Le Scandal

The French soccer team's disaster in South Africa has exposed the superficiality of European racial integration -- and now only Germany can save France from tearing itself apart.

BY JOHN HOBERMAN | JULY 1, 2010

In August 1936, shortly after African-American track star Jesse Owens won a sensational four gold medals at the Berlin Olympic Games, the editor of France's leading sports magazine L'Auto called upon French colonial authorities to find and recruit athletically talented black Africans who would be able to "represent the French race in a dignified manner" at international competitions. French runners and throwers had cut a poor figure in Berlin, and their failures before the eyes of the world were regarded as a national humiliation for France.

Accordingly, on Dec. 3, 1937, a search party sponsored by the magazine sailed from Bordeaux on a mission to study the athletic potential of the inhabitants of French West Africa. These sports missionaries eventually arrived in Senegal and were received by the highest colonial officials.

The result of this talent search was the sobering discovery that the explorers had completely misunderstood the relationship between sport and their colonial subjects. The Africans, unlike their African-American counterparts, showed little aptitude for sport. On the contrary, these impoverished and undernourished people needed sport as a therapy to restore their health. The search for children who might be future athletes was abandoned.

Half a century later, racial sensibilities have evolved, but European agents and coaches are still on the lookout for black talent to make them rich. And as the majority-African roster that France fielded at this year's World Cup attests, many have succeeded. But after a lackluster performance that saw the French squad sent home after the first round amid a swirl of scandals and accusations, the complicated relationship between race and sports has re-emerged in the public discourse in a very ugly way.

The recent uproar began after the entire French team refused to attend a training session following the expulsion of a teammate. The player in question, Nicolas Anelka, had shouted obscenities at the coach, Raymond Domenech, during the halftime of France's 0-2 pasting by Mexico on June 17. When the French media began calling this action a "strike" and a "mutiny," the escalation of the incident into a crisis took on a political dimension that is best explained as post-colonial drama, as indispensable black talent confronted the white authority figure whose job it was to keep them under control.

The denigration of France's North and sub-Saharan African athletes has been a favorite theme of the French extreme right for years. Jean-Marie Le Pen, the anti-immigrant and anti-Semitic founder of the racist Front National, declared in 1996 that the French national soccer team was unacceptable on patriotic grounds because of the number of "foreigners" -- i.e., nonwhite citizens -- who had been selected to represent France. Some players' refusal to sing the national anthem became a sore point that persists to this day.

But after the mostly black French soccer team's defiance of its white leaders in South Africa, Le Pen's racist critique of multiracial sport has entered the French political mainstream with a vengeance. It was the French minister of health and sports, Roselyne Bachelot -- hardly a fringe figure -- who recently called the older players "gang leaders" who were tyrannizing "frightened boys" on the national squad. During the 1990s, it was only the French extreme right that ridiculed the idea that multiracial sport could facilitate racial integration in France. Now the derision directed against the indiscipline of a "black" team and the implicit failure of sport's integrative role in French society rains down from across the political spectrum.

Never mind that Domenech is universally thought of as an incompetent clown. The scandal's psychopolitical shock produced an extraordinary and almost unanimous chorus of criticism and abuse from the entire French political class. "Is this going to tarnish the image of France?" asked Foreign Minister Bernard Kouchner. "How are young people going to respect their professors when they see Anelka insulting his trainer?" asked Minister for Higher Education Valérie Pécresse.

GIANLUIGI GUERCIA/AFP/Getty Images

 

John Hoberman is professor of Germanic studies at the University of Texas at Austin.

COUNTCHOCULA1011

9:05 PM ET

July 1, 2010

The French and Racism

One of the main issues I've observed in regards to French attitudes towards racism is their inability to acknowledge events or actions as genuinely racist. They always try to dismiss everything as mere "cultural disputes" or playful soccer hooliganism (see racist monkey chants).; I think they have this conception that racism is a purely American problem and that none of their enlightened citizenry could possibly be racist or xenophobic. Of course, it's quite apparent that this is the case, and one should hardly be surprised. After all, prior to the modern age, most European countries were ethnically homogeneous. Their only non-Christian, non-White subjects (the Jews) were expelled or exterminated.

