Congo’s New Mobutu

As the Democratic Republic of the Congo turns 50 this month, its leader is taking a page from Mobutu Sese Seko’s playbook on repression. And the West is helping him.

BY JOE BAVIER | JUNE 29, 2010

You might expect that the Democratic Republic of the Congo -- which suffered under what was arguably the most brutal colonial administration in sub-Saharan Africa, a dismal three decades of repression under strongman Mobutu Sese Seko, and a regional war that resulted in the deaths of some 5.4 million and counting -- would want to move on from its past. But the country's 50-year independence celebration on June 30 will do exactly the opposite: In an attempt to recreate that historic day in 1960 when Congo's first prime minister, Patrice Lumumba, took over the reins of leadership from Belgium's King Baudouin, President Joseph Kabila has invited the former colonial power's current sovereign, Albert II, to be the guest of honor. Yet try as Kabila might, casting himself in the same light as Congo's iconic independence leader is proving a difficult sell these days. It's much more accurate to say that he is the new Mobutu.

The two leaders have a disheartening amount in common. Mobutu, archetype of the African strongman, was fond of pink champagne, leopard-skin hats, and pushing political opponents out of helicopters while his backers in Washington footed the bill. Mobutu siphoned vast profits from Congo's mineral wealth and presided over a willfully dysfunctional state. Kabila is less audacious -- so far -- but his government has a similar penchant for silencing political opponents. As to his backers, it's true that the good old days of Cold War money have ended, but what Congo has now is equally good: loads of donors, from the World Bank, the International Monetary Fund, and the European Union to bilaterals like Britain, the United States, and France, who hold their noses but don't let bad politics chase them out.

Now 50 years into Congo's woeful history as an independent country, the stakes are as high as ever to get things right -- and the consequences as dire if yet another leader chooses self-perpetuation over progress.

Why? Because today's Congo is about as dismal as a country can get. Nearly 80 percent of the country's 70 million people survive on less than $2 a day, annual government spending on health care amounts to just $7 per person (only Burundi spends less), and one out of every 10 infants never makes it to childhood. Three hundred thousand refugees are still afraid to return home despite the official end of the war seven years ago, and most of the country's 2 million internally displaced people fled their homes since 2007. And even as foreign rebels and homegrown militias continue to stalk the eastern borderlands and a new rebellion gains ground in the remote north, Kabila is calling for Congo's U.N. peacekeeping mission -- already struggling to compensate for the shortcomings of a singularly incompetent national army -- to begin pulling out. The symbolic withdrawal of 2,000 of the United Nations' 20,000 peacekeepers seems to have sated the young president's appetite for more sovereignty ahead of the June 30 celebrations. But many fear that with further downsizing Congo could backslide into generalized chaos.

Few had heard of Joseph Kabila before 1996 when he emerged from exile in Tanzania to serve as an officer in a Rwandan-supported rebellion led by his father, Laurent. When the rag-tag force swept practically unopposed across the vast country, Western governments reveled in Mobutu's downfall. But before long, Kabila the father, with his rampant cronyism and bizarre affinity for Marxist rhetoric, was eliciting gasps of horror from the likes of U.S Secretary of State Madeleine Albright. His decision to break with his Rwandan backers in 1998 helped plunge Congo into the deadliest conflict since World War II. Laurent was assassinated by his bodyguard three years later, and his son, Joseph, took the reins. It was hoped that he would be a new leader, a symbol of progress and reconciliation. And when he won Congo's first democratic election in four decades in 2006, he did so much to the relief of Western diplomats who thought him flawed, but vastly preferable to his chief opponent, the populist former warlord Jean-Pierre Bemba.

But any chance that Kabila, then 35, would usher Congo toward a new era of freedom, democracy, and respect for human rights soon fizzled. In January 2007, just weeks after his swearing in, Kabila ordered police to clamp down on a small politico-religious sect known as Bundu dia Kongo, which was protesting what it alleged -- and not without reason -- was the rigging of the gubernatorial election in western Bas-Congo province. More than 100 members of the sect were shot or stabbed to death, and the security forces would return about a year later and slaughter over 200 more.

"The fact that we said nothing and the U.N. hushed up their own report into the incident told Kabila everything he needed to know about how much he could get away with in the future," one Western diplomat, who was posted to Congo at the time, told me.

 

Joe Bavier is editing an oral history of the Democratic Republic of the Congo.

