This Week at War: Pakistan Is Winning the War in Afghanistan

What the four-stars are reading -- a weekly column from Small Wars Journal.

BY ROBERT HADDICK | JULY 30, 2010

Pakistan's Game

Of all the players in the Afghan game, Pakistan is running up the highest score. For several decades, Pakistan's policy toward Afghanistan has remained largely unchanged, regardless of who was running the country. That policy is to support Afghanistan's Pashtuns in their seemingly genetic resistance to outside control (outside in this case extends to any government located in Kabul). By supporting Pashtun autonomy, Pakistan establishes for itself a security buffer zone on its northwest frontier, which comes with a friendly auxiliary army -- the Afghan Taliban -- as a bonus.

For nearly nine years, U.S. officials have pleaded with Pakistan to suspend support for the Afghan Taliban and allow Afghanistan to unite under a central government. Pakistani officials have provided a variety of verbal responses to these entreaties but have not changed their policies toward the Afghan Taliban, whose military capability inside Afghanistan only seems to grow.

The United States cannot achieve its goals in Afghanistan while the Afghan Taliban's sanctuaries in Pakistan remain open. The Pakistani government refuses to close or even isolate those sanctuaries. Yet the massive U.S. foreign-assistance pipeline to Pakistan remains open. Why?

U.S. policymakers have seemingly concluded that they have more options and less risk by engaging Pakistan. They tried isolating Pakistan and found that course was neither wise nor sustainable. As a result, the Washington has opted to shower Pakistan with aid and hope that persistent persuasion will eventually result in greater Pakistani action against the Afghan Taliban.

The result has been a spectacular strategic success for Pakistan. Development aid from the United States has never been greater. The United States will deliver long-embargoed F-16 fighters to Pakistan and is providing other upgrades to Pakistan's armed forces. Along with this has come a de facto U.S. security guarantee against the perceived threat from India. Pakistan's diplomatic leverage over the United States has given it a free hand to work with China to upgrade its nuclear complex. Meanwhile, Pakistan's proxy forces in southeast Afghanistan are successfully defending the security buffer zone. Pakistan's dominant position has forced Afghan President Hamid Karzai to virtually sue for peace. This could result in an ethnic partition of Afghanistan that would secure Pakistan's main objective in the conflict.

With its winning position, Pakistan's current task is to arrange a stable end-state that avoids a backlash from the losers. Pakistan and the United States are in a largely zero-sum relationship over Afghanistan. Pakistan's leaders must fashion a settlement (however temporary) that allows the United States to save face, that maintains the U.S. aid pipeline, and that keeps the de facto security guarantee in place. U.S. officials should hope that Pakistan manages the endgame as well as it has managed the rest of the match.

AAMIR QURESHI/AFP/Getty Images

 SUBJECTS:
 

Robert Haddick is managing editor of Small Wars Journal. 

INDIAN_GUY

11:18 PM ET

July 30, 2010

Sad....Very Sad...

All that money could have been used to educate a whole generation of doctors, engineers, scientists and workers rather than to purchase expensive firecrackers...

 

LAHORIJERRY

1:29 AM ET

July 31, 2010

yeah and all that money india

yeah and all that money india spent on maintaining 700,000 troops in kashmir for the past 20 years could have been used to bring the 600 Million poor indians surviving on less than a dollar a day out of poverty

 

MARTY MARTEL

6:56 AM ET

July 31, 2010

US mollycoddled Pakistan at the expense of Afghanistan

Obama administration has continued Bush’s mollycoddling of Pakistan at the expense of Afghanistan. With three top Pakistan-apologists in Obama administration, namely Gates, Mullen and Petraeus promoting Pakistan’s victory, it was only a matter of time before Pakistan could have its cake and eat it too.

With General David Petraeus and Admiral Mike Mullen as well as Defense secretary Gates justifying Pakistan’s ‘terrorist connections’, Mullah Mohammed Omar’s QST trail from Quetta to Kandahar is operating unimpeded.

General McChrystal had warned about Pakistan’s sheltering of Taliban terrorists in his August 2009 report to Obama: Quetta Shura Taliban (QST) based in Quetta, the provincial capital of Baluchistan, is the No. 1 threat to US/NATO mission in Afghanistan. At the operational level, the Quetta Shura conducts a formal campaign review each winter, after which Mullah Mohammed Omar (Afghan Taliban Chief) announces his guidance and intent for the coming year‘.

But US can not even use its drones to destroy QST that is causing daily deaths of US/NATO soldiers in Afghanistan since 2002! That shows Obama’s continuance of Bush’s mollycoddling of Pakistan.

Defense Secretary Robert Gates sought to justify Pakistan’s terrorist connections, alluding to a “deficit of trust” between Washington, DC and Islamabad. Mr Gates also said there was “some justification” for Pakistan's concerns about past American policies. Gen David Patraeus, rushed in with an apologia for his Pakistani friends, by claiming that while Faisal was inspired by militants in Pakistan, he did not necessarily have contacts with the militants which has turned out to be false. Both Adm Mike Mullen and Gen Patraeus fancy themselves to be “soldier statesmen” a la Gen Dwight Eisenhower. Adm Mullen has visited Pakistan 15 times and Gen Patraeus no less frequently.

With such stalwarts guiding Obama’s Afghan policy, US is going to hand over Afghanistan to Pakistan.