 

ANTINOMIA

3:48 AM ET

July 2, 2010

If you had spent time in

If you had spent time in France, then you would know that racism is a major issue in french political and social life, and has been since the 70s. Concerning the "playful hooliganism", more than 4 Parisian football supporter clubs have been closed down this year, and any time a racist behaviour was observed, it was always condemned by society as such, racism, and not "cultural disputes". Italy on the other hand is a different matter (the Torino Juventus crowd is known for systematic racism, pushing black players to quit).

This does not mean that the french society is exempt from racism, who isn't? France is facing a serious problem with the obvious failure of its integration model. This leads to racism, but mostly social inequalities. But to each racist crime committed, no matter which population was concerned by the aggression, you always face a huge popular and political reaction of disgust. Describing antisemitism as a systemic and historical european trait that explains today's racism is, in any case for France, completely off...

I still find it funny to say that racism is purely american and that France is being hypocritical about it, american society is always presented (to us) as a "société à deux vitesses", literally a schizophrenic society where alongside the privileged lives a minority characterized by extreme poverty that would put any european society to shame. And most of them aren't white...

But then again, maybe I suffer from the same distorted perception of clichés as any one else...

 

MISHMAEL

11:26 PM ET

July 1, 2010

Welcome or Get Out

As someone with only a passing interest in football/soccer (usually during the world cup) I admit that I did find it somewhat odd that European teams had obviously African players. This is all the more interesting considering that Asian teams and African teams do not have European players.
The article seems to suggest that French self-identification relies more on ethnic definitions than ideological ones. To be immune to right-wing critics in other words depends on your ancestry. This in itself is not all that strange and objectionable, for the vast majority of countries worldwide define themselves in ethnic terms, the notable outliers being India(due to the number and relative equality in power and wealth of its ethnicities) and the US which has an official doctrine of multiculturalism and an unofficial "melting-pot" strategy.
The French strategy can be said to have failed. The riots in the banilieus, the debacle over the burqa, and now soccer players being lampooned based upon race all point to the failure or incoherence of the French identity. France (and Europe) can either remain white, welfare-state, croissant-connoisseuring, moped-riding, wine-drinking, accordion-playing, etc by rejecting foreigners and their influences (which would not be all that shocking since most countries do reject foreigners moving in en masse bringing their culture with them) or become like the US or Canada and create either a new identity based upon ideology like the US or just let people do as they will (so long as they learn english or french) in Canada.
Countries are either or, and should not be both liberal destinations for immigrants and lovers of their culture and heritage at the same time.
African teams and Asian teams are all African and all Asian because of this dialectic. many non-Japanese live in Japan, but they probably will never become "Japanese." In fact, there are people with Japanese ethnicity who have emigrated from Latin America that have a hard time being thought of as Japanese. (hence theres only one only Tulio on the Japanese team)

 

REBELS8

4:43 AM ET

July 5, 2010

Multiculturalism in the United States

Mishmael:
You wrote: "the US which has an official doctrine of multiculturalism and an unofficial "melting-pot" strategy."

The United States doesn't have an official doctrine of multiculturalism and it never has, but it has always had an unofficial assimilation or melting-pot strategy. This is what many of the Founding Fathers wanted. They only wanted immigrants who would assimilate into American society and didn't want immigrants who wouldn't assimilate into American society. The Founding Fathers would be shocked at the millions of immigrants, both legal and illegal, coming into the U.S. today who refuse to assimilate.

 

REBELS8

4:54 AM ET

July 5, 2010

Multiculturalism in the United States

There was none of this multiculturalism garbage in the United States until relatively recently, probably during the Vietnam War period, when leftists began playing the "Blame America First" game, and they wanted to discourage immigrants from assimilating into American society. I don't see anything wrong in celebrating the cultural heritage of America's different immigrant groups--in fact I'm proud of the cultural heritage of all of my ancestors-- but all Americans have to come together as Americans first.

 

OPEMILY

12:57 PM ET

July 11, 2010

RebelS80, are you crazy?

RebelS80, are you crazy? There have been criticisms of multiculturalism since the founding of our country! Whenever there was a spike in immigration, recent immigrants were discriminated against and criticized for their lack of assimilation. German, Irish, Italian, Eastern European (both Jewish and non Jewish), Chinese, Japanese (Internment camps were the ultimate form of immigrant discrimination- you moved to our country and made a life here- but we think you might spy for your home country, so we're going to lock you up).

