The Two Obamas

It's too early to call the U.S. president a foreign-policy failure. But he does need to figure out what kind of global leader he wants to be.

BY JAMES TRAUB | AUGUST 6, 2010

That is one side of Barack Obama. But there is another side, a deeply hopeful and visionary side that holds out the possibility of transformative change. Obama has long believed that by virtue of his identity, history, and voice, he has the unique capacity to redeem America's reputation in the world. Millions of Americans, and people all over the world, came to share this remarkable faith. Obama deployed this aspiration to great effect in the Cairo speech, in which he said that his conviction that the breach between Islam and the West could be overcome was in part "rooted in my own experience" as a Christian from a Kenyan family, an American with Muslim roots, a man who himself bridged those worlds. The tremendous enthusiasm that initially greeted the speech, in the Middle East and beyond, seemed to confirm that view.

That excitement already feels like a distant memory. Although the speech succeeded in raising America's standing in the Islamic world, it had virtually no effect on policy. Policy is made by regimes, and regimes in the region were not swayed by Obama's proffer of a new policy of "mutual interest and mutual respect." Moderate states like Saudi Arabia and Jordan have taken no further steps to press for peace between Israel and the Palestinians. Israel's prime minister, Benjamin Netanyahu, pocketed Obama's impassioned defense of his country's right to exist and continued to pursue a policy Obama viewed as obstructive. The regime in Tehran brushed off Obama's Nowruz message of peace and continued its pursuit of nuclear capacity. And with the absence of progress on major issues, public opinion in the Islamic world has slumped, though not to Bush-era levels.

If the Middle East is a physics problem, Obama fully recognized the inertia of the object, but exaggerated the force his lever could produce. Like Bush, Obama believed that there was something in himself -- a very different something, to be sure -- that would break the stalemates of years past. Bush arguably deepened those stalemates. Obama has not done that; in the case of Iran, he deserves credit for assembling a coalition of states prepared to impose sanctions, and for giving Tehran no pretext to forge a closing of ranks against the meddlesome outsider. America's face, its voice, its tone, do matter -- but less than Obama, and those around him, and those rooting for him, believed. The single biggest reason Middle Eastern publics cite for anger at the United States is American support for Israel. But the one public completely unmoved by the Cairo speech was the Israeli one. Obama has less leverage in Israel than Bush had because he has pushed Israel so much harder than Bush did. Obama demanded an end to settlements; Israel pushed back. The ongoing stalemate has virtually killed off the "new beginning" Obama promised in the Cairo speech.

Obama's charisma has been a dwindling force, both at home and abroad. That has been a painful lesson for the White House. Still, we shouldn't mistake a transitory judgment for a final one. Obama has always been more patient than his critics. He stuck to his line of attack when he was being dismissed as roadkill in 2007. He prolonged the debate over Afghanistan when critics were ridiculing him for indecision. On his core issue of nuclear nonproliferation, he has played a very deliberate game, laying down a foundation of small but significant achievements in what he views as a generational project. Politics, of course, has a much shorter and less forgiving time frame, and if voters harshly punish the Democrats this November, Obama's failure to deliver quick wins might jeopardize his ability to achieve his long-term goals. But would we wish Obama to, say, threaten to invade Iran to prove his toughness to wavering independents? Would we want him to court voters as shamelessly as, say, John McCain? Not me.

The power to inspire others matters, in statecraft as in politics. But patience, persistence, and clarity of judgment -- those virtues Obama admires in hard-shell realists like Baker and Scowcroft -- ultimately carry the day. For this reason, I would say that the Obama story has not yet been written. It is too early to fill in the score card.

SAUL LOEB/AFP/Getty Images

 

James Traub is a contributing writer for the New York Times Magazine and author of, most recently, The Freedom Agenda. "Terms of Engagement," his column for ForeignPolicy.com, runs weekly.

PJW5552

4:18 PM ET

August 6, 2010

Two Obama's?

The success or failure of foreign policy isn't define by a year or two. Anyone who thinks the foreign policy so far is unsuccessful hasn't paid much attention to what has changed. It wasn't just a speech in Cairo that moved people to believe Obama. In Pakistan, the belief in development was met with a commitment to $7.5 billion in Pakistan domestic aid, the first down payment of which was just recently delivered. A re-vamping of USAID has led to better accounting and less waste. A paying off of the US bill to the UN and a re-establishing of the US on the UN Human Rights Council has re-affirmed the US interest in supporting the ideals of this organization rather than our abandonment of it. Sanctions against North Korea, Iran and Myanmar are largely due to US efforts to work with and listen to other countries. The international cooperation this administration has received in just these efforts was not possible just a couple of years ago. Let us not forget how far apart Israel and the Palestinians were before Obama took office, they weren't even talking and the distance between them increasing. The US has pushed to get Israel to lower barriers, allow greater movement, stop building in the West Bank and begin discussions about peace. Meanwhile the US has provided substantial foreign aid to the West Bank Palestinians for development and security efforts.

