Afghans Can Win This War

The fight in Afghanistan is difficult, but with a strategy that fully empowers the Afghan people to defeat the Taliban, it is still winnable.

BY YAHYA MASSOUD | JULY 30, 2010

It was the spring of 2001. I was in Afghanistan's Panjshir Valley, together with my brother Ahmad Shah Massoud, the leader of the Afghan resistance against the Taliban, and Bismullah Khan, who currently serves as Afghanistan's interior minister. One of our commanders, Commandant Momin, wanted us to see 30 Taliban fighters who had been taken hostage after a gun battle. My brother agreed to meet them.

I remember that his first question concerned the centuries-old Buddha statues that were dynamited by the Taliban in March of that year, shortly before our encounter. Two Taliban combatants from Kandahar confidently responded that worshiping anything outside of Islam was unacceptable and that therefore these statues had to be destroyed. My brother looked at them and said, this time in Pashto, "There are still many sun- worshippers in this country. Will you also try to get rid of the sun and drop darkness over the Earth?"

Indeed, the Taliban are prepared to go very far in their jihad. They will spare no human life or piece of their country's history in their attempt to remake Afghanistan in their image. If it were within their powers, they would not even stop with the sun.

I was thinking about this episode recently when, at the July 20 conference in Kabul, international powerbrokers rededicated themselves to seeing the mission in Afghanistan through to the end. "We have no intention of abandoning our long-term mission," said U.S. Secretary of State Hillary Clinton. "Too many nations … have suffered too many losses to see this country slide backward."

It will be no small feat to match the Taliban's commitment. Over the duration of this nine-year conflict, U.S. and European leaders have discovered that it will take more than the same old methods to fix Afghanistan. Rather, what is needed is a new understanding of the complex dynamics of the current war and of Afghan society as a whole.

NATO members are increasingly showing concern over the lack of progress in the counterinsurgency campaign, which has concentrated on the southern provinces of Helmand and Kandahar. So far, the results have been mixed: Although the 15,000 International Security Assistance Force (ISAF) troops who participated in the military operation in Helmand's Marja district largely managed to clear the area of insurgents, the process of establishing legitimate and trusted institutions and security forces in the region will remain on the agenda for a long time.

The military operation in Kandahar will likely experience similarly inconclusive results if NATO and Afghan forces fail to counter the Taliban strategy in the area. To lay the groundwork for the Kandahar operation, Afghan President Hamid Karzai traveled twice to the province; he was followed by a joint Afghan-U.S. delegation led by Afghan Defense Minister Abdul Rahim Wardak and Richard Holbrooke, U.S. President Barack Obama's special representative for Afghanistan and Pakistan.

These officials were right to make Kandahar the centerpiece of their efforts to combat the insurgency. Along with Helmand, this area forms the core of the Taliban's stronghold in Afghanistan; it is the source of the group's most ideologically committed fighters and also the home of most of its leadership. Helmand in particular is also an important source of revenue for the Taliban: The province accounts for nearly 50 percent of the world's opium production, and profits from the drug trade are funneled back into the insurgency.

MANPREET ROMANA/AFP/Getty Images

 SUBJECTS:
 

Yahya Massoud is the brother of Ahmad Shah Massood. He joined the Afghan resistance following the 1979 Soviet invasion. This article was translated by Djeyhoun Ostowar, a graduate student at the University of Oxford.

Facebook|Twitter|Reddit

XMASTER4000

7:12 PM ET

July 30, 2010

"Victory" is possible

But only if it comes from the Afghans themselves. It's their land, their people and their future the ones hanging in the balance, not ours.

The fact that no one likes the Taliban,and most locals are quite fearful of them, should be the driving force behind ANA and ANP strategy. The Northern Alliance survived and flourished across Afghanistan during the Taliban regime, why can't its leaders rise up again to the fight with the same effectiveness?

Just like in Iraq, the ultimate fate of the country will be up to the locals themselves, the western army should only serve as "facilitator", as the western commitment and interests in that region are actually quite limited.