The Amish communities have rejected integration outright (they are of Swiss-German origin and they continue to speak a form of German known as Pennsylvania Dutch), there are Russian communities in Brooklyn that remain very insulated, and Chasidic Jews (The men dressed in the black coats, the beards, and the curly sideburns) have also resisted fully integrating with the rest of American society. Although these groups are relatively small, they are still important because there will always be groups who reject the concept of the melting pot and live insulated within their own communities.

Re Mishmael: There are no white players on African/Asian teams because there are very few white citizens in these countries. Yes, there might be Western communities in the major cities- but how many of these people actually move to Nigeria or the Philippines and say, "I want to give up my European/American citizenship to become Nigerian or Filipino" If a European living in Nigeria has a child who grows up to be an athlete, they are going to compete under the flag of their parents homeland and not as a member of the Nigerian squad- even if they never actually lived in that country. South Africa is the exception and they do have a white player.

 

JEAN-MARC

2:13 AM ET

July 2, 2010

Hilarious collection of cliches

The real way people live it here:
I'm not much fond of soccer, but France's team had what it deserved. Their level was no sufficient to enter the cup, they succeded only by cheating (which is so common in soccer that it is part of the game).
The people in charge of the team are "amateurs", not able to run a team at this level.
I could not even tell what is the ratio black/ blanc/ beur (africans / caucasians / north africans). There is no racism here. But it is present in other places for sure. As always and in any part of the world, it is the small percentage of a..h.les that are enough to spoil the live of the majority.

The only sure thing is that the players are multi-million brat kids.

... and excuse my English...

 

COMRADE RED

3:25 AM ET

July 2, 2010

Sarkozy somehow finds a way

Sarkozy somehow finds a way to blame the performance on America, and yet we made it further than them anyway!

Not only that but we've done better than France in the past two Olympics as well. Maybe a little bit of Americanization in their athletics would be good for them. :P

 

RöSTIGRABEN

6:51 AM ET

July 2, 2010

Nonsense

"Bringing home the golden trophy is hardly easy, but compared with reconciling Europe's racial tensions, it's child's play."

Exactly. Sports and politics are two different fields, presenting different challenges. And for the same reason, it's completely superficial to attach any deeper meaning to the World Cup performance of a small group of pro athletes and to somehow turn it into a symbol of a country's glory or disgrace. France's early exit can be explained entirely with the internal group dynamics of its cadre (I won't call them a "team", because they didn't act like one), and most of the blame is rightly put on Domenech, because he failed at his task of turning them into a functioning ensemble. Likewise, Anelka's insult isn't a symbol of blacks rebelling against white authority, but simply constitutes a case of a player known for his lack of discipline attacking a coach known for his lack of authority. France's failure doesn't spell doom for its integration policy, and Germany's success doesn't magically make all social tension there disappear. I wish people would stop trying to find profound insights about a country's social and political state by analyzing the results of a sports competition that only consists of a handful of games involving a tiny share of its people. Writing even semi-critical articles about this is sheer nonsense, and grandstanding statements such as "The French soccer team's disaster in South Africa has exposed the superficiality of European (!) racial integration" are downright silly.

 

WYCOFF

9:49 AM ET

July 2, 2010

Germany's "success" has come

Germany's "success" has come at the point of a gun, along with a 70 year scapegoating for all of the actions of Western Civilization.

Germany's leaders and intelligensia decided to throw away 2,000 years of history as a way to beg forgiveness for 13 years of evil. Such action is unique; it's an outlier that even the German people are starting to get sick of it. As ever more Europeans (and European-Americans) realize that multi-culturalism is a one-way street, there will be more ethnic unrest in the European countries.

 

ENIGMA

7:55 AM ET

July 2, 2010

Uh?

1) Why does the title of this article lump all of Europe into France's predicament of "superficial racial integration?" Seems like a cheap attempt to smear Europe.

2) Maybe it really isn't all about race....perhaps it's just the fact that you have a crappy coach and a bunch spoiled, undisciplined players who bumped heads. This could happen anywhere.

