Benedict's Crusade

Can the Pope bring God back to Europe?

BY NICK SPENCER | JULY 20, 2010

The Vatican's recently-founded Pontifical Council for New Evangelization seems at first glance to be a somewhat redundant enterprise. Isn't the Catholic Church already pretty good at spreading the faith? Not in its own backyard, it turns out.

According to the Vatican's statistics, the number of Catholics worldwide in the past ten years has increased at a healthy 11 percent clip, faster than the global population as a whole. But that's largely been driven by a 33 percent increase in the Catholic population in Africa. Meanwhile, in traditionally Catholic countries like France and Germany, church attendance has dropped below 20 percent. In the cathedrals of Paris, tourists now regularly outnumber churchgoers. And in Ireland, where just 30 years ago 91 percent of the population went to mass regularly, local dioceses are suddenly bereft of laity and leadership: church pews are empty and hundreds of priests are dying every year with no one to take their place. In the words of the Irish religion journalist David Quinn, "It's not a crisis, it's a catastrophe and it's happened in a generation."

The Vatican's new official administrative apparatus is, in fact, committed to the unprecedented, and ostensibly quixotic, task of combating that catastrophe. Its sole goal is the re-evangelization of Europe. The council will shape the Vatican's messaging and direct European churches in their efforts to steer the public back towards the "perennial truth of the Gospel of Christ" and away from an "eclipse of God." It's tasked with finding and implementing methods, both pastoral and political, to convince Europeans to put Christ back at the center of their lives. Not surprisingly, the Vatican has faith that it can turn back the secular tide. But it's also going to have to show a newfound willingness to compete for believers, and, even then, it will probably need a good dose of luck.

With the odds so stacked against it, the new council begs the question: why Europe? As Catholicism continues to spread rapidly in the global south, the European continent -- with its aging population and diminishing political influence -- seems a curious strategic priority for a global institution like the Vatican. Scholars and laymen alike used to think that Europe's secularism epidemic was spreading: soon everyone would follow in exchanging prayer beads and crucifixes for fast food and sitcoms. But Europe proved the exception rather than the rule. The United States didn't secularize, and most of the rest of the world grew steadily more, rather than less, religious during the late 20th century.

So why devote resources to a problem that seems unlikely to spread? While Europe's growing secularism may be the "exceptional case," as British sociologist Grace Davie has deemed it, it is a concern exceptionally close to Pope Benedict, both to his personal career and his theological reflections.

The German-born Pope Benedict XVI (nee Joseph Ratzinger) has long held fast to the goal of his predecessor, Pope John Paul II, to preserve "the Christian roots of Europe and its Christian soul."

As John Paul's prefect of the Sacred Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith, Cardinal Ratzinger became the Vatican's key player in 2004 in the battle over the preamble to the European Constitution, a document that was supposed to be a symbol of the continent's "ever closer union."

While many political representatives at the constitutional convention insisted that Europe remain secular, the Vatican lobbied hard for the document to reflect the continent's millennium and a half of Christian history. Europe, Ratzinger argued, was not a geographic or political concept, but a "cultural and historical" one, founded on Christianity. He and the Vatican ultimately had to settle for the compromise phrase: "the cultural, religious and humanist inheritance of Europe."

Subsequently, Benedict's papacy has had a particular emphasis on Europe. Cardinal Ratzinger chose his pontifical name partly in honor of Pope Benedict XV, the early-20th-century pope who sought to bring peace to a continent devastated by World War I, and partly in honor of St. Benedict of Nursia, whom Ratzinger, reflecting on his choice of name, called "the co-patron of Europe," and described as "a fundamental reference point for European unity and a powerful reminder of the indispensable Christian roots of his culture and civilization." Since ascending to the throne of Peter, Benedict has made 16 foreign visits. Ten have been to European countries.

The pope is motivated by a deep concern that Europe's spiritual foundation is slipping away, taking with it the continent's future, both earthly and eternal. This concern lay behind both his reservations about Turkey's prospective EU membership and his infamous 2006 Regensburg lecture, in which -- with prose both dense and controversial -- he voiced reservations about Islam's adherence to human reason. But, apparently, the pope now deems the threat of secularism more urgent than that of Islam.

Getty Images

 SUBJECTS: RELIGION, EUROPE
 

Nick Spencer is director of studies at Theos, a public theology think tank in London.

Facebook|Twitter|Reddit

WALLACE2010

3:39 AM ET

July 21, 2010

Benedict's Crusade

The pope is motivated by a deep concern that Europe's spiritual foundation is slipping away, taking with it the continent's future, both earthly and eternal. This concern lay behind both his reservations about Turkey's prospective EU membership and his infamous 2006 Regensburg lecture, in which -- with prose both dense nfl jerseys and controversial -- he voiced reservations about Islam's adherence to human reason. But, apparently, the pope now deems the threat of secularism more urgent than that of Islam.