Obama will have his victory a la Vietnam style just like Nixon/Kissinger and Taliban government will return to power, also just like a la Vietnam style within two-three years. All the sacrifices of US military will be in vain and US government would have thrown away billions of dollars for nothing, just like Russians before. By that time Obama, Hillary and Petraeus will be gone from the scene.

Only question left will be ’will US continue to have to feed billions of dollars to Pakistan as ransom money after Taliban takeover of Afghanistan’ so that Pakistan can protect US from future terrorist attacks? And if US does not, then will Pakistan return to same old terrorism, citing US walk-away from the region just like back in 1996?

 

DHRAVIDA

2:17 AM ET

August 1, 2010

Arvay, what you say is absurd.

No self respecting American would care to share your views, that is if you are really an American as you claim. To say that US is as dependent on a despicable, dysfunctional state such as Pakistan is totally absurd.

Pakistan has been repeatedly rescued by the US from the brink of economic collapse especially since 2001. What in your opinion has Pakistan done to show its gratitude to the US, other than to sneak its Taliban thugs into Afghanistan to kill US troops? Without the Pakistani safe havens, do you think the Taliban could survive as an effective fighting force for more than a few months?

 

AVNER STEIN

2:56 AM ET

August 1, 2010

Pakistan

This so-called "expert" knows jack and shit about Pakistan or US relationship with the state.

Pakistan is not simply a dysfunctional state but a failed one. The intelligence branch is rogue and runs independently of the civilian leadership. The military is corrupt, often collaborating and arming LeT terrorists that murder Hindus in Kashmir, while also running guns for the Taliban in exchange for big money or drugs.

Pakistan has brought results - namely 40,000 KIA since 2004, probably more but we really won't know because Pakistan bars foreign journalists from the battlefield.

And because the Left is too obsessed with evil Israel and the starving Palestinians, the 2 million made homeless in Afghanistan because of OUR operations have mostly been ignored.

Barack Obama pledged more than 2 billion in aid to Pakistan, even after it squandered the 10 billion in free money over the last 7 years. So now we give them more tax dollars for nothing.

Obama is not a liberal, he is a neocon HAWK posing as a loser progressive. Afghanistan is NOT our problem. Taliban is NOT a threat to the US. How can we possibly justify our war against Al-Qaeda if we CONTINUE TO ARM AND SUPPORT ITS #1 SPONSOR - SAUDI ARABIA!!

Tell me BO, how? We saw you bow to the King of Arabia.

The world is waking up...

 

DHRAVIDA

3:06 AM ET

August 1, 2010

Pashtun autonomy could be Pakistan's poison pill

Pakistan has a short memory. It has forgotten that when its protege the Taliban were in power in Kabul, chasing innocent women back into their burqas, kicking young girls out of the schools and stoning people to painful death in crowded sports stadiums etc they still insisted on a unified Pashtun lands that included claims on large swaths of what is Pakistan's FATA and NWFP. The Pushtun Taliban do not recognize the colonial era Durand Line and for that matter neither do the other major ethnic groups of Afghan society.

Pakistani's are a hated lot among the Afghans, for having been directly responsible for the death and destruction of countless thousands of innocent Afghan lives by their habitual meddling and mischief in Afghanistan.

Would the US or China or Saudi Arabia once again come to rescue Pakistan in its hour of future need? Instead, it is best for Pakistan to try to cultivate peace and friendship with its neighbors to ensure its own survival as a nation state. Bangladesh should serve them as a good reminder.

 

AHSON HASAN

9:42 PM ET

August 1, 2010

Pakistan Is Winning the War in Afghanistan

"Passion speaks the language that reason does not follow."

Folks, we must all, take a moment and contemplate about the threat that Pakistan presents to world peace. The world needs peace and that objective cannot be achieved with terrorist Pakistan around.

We need to stop bickering amongst ourselves and understand that Pakistan's loyalty or commitment vis-a-vis war against terrorism cannot be ensured for the simple reason that the scourge of religious fundamentalism is totally blended in all spheres of activity in that culture.

The army, the ISI and other intelligence outfits that call the shots rule over the hearts and minds of poor folks in the name of a wretched brand of Islam called Wahabism.

Something needs to be done to shake off religion or this mushroom growth of madrassahs and terrorist camps will drown the entire world into oblivion.

 

NAHIAALI15

12:27 AM ET

August 5, 2010

little help can save a life.

Due to heavey monsoon rains in Pakistan, about half of the Pakistan is under flood. Millions

of people need help. They have no food and shelter. Please create awareness and try to help

these needy people. You can give your suggestions to us at info@forumpakistan.com , your

little help can save a life.

A message from http://www.forumpakistan.com , we request all the charity organization in the

world to come in Pakistan and help in this hour of need.

Thanks.

 

TOTRONET

3:49 PM ET

August 5, 2010

inf

One need not assume the India/Pakistan differences are carved in granite. In the middle of last month the Indian Foreign Minister visited his Pakistan counterpart in Islamabad. There is an ongoing problem over the Indus water treaty that both sides are keen to resolve and it appears they made serious progress only days ago in New Delhi. These may be small steps but they are in the right direction

 

TOTRONET

4:36 PM ET

August 11, 2010

ty

And buddy for Pakistani political class Kashmir is question of bread and butter if they don't bark on this they can not win elections. online sikis

 

FAS

2:58 AM ET

August 14, 2010

I was very pleased to find

I was very pleased to find this site.I wanted to thank you for this great read!! Hulu Downloader

This article is very interesting. Thank you very much for sharing . flv to wmv converter thanks really thanks. youtube to mp4 converter