 

WYCOFF

9:34 AM ET

July 2, 2010

The thing that us Americans misunderstand

The thing that us Americans misunderstand is that France, Germany, and the other European countries are fundamentally ethnic nations. It's understandable that an ethnic Frenchman would believe that an immigrant wouldn't be as devoted to the nation as him. To the immigrant, France is a country- his homeland and his people are elsewhere. To the Frenchman, France is the homeland, the cradle of his civilization. That's why Le Pen and the National Front are gaining in popularity- many French legitimately fear that they're being colonized and are losing their homeland.

Forcing Europeans to accept and abide by American-style integration and multiculturalism is wrong. We don't expect African countries or Asian countries to "embrace diversity" and take in thousands or millions of white Europeans. Why then do we expect European countries to do so and chastise them when they don't. While the U.S. may be a nation of immigrants, France is not.

 

FP KID

10:44 PM ET

July 2, 2010

Colonialism

Umm... Maybe the Europeans should have thought about that before they pillaged and colonized the Third World. The French exported their culture to Vietnam and Algeria. If they have a problem with living in a multiethnic society, well, they're far too late to do anything about it. The immigration from countries like Pakistan and India to England and from the countries of North Africa and the Sahel to France are vestiges of colonialism. After the European powers ruled over their overseas colonies, all the idiotic arguments about ethnic identity became moot.

 

REBELS8

5:34 AM ET

July 5, 2010

If America can assimlate its immigrants, so can Europe.

Wycoff:

The United States may now be a nation of immigrants, but it wasn't always like that. At the time of its founding, the United States was a predominantly White, Anglo-Saxon, Protestant (WASP) nation. Benjamin Franklin, one of our greatest Founding Fathers, was worried about the large German-speaking minority in his home state of Pennsylvania and the possibility that they might not assimilate, which meant assimilate into Anglo-American society. At the time of its founding, the United States did have a relatively significant black minority population-- larger in terms of percentage than today in fact-- ,mostly in the Southern states. But a large majority of these blacks were slaves, and therefore property, and only counted by the federal government as 3/5 of a person. In the 19th Century when immigrants, mostly European, began coming in droves to the United States, they faced prejudice from native-born Americans, no matter what the nationality, ethnicity, race, or religion was of the immigrant. But most of these immigrants, and most of the immigrants of the 20th Century, did assimilate into American society, which has as its foundation, the society of the original WASP colonists, but has been built on by the multitude of immigrants from every nation, ethnicity, and race on the face of the Earth. If the United States, formed from 13 English colonies, can do it, then all countries, especially European countries can do it.

The reason why we probably don't expect African and Asian countries to take in millions of white European immigrants is that people of European cultural heritage, including Americans, consciously or unconsciously would feel superior to the people and cultures of their host nations. But that doesn't mean that it can't be done. There has been some success in post-apartheid South Africa, though black-white relations have gotten worse since Nelson Mandela left office and if this continues then South Africa could unfortunately end up like Zimbabwe, where Robert Mugabe stole the lands of most of the country's whites.

 

OPEMILY

1:13 PM ET

July 11, 2010

I've lived in the Middle

I've lived in the Middle East, and I agree most European and American ex-pats view themselves as a class above the locals. For the most part, the locals maintain the colonial inferiority complexes and further perpetuate the seperation of the two communities.

Can you give an example of a country in Asia or Africa where the white ex-pat community complains of legal and social persecution, where they are denied the rights that the average citizen of that country enjoys? Even where there is segregation between the two communities, the ex-pat community explicitly seeks out that segregation (ie compounds in Saudi Arabia)

 

XRAUSCHER

3:52 PM ET

July 2, 2010

Overplaying the "Race" Card

I think your article raises a lot of interesting points about French society and its issues, and it is always enlightening to read a foreigner's perception of your own country: they often have a perspective that a national lacks on his own country.
But I do believe, as a Frenchman, that you are overplaying the whole "race" issue. Although some, such as respected philosopher Alain Finkielkraut, raise the "ethnic" dimension to point out to tensions and divisions within French society and its football (or soccer) team, I think it's a partly erroneous interpretation of the problems at hand. Yes, French society, as all societies, have problems with racism. Yes, integration of certain minorities are difficult due to such problems.
But to analyze the French's reactions to its football team's failures and behaviors through the lens of racism is overkill. The French are just disappointed and bitter, and seeing how their team played and behaved on and off the football field, who can blame them?