 

YKORI

3:09 AM ET

July 31, 2010

Definition is the key

One has to ask oneself, what would define a victory in Afghanistan?
This is not a regular war, so in order to know when victory is achieved, you must first know what victory is. Afghanistan is much more complicated than a regular "us vs. them" situation, a fact that is often overlooked in this kind of discussion.

 

KAWOJKTLTH@NOWMYMAIL.COM

11:26 PM ET

July 31, 2010

Victory in good measure...

One measurable definition of victory in Afghanistan is the day that Taliban's lifeline to Pakistani safe havens and sanctuaries is terminated, signaling the end of Taliban as a fighting force. Only then can the Afghans begin in earnest to rebuild their war torn nation in relative peace. Minus the Taliban, there would be no need for so many foreign troops on Afghan soil. More civilians can then work alongside the Afghans to rebuild their schools, hospitals, roads and homes. Peace, peace peace...

 

NICHOLAS WIBBERLEY

6:43 AM ET

July 31, 2010

Sounds OK

Yaha Massound’s recipe sounds sensible and worth a try but I don’t see why it needs the ISAF. Surely Blackwater, or whatever they call themselves these days, could do all that under contract to Kabul, and the US just foot the bill.

 

KAWOJKTLTH@NOWMYMAIL.COM

10:19 PM ET

July 31, 2010

Get tough with Pakistan

Many of our US soldiers dying in Afghanistan were barely 10 years old on 9/11. This is how long the war has lasted. Thousands killed or maimed, Afghanistan near the brink and countless Afghan lives lost and the vast proud and ancient land devastated to satiate the ruthless generals who rule behind a mere facade of democracy in Islamabad, Pakistan.

The US administration is simultaneously talking about cutting its losses and retreating while ironically ordering an impending surge of an additional 30,000 US troops blindly being put in harm’s way. More death and destruction awaits us, while the solution to our predicament has been staring us in the face from the very first day of this horrid war.

The Taliban - vanquished in 2001, have returned with renewed strength. Is this possible without the Taliban's vital lifeline to the vast militant infrastructure carefully nurtured in Pakistan?

Under a thin veil of deniability, Pakistan tolerates and/or enables terrorist safe havens, sanctuaries for training camps, madrassa factories that produce martyrs for jihad and teenage suicide bombers and organizations of all shades that raise and funnel funds from a vast international network to arm and sustain the terror pipeline to the Taliban fighters..

The simple truth: If Pakistan terminates its terror lifeline to the Taliban, the Taliban's days as an effective fighting force in Afghanistan would quickly end. Only then can Afghan citizens get enough breathing room to earnestly begin rebuilding their war torn nation with the help of its friends and with international aid already underway. Only then can Afghans start fixing the many problems that has been their tragic legacy due to past wars. It is absurd to criticize Afghans for corruption etc. as long as USA turns its habitual blind eye, to the equally diabolical Pakistani propensity to meddle in the affairs of its neighbors.

US aid keeps Pakistan from the brink of economic collapse. The US certainly has the power to shape Pakistan's behavior. As a precondition for the continued massive US aid - as a quid-pro-quo, President Obama should require that Pakistan deliver on its often broken promises to eradicate its terrorist infrastructure and terminate its lifeline to the Taliban fighters in Afghanistan in a transparent and verifiable manner. Only then can peace have a chance to begin the healing process and common citizens get a chance to breathe freely without fear.

Instead of being resolute and hold Pakistan to its promise to end the terror sanctuaries, Obama has sadly decided to reward Pakistan’s deception with billions of our tax dollars and shiploads of lethal arms including nuclear capable F-16's. This is counterproductive since it only prolongs the agony of the Afghans and continues to cost the US needless life and treasure while endangering peace in the region.

