The Sheikh Who Got Away

How the United States got Lebanon's leading Shiite cleric dead wrong -- and missed a chance to change the Middle East forever.

BY DAVID KENNER | JULY 6, 2010

The coffin of Grand Ayatollah Muhammad Hussein Fadlallah, covered in a black cloth embroidered in gold with verses from the Quran, wound through Beirut's southern suburbs July 6, traveling from his home to the Hassanein mosque, where he used to deliver Friday sermons. It was followed by thousands of mourners, most of them wearing black and many carrying pictures of Lebanon's most eminent Shiite cleric on their way to his final resting place.

Tributes poured in from across the Middle East. Iranian Supreme Leader Ali Khamenei referred to the late ayatollah as a "true companion of the Islamic Republic." Hassan Nasrallah, the secretary-general of the Lebanese militia Hezbollah, even came out of hiding to pay his respects at Fadlallah's casket and offer his condolences to his family. Nasrallah issued a statement mourning the death of "a merciful father and a wise guide."

But the accolades did not just come from America's enemies. Lebanese Prime Minister Saad Hariri, a Sunni leader considered sympathetic to the United States, called Fadlallah "a voice of moderation and an advocate of unity." Ali al-Adeeb, an official in Iraq's Dawa Party, which Fadlallah helped create, said that it "will be hard to replace him." Dawa Party leader and Iraqi Prime Minister Nouri al-Maliki, who has worked closely with U.S. forces in the country, counted himself among the ayatollah's many followers. Even British Ambassador to Lebanon Frances Guy offered her praise, writing that when visiting with him "you could be sure of a real debate … and you knew you would leave his presence feeling a better person." 

Although Fadlallah may have confounded the Middle East's traditional fault lines, the United States never wavered on its stance toward the ayatollah: He was the "spiritual advisor" to Hezbollah, a terrorist who was responsible for numerous attacks on U.S. interests in the region. This grudge was formed more than a quarter-century ago, during Lebanon's 15-year civil war, when the CIA reportedly sponsored a notorious plot to assassinate Fadlallah.

On March 8, 1985, a car bomb carrying 200 kilograms of explosives detonated outside Fadlallah's home in the southern suburbs of Beirut. The bomb devastated the neighborhood, killing 80 people and wounding approximately 200 more. Fadlallah, however, escaped without injury. In the eyes of his followers, there was no doubt who was responsible: They strung up a "MADE IN USA" banner over a destroyed building immediately following the attack. The U.S. government, however, steadfastly denied any involvement. Targeted assassinations, officials pointed out, were explicitly forbidden since Gerald Ford's administration.

Washington Post reporter Bob Woodward's explosive account of CIA involvement in the Middle East, Veil: The Secret Wars of the CIA 1981-1987, would eventually undermine the official denials. Woodward, drawing on interviews with President Ronald Reagan's aggressive CIA Director William Casey, reported that Casey had circumvented the spy agency's established bureaucracy to funnel money to a professional hit team trained to assassinate Fadlallah.

It was a bloody time for the United States in Lebanon. The 1983 U.S. Embassy and Marine barracks bombings and the 1984 attack on the U.S. Embassy annex in East Beirut had claimed the lives of hundreds of Americans. The CIA station chief in Beirut, William Francis Buckley, was also kidnapped in 1984 and eventually died in captivity after being tortured by Hezbollah interrogators. U.S. officials were itching for revenge. Fadlallah "had been connected to all three bombings of Americans facilities in Beirut," wrote Woodward. "He had to go."

Woodward may have gotten an explosive scoop on the inside story of the CIA's involvement, but he got the much easier story of Fadlallah's relationship with Hezbollah wrong. In Veil, Woodward refers to Fadlallah as "the leader of the Party of God, Hizbollah," and an "archterrorist." The confusion over Fadlallah's connection to the organization would continue to bedevil U.S officials and media until the current day.

Robert Baer, a former CIA case officer who worked in Beirut during the 1980s, denies that Fadlallah played any operational role within Hezbollah. "I can guarantee you, and I have seen every bit of intelligence, that Fadlallah had no connection [to the attacks]," he told me. "He knew the people carrying out the terrorism acts, but he had no connection in ordering them."

Fadlallah himself consistently denied having any official role within the Shiite militant group, even while making no apologies for supporting many of its aims. "I live in a warm atmosphere surrounded by the youth of 'Hezbollah,' whom I consider my sons," he said in one 1995 interview. "However, and since the inception of Hezbollah, I was never part of its organizational structure."

Fadlallah did have relationships with some of the highest-ranking Hezbollah officials and had never made a secret of the fact that he issued rulings offering religious sanctions for its attacks. He enthusiastically supported attacks against Western forces in Lebanon during the civil war and continued to support attacks on Israel until his last days.

"He wasn't our friend, let's get that straight," noted Baer. "But that doesn't mean he was a master terrorist."

-/AFP/Getty Images

 

David Kenner is an assistant editor at Foreign Policy.

