bound Washington and Ankara. Without that glue, Turkey was bound to explore and exploit opportunities in countries to the east and south and even exploit opportunities for developing relations with Moscow. xerox phaser 8400 solid ink The Turks also perceive a whole range of economic interests since they are rising as a trading state with an export-oriented economy. From the perspective of the Turks, this is good economic policy. There's even a kind of political economy aspect to it. If you look at the opening to Syria and the waiving of visa requirements so that Syrians and Turks can come and go as they please, this is a way in which the Turks are trying to deal with the historic problem of the Kurds and Kurdish nationalism. I don't think that that is the reason for the divergence of Turkish foreign policy, but I do believe it is a contributing factor. Turkey remains integrated with the West; it has a customs union agreement with Europe, and the bulk of its trade is to the West rather than the East. phaser 8400 solid ink But the recognition that the Europeans are increasingly unwilling to seriously consider Turkey's full membership in the EU has contributed to the notion that Turkey needs a broader foreign policy, rather than one just focused on the West.

 

SEANMCBRIDE

8:38 AM ET

June 25, 2010

Israel-centrism in American foreign policy

Does one detect an Israel-centric subtext in James Traub's essay? And is this what passes for serious analytical thinking in Foreign Policy?

BEGIN QUOTE
Kinzer would have Iran and Turkey replace Israel and Saudi Arabia as key U.S. allies in the region. Perhaps the Turks entertain the same dreams.

That's not going to happen. The White House is not going to leave Israel in the lurch....
END QUOTE

Apparently eternal fealty to Israel is a given, because why? Because that's just the way it is, according to Traub. But what if an objective and rational analysis of the American interest in the Middle East dictates policy changes that upset this assumption? Does Traub assume that AIPAC and its network of organizational affiliates and allies will be able to maintain absolute control over the American political system forever, regardless of the consequences for Americans? That could be a short-sighted and mistaken view. No foreign alliance is forever in this world for any nation. Interests shift.

An extended debate between Traub and Kinzer on this issue would be illuminating.

 

MEDA

8:16 AM ET

June 26, 2010

very nice articel good

very nice articel good work

visits free-send.de

 

ENGUZELSIN

7:33 AM ET

July 5, 2010

Scan you

Israel bad is a turkish pornolar
porno
pornolar

veritfy it a good!