 

EW66

12:15 AM ET

August 2, 2010

1

You're claim that the Taliban "had nothing to do with" 9/11 doesn't seem entirely true. While it is pretty much accepted that they had nothing to do with the planning or operational stages of 9/11, it is still an overstatement to say they had nothing to do with it. First of all, no one actually knows the extent of Taliban involvement with 9/11. Most intelligence analysts can agree that the vast majority of Taliban forces had no knowledge of the terrorist attacks, but many believe that Mullah Omar (and possibly a few other senior Taliban officials) were in fact informed of the impending attacks on the US prior to 9/11. It is said that Omar was initially against the move because of the military response it would undoubtedly provoke, but that he ultimately gave in (perhaps for something in return?). As such, the murder of Ahmad Shah Massoud by al-Qaeda operatives just two days prior to 9/11 is widely believed to be bin Laden and Zawahiri's "gift" to Mullah Omar. The "gift" of course being the removal of Omar's main adversary.
Also, another reason why it's not entirely accurate to say the Taliban had "nothing" to do with it is for the simple fact that they refused to give up bin Laden on several occasions including after 9/11. They turned down Bill Richardson in the 90's and they said no once again after knowing that al-Qaeda had murdered thousands of US civilians and being well aware that we would respond militarily. Imagine that a friend of yours murders another person, orders it from your house, seeks refuge in your house afterward, and when the police come to arrest him you refuse to give him up. Should you not be held at all accountable? Sounds like a pretty clear case of aiding & abetting (at the very least) to me.
I also disagree with the statement "The foreigners successfully drove the non-Taliban terrorists out of Afghanistan in a few weeks and have done little to capture or kill them since". I believe about 13 of al-Qaeda's 20 most senior leadership have been killed since 9/11. In addition, the numbers themselves by all accounts have decreased dramatically since we first sent CIA and Delta into Afghanistan. Leaders of these strike teams (Schroen, Bernsten, Dalton Fury etc) put the number of al-Qaeda fighters at about 800-1,000. You'll probably recall Leon Panetta's most recent estimates on al-Qaeda at 50-100. I wouldn't exactly say we've done "little to capture or kill them since". Yes, the senior leadership and core was able to evade capture but many, many al-Qaeda foot soldiers were killed in the battle of Tora Bora and other initial battles partly accounting for the reason they have such a limited presence in the country now.

 

WATTY

4:13 AM ET

August 2, 2010

To Kunino

Afghan forces and their US, NATO allies should destroy the sanctuaries in Pakistan.
Taliban cannot last long as a fighting force in Afghanistan without the support they get from these safe havens in Pakistan.

IMO US made a big mistake in once again trusting the double-dealing Pakistani's who will never allow a united and strong democratic Afghanistan. That is why they invented the Taliban thugs.

 

CEOUNICOM

2:20 AM ET

August 4, 2010

re: EW66 1:15 AM ET

Good comments.

One thing: it wasn't Delta, but ODA 555 from the 5th Special Forces Group that joined the CIA and SAD guys already there. Details available in a few books, like "Jawbreaker", "Horse Soldiers", and "First In"

 

EW66

8:55 PM ET

August 5, 2010

Wasn't Dalton Fury's team

Wasn't Dalton Fury's team Delta technically? Check out his book, Kill Bin Laden: A Delta Force commander's account of the hunt for the world's most wanted man. I've read Jawbreaker but not the other two yet. I'll be sure to do so. Thanks.

 

AHSON HASAN

10:21 PM ET

July 31, 2010

Afghans Can Win This War

The title of this piece appears to be rather unrealistically hopeful. It is a wonderful, skillful and artistic presentation of issues that engulf Afghanistan today.

However, Mr. Massoud needs to understand that as long as ISI's presence (backed by Kayani and company) is a recognizable fact, the Afghans will continue to suffer.

Take Pakistan out of the equation and we'll be 'rewarded' with a much peaceful area that may bring the much-needed stability without destruction of structures and human lives.

The Pakistanis are restless and highly-driven souls. They are ambitious and motivated. Whereas gaining control of Kashmir from India seems to be a far-fetched idea, they still 'want' Afghanistan's 'subjugation'.

There are currents and undercurrents within the Pakistani military bureaucracy that dictates supporting the Taliban - a fact know much before the recent WikiLeaks 'revelation'. One is not really sure why the Western countries encourage and support Kayani. Or, do they really? One wonders at times.

Afghanistan's problems are, to a certain extent, just like Pakistan's issues. Both are paralyzed by the over-zealous religious fanatics; people are corrupt; there is no 'system' whatsoever to run the government, politicians are nasty as hell.

