Is the UAE Banning BlackBerrys Because of Israel?

Seven months after it happened, the mysterious assassination of a Hamas operative in Dubai is still causing fallout in the Middle East.

BY CHRISTIAN CARYL | AUGUST 10, 2010

The government of the United Arab Emirates recently announced that it's going to restrict BlackBerry use. Now why would it want to do a thing like that? It would seem like a bad PR move from a country that prides itself on being the most plugged-in place in the Middle East. But that was before the little matter of Mahmoud al-Mabhouh.

Mabhouh was the high-ranking Hamas military commander who, at age 48, died suddenly in his room at the Al Bustan Rotana hotel in Dubai on Jan. 19. You always have to wonder when people who have been accused of terrorist activities die premature deaths -- and the UAE authorities soon started doing exactly that. Ten days after Mabhouh's death, officials from the UAE's secret police, the General Department of State Security, announced that the Hamas official had died as the result of a carefully engineered assassination. But they didn't stop there. They proceeded to show anyone who cared