 

RODNEYDERRICK

4:58 AM ET

July 21, 2010

Are you kidding

No mention of pedophilia and the organized criminal defense of it from top down, no mention of a member of a Nazi youth being considered "Vicar of Christ". Who in their right mind can consider such superstitions a realistic option for intelligent people!

 

ESDEETEE

5:26 AM ET

July 21, 2010

Habit fading

Religion at large is loosing ground in Europe.
Let's face it: for many people going to mass was more an established tradition than a true act of faith.
Also, social activities offered by churches (recreational activities for kids, summer camps, feast days for patron saints, etc) were pretty much all a rural society had to offer for entertainment.
And don't let's not forget that being a pastor / priest gave someone a well respected position within the society, with a sure income.
No wonder that today, with so many different possibilities to choose from, the religious "thing" lost much of its appeal.
Tterefore so-so-believers left the Church, while fundamentalist one's remained.

 

COUNTCHOCULA1011

7:05 PM ET

July 21, 2010

Christianity is fading; not all religions in Europe are

While Christianity may be dying in Old Europe, Islam is alive and thriving. Mosques are packed to the brim and only aren't expanding their premises due to restrictions by the government. Thousands are also converting to Islam, so to say that religion in general is dying in Europe is quite a fallacy. Christianity--and specifically Catholicism--is dying (Anglicanism isn't doing much better though).

 

SAJANAS

8:48 AM ET

July 21, 2010

good riddence

It really bothers me when religions make the claim that they did everything for human rights in the 20th century. Being an atheist does not turn you into a violent dictator, and being religion doesn't suddenly make you magnanimous. I think that the RCC's stance against women's rights, abortion, gays, and contraception makes them deeply unappealing to a lot of modern people. American Catholics seem to just ignore these proscriptions and continue to call themselves Catholic, but I have to hand it to the Europeans for taking the next step and just leaving the church entirely. Seriously, the church is not a liberal organization, and Europe is by and large a very liberal, progressive set of states.
Perhaps that is why Benedict is concerned. The author dismisses Europe as part of the world stage, saying it is fading and not influential, but at the same time, it is home to half a billion people, all of whom are literal, educated, and worldly, and live in a country that takes in more tourism than anywhere else. I think that it does bode poorly for the RCC and religion in general, that when people reach the point where they are pretty happy, and are educated enough to see errors in religious teachings, they just stop. Its easy to evangelize to people that just need a meal, or people that know only what you tell them about your religion. But if whole societies can become accepting of atheism as a reasonable choice, and stop listening to the ravings of clerics about how you cannot be good without them (which is nonsense), then it bodes ill for every religion, everywhere. Even in the US, there are more non-religious people than any denomination but baptists now.

 

COUNTCHOCULA1011

7:12 PM ET

July 21, 2010

Atheism

I personally would never claim that being an atheist turns a person into a dictator, but such a worldview makes it very easy to divulge into such fields. After all, if there's nothing inherently sacred about human life and all laws/moral concepts are mere impositions created by society, what is to prevent a person from assuming the role of a dictator and murdering their opponents? If we're nothing but fatty tissue, what's the big deal in destroying that fatty tissue? Life is meaningless right? Everybody has to die, why not now?

You may have a hard time connecting atheism to such actions, but others (such as myself) can easily see how such worldviews would lead to atrocities. Most atheists simply don't take atheism to its logical conclusions.

 

SAJANAS

12:17 PM ET

July 22, 2010

I don't think the lack of a

I don't think the lack of a God necessarily renders life immoral. Certainly, the God in the Bible does things that are patently immoral, so then one must ask, where does morality come from? It comes from us, and morality changes over time. I think that not having a God does prevent things from being completely immutable, and that is largely a good thing since standards and values need to change as society changes.

Plus, the current RCC concepts of 'the sacred', and those of other religions change too. Certainly there have been religions in the past that have been perfectly fine with killing people on a pretty wide scale, and there is nothing about the current religions that somehow prevents us from having them changed to darker version, or being replaced by a new one. All religion does is prevent people from arguing with authority, giving authority an easy win until it is completely replaced. It does not make the religious authority right, and I think the RCC does itself a vast disservice by tying itself down to medieval thinking that was not moral then, and is not moral now.

I personally have found my experience with Atheism (and science more generally) to be one that has opened my eyes to just how similar people are, and how precious life is. Not having a soul doesn't mean you are a useless meatbag, and being an atheist does not mean you completely lose your ability to empathize with others.