The war may possibly be doable proposition. It's not impossible. However, those role-players meddling negatively in Afghan affairs need to not only be checked but also should be told to stay away. Pakistan, of course, tops that list.

 

KAWOJKTLTH@NOWMYMAIL.COM

11:14 PM ET

July 31, 2010

It is Pakistani Punjabi military at the core of all problems

It is interesting to discover that it is often the Pakistani Punjabi military that dominates the rest of Pakistan and projects its diabolical influence on the entire south Asian region. When you study the history of Pakistan it becomes self evident that peace in south Asia is often held hostage by a few military strongmen most often of Punjabi origin. Now with Pakistan being a nuclear power and a Chinese surrogate the dangers multiply many times over.

For instance Pakistani generals make absurd demands of free Afghanistan by dictating who the Afghans can choose to be their friends. Surprisingly the US tolerates and encourages such unacceptable Pakistani behavior. Minus the Punjabi boots most communities in south Asia would breathe easier - including Pakistani Sindh, Balochistan etc.

 

WATTY

3:37 AM ET

August 2, 2010

To ASH0K2718

You are doing a fine job of cutting yourself up into pieces, get ready for an independent Pashtunistan, taking your NWFP and FATA along! Pakistan is an oxymoron.

 

GHOSTSOLDIER

12:41 AM ET

August 1, 2010

'Protect the border'?

'This may seem a daunting task. But Afghans, Americans, and Europeans alike should realize that, even if the war effort succeeds on all other fronts but fails to protect the border, the struggle against the insurgents will be lost.'

Someone, anyone, tell me, as a soldier who spent a year in Kunar and Nuristan Provinces, how you can 'protect the border'? What border? Where? How? NURISTAN and KUNAR? That's not even Afghanistan. It's Pashtunistan and a separate country named 'Nuristan'.

Nuristan is absolutely, positively, violently ungovernable by outside forces. Anything resembling a security force with government legitimacy there would have to incorporate and integrate the majority of the fighting groups into its force for legitimacy reasons. Kunar is enemy central. Nuristan is absolutely, positively schizophrenically a province of primitive anarchy.

 

WATTY

3:43 AM ET

August 2, 2010

To ASH0K2718

What marauders from Michigan? You think this is your stink hole of Waziristan, or Pakistan? You sound really ignorant.

 

MARYAMALI

2:08 AM ET

August 2, 2010

To Taliban: You want to

To Taliban: You want to control our nation while you are controlled by al qaeda and insurgent. They laugh at you because you allow them to enter our country on their false words to you. They would fight you too one day they say. Bring back a success to our Afghan country and let UN rebuild our country for our children. Insurgent and al qaeda are not from us, it is their will to control many Islamic nation. Don't let them control your thought and actions. Come back to your families, to our people and make our nation one where we can be happy with our families, have jobs and homes, feed our children and contribute to the world because we are a smart nation that is creative and needs education. Our people have suffered from these radicals who think they can control you and our country. Dialogue with UN to help them rebuild us. We can keep our culture and our faith, we just want fairness for all people, good lives for our children, trade with other countries...we the people DO NOT want people training in our lands to hurt good people for their agenda...America isnt imperialist, the insurgent who pretend to be helping you are the true invader, as they use our land to train and harm others. Be your own voice and come back to our nation to make it better, not worse.

 

BOREDWELL

4:12 AM ET

August 2, 2010

FUBARRED

I applaud your hopefulness but question how you can conflate it with reality. Certainly, as an Afghan citizen, you are intimately aware of failures in both the Afghan government and NATO forces to effect top-down and-bottom-up changes. It is evident that both entities have been unable to work cooperatively these past 9 years to achieve a consensus on how best to defeat the Taliban let alone remake the country if that is even remotely possible.

The Afghan people have been perennially living between a rock and a hard place suffering the vagaries and violence perpetrated by the government, the occupying forces and the Taliban. Karzai is feckless., his administration corrupted. NATO, COIN and SURGE are redundant. It's easy for the Taliban exploit their collective weaknesses. What has been achieved in 9 years? Not much. For all your good intentions, it would seem, realistically, your ideas are not too little but too late.

