'None of This Is Easy'

Gen. David Petraeus agreed Wednesday to become commander of U.S. forces in Afghanistan. In his testimony last week to the Senate Armed Services Committee, Petraeus portrayed an Afghanistan that is on the right track, but still has a long way to go before it can fend for itself.

BY DAVID PETRAEUS | JUNE 23, 2010

I'll begin by setting my remarks in context. As you will recall, soon after the 9/11 attacks, an international coalition led by the United States conducted an impressive campaign to defeat the Taliban, al Qaeda, and other associated extremist groups in Afghanistan. In the years that followed, however, members of the Taliban and the other extremist elements gradually reconnected in Afghanistan's and Pakistan's border regions and rebuilt the structures necessary to communicate, plan, and carry out operations.

In recent years, these groups have engaged in an increasingly violent campaign against the Afghan people, their government, and [International Security Assistance Force] ISAF forces, and they have developed symbiotic relationships that pose threats not just to Afghanistan and the region, but to countries throughout the world.

In response to the threat posed by these extremists, coalition forces and their Afghan partners are now engaged in a comprehensive civil-military campaign intended, above all, to prevent reestablishment of trans-national extremist sanctuaries in Afghanistan like the ones al Qaeda enjoyed there when the Taliban ruled Afghanistan prior to 9/11.

To achieve our objectives, we are working with our ISAF and Afghan partners to wrest the initiative from the Taliban and other insurgent elements, to improve security for the Afghan people, to increase the quantity and quality of the Afghan National Security Forces (ANSF), and to support establishment of Afghan governance that is seen as legitimate in the eyes of the people.

Over the past year or so, we and our ISAF partners have worked hard to get the "inputs" right in Afghanistan: to build organizations, command and control structures, and relationships needed to carry out a comprehensive civil-military campaign. We and our international partners have put the best possible civilian and military leaders in charge of those organizations. We have refined and, where necessary, developed the civil-military plans and concepts needed to guide the conduct of a comprehensive counterinsurgency effort. And we have deployed the substantial additional resources -- military, civilian, financial, and so on -- needed to implement the plans that have been developed. And I note here that the deployment of the 30,000 additional US troopers announced by President Obama last December and their equipment is slightly ahead of schedule. By the end of August, all the additional US forces will be on the ground except for a division headquarters that is not required until a month or so later. Meanwhile, the efforts to increase the size and capability of the Afghan National Army and police are also on track, though there clearly is considerable work to be done in that critical area.

Even as we continue the effort to get all the inputs in place, the actions taken over the last 18 months, which include tripling the U.S. force contribution and increasing similarly the US civilian component, have enabled the initiation of comprehensive civil-military counterinsurgency operations in key districts in Afghanistan.

The initial main operational effort has been in the Central Helmand River Valley, and progress has been made there, though, predictably, the enemy has fought back as we have taken away his sanctuaries in Marjah, Nad-i-Ali, and elsewhere.

The focus is now shifting to Kandahar Province, and the effort there features an integrated civil-military approach to security, governance, and development. Over the course of the month ahead, we will see an additional US brigade -- from the great 101st Airborne Division -- deploy into the districts around Kandahar City, together with an additional Afghan Army brigade. There will also be the introduction of additional Afghan police and US military police into the city, together with other US forces and civilians who will work together with the impressive Canadian PRT [Provincial Reconstruction Team] that has been working in the city. The concept is to provide the Kandaharis "a rising tide of security" that will expand incrementally over time and establish the foundation of improved security on which local Afghan governance can be built, that will enable improvements in the provision of basic services, and so on. There will be nothing easy about any of this, to be sure, and as I noted during my annual posture hearing, the going is likely to get harder before it gets easier. But it is essential to make progress in the critical southern part of the country, the part where, in fact, the 9/11 attacks were planned by al Qaeda during the period when the Taliban controlled it and much of the rest of the country.

Central to achieving progress in Afghanistan -- and to setting the conditions necessary to transition security tasks from the international community to the Afghan government -- is increasing the size and capability of ANSF. To that end, with the assistance of the Afghan Security Forces Fund, the security forces are on track to meet their targeted end strength objectives by the end of this year. In January 2009, the ANSF numbered 156,000; today, there are over 231,000 ANSF members. Additionally, Gen. Stan McChrystal has placed a premium on comprehensive partnering with the ANSF, an emphasis that is on display daily in operations throughout Afghanistan. Clearly, there is need for improvement in quality, not just quantity. And considerable progress has been made in getting the concepts right for developing the ANSF and also in developing the structures needed to implement the concepts.