This somewhat reminds me of the rioting problems we had in 2005, that were presented by foreign media as "Muslim riots." Religion had nothing to do with it, the rioting was based on social problems, not religious tensions. It's one of the oldest French traditions: "les jacqueries."

In the case of the French football team, it's another French tradition that comes into play: internal strife. Read the comic books "Asterix" to know more.

 

JASONBIRD

6:33 AM ET

July 3, 2010

Have you ever got these

Have you ever got these jerseys?They are all great gears....
The National Football League (NFL) is the highest level of professional American football. It was formed by eleven teams in 1920 as the American Professional Football Association, with the league changing its name to the National Football League in 1922. The league currently consists of thirty-two teams from the United States. The league is divided evenly into two conferences — the American Football Conference (AFC) and National Football Conference (NFC), and each conference has four divisions that have four teams each. The NFL is organized as an unincorporated association of its 32 teams. The NFL is by far the most attended domestic sports league in the world by average attendance per game, with 67,509 fans per game in the latest regular season (2009)

chris Johnson navy jersey|chris Johnson white jersey|Adrian Peterson purple jersey|Adrian Peterson white jersey|ray rice black jersey|Ray rice purple jersey|Ray rice white jersey|Frank Gore red jersey|Frank Gore white jersey|Aaron Rodgers green jersey|Aaron Rodgers white jersey|Michael Turner red jersey|Michael Turner white jersey|Drew Brees black jersey|Drew Brees white jersey|Peyton Manning blue jersey|Peyton Manning white jersey|Rashard Mendenhall team jersey|Rashard Mendenhall white jersey|Steven Jackson white jersey|Steven Jackson navy jersey|Larry Fitzgerald red jersey|Larry Fitzgerald white jersey|Randy Moss navy jersey|Randy Moss white jersey|DeAngelo Williams black jersey|Reggie Wayne blue jersey|Reggie Wayne white jersey

Alexander Ovechkin red jersey|Alexander Ovechkin white jersey| Sidney Crosby Home jersey|Sidney Crosby Road jersey|Sidney Crosby Third jersey|Zach Parise red jersey|Zach Parise red jersey|corey perry home jersey|ryan getzlaf home jersey|Jeff Carter home jersey|Jeff Carter road jersey|Jeff Carter third jersey| Mike Green home jersey|Jarome Iginla home jersey|Pavel Datsyuk home jersey|Pavel Datsyuk road jersey|Henrik Zetterberg red jersey|Henrik Zetterberg white jersey|Ilya Kovalchuk team classic jersey|Miikka Kiprusoff jersey|Alexander Semin home jersey|Alexander Semin road jersey|Marian Gaborik jersey|Alexander Semin road jersey|Dion Phaneuf blue jersey|Dion Phaneuf white jersey|Patrick Kane jersey|Vincent Lecavalier jersey|

Cheap blackhawks jerseys|cheap nhl jerseys|Wholesale ed hardy|Cheap ed hardy|cheap Penguins jerseys|cheap replica handbags|Cheap bears jerseys

Get the nfl gears on bargain price.

 

