Beijing's Coalition of the Willing

For the West, failed states are a problem. For China, they're an opportunity.

BY STEFAN HALPER | JULY/AUGUST 2010

You've probably heard by now that China, in its bid to lock in access to energy and mineral riches in far-flung corners of the world, is causing heartburn for the legions of do-gooders working to turn the world's most fragile countries into stable, prosperous states. Everyone from the president of the World Bank to Bono has blamed Chinese companies and government officials for threatening the hard-won progress the West has made in the global south, while warning of dire consequences for countries on the receiving end of Chinese largesse.

Commentators such as Zambian economist Bob Sichinga have even accused Beijing of "raping" Africa in its bid for natural resources. I call it the China effect -- the disturbing notion that Western-led development efforts could come to naught, cast aside by the allure of fast money and rapid economic progress. And it's easy to see the appeal: While U.S. and European gurus are busy lecturing Third World autocrats about good governance and transparency, Chinese engineers are building highways to the dictators' weekend homes.

What's less well known is the key role such states as Brazil, Kazakhstan, Nigeria, South Africa, and Venezuela are playing in China's international diplomatic game. Over the past decade and a half, while few in the West were paying attention, Beijing has built a coalition of countries -- a great many of them in Africa -- that can be trusted to vote China's way in an increasingly clogged alphabet soup of international fora. It's a bloc reminiscent of the one the Soviet Union assembled during the Cold War, though focused on economic and trade advantages, not security issues.

So far, China's strategy is working, and nowhere more so than with Beijing's campaign to delegitimize Taiwan as an independent state. In 2008, for instance, Malawi announced it had cut diplomatic relations with the island would-be nation; Taipei couldn't match China's offer of $6 billion in aid. Senegal broke relations in 2005, signing an agreement that reportedly included an initial $600 million in financial assistance from China. Chad followed suit after a series of secret meetings with Chinese officials and an undisclosed amount of aid. Today, just four African countries still recognize Taiwan as the one true China: Burkina Faso, Gambia, São Tomé and Príncipe, and Swaziland, down from 13 in 1994; the global number has declined from 68 states in 1971 to 23 currently. Even Panama and Nicaragua, two of the few Latin American states that still officially recognize Taiwan, abstained from a vote on its 2007 bid to join the World Health Organization. Taipei's list of friends is headed rapidly toward zero.

Related

Money Can Buy Love
China isn't just investing in minerals and oil

Not only is Beijing building a string of alliances across the globe with countries overlooked and sometimes shunned by the United States, but it also aims to alter, or at least complicate, the loyalties of those still in the Western camp. To U.S. officials, most of Beijing's new allies are decidedly third tier, mere afterthoughts in the West Wing and on the State Department's seventh floor (at least until a crisis breaks out). But to China, they are becoming an increasingly potent diplomatic weapon.

At the United Nations, support for Chinese positions on human rights jumped from 50 percent in 2000 to 74 percent in 2008, according to the European Council on Foreign Relations. The council also found that 41 countries that were Western-voting allies on human rights issues in the U.N. 10 years ago now support China and Russia. From Africa to Asia to Latin America, these include a notable list of Chinese commercial partners, some of the most undistinguished performers on the Failed States Index. Many of these same countries have joined to vigorously defend traditional sovereignty -- a notion deeply important to Beijing because it fears and resents Western meddling in its internal affairs. Support for China and Russia on this issue has exceeded 80 percent in recent years.

China has also deployed this winning formula at the World Trade Organization (WTO). Within the WTO, Beijing has already put together an African coalition large enough to torpedo specific rules it opposes. But the strategic prize China is seeking in Geneva is official status as a market economy -- a valuable legal and trade designation that prevents other countries from launching anti-dumping cases. Chinese companies stand to gain billions if Beijing's diplomats can outmaneuver the United States and the European Union, which accuse China of unfair competitive practices and inadequate bankruptcy and intellectual-property laws. Egypt, Russia, South Africa, Venezuela, and dozens of other countries have proved happy to extend this designation to Beijing on bilateral terms in return for Chinese engagement. Now, China's goal is to cobble together enough WTO votes from African and Latin American countries to see this protection expanded globally -- while teaming up with India to sink the Doha round of trade talks, which threatens to swamp Chinese farmers with a flood of cheap imports.

