Night of the Living Wonks

Toward an international relations theory of zombies.

BY DANIEL W. DREZNER | JULY/AUGUST 2010

IV. On Managing the Zombie Threat

This quick review of the theoretical paradigms reveals some interesting findings about the world in the age of zombies. There is some continuity across the different theories.

For example, most approaches predict that the living dead would have an unequal effect on different governments. Powerful states would be more likely to withstand an army of flesh-eating ghouls. The plague of the undead would join the roster of threats that disproportionately affect the poorest and weakest countries.

The different international relations theories also provide a much greater variety of possible outcomes than the Hollywood zombie canon. Traditional zombie narratives in film and fiction are quick to get to the apocalypse. The theoretical approaches presented here, however, suggest that in the real world there would be a vigorous policy response to the menace of the living dead. Realism predicts an eventual live-and-let-live arrangement between the undead and everyone else. Liberals predict an imperfect but nevertheless useful counterzombie regime. Neoconservatives see the defeat of the zombie threat after a long, existential struggle. These scenarios suggest that maybe, just maybe, the zombie canon's dominant narrative of human extinction is overstated.

To be sure, disastrous outcomes are still possible. Bureaucratic dysfunction could trigger a total collapse in state authority. Public opinion and interest-group pressure could make multilateral cooperation more difficult. A societal breakdown could also trigger a world in which the biological distinctions between humans and zombies would be immaterial -- they would both act like traditional zombies. Still, these are possible outcomes; whether they are the likely outcomes is another question altogether.

In the end, what I am suggesting is that with careful planning and a consistent approach, the zombie threat can be managed. The purpose of this essay is not to make a policy recommendation or suggest that one approach is superior to another. It is up to the reader to exercise his or her own judgment in determining what to do with this information. Indeed, interested and intelligent students of world politics should use their own brains -- before the zombies do.

KAKO 2010, Levy Creative Management, NYC

 

Daniel W. Drezner, professor of international politics at Tufts University's Fletcher School and a contributing editor to Foreign Policy, is author of the forthcoming Theories of International Politics and Zombies, from which this piece is adapted. He blogs at drezner.foreignpolicy.com.

MALICEIT

11:42 PM ET

June 20, 2010

Great article...

...but if zombies come im moving to texas.

 

HAZZA9

4:42 PM ET

June 22, 2010

shotgun.

in more ways than one.

 

KRAKOW

3:38 PM ET

June 21, 2010

One more possiblity

You left out the basic conservative, or Inhofe, response: claim that the "so called zombie plague" is an elaborate hoax perpetrated by a bunch of health-care obsessed liberals. Then when the living dead are about to feast on you, resort to prayer (or helicopter in a gun-toting Palin).
Finally, apologize to whatever bio tech or chemical company created the zombies if they are forced to pay for body removal.

 

MISSMMITCH

4:04 AM ET

June 22, 2010

Fantastic concept...

...can't wait for the book.

 

ADAMOLUPIN

1:27 PM ET

June 22, 2010

There already is one

World War Z by Max Brooks. It's the most detailed and insightful look at how the world might react to a zombie apocolypse told through personal accounts of people who were "there."

I highly recommend it.

 

AUTOGRAPHEDCAT

12:54 PM ET

June 24, 2010

Another book...

"Feed" by Mira Grant is book one in a trilogy that images precisely what kind of world the post-zombie apocalypse might look like, how society adjusts, and what effect it has on both journalism and politics. Highly highly recommended.

 

TULLY

1:13 PM ET

June 23, 2010

The there's domestic policy ...

The ACLU would file lawsuits to prevent discrimination against the life-impaired, and to block the enforcement of laws limiting zombie admittance to the country.

Democrats would lobby for housing, health care, schooling, and welfare for the "undocumented ambulatory," and start a zombie union for political lobbying & fundraising purposes.

ACORN would sign them up to vote. In major Democratic strongholds such as Chicago, this would have zero effect on voter turnout, but would lead to many court contests in close races as Democrats sued to have zombie provisional ballots counted even though the registrees had already voted once by absentee ballot ...

 

UBERZETE

9:50 PM ET

June 23, 2010

Another question on the domestic front...

If an illegal alien dies in the United States but is reanimated in the U.S., is he/she considered "re-born" and therefore a citizen?

 

ZORRO

2:28 PM ET

June 25, 2010

Escapism

Seeing the obviously fake horrors makes us able to disregard the very real horrors unemployment, terrorists, peak oil, climate change, population increase etc that surrounds us.

 

JENNY34

11:52 AM ET

June 26, 2010

Something behind the myths

It is strange that the idea of zombies appears in popular cultures (to the extent there is a zombie survival guide!)around the world, the same as the idea of dragons. It does make you wonder what substance is behind all the myths!

In all seriousness, when there is less to worry about in society the human mind is geared to survival, so it will attempt to identify threats, real or imaginary...

 

ALMANZOR

3:45 PM ET

June 30, 2010

What about the machines?

Mr. Drezner,

This may be Luddite in me, but I'm much more nervous about artificial intelligence and the machines, a la Matrix, Dune, and Terminator, than I am about zombies. I'm not saying that thinking machines are more likely to menace humanity than zombies, though now that I think about it, they probably are, since, to my knowledge, the reanimation of living beings isn't the subject of any scientific research, whereas the creation of "strong AI" is the stated goal of many scientists.

Is there any scholarship or research on this topic? Is there anyone out there who even takes this possibility seriously?

 

LUVMY91STANG

4:35 PM ET

June 30, 2010

And the dumbing down

And the dumbing down continues unabated.

 

HELLX

3:34 PM ET

July 1, 2010

Where's this guy been?

Zombies are so 2003.

Has he missed the fact that it's now 2010 and we're all obssessed with vampires?

I bet in 2017 he comes out with a book comparing multinational corporations to vampires.

 

PMANDAVILLE

8:48 AM ET

July 13, 2010

Absent paradigms

Zombies are what states make of them.

 

BMPRICE

3:35 PM ET

July 15, 2010

Bandwagoning

The author makes a novel contribution to IR theory. The discussion of realism neglects, however, the possibility that weak states might engage in so-called "bandwagoning" by aligning themselves with the emergent zombie hegemon. Agreements between such a state and the zombie thralldom could include, inter alia, (1) a non-aggression pact (NAP), under which each party would promise not to attack the other for a specified duration; (2) an NAP augmented with a tributary arrangement, whereby the human vassal would supply the zombie overlord with a specified number of citizen-sacrifices each month; (3) an NAP augmented with military cooperation and intelligence-sharing; and (4) full-fledged integration and zombification, presumably with assurances on the part of the hegemon of an adequate supply of brain-spoils to the newly incorporated satellites. The stronger human states should guard against possible bandwagoning on the part of their weaker neighbors by devising wedge issues to detach the interests of weak states from those of the zombie hegemon.

Brendan Price