ALIASWONDER

6:55 AM ET

July 3, 2010

in my opinion

I agree this article is going a bit too far in trying to link the passionnate reactions of the french public concerning the disastrous performance of their soccer team to french society in general.
France is a land of "terroirs" and has always been. Most of people feel a strong relation with the region of their origin, one is as much as an alsacian, a britton, a provencal as a french citizen. In some parts of the country side some people still look at the next village as foreigners so one can imagine how these people look at immigration and at having to accept people of exotic backgrounds as their immediate neighbors.
Yet traditionally France has been a land of immigration and has embraced many different nationalities over the last century, Spannish, Italians, Poles, Armenians, Russians... without problems. These people integrated and simply became french. The problem nowadays consist essentially with the offsprings of immigrants from North Africa and Africa from the former colonies. This generation that is french by birth is causing a lot of problems and has difficulties finding its place in society. it is quite testing for the model of french integration because of different cultures, religion and values rather than skin color. Of course as in every society, there is a certain amount of racism that should be fought against but that doesn't explain all. Chinese, Vetnamese or even Indian immigrants are integrating quietly without major problems and no one seems to complain about them.
The reasons of the failure are multiple, parents often came from poor uneducated backgrounds, tried to maintain their original way of life and their kids don't feel french and at the same time are uprooted from their parent's culture. Coming from Algeria makes things even more difficult as they fought a war with France, won it and it is in someway contradictory to now embrace the values of the former colonist.
Once this generation realize that they are french as well, start profiting from the system and take school and education seriously (it is free and available) instead of burning cars and being in a logic of confrontation, things will eventually quiet down. It goes both way, respect has to be deserved and some of these kids need to learn how to behave as they are casting a bad reputation on a whole generation. As the saying goes "don't ask what your country can do for you but what you can do for your country"
To this respect there is a relation with our football team and the way their behaviour has infuriated people here. Some die hard rightists have taken opportunity to raise racist issues but overall the french public was more disgusted by the lack of commitment of the team considering the high salaries and priviledges that they enjoy. They would have been all whites the reaction, I believe, would have been the same.

 

SUSSANE007SIG

5:15 AM ET

July 4, 2010

humiliating defeat

what a humiliating defeat for all top teams... This worldcup is unpredictable.

 

DISIGNY

12:30 PM ET

July 4, 2010

"Integration"

How anyone can imagine that this frantic push to "integrate" is going to work, when the cultures are so different is beyond me. When has it ever worked? The Japanese have a much better idea; don't do it.

 

DISIGNY

12:32 PM ET

July 4, 2010

"Integration"

How anyone can imagine that this frantic push to "integrate" is going to work, when the cultures are so different is beyond me. When has it ever worked? The Japanese have a much better idea; don't do it.

 

KMC2K9

2:26 PM ET

July 4, 2010

France has issues from the

France has issues from the start not only in sport there goverment doesnt allow relgious freedom banning relgions from wearing there relgious symbols which to be honest is a human right which they should not be allowed to ban when I was using my sleep apnea mouthpiece and watching tv I couldnt believe South Africa a team that doesn't have any real star player outplayed a French team with players earning million of pounds a year really says it all.

 

ENGUZELSIN

3:06 PM ET

July 4, 2010

France soccers

Thank you shampione:D

porno
pornolar

 

MARS

3:50 AM ET

July 5, 2010

Speaking of bad soccer and racism: Italy

While listening to the games, one of the commentators mentioned that the Italian national team has no immigrants and that the Italian coach was quite proud of this. Has any one else heard anything about this? This would be quite interesting, if true, considering Italy's spectacular failure alongside France.

 

RSAFSOZ

10:49 AM ET

July 5, 2010

spain will won

spain which is my favorite team will win the cup
porno
sex videolari
porno film

 

TEASER38

5:39 PM ET

July 5, 2010

Exiled Germans from Eastern Europe...

tend to be more "German than Germans" and hardly in much need of cultural integration. My experience is that they were not exiled but immigrants that themselves had failed to integrate in Eastern Europe.

France doesn't have the same "German Guilt" taboos surrounding the discussion of the race. Not being able to get along with a non-white German in Germany, might get you labeled a neo-Nazi. Likewise you won't find real German politicians talking negatively about immigrants in public.

Some reason Austria and Italy didn't develop the same level of taboo when it comes to race...

 

ALDO12

7:54 PM ET

July 15, 2010

the trouble with footballers

The italians, the english and the french have lost their passion for the game. The club means more than the nation and it can be seen in the way they play. It won't happen i accept that, but until the vast sums of money are taken out of the game France and others will continue to breed players who are overrated and bigheaded who turn up for their country but fail to deliver. Chop the salaries, lose the wags, and improve their fitness and passion.

 

MARTINE

3:43 PM ET

July 18, 2010

Remember 1998?

In 1998, France won the World Cup and half of the players had their ethnic origin in Africa, the Carribean area or North Africa. Diversity of the team was put forward as one of the things that contributed to that great success.

Yes France has its integration problems, won't deny it. But a shortcut between the integration challenge and the soccer debacle is overplayed.

Bad management of the team and spoiled players are to blame first.