China is also making great strides within a host of smaller multilateral organizations that don't invite the United States and the European Union to join -- obscure bodies like the East Asia Summit, the Forum on China-Africa Cooperation, and the Shanghai Cooperation Organization. In these venues, Chinese officials have not hesitated to combine soft power with a bit of muscle. African and Asian ambassadors have made off-the-record statements suggesting that China uses its aid and trade as leverage to make them tilt away from U.S. initiatives. If countries do not toe Beijing's line or don't abstain when asked, their economic projects could be put at risk.

China's goal is not to challenge the West militarily or even economically just now. The United States and Europe are, after all, the lifeblood of China's export economy. But we shouldn't dismiss China's efforts as merely a sophisticated reprise of the Soviet Union's failed bid for the loyalties of the global south. China is a capitalist dynamo, not a creaking autarky, and its market-authoritarian example is fast winning adherents around the world -- while marginalizing the values that have informed Western progress for 300 years.

NEXT: Blame the French

Illustration by Sean McCabe for FP

 

Stefan Halper is senior fellow at Cambridge University's Centre of International Studies and author of The Beijing Consensus.

JOE GRIM

7:14 PM ET

June 25, 2010

Ha

This tirade would make a lot more sense if the West hadn't been busy over the past fifty-sixty years toppling democratically elected leaders and propping up dictators, especially in Africa, and the centuries before that busy conquering and pillaging wherever they could reach.

Don't kid yourselves. 300 years of Western progress was built on the bloodied backs of non-Europeans. That may be China's secret allure.

 

VILKSSWEDEN

10:05 AM ET

June 28, 2010

Khan you are a moron

your mantra should be "long life idiocy."

 

VILKSSWEDEN

11:59 AM ET

June 28, 2010

Khan did you know

that pakistan is an army without a country. haha. Did you know your children in pakistan are being exported to UAE to be camel jockeys and sodomized by the rich arab "pious" muslim sheikhs there?

Did you know that your profit mohamed had sex with a 9 year old and made her clean his semen off his clothing?

 

MUSTNOTSLEEP14

11:15 PM ET

June 25, 2010

The British empire mass

The British empire mass farmed opium in India to sell to the Chinese for hundreds of years. It is because of colonialism's brutal history, especially towards the Chinese, that they feel as if their conscience is clear. And in some ways it is very difficult to disagree with them.

 

VILKSSWEDEN

10:06 AM ET

June 28, 2010

that's a load of crap. It is not about colonialism

everyone is just jockeying for power and money. Colonialism or no colonialism, there should still be moral issues when dealing with Sudan. Only someone willfully blind or heartless, even if colonized for a million years, would not be able to see these issues.

 

VILKSSWEDEN

12:03 PM ET

June 28, 2010

Does your moral behavoir fly out the window

when your pakistani and muslim people launch terrorist attacks against innocent Indian civilians? When you wage jihad and murder innocents in india in train stations and hotels?

What about when you all kill eachother in pakistan? You can't even get along with eachother in your own country yet you lecture nations to get along. First stop killing eachother before you tell others what to do.

 

XIFAUR

12:46 AM ET

June 26, 2010

If...

If only the West could be more than just the lesser of two evils.

 

WASLOVE

9:05 AM ET

June 26, 2010

Big joke

Why can't the chinese share a little bit of the "white man's burden"? Is it cause they are yellow!!! Hahaha!!

 

TOMHE

2:23 AM ET

June 27, 2010

The power of dialectic process of history

The law of history is forcing Chinese to do this. To put it in simple words, the great advance of Western countries in the past 3o0 years, created a huge distance from developing countries. The developing counties, most of them are African countries accidentally, become an opposite force to the Western powers. Therefore, there is a dialectic pair of history. China is left somewhere between the two opposing side of history. And Chinese are willing to give a hand without demanding any ideological threshold.

 

PUBLICUS

1:58 PM ET

June 30, 2010

Your imaginary dialectic

The significant developing economies of the world (not necessarily 'countries', societies, cultures, civilizations) are in Southeast Asia: Malaysia, Indonesia, Thailand, lately Vietnam - add to which are the developed places of SE Asia such as Singapore and a laggard but more promising now than ever, the Philippines....there also is Hong Kong which of course technically is a part of the PRC but which resists Beijing's one party authoritarian, anti-democracy political control - just days ago winning universal sufferage as a vital counterforce to Beijing's constand drip drip erosion of democracy there. The Asian Tiger Taiwan continues to impress, as do but a few countries of Africa such as Botswana.