Improving the ANSF is facilitated considerably by the establishment last November of the NATO Training Mission-Afghanistan (NTM-A), the organization created to help the ANSF expand and professionalize so that they can answer their country's security needs. It is worth noting that the NTM-A Commander, Lt. Gen. Bill Caldwell, assessed that in NTM-A's first six months, NATO and Afghan security leadership have made "progress in reversing adverse trends in the growth and professionalization of the ANSF." Nevertheless, as Lieutenant General Caldwell has also observed, there is much work remaining to reduce attrition and to develop effective leaders through considerably augmented partnering, training, and recruiting.

In all of our efforts, we continue to emphasize the importance of inclusivity and transparency on the part of the Afghan government and leadership, especially in linking nascent local governing institutions to the decision-making and financial resources in Kabul. Needless to say, innumerable challenges exist in all areas of governance, and much more needs to be done to help the Afghan government assume full responsibility for addressing the concerns of ordinary Afghan citizens. The National Consultative Peace Jirga held in Kabul earlier this month represents a constructive first step in this effort, providing an opportunity for President Karzai to build consensus, to address some of the political tensions that fuel the insurgency, and to promote reconciliation and local reintegration as means that can contribute to a political resolution of some of the issues that exist.

Another critically important part of our joint civil-military campaign in Afghanistan is promoting broad-based economic and infrastructure development. We have seen that improvements in the Afghan government's ability to deliver basic services such as electricity and water have positive effects in other areas, including public perception, security, and economic well-being. We have worked closely with the international community and the Afghan government to develop robust overarching strategies for water, governance, energy, and road programs. We are now embarking on a project jointly developed by the government of Afghanistan and various U.S. government agencies to dramatically increase production of electricity to the Kandahar area. To complement this effort, we are supporting and promoting viable agricultural and economic alternatives to help Afghans bring licit products to market, rather than continuing to grow poppy.

Again, none of this is easy or without considerable challenges. However, the mission is hugely important to the security of the region and our country. And we are obviously doing all that we can to achieve progress toward achieving our important objectives in Afghanistan.

AFP/Getty Images

 SUBJECTS: AFGHANISTAN, MIDDLE EAST
 

Gen. David Petraeus is the commander of American forces in Afghanistan. These are excerpts from his prepared remarks to the Senate Armed Services Committee on June 15. 

ADRIAN888

12:34 AM ET

June 24, 2010

Re: None of This Is Easy

As commented "In recent years, these groups have engaged in an increasingly violent campaign against the Afghan people, their government, and [International Security Assistance Force] ISAF forces, and they have developed symbiotic current sports news relationships that pose threats not just to Afghanistan and the region, but to countries throughout the world. "

 

NAZIA

1:32 AM ET

June 24, 2010

It is very interesting to see

It is very interesting to see that Phd degree holder general is discussing the war strategies of one of illiterate nation of the world.
I never thought that Americans whom I always considered as a nation which maximum utilize its common senses while developing its working areas, can believe to unbelievable lies of their Govt.
At this critical moment when second combat mission for Kandahar was ready, no sane leader can think of releasing his leading general with whom all was planned.It highly shake the morale of soldiers who are actually facing the true ground realities.But Obama did it as this war is not designed or being fought on the basis of true ground realities but all plans are fabricated in pentagon and CIA cell.So enjoy this farce war and try to use common sense that how a most capable general in few moments are rejected by US civil administration who a year back selected him to carry on this 9 year war.

 

ARYABHAT

4:04 AM ET

June 24, 2010

This is USA not Pakistan - Here Civilians really rule

Nazia, Replacing General in Afghanistan with a proven leader like Gen Petraus is not a mistake. It just sends clear signal that civilina supremacy on policy matter must continue while military remain a tool to deliver the policy. No more and no less.

Perhaps your background might indicate perspective from Pakistan. I REPEAT, I say PERHAPS - not necessarily. In such a case, try as you might, it is impossible to imagine a similar scenario unfolding in Pakistan. That is the difference between REAL democracies and Pakistan where the military has called the shots almost from day one.