JAYBIRD2064

5:59 AM ET

July 7, 2010

not our enemy?

fazlallah is indeeeed a good companion to the Supreme Leader of Iran. He specializes on baby-killing, lies and terror just like the Iranian government leaders.

 

RAINING01

2:53 AM ET

July 9, 2010

Good post! Our online store

Good post! Our online store has many different Cosplay costumes on offer. Cosplay parties are great places for anime fans to have fun. And the Hermes birkin and Nike shoes here are also very popular. Just take a look!

 

ETHANSULLIVAN26

3:55 AM ET

August 2, 2010

Sarcastic comment. LOL How

Sarcastic comment. LOL How could he be a good leader if he haven't done anything good for the welfare of his country and his fellowmen. If people have the choice to choose their leaders, they need to choose wisely or else, they can't no longer do anything about it.Ethan Sullivan

 

POCOCURANTE

6:39 AM ET

July 7, 2010

He Loved Children Less Than Himself

> "What is the difference between setting out for battle knowing you will
> die after killing ten [enemies], and setting out to the field and knowing
> you will die while killing them?"

Well one difference is he got to live a long life, enjoy prestige comfort and power, and then die in his sleep of old age surrounded by friends and family.

And the young men and women who strapped on bombs at his cheerleading did not.

Seems to be a common story with this noble leaders of Islam, who all live long lives as they destroy their children and Islamic culture gains nothing in the process.

 

FADI

1:18 PM ET

July 7, 2010

ur comment contain many fallacies

Its a nice article , Yes fadlallah wasnt enemy for US .he support Hizballah, which is national liberty movment , against Israeli occupation and terrorism. we all knew that the unconditional US support for Israel which still abuse the international law, do u rememeber israeli attack against flotilla........
Fadlallah(along with Hizbollah and Iran) condemned the september 11,2001, terrorists attacks, and said that the attackers are just suicides not martyrs ...........as mentioned in the article .... also u should forgot to write in ur comment that he told young men to carry bombs in order to kill israeli .. we all knew that Isreali offense army was and still killing civilians in Gaza, i think that u can read Goldstone report ............... Dear u should know that Israeli policy is the root of the struggle in the middle east

 

BUDAHH

5:18 PM ET

July 7, 2010

FADI

Did you forget all the wars that happened in the last 60 years, and who started them, 48 , 67 , 73, who did not agree to the partition plan.
Who is Hizbullah liberating Lebanon from these daays, not the syrians I am afraid. They have no rason to exist these days, Israel withdrew in 2000 in case you forgot and they had no reason to start the war in 2006.
Are they really serving lebanon why don't they kick out the syrians if they are such lebanese patriots, why do they do what Iran says, and are considered to be proxies. Are they helping lebanon.
The lebanese treat palestinians like dogs keep them in camps don't give them rights, and we are the unhumane ones, Lebanese people have no right to talk about oppression of palestinians because they are the worst ones, I bet you the quality of life in gaza is better than in all of the camps in lebanon, even in our prisons the palestinians get more rights than they do in Lebanon. You guys really care about palestinians????

 

TRUTH NOT PARTISAN

1:14 AM ET

July 9, 2010

also Fadi, care to explain

also Fadi, care to explain the Palestinian armed uprising a few years ago in the Palestinian "refugee" camps in Lebanon?

 

BUDAHH

7:50 AM ET

July 7, 2010

He is the worst than the suicide bomber himself, may this be the

fate of all religious leaders who call upon suicide bombings, hopefuly sooner than later.there is a differance when being a kamikaze in a war and targeting civilians you forgot to mention that.
He is worse than the suicide bomber who is most of the time a poor misguided youngster. He is the one who gives him god's approval for his acts and therefor it make him responsible, yep blah balh we had some interests that might have crossed ways, he is still a Terror leader no matter what.
He is such a liberal wow, women it is okay for you to fight back you don't just have to take beatings silently so if you are strong enough it won't be wrong to hit back awsome stuff he should run for office in Vermont.
Actually I think that should be the solution to terror get rid of the rooot of the problem and target all the religious leaders who call upon Jihad

 

JACOB BLUES

9:03 AM ET

July 7, 2010

Splitting hairs of Fadallah

So Fadallah wasn't "Hizballah's Spiritual Leader". Big whoop. Here is a religious authority authorizing terrorist activities against civilians, a war crime if there ever was one.
.
Both Baer', who's article in the TIME Magazine, was the source of the first third of this blog, and now Kenner, make a huge deal out of the idea that Fadallah wasn't Hizballah's spiritual leader. Honestly, at this point, that's a minor footnote given what is written about him in the artice above. A man who advocates killing civilians and Jihad. Indeed, hardly a supporter of the US.
.
One note about the suicide-bombing issue, its not the tactic that is a problem. Killing and sacrifice is what happens during a war, whether its someone throwing themselves on a grenade, fighting to let their comrades live, or going to kill the enemy on a risky, or one-way mission.
.
No, the two problems with the use of suicide bombers is that they break the barrier between civilians and combatants, disguising fighters as civilians (non-combatants), and targeting civilians. Both war crimes.