As to your law of history and your illusory dialectic, the laws of history are that economic control, such as the PRC is gaining of African countries, leads gradually, eventually to control of those countries' political economy. The PRC isn't in the middle of anything except buying off the Least Developing Economies (Africa) against the Developing Economies of Africa and SE Asia.

CLASSIFICATION OF ECONOMIES OF THE WORLD: Advanced (US), Developed (S Korea), Developing (Botswana), Least Developing (Lesotho). The vast number of Least Developing Economics of the world exist in Africa. Such countries are susceptible to the big RMB bucks the PRC presents to them rather than the expectations presented to them by Western Civilization for human rights, democratic government and society, the uncensored and free flow and exchange of knowledge and information, the free and open intercourse of ideas, creativity, new and challenging thinking etc.

The CCP ideology comes after the takeover of the political economy. The China Fantasy in its Real Reality.

 

SURESH SHETH

10:48 AM ET

June 27, 2010

US ignores China-Pakistan-North Korea nuclear axis

Just like most other American pundits, Stefan Halper is failing to include Pakistan, the most important of China’s coalition of the Willing.

The West has to worry lot more about China-Pakistan-North Korea nuclear axis than Beijing’s coalition of the Willing.

It is only naïve US that intentionally does NOT want to see China’s game.

China’s aim is to weaken US influence as fast and as much as it can.

That is why China continues to prop up North Korean regime while pretending to work with US on containing North Korea’s nuclear program when it is China that helped created that North Korean nuclear program to begin with. Afterall North Koreans are NOT geniuses who can invent nuclear triggers or ballistic missiles. Pakistan and North Korea would NOT have dared to swap Pakistan’s uranium enrichment technology for North Korea’s Chinese ballistic missile technology if China would have strongly objected since China is an indispensable ally of both. China is the one that has provided all the technologies to North Korea for nuclear reactors, spent nuclear fuel reprocessing, nuclear triggers, ballistic missile technology and everything else.

China carried out Pakistan’s first nuclear test on Chinese territory. China has silently blessed Pakistan’s proliferation of China’s nuclear weapon and ballistic missile technology to Iran, Iraq, Libya and Syria.

 

AND REW

9:06 AM ET

June 28, 2010

And we...

We are either sleeping or barking up the wrong tree: Russia.

 

JASONBIRD

6:35 AM ET

July 3, 2010

Have you ever got these

Have you ever got these jerseys?They are all great gears....
The National Football League (NFL) is the highest level of professional American football. It was formed by eleven teams in 1920 as the American Professional Football Association, with the league changing its name to the National Football League in 1922. The league currently consists of thirty-two teams from the United States. The league is divided evenly into two conferences — the American Football Conference (AFC) and National Football Conference (NFC), and each conference has four divisions that have four teams each. The NFL is organized as an unincorporated association of its 32 teams. The NFL is by far the most attended domestic sports league in the world by average attendance per game, with 67,509 fans per game in the latest regular season (2009)

chris Johnson navy jersey|chris Johnson white jersey|Adrian Peterson purple jersey|Adrian Peterson white jersey|ray rice black jersey|Ray rice purple jersey|Ray rice white jersey|Frank Gore red jersey|Frank Gore white jersey|Aaron Rodgers green jersey|Aaron Rodgers white jersey|Michael Turner red jersey|Michael Turner white jersey|Drew Brees black jersey|Drew Brees white jersey|Peyton Manning blue jersey|Peyton Manning white jersey|Rashard Mendenhall team jersey|Rashard Mendenhall white jersey|Steven Jackson white jersey|Steven Jackson navy jersey|Larry Fitzgerald red jersey|Larry Fitzgerald white jersey|Randy Moss navy jersey|Randy Moss white jersey|DeAngelo Williams black jersey|Reggie Wayne blue jersey|Reggie Wayne white jersey

Alexander Ovechkin red jersey|Alexander Ovechkin white jersey| Sidney Crosby Home jersey|Sidney Crosby Road jersey|Sidney Crosby Third jersey|Zach Parise red jersey|Zach Parise red jersey|corey perry home jersey|ryan getzlaf home jersey|Jeff Carter home jersey|Jeff Carter road jersey|Jeff Carter third jersey| Mike Green home jersey|Jarome Iginla home jersey|Pavel Datsyuk home jersey|Pavel Datsyuk road jersey|Henrik Zetterberg red jersey|Henrik Zetterberg white jersey|Ilya Kovalchuk team classic jersey|Miikka Kiprusoff jersey|Alexander Semin home jersey|Alexander Semin road jersey|Marian Gaborik jersey|Alexander Semin road jersey|Dion Phaneuf blue jersey|Dion Phaneuf white jersey|Patrick Kane jersey|Vincent Lecavalier jersey|