As claimed in every briefing since replacement, this is a change of personnel not policy. And the replacement General has proven that he can deliver the policy. Rest is detail, as they say!

 

ASHOK2718

7:14 AM ET

June 24, 2010

@ ARYABHATT

different strokes for different folks. Can you imagine two countries being different ?

Army of Pakistan is holding together a nation which would otherwise go Iraq's way after the ba'ath army was disbanded there.

@ Nazia you don't need a Phd to handle a gun or public office. Why are you unhappy now ? Americans will be leaving next year so rejoice things will be back as before. We may get to see a hanging Karzai from even higher lamppost this time

 

NAZIA

1:00 PM ET

June 24, 2010

There is no doubt in my mind

There is no doubt in my mind that civilians are stronger in democratic govt but what that general has overflowed his real sentiment shouldn't be ignored.
Now it is proved that such kind of war is being fought on hypothesis basis while sitting in Washington and ordering death of hundreds of poor civilians,
Pick the words from the tongue of known composed general.e bleeding ulcer, bite me, wounded animal for those people who are handling this war games through civilian point of view.
Mr he actually has seen the reality of war in one combat operation and in one year he predicted the future of US army in Afghanistan and it is his professional skills that made him to speak like that.
Now obama is in deep thinking that at what time he actually made mistake.??
At the time of selection of Machrystal or when he was fired on immediate basis.

 

ARYABHAT

6:50 AM ET

June 25, 2010

@Nazia

Nazia, Thanks for your comments and glad to see you agree on civilian supremacy point.

Yes, death of civilians is a horrible thing and must be avoided. However, NO war has been free of civilian deaths. Let us also acknowledge that Gen Petraeus is no lesser a leader then his predecessor. He is also intelligent and good at delivering results that count, pacifying the terriroty by winning confidence of locals. He has done that in Iraq and he is the most capable person who could do it in Afghanistan.

However, should he lose, (which is likely), be preapred to see majority of Afghan civilians suffering MORE not less. In that scenario, with Taliban firmly in rule - Woment (50% of population), Tajik, Hazara and Uzbeks (another 15% of population at least) should prepare for persecution. Women will be flogged for going to by bread or Potatos alone. Women would not only be denied education - so no lady doctors - but also medical help from male doctors, effectively excluding them from healthcare. As for women's education, Taliban's views are well known. Add with that no TV, No music - not even Sufi and No NGOs.

You are right when you say whether Karzai goes 6 feet deep or above ground before meeting his maker is less important then better conditions for civilians.

Unfortunately THAT, quality of civilian life once American leave, is only going to go down in rapid spiral. Only ones who would celebrate that are either in GHQ - Rawalpindi. One can only feel sad and sorry for Afghans and their future that awaits them - 18 months down the line.

 

ARYABHAT

7:00 AM ET

June 25, 2010

@Ashok

Ashok, IF as you claim Pakistan Army holds Pakistan together then where was it in 1971? Pakistan Army is a Punjabi dominated force. It is perhaps only Army (alongwith Burma and North Korea - other two "Jewels" of China's "peaceful rise") in the world that own a conutry. Everywhere else it is the country that owns Army.

It was Pakistan Army that divided country while trying to bully Bengalis in 1971. It is doing the same in Balochistan even NOW. Watch here the persecution of Balochs by Pakistan Army - http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aYlNnptu_98 It is also torturing Pashtuns who disagree to support their Talibani agenda - see here: http://www.youtube.com/verify_age?next_url=http%3A//www.youtube.com/watch%3Fv%3DyJReUu7pdmM

So my friend, Pakistan Army is not the cause that is holding Paksitan together. Pakistan is held together IN SPITE OF its Army!

 

NAZIA

1:33 PM ET

June 24, 2010

Ashok No way I am unhappy but

Ashok
No way I am unhappy but I am just showing you balance of power and caliber between two forces who are in front of each other for more than 9 years.
Americans are aliens of Afghanistan and have to go.it is not objection of any kind same as none of my concern that kazai will be hanged or burry alive 5 ft above or below ground .I am worried about our backwardness as post war scenario country which is now becoming our fate for coming years.
US and its companies earned a lot and we are living on debris of war for what cause exactly dont know yet?
This state of deprivation is best breeding ground for more violent generation than Taliban.That is what I can predict from game of bleeding ulcer and wounded animals

 

ASHOK2718

7:46 PM ET

June 24, 2010

Americans overstayed

because of paranoia of right wing fox news viewers (which includes many influential politicians).