We are a long way from reaching the huge milestones we would like to see, but we are well on our way down the road toward them. This administration has been one of the few to embrace a policy of cooperative development, where one works WITH others for our mutual benefit. It led to NATO support for the unpopular Afghan war when NATO was saying no more to Obama initially. It will lead eventually to US cooperating with Europe and ending that war. Eventually, it will be a less is more policy in Afghanistan as it has in Iraq, for the problems we face there are national and not international in scope. In two more years as the foreign policy of Obama gains more momentum people will be asking, how could we have been so wrong?

The fact of the matter is, the Obama foreign policy is based on a very simple concept utilized by nature for millennium: All living substances prosper when they cooperate toward common goals and avoid confrontation and conflict. You might notice the elements of that policy that if you read his Berlin speech (bridges not walls) or his West Point speech (partner not patron). Nations and leaders will come around as the slowly see the advantages of that cooperation over conflict. Initially, leaders are unsure about it, but with time they will be won over because IT WORKS. Be patient.

 

HAYDENHARNET

1:04 PM ET

August 7, 2010

these are not two faces of

these are not two faces of obama but of the united states , play the role of the good and evil in the same time.
the Iraq is completely destroyed now , every day we heart of scientists being murdered by terrorist troops , the situation is much worse than Sadam Days .
neither Obama nor anyone can change the situation now . we live the impact of George B. acts
wireless router reviews

 

MUSTNOTSLEEP14

2:16 PM ET

August 7, 2010

We have to stop assuming

We have to stop assuming government can solve our problems and infer instead that govt is itself the problem. America would be best served with a Democratic president and a Republican Congress so that absolutely nothing ever got done. Nothing is better than the series of horrible decisions our government insists on making.

I really hope Obama loses control of both chambers of Congress this November and he is denied money for all of his programs. He is incompetent and hopelessly out of his depth.

 

ASJDG

10:09 AM ET

August 8, 2010

http://www.tnta.us

===== http://www.tnta.us ====

jordan air max oakland raiders $34–39;

Ed Hardy AF JUICY POLO Bikini $25;

Christan Audigier BIKINI JACKET $25;

gstar coogi evisu true jeans $35;

coach chanel gucci LV handbags $36;

coogi DG edhardy gucci t-shirts $18;

CA edhardy vests.paul smith shoes $32;

jordan dunk af1 max gucci shoes $37;

EDhardy gucci ny New Era cap $16;

coach okely Adidas CHANEL DG Sunglass $18;

===== http://www.tnta.us ====

 

LINJINGJING

7:40 PM ET

August 8, 2010

LINJING

input this URL:
( http://www.ashops.us)
you can find many cheap and fashion stuff
(nike jor dan s-h-o-e-s)
(NBA NFL NHL MLB j-e-r-s-e-y)
( lv Chanel Gucci Coach h-a-n-d-b-a-g)
(cha nel w-a-l-l-e-t)
(D&G s-u-n-g-l-a-s-s-e-s)
(ed har dy j-a-c-k-e-t)
(UG G b-o-o-t)

WE ACCEPT PYAPAL PAYMENT
YOU MUST NOT MISS IT!!!

 

AARKY

3:04 PM ET

August 9, 2010

Is Obama that wishy washy

Ordinarily I see lots of Israeli trolls but the first poster must be from the US State Department or Democratic National Committee.
Obama's big problem and also now the Democratic party's big problem is that they were given a legislative 2x4 in the 2006 and 08 elections and they didn't use it to really cancel out many of the really bad Bush programs. Most of our foreign policy failures was because Obama surrounded himself with Israeli Zionists who have played him for the fool at every oppurtunity. The Israelis continue to build houses in East Jerusalem and continue to rattle the saber towards Iran. The Arab countries see so much hypocrisy from the White House that they are very skeptical of any speeches made by the WH. There were so many ways that Obama could have made peace with Iran but contiunues to parrot the talking points of the Israeli lobby that Iran is building nukes when there is absolutely no proof of that. If the WH says that they are shocked when they lose lots of seats in Congress this fall, they will deserve a real ass kicking. They should have seen this coming a long time ago.
You really need to change your word verification program. Just put a combination of letters or numbers instead of screwing them up so badly that we can only guess what they are.