Cheap blackhawks jerseys|cheap nhl jerseys|Wholesale ed hardy|Cheap ed hardy|cheap Penguins jerseys|cheap replica handbags|Cheap bears jerseys

Get the nfl gears on bargain price.

 

MHENRIDAY

9:15 AM ET

July 4, 2010

Perhaps Mr Halper would be pleased

were the Chinese to follow the example of the so-called «West» - a term always left conveniently undefined, so as to allow for manipulation - and employ military power to intervene in the affairs of other sovereign states, when its leaders deemed this appropriate and profitable ? Alas, China's leadership hasn't engaged in such adventures since Deng Xiaoping's ill-fated intervention in Vietnam in 1979, and even then they didn't exhibit the staying power of say, the US and the UK, instead giving up the whole thing as a bad job and withdrawing after one month. Is this article an adequate example of the sort of thing that passes for scholarship at Cambridge these days ?...

Henri

 

PUBLICUS

10:30 AM ET

July 10, 2010

A League of their own

The PRChina and the Republic of India are in an exclusive league of only two clubs. It is impossible for any other country of the world to become a member of this unique league.

Qualifications to entry of the league are, inter alia, as follow:

*A monstrously outsized population that is both beyond comprehension or managing;

*A fractured society of numerous ethnic groups which are diverse and are naturally impelled to practice anomie;

*Citizens who constitute the vast majority of the official poor of the planet by every international economic standard, especially post WW 2 standards;

*Government leaders who suffer from serious brain diseases, in one instance a number of one and only true god religions, in the other instance a political ideology;

India has its Old World self-limitations, such as the caste system; the PRChina has its own Old World limitations, such as 5,000 years of continuous authoritarian rule.

Hence, discussion to compare and contrast these two freaks of nature is meaningless, whether in relation to one another, or in relation to any other country of group of countries of the world. No other country remotely approaches either the PRChina or India in the challenges either faces, or in how the elites of either country, or of both countries in their league of their own, choose to confront the challenges.

Did I mention that the challenges each country faces are insurmountable?
It's true.

Further, neither country offers a model to any other country of the world. The challenges, responses, methods, means, techniques etc of either the PRC or India are so distant from the the size and nature of the challenges and responses to challenges all other countries face, that anything done by either monstrous giant of a country is meaningless to the world of nations at large.

That India has a caste system is not a justification for the CCP of the PRC to censor all news and all information to its citizens. That 700 000 000 PRChinese remain below the poverty line does not justify or nullify democracy as the form of government in India.

Between the PRC and India, It's the old instance of apples and oranges -grossly outsized apples and oranges. Considering the two freak nations relative to the nations of the world, it's a matter of existing in two universes.

 

PUBLICUS

2:56 PM ET

July 11, 2010

Cancelled out

Jez ARVAY, you in got the fact that Old World India (diminishingly) has a caste system three times in a four paragraph post. Your equally pro PRC communist admirer in the post previous to yours got the (rapidly diminishing) caste system into his post as well. The spontanety of your two posts in mentioning the (diminishing) caste system of democratic India is a remarkable coincidence.

Or is it?

None the less, as I effectively point out, this is bogus pro Beijing stuff. I reiterate that the rapidly fading caste system of democratic India has as much to do with the other nations of the world at large as does the censoring, self-limiting Old World authoritarianism of the People's Republic of China in the modern world.

Entirely apart from India, the PRC is a reactionary force against the Age of IT, to include its censorship of the internet, its censoring of Discussion Boards in the PRC which criticize the CPC, its inherent antithetical stance in respect to democracy and to personal human self development, intellectual and academic freedom; its continuous 5,000 year authoritarianism which self-limits its cultural and social development.

They are two freaks of nature, the PRC and India, relevant to no one nor to any country anywhere on earth. Not comparable or contrastable to any other country or group of countries on the plant - not comparable or contrastable to one another either.

Give it up, PLEASE!