Leaving afghan region is the right thing to do at present.

At present they are just preparing Kabul for one last grand party where they can claim with a big banner 'mission accomplished'.

 

SURESH SHETH

6:33 PM ET

June 24, 2010

Can Petraeus tame Kayani's Pakistan?

While Petraeus can provide calming influence after leadership change, his close relationship with Pakistani General Kayani can very well doom the chances for success of US Afghan mission.

Defense Secretary Robert Gates justified Pakistan’s terrorist connections, alluding to a “deficit of trust” between Washington, DC and Islamabad. Mr Gates also said that there was “some justification” for Pakistan's concerns about past American policies. Gen David Patraeus, rushed in with an apologia for his Pakistani friends, by claiming that while Faisal was inspired by militants in Pakistan, he did not necessarily have contacts with the militants which is proven to be wrong. Both Adm Mike Mullen and Gen Patraeus fancy themselves to be “soldier statesmen” a la Gen Dwight Eisenhower. Adm Mullen has visited Pakistan 15 times and Gen Patraeus no less frequently. Both evidently have high opinions of their abilities to persuade Gen Ashfaq Parvez Kayani to crack down on the Haqqani network in North Waziristan and the Taliban’s Mullah Omar-led Quetta Shura.

All American officers in southern Afghanistan know that they can not prevail in the ongoing military operations, unless Taliban strongholds across the Durand Line in North Waziristan and Baluchistan are neutralized. Adm Mullen and Gen Patraeus evidently do not want to acknowledge that hard options have to be considered if their soldiers are not to die at the hands of radicals, armed and trained across the Durand Line. This is where rubber meets the road for the famed General.

According to Afghan Taliban commanders’ interviews with Matt Waldman, a Harvard Professor, the Pakistani ISI orchestrates, sustains and strongly influences the Taliban insurgency movement. The Afghan Taliban commanders also say that ISI gives sanctuary to both Taliban and Haqqani groups, and provides huge support in terms of training, funding, munitions, and supplies. In the words of these Afghan Taliban commanders, this is ‘as clear as the sun in the sky’.

Pakistani government issued its usual denials just as it had denied existence of Mullah Mohammed Omar’s ‘Quetta Shura Taliban (QST)’ in the provincial capital Quetta of Baluchistan. But General Stanley McChrystal had confirmed the existence of QST in his report to President Obama in August, 2009.

Unless and until Gates, Mullen and Petraeus trio is willing to accept that Pakistan is a ‘problem’ rather than a ‘solution’, US Afghan mission will continue to suffer.

 

MONTAUK64

6:52 PM ET

June 24, 2010

AFGHANISTAN

First let me speak about what is really happening. It is the first Black American President and we have alot of enemies around the world. We can end this conflict by you giving up Bin Laden and we will go home. The war was over and Afghanistan can return to selling Karzai dolls. It's true we could neutron the whole place and sweep up in a couple of days, right?! You don't disagree?! As longs as we are in office we will make sure that all laws are applied...The arabs sold us into slavery, the Africans gave us up, and the whites bought us...So we don't have anything to lose, if we apply the full power of the USA against you and all of our enemies. The choice is yours lets end this distructive war and bring peace, prosperity, and order to our world...We refuse to lose, because it will be a slam dunk!

 

MONTAUK64

6:52 PM ET

June 24, 2010

AFGHANISTAN

First let me speak about what is really happening. It is the first Black American President and we have alot of enemies around the world. We can end this conflict by you giving up Bin Laden and we will go home. The war was over and Afghanistan can return to selling Karzai dolls. It's true we could neutron the whole place and sweep up in a couple of days, right?! You don't disagree?! As longs as we are in office we will make sure that all laws are applied...The arabs sold us into slavery, the Africans gave us up, and the whites bought us...So we don't have anything to lose, if we apply the full power of the USA against you and all of our enemies. The choice is yours lets end this distructive war and bring peace, prosperity, and order to our world...We refuse to lose, because it will be a slam dunk!