 

WATTY

4:47 AM ET

August 2, 2010

To BOREDWELL

Corruption is common in many parts of south and central Asia and not something unique to the Afghans. Most importantly the Afghans need peace to rebuild their country and try to improve their government and society. Peace can come only on the day all the sanctuaries in Pakistan are destroyed and the Taliban's life line are cut and quickly its fighting days will be over.

Then most of the foreign ISAF troops can go home and rebuilding of a strong united Afghan nation can begin. Pakistan fears an united, independent democratic Afghanistan and it will try its best to prolonging this war with its proxy the Taliban.

The US's biggest blunder was to trust treacherous double dealing Pakistan for which thousands of lives have been lost.

 

KRUSADER

4:25 AM ET

August 2, 2010

I salute Mr. Obama and Mr. Biden

Despite the concerted effort by the US military, which has embraced the false religion of COIN in the last three years, mistakenly taking credit for the Iraqi Anbar Awakening, the current administration has correctly assessed that Counter-Terror, not COIN will be the de facto strategy in Afghanistan.

As an active past and current participant of both OIF/New Dawn and OEF, with seven over seas tours so far, I salute that decision! I have lost six personal friends so far in this war without end, due to that false religion setting the pace of our operations. As a New Yorker (very few in the Army), I salute the return of our focus on killing and capturing Al Qaeda, rather than conducting nation building in a place where they do not want it.

Let the Afghans go back to blowing themselves up. They can talk all day about having defeated whomever, but at the end of the day, they will continue to remain uncivilized barabrians that they have been since before the Achaemenid conquest. Let them bask in their independence and freedom to lob each others' heads off, and prevent their daughters from ever learning how to read. Allahu Akhbar!

 

WATTY

5:07 AM ET

August 2, 2010

To KRUSADER

I salute you for your long service. Your direct knowledge gives your opinions added credibility, tell me:

Did the forces that were fighting you benefit from their safe havens or sanctuaries in Pakistan? If their lifeline to these sanctuaries were totally shut down do you think we could totally neutralize them and secure the territory?

Your response appreciated.

 

MUSTNOTSLEEP14

6:33 AM ET

August 2, 2010

Thanks for this informative

Thanks for this informative article. Ahmad Shah Massoud was a great man and it is a shame the US did not support him more while he was still alive. If he was at the helm of the Afghan nation instead of Karzai, I would feel much more comfortable about having American troops in Afghanistan.

 

NICOLAS19

9:22 AM ET

August 2, 2010

stop the propaganda already

"The Taliban would even kill the sun, bringing darkness to all over the world"... oh, come on, what this kind of idiocy is doing on a site like FP? Who do you want to sway with big, meaningless words like that? It's like "The Taliban are doing everything bad, while we're doing everything good". This is not a black and white scenario, and because their interests do not align with yours, they are not evil. This idiotic, brainwashing propaganda has to end. STOP SPREADING THE HATRED!

 

TRYINGTOBERATIONAL

10:15 AM ET

August 2, 2010

"Afghans" Minus Pastuns=Phase1, Bring back Pashtun=phase2

The Tajiks and the Hazara's are great fighters but they are not primarily fighters. They are traders, farmers, artisans who fight when they have to!
The Pashtuns are primarily fighters. That is what they seem to have chosen as their primary vocation. That seems to have served them well by their own assessment. Hence they continue to do that.

As much as I would love to agree with Mr. Masood, I do not share his optimism.
I think the best way forward is to bring peace to the non-Pashtun Afghanistan.
Do a de-facto partition. Let the Tajiks, hazaras and Uzbeks go back to their primary vocations. Do not try to solve the Taliban problem, just contain it.
Once you take Pashtuns out of the equation, you take Pakistan out automatically. Let Pakistanis deal with the Pashtuns, let them absorb those in their loose Pak-Pashtunistan confederation. Let them get their "Strategic depth" and all the headache that it comes with.