MUSTNOTSLEEP14

5:01 AM ET

June 30, 2010

Africans are clearly unable

Africans are clearly unable to rule themselves. The sad truth is that they were far better off being 3rd class citizens under colonialism. Even post-apartheid South Africa is pursuing ethno-politics, and that is supposedly the success story. We should be surprised if an African leader acts responsibly, not the other way around.

 

YASEEN

10:01 AM ET

June 30, 2010

Please get some sleep, you clearly need it

What a disgusting comment by someone who clearly lacks any understanding of African politics and the continent itself. Get some sleep buddy, you cannot be thinking straight.

There are countless problems in POST-COLONIAL Africa but it takes a long time for a host to recover after ridding itself from a parasite. The so-called "civilized" world points a finger at us and says "look at how cruel and brutal they are" as a means to distract from the inhumane and downright dispicable nature yanks and europeans are capable of. The notion that whites "worked hard to build South Africa" is a hopelessly false one. The truth is that they worked US africans hard to get infrasructure on the continent. Western democracy has become a joke with a US government that is nothing less than the bitch of the corporate entities that actually dictates the law of the land of the so-called greatest nation in the world. A nation that has demonstrated its hypocrisy and lack of morals by fighting wars in the name of economic interests. All this is possible of course since the American people have become so dumbed-down that they do not have a clue about the realities of their governments. Too much MTV I suppose...

We were kings before the parasites (Europeans and Yanks) landed here and when the notion of westernising africa finally subsides our societies can return to its former glory.

 

ENGUZELSIN

7:38 AM ET

June 30, 2010

like South Africa

between tyrannical parties and corrupt local warlords.
like South Africa and Ghana, but none of them suffer from those problems as acutely as the Congo.

 

MIBA

11:48 AM ET

June 30, 2010

Or consult a shrink

I could not have said that better, Yaseem. Apparently some people are very narrow-minded to the point that they need help to articulate their thinking. These are the so-called educated people who think they know every singel detail of African politics and history. I myself am studying in the US, and it's amazes me how delusional some Americans are about their so-called democarcy and the pursuit of hapiness.

 

MAIGARI

4:46 PM ET

June 30, 2010

AFRICAN DICTATORS AND THE WEST

It should not suprise anybody with a sense of history. The West does not really care a hoot about freedoms and rights anywhere. it s simply coomodities they are looking for and Congo is abundauntly blessed; better still with a "strong leader'. Why everyone knows all along the reason of the problems of the 'third world' -Western Interest- no more no less. from Mobutu to military governments and democrats who steal their countries blind and end up operating "secret accounts" in the metropolitan. yet not one government has ever raoised a voice! Where do you think the African rulers "earned" the income to purchase houses in the most exclusive areeas of the US and thed the EU; certainly it not from any legitimate earnibg since we are poorer than a church rat! Everyone knows it was looted from our PUBLIC TREASURIES before being deposited inyour banks! Stop pretending and face realities.

 

SPOERAD1

6:00 PM ET

June 30, 2010

MUSTNOTSLEEP14

wake up, the Congo is one of the most ravaged countries in Africa by the west. AND they were a wealthy civilization with a extensive central government before europeans arrived.

 

NORBOOSE

3:44 PM ET

July 1, 2010

Way Romanticized

The Kingdom of the Kongo (As it was spelled in english when it existed) was an unexceptional medeivil kingdom. It had one very wealthy city. Like most states of its level of technological advancement, its reach only extended far in its ability to extract tribute (the universal predecessor to taxes). The incredibly rough terrain did not help. People are people, the pre-colonial African civilizations were very similar to any other civilization of their advancement. The only differences are directly attributable to differences in climate and geography.

 

SPOERAD1

6:14 PM ET

July 1, 2010

just

just proving that Africans can obviously govern themselves and their current problems were caused by colonialism and western greed. See all mustnotsleep had to do was Wikipedia Congo before he made his incredibly ignorant remarks.

 

RSAFSOZ

4:53 PM ET

July 2, 2010

congo?

how many people knows where is the congo?

porno sex porno film

 

MACGYVER1

7:45 PM ET

July 23, 2010

Online Meeting Blog in Congo

We are here to demonstrate and discuss the online meeting blog models, we assume these terms. That it is in fact culturally-influenced and the position-shaped models, will be illustrated by the respective alternatives, the term education. The important question for us is already moved to the starting point of the online meetings and time management debate: Is the distinction between (objective) risk and the (subjective) assessment, in short, the traditional separation between facts and web conference values in this context at all a useful distinction? In other words, we must, the fact-based division of labor between culture and science itself into question. It is proposed to be regarded this separation as part of the problem.