No White Knight

How Medvedev's vaunted liberalism went up in flames.

BY JULIA IOFFE | AUGUST 6, 2010

View a slideshow of Russia's wildfires.

When your country, simmering for days in record-breaking heat, suddenly bursts into flame in 831 places, destroying half a million acres of land, killing 52 people, blanketing your capital in toxic smoke, and threatening to release old Chernobyl radiation into the atmosphere, someone has to take charge. If you're the Russian president, however, you will not be that person. You will sit in your office while your prime minister, his sleeves rolled up the way men of action tend to roll them up when they mean business, goes and tours the devastation, talks to grieving villagers, and shows the country that, hey, he's on it.

After the warm Moscow-Washington spring we've had, one would be forgiven for believing the conventional wisdom: that the aggressive, unpredictable Russian Prime Minister Vladimir Putin is relaxing his hold on the reins a bit, and that President Dmitry Medvedev, the shy liberal, is finally coming into his own. The events of the last week, however, have served as stark reminders of who really is in charge -- and how empty the promises of Medvedev's modernization pitch actually are.

First came the Minority Report law. Under the proposed policy, which came tucked into broader legislation designed to help Russian security forces fight terrorism, the Federal Security Service (FSB) would be able to issue warnings to people they thought were heading down the road to committing a crime -- possibly by throwing them into jail for 15 days.

When the law was introduced, people hoped that Medvedev the Liberal would step in and show Russians and the world that his country had gone beyond the point of punishing its citizens for acts not yet committed. Human rights activist Lev Ponomarev told the New York Times he hoped that Medvedev would show "the courage to oppose this bill." It would, Ponomarev said, win him much credibility and loyalty in liberal circles.

But then Medvedev cleared it up for everyone. Speaking at a press conference with Angela Merkel in Ekaterinburg on July 15, he said that not only would he sign it, but that he had initiated it. "The situation is extremely simple," the president said. "I don't really want to comment now on the changes in the legislation that are currently underway. But ... first I'd like to draw your attention to the fact that this is our internal legal system, and not an international act. Second, every country has the right to its own legal system, including its own intelligence agency. And we will do this. And what's happening now -- I want you to know -- is being done on my direct instructions."

ARTYOM KOROTAYEV/AFP/Getty Images

 SUBJECTS: FREEDOM, LAW, RUSSIA
 

Julia Ioffe is a journalist living in Moscow.

Facebook|Twitter|Reddit

NORBOOSE

6:34 PM ET

August 6, 2010

Who ever really believed it?

I always found Medvedev's liberalism an obvious farce. I think a lot of American observers just wanted it to be true so badly that they overlooked everything. From the beginning, it was a choreographed show by Putin, to put a friendlier face on his oppressive expansions of state power. I have a hard time believing that an serious observer of world affairs honestly thought there was anything more to Medvedev.

 

THEKOOKFRINGE

8:37 AM ET

August 7, 2010

Russia first

Whoever thought Medvedev was a western style liberal was a fool.That's why our nit wit President should get his head out of his behind and see the world for what it really is,a dangerous place.Medvedev has made it clear mother Russia comes first before some stupid world community.

 

THABITI

10:50 AM ET

August 7, 2010

Medvedev

I don't believe anyone in the U.S. government thought Medvedev was a liberal in any way. The President included. He is among a long list of Russian hardliners. What does that change for us in the US. Nothing. We need cooperation from him on some issues. He needs cooperation from the U.S. on some issues. This president and any future Preisdent will deal with Russia because they have to not because their looking for friendships.

 

SISTEME

12:08 PM ET

August 7, 2010

Centrale termice

i am agree with you in this point.
Centrale termice

 

VIVANCHENKO

5:17 AM ET

August 9, 2010

any future Preisdent will deal with Russia

The Russians will always create issues for the Americans just to keep Obama or any other similarly unwise US president busy solving them. Some call it being “engaged” in reality it means being effectively paralyzed. What's an issue for the Americans is often a blessing for guys like Putin. Look at the US’ foreign policy these days! Reminds me of those Italian chorus singers. Effective foreign policy should focus on causes of problems rather than consequences. Lose oversees and you will lose at home. The only thing the Russians really want is to get the Americans out from everywhere and take up their place. The Russians bluffed and the Americans gave way. I often wonder why Medvedev and Putin like Obama so much? May be just because he is losing?

 

ASJDG

10:02 AM ET

August 8, 2010

http://www.tnta.us

===== http://www.tnta.us ====

jordan air max oakland raiders $34–39;

Ed Hardy AF JUICY POLO Bikini $25;

Christan Audigier BIKINI JACKET $25;

gstar coogi evisu true jeans $35;

coach chanel gucci LV handbags $36;

coogi DG edhardy gucci t-shirts $18;

CA edhardy vests.paul smith shoes $32;

jordan dunk af1 max gucci shoes $37;

EDhardy gucci ny New Era cap $16;

coach okely Adidas CHANEL DG Sunglass $18;

===== http://www.tnta.us ====

 

ASJDG

10:05 AM ET

August 8, 2010

http://www.tnta.us

===== http://www.tnta.us ====

jordan air max oakland raiders $34–39;

Ed Hardy AF JUICY POLO Bikini $25;

Christan Audigier BIKINI JACKET $25;

gstar coogi evisu true jeans $35;

coach chanel gucci LV handbags $36;

coogi DG edhardy gucci t-shirts $18;

CA edhardy vests.paul smith shoes $32;

jordan dunk af1 max gucci shoes $37;

EDhardy gucci ny New Era cap $16;

coach okely Adidas CHANEL DG Sunglass $18;

===== http://www.tnta.us ====

 

ANDOR_1

12:04 PM ET

August 9, 2010

Facts, interpretations and lies...

Author writes, "Last fall, Pamfilova publicly chastised Nashi for "persecuting" a journalist who had written an article the group felt was critical of veterans (it wasn't)."

Mr.Podrabinek, the journalist in question, wrote not just, "Yes, we should respect those who fought Nazism, but not those who defend Soviet power." This is the cleaned up version of his diatribe.
He called all our veterans "screws" (prison wardens) in the prisons and camps, comissars and executioners. He says, "It were you, the soviet veterans, who protected Soviet power and now are reaping benefits for it..." and then juxtaposes them "other kind of "veterans" , "In the USSR besides you were other veterans- the veterans of the struggle against the Soviet power."
When Americans and Russians met at the Elba River in Germany, they met not with those, who fought on the side of Hitler. I met some of those "freedom fighters against the Soviet power" in the USA. They fought with German Army, they guarded the Jews in the extermination camps, and they brought to the US golden coins and jewelry stolen from the people they killed.
They may be the heroes for Mr. Podrabinek and Ms. Pamfilova, but they are not my friends. My father, from a long line of the Russian Orthodox clergy, prosecuted by Stalin, volunteered in the first month of the WW2, and perished in the war. He was never a Communist Party member, and nobody in my family ever joined that vile organization.
Besmearching the memory of our veterans is unforgivable. Declaring that the "other veterans" deserve admiration - ugly.
How many of you liked "Hanoi Jane" dancing with the North Vietnamise? Podrabinek is OUR Hanoi Jane.

 

MUSTNOTSLEEP14

6:22 AM ET

August 10, 2010

Great article, thanks.

Great article, thanks.