Give Pashtuns 20- 30 years and they will come back to seeing it for what it is.
So the best solution is to emancipate Masood's people and leave the rest of the Af-Pak alone.

 

HINDUTVA

8:30 PM ET

August 2, 2010

Good idea, American Occupier should retreat northwards

and leave Pashtuns alone.

Now lets see how this parasite American Occupier will get its food, fuel and other supplies for through Pakistan and Pashtun part of Afghanistan.

Any thoughts?

 

CEOUNICOM

2:06 AM ET

August 4, 2010

Hindutva: aka Lal Qila redux

Thoughts?...

There are plenty here. The problem is that Pakistan will not leave Afghanistan alone. And Pakistan cannot even control the NWFP, Waziristan, etc. - who send militants both east and west to murder other muslims. And yet the ISI continues to fund and support these groups despite the havoc they are causing both domestically and internationally.

Thoughts?

 

HINDUTVA

12:13 PM ET

August 4, 2010

Just remember when Hindoo Indian army was sending

Just remember fondly when the Hindoo Indian army invaded and occupied Kashmir, Hyderabad Deccan, Junagarh and Manavader and sowed the eternal seeds of enmity between India and Pakistan.

Just remember fondly when the Hindoo India army was training and sending its terrorists called the Mukhti Bahani into East Pakistan and firmly cemented India as the eternal enemy in the minds of the Pakistanis. Imagine permanent neighbours as permanent enemies; the Hindoo isn't very clever is he.

Now just harvest the fruits of your ugly labours; as shall you sow, so shall you reap.

Afghanistan, Kashmir, Naxalites, Khalistan a never ending parade for rather stupid Hindoos.

lalqila.wordpress.com

 

CEOUNICOM

1:39 AM ET

August 6, 2010

Yawn...

Dude, all you are saying is that Pakistan's endorsement of terrorism is somehow justifiable because of some perceived grudge with "Hindoo" history. The truth is that the things you think are justifiable are mostly killing muslims. And mostly fucking up their own country. Way to go with that by the way. If you think this is smart, I'd hate to see what you think what stupid is.

 

WEBWORKS

8:31 PM ET

August 2, 2010

Focus shifting to counterterrorism

This article points out that our president is shifting to a 'counterterrorism' strategy - killing more insurgents in leadership positions - than counterinsurgency, which is flailing as of late:

http://www.nytimes.com/2010/08/01/world/asia/01afghan.html?pagewanted=all

 

DANIELWOODS

2:37 AM ET

August 4, 2010

I think the logic is right.

I think the logic is right. You can't actually win any battle with pure arms, but you can still win if you have the right strategy. Just implement it rightly then hope that everything will work as expected.Daniel Woods

 

HINDUTVA

12:29 PM ET

August 4, 2010

Accommodation must be found with the Taliban w Pakistan's help

Accommodation must be found with the Taliban, with Pakistan's help despite the cries and yelps from the Hindoo Indian contingent.

Throwing the Afghan baby out with bath water.

The West hopes to hand over security to Afghan security forces by 2014.

Ahmed Rashid says in the wake of the Wikileaks dossier, Western lawmakers must focus on ending the war in Afghanistan responsibly, with Pakistan’s help, or risk setting the region aflame.

Pakistan’s General Kiyani wants an end to the Afghan war and the destabilisation of Pakistan.

He knows that as the end-game approaches he has to take on board the interests of other neighbouring states and the non-Pashtun minorities.

Accommodation must be found with the Taliban, with Pakistan’s help.John Kerry has said that Pakistan is more crucial to the outcome than what happens in Afghanistan itself in many cases and Pakistan remains central… and perhaps holds the key.

Read the full article here:

lalqila.wordpress.com/2010/08/04/throwing-the-afghan-baby-out-with-bath-water-the-west-hopes-to-hand-over-security-to-afghan-security-forces-by-2014-ahmed-rashid-says-in-the-wake-of-the-wikileaks-dossier-western-lawmakers-must-foc/

 

CEOUNICOM

1:46 AM ET

August 6, 2010

Hindutva: aka Lal Qila redux

...will end up like all the other versions: reviled by all, and eventually banned. Do you jerk off to videos of Taliban shooting women in the back of the head? I suppose so, if you think they are a viable constituency. They are scum, and Pakistanis should be rejecting them like the cancer they are.