 

COUNTCHOCULA1011

3:20 PM ET

July 22, 2010

Response

By your own admission though, morality is nothing but a social construction. As such, it's something that can be deconstructed and fashioned based on one's own personal whims. This naturally can lead to problems. If morality has no true basis outside of society, then there's no real reason to not be immoral if doing something immoral brings pleasure to you--and it does to many. Not to mention, society is weak. If the only reason not to kill another human being was the fear of the police catching you, this would be a pretty weak barricade. Real life isn't CSI. Crimes such as murder and especially rape are far easier than you might think to get away with so long as you know what you're doing. This doesn't even take into account if you are the law. Then there's theoretically nothing stopping you from killing at whim so long as the people you are killing aren't strong enough to resist you. Again, I am not in any way saying that being an atheist makes you inherently immoral or that being a religionist makes you inherently good. Such dichotomies are infantile. However, the logical conculsion of atheism is that there's no inherent reason to be moral in the sense that society defines it.

 

JPWREL

9:00 AM ET

July 21, 2010

This Pope should concentrate

This Pope should concentrate on bringing God back into the Roman Catholic Church before he takes on Europe. If there ever was a time when this Church needed a through house cleaning of its financial improprieties and sexual deviancies it is now. A second Reformation is the real answer to a Church plagued with centuries of clogged arteries of self-serving corruption. They need to bring Christianity back into ‘Christ’s Church.

 

ZORRO

10:21 AM ET

July 21, 2010

Get your filthy paws of those children!

Was what I was thinking as I saw the picture...

 

HIS HOLINESS FOCUSED ON CHURCH BUREAUCRACY NOT DOCTRINE

11:32 AM ET

July 21, 2010

Benedict's Crusade Not Based on Teaching of Christ

With all respect, the actions of the Church over the last 2 years show it is focused on preserving it's obsolete male hierarchy and status. To do this it has shown it will happily sacrifice the innocents in its care and its own history.

The abuse of children, the flock of the Church that the priesthood is sworn to protect above all, is a continuing sin. It is not a stain. It is not a concern or feeling. It is a sin.

Last week the Church made ordination of women a crime that rivals pedophilia. This is insane and inane given the Church itself had early women leaders and it was official doctrine to provide ordination of women priests and bishops from the 8th century up to the 12th century. http://www.cta-usa.org/watch01-01/macy.html

His Holiness needs to lead a movement back to the teachings of Christ, not preserve the traditions of an obsolete male privledged bureaucracy. Then, and only the will people return to the Church.

 

GENNY

2:55 PM ET

July 21, 2010

Blessed Carmelites of Compiegne, pray for us!

Read this http://www.catholicapologetics.info/library/onlinelibrary/martyrs.htm and have respect of the roots

 

AURANGZEB KHAN II

9:23 PM ET

July 21, 2010

 

F1FAN

9:51 AM ET

July 22, 2010

That picture

That picture for the article should bring terror to the hearts of parents everywhere. The man who forbid the Vatican from turning over child-molester priests to the authorities and sought to silence the victims with those three children.

They gone git raped.

 

YEBDA

10:43 AM ET

July 25, 2010

More complicated than you think

The available data on European religious adherence is more complicated than this and does not support the thesis of general "secularization" in the sense of widespread or increasing atheism or agnosticism. There is a disconnect between what Europeans believe and what they do.

In general in Western Europe, according to a 1995 survey, 75% of the population believe in God, but only 33% attend church even once a month. In Denmark, for example, nearly 2/3 are theists (64%), but only 11% attend church even once a month. In France the figures are 62% and 17%; UK 83% and 25%; Norway 65% and 13%. Spain 85% and 40%; Netherlands 65% and 31 % etc.

Among Western European countries, only Sweden has a non-religious majority (55%). The non-religious population is comparable in some of the former Soviet bloc states such as Russia, Belarus and Bulgaria; no doubt the lingering effect of official atheism. But in Eastern Europe as a whole, a clear majority (55%) still say that they believed in God.

cf. David Kertzer and Marzio Barbagli, FAMILY LIFE IN THE TWENTIETH CENTURY, Yale University Press, 2003 p. xv).

Granted, this survey is somewhat old, but I think few opinion researchers would expect a large change in religious attitudes over just 15 years. Europe is significantly more secular than the US, Latin America, Africa or Asia. But the evidence suggests that most people retain a basic religious belief. They just don't find that organized religion provides what they are seeking.

The Pope may seek to combat this trend by drawing a sword against the evils of "relativism" etc; reversing the principles of Vatican II and reverting to the spiritual climate of Pius IX and the 19th Century "Syllabus of Errors". He may try to brow beat people out of their honest religious confusion, while blasting critics of the church's handling of the sexual abuse scandal as agents of a diabolical conspiracy. But he is unlikely to be successful.

 

BVSAD

11:40 PM ET

August 12, 2010

| I was very pleased to find

| I was very pleased to find this site.I wanted to thank you for this great read!! m2ts files converter from m2ts converter | iPad Converter This article is very interesting. Thank you very much for sharing . Hulu Downloader

 

SUPERMADA

3:16 PM ET

August 19, 2010

I am not much into reading,

I am not much into reading, but somehow I got to read nice information on your site. Simple to understand and helpful. We will look forward for your future updates.Thanks!