 

NSC LONDON

9:19 AM ET

July 7, 2010

As is often the case...

... the comments section of FP's "Argument" articles is more astute in its analysis than the actual article.

 

HUGH

10:18 AM ET

July 7, 2010

Nice article

Nice article, with an analysis that goes beyond the dumb Shia = Iran & Lebanese Shia=Hezbollah. Given how piss poor much of FP's content is it's a surprise when you come across an article like this.

 

JJACKSON

1:21 PM ET

July 7, 2010

All in the eye of the beholder

Thanks for this FP, an interesting article, and predictable comments.

As I read I wonder if anyone would pick-up on the CIA terror attack that killed 80 and injured 200 in a residential suburb - and missed their target. The level of hypocrisy inherent in the US's dealings with others is always staggering. I am not saying some of those the US vilifies are not worthy of attack but it is always stunning to see the pot calling the kettle black without any hint of irony. Of course the perennial desire to depict 'them' as comic book baddies has led to the usually misinterpretations. This is another example of 'America doesn't do nuance' writ large. One day the US will learn that some of its friends are not all good and some of its enemies are not all bad but more the time being the US is going to keep thinking it is superman, while going all Mr. Magoo when it comes to its own acts, and sponsorship, of terrorism.

 

TRUTH NOT PARTISAN

1:17 AM ET

July 9, 2010

it snot necessarily the pot

it snot necessarily the pot calling the kettle black. You seem to miss the distinct difference.
All of Hizbullahs doing is in order use terror to achieve their means. All the buildings they build for the communities in Southern Lebanon you think are free of ideology? No way. Of course it is just to indoctrinate the civilians into their ideology. Be a realist and be practical.

Also, the US does make a few mistakes, but the majority of its actions arent that bad. All war is bad, hence the wording that bad. Yet Hizbullah is in and of itself inherently a terrorist organization.
The difference between good and bad is the net worth, the balance between good and bad. Churchill had his faults as did Patton, etc. Yet their overall net worth was deemed positive. This mans overall net worth is bad as is Hezbollahs.

 

EW66

2:27 PM ET

July 7, 2010

Worth the Read?

Anyone read Woodward's book? Comments, opinions, etc....

 

JJACKSON

6:16 AM ET

July 8, 2010

Sacked for having an opinion, or telling the truth?

"Sad to hear of the passing of Sayyed Mohammad Hussein Fadlallah... One of Hezbollah's giants I respect a lot."

David Kenner should count himself lucky that he does not work for CNN. The rather inocuous quote above is a tweet from a CNN foreign affairs senior editor, of 20 years service, which got her sacked. If this is the level of self sencorship required of those in the US MSM then the US does not have, and can not have, a free press. Tow the government's propaganda line or face the consequences.

http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/world/us_and_canada/10549106.stm

 

JJACKSON

1:18 PM ET

July 8, 2010

I have to agree

I have to agree the level of bias is so great that balance is seen as bias. I just suspect our views of where reality lies is rather different and so what I see as propaganda you see as truthful, and vis-a-versa. We all live in a reality created by our environment and seem unable to see, or understand, each other's realities.

 

SIDROCK23

5:36 PM ET

July 8, 2010

more israeli breast feeding

its not surprising to hear that U.S got ANOTHER thing wrong in the middle east. this is just another item to the long list of american scew ups in the middle east, all for the sole purpose of breast feeding baby israel. israel got it what it deserved back in 2006 by getting its butt kicked by hezbullah. ever since then they have only become stronger and have gained more influence in lebanon and in the arab world. all the israeli cry babies will complain about an article like this, yet won't hold thier own government accountable for their stupidity. in a world where israel acts the way it does, having a formidable force like hezbullah is needed. if reports are true that hezbullah has acquired SCUD missles, then we should all celebrate it. israel will be mindful of what it does. the arabs have gotten used to being killed, the israelis are little cry babies who cry when they get a paper cut

 

MARTINBR

9:06 AM ET

July 13, 2010

Well one difference is he got

Well one difference is he got to live a long life, enjoy prestige comfort and power, and then die in his sleep of old age surrounded by friends and family.

And the young men and women who strapped on bombs at his cheerleading did not.

Seems to be a common story with this noble leaders of Islam, who all live long lives as they destroy their children and Islamic culture gains nothing in the process.

Well said! I had the exact thought after reading this article! That's a hell of a difference.. Cheers, Martin

 

COMPASSIONFORBOTHSIDES

12:02 PM ET

July 13, 2010

What an absurd comment

Your logic that "he got to enjoy a long life while the young suicide bombers died" is along the same lines of "Obama gets to enjoy a long pampered life while our troops in afghanistan die" or "the pope gets to enjoy a long life while africans get AIDS from not using condoms."

He is a CLERGYMAN. In my church, the priest would always say a prayer for "our armed forces." I suppose my priest is also a hypocrit for not going out and shooting people himself and instead doing what a clergyman does, preaching?