 

LANNEN

5:18 AM ET

August 5, 2010

Wounded Afghan Civilians

There is a component of this war that is largely overlooked – that of treating wounded civilians.

Am I alone in thinking that the richest nation in the world can afford to provide medical care for wounded Afghan civilians – 40% of whom are wounded by NATO action? It is common practice for civilians to be refused care when NATO hospitals enter “condition black” – signifying maximum capacity. This doctrine amounts to triaging patients based on nationality, secondary to medical need.

This is contrary to DoD’s own regulation requiring “The … sorting of patients according to type and seriousness of injury, … to assure medical care of the greatest benefit to the largest number.”

It is unscrupulous – and likely illegal – according to the Geneva Convections – that we refuse care to war-wounded civilians, and immoral to treat them as secondary citizens.

Congress must investigate the shameful practice. Certainly DoD can do more to relieve suffering and decrease mortality and end this reprehensible act of providing substandard care to the disenfranchised.

These innocent Afghan civilians deserve protection to mitigate needless suffering. Congress may continue to support this unjust war – but end this appalling practice – this policy of neglect.

 

CEOUNICOM

7:32 PM ET

August 9, 2010

This is not what I've heard...

My reading about medical units in Afghanistan is that a large majority of the work they do is with civilians.

Partly this has to do with the fact that this is a fairly low-intensity conflict (despite 9 years, OEF has resulted in 2000 fatalities, ~6000 wounded. note: remarkable increases in monthly wounded in H1 2010. Probably because of new offensives. may also account for recent reportings of "condition black"; I do not think this is par for the course, but rather a product of the recent efforts to take a more aggressive posture against militants) Michael Yon did a piece or two with medical units in Afghanistan in the last 2 years and talked about how they spend a lot of their resources treating wounded civilians.

Of course this isn't possible when they have no access to the wounded. (from airstrikes or artillery) But I think it would be wrong to make the case that its a "policy of neglect". They have flown people out of country for treatment in many cases. But yes, being unable to protect the populace is certainly a problem. Do I think the war should end? Yes. Do I think the way we're doing it is 'unjust' or reprehensible? No. I think the two are different; one being 'bad policy', the second being 'responsible tactics'. Some people seem to think we should "win" by bombing every Helmand village to the ground, civilian casualties be damned. Obviously I think this is insane and stupid, and wouldn't achieve anything anyway. But the way they are currently fighting what is I think a strategically-flawed war is not irresponsible or unconcerned with civilian casualties, in practice.

Its also worth noting that Taliban aren't exactly medivac-ing civilians so much as, say, shooting pregnant women for being unmarried. This is no excuse, obviously, for coalition-caused injuries to civilians, but one should remember who it is we are fighting and that we don't take hurting people indiscriminately lightly. If there's a reason to end the war, its that we cant spend the next decade there defending a crappy government that does not serve the interests of its people. Not because we are irresponsibly killing civilians, because by and large we're not. Yes, there will always be civilians killed as long as we are fighting there. I doubt many will be better off when we go. I expect many will be killed after we leave, either for collaboration or simply because there will be grudges between parties that we currently hold at bay. If the goal is protecting the civilian population, arguably, the best thing we could do is stay there indefinitely.

 

ISHAQ

5:35 PM ET

August 15, 2010

fuck off

how about all of you foreigns fuck off and leave afghanstan already..
coz you cant win this war now creating conflict between their own people like you fucking america did in pakistan.. it wont happen buddy..

afghan is one.. you cant say afghan can defeat taliban... they all are freedom fighters.. they will fuck you off afghanistan soonish.. and USA AND THE REST OF CRUSADERS HAVE BEEN DEFEATED ALREADY..

 

ISHAQ

5:50 PM ET

August 15, 2010

yoooooooo

join this page all of you... and yeah come for argument whoever want to..

http://www.facebook.com/?sk=events#!/pages/Pukhtoons-vs-Crusaders/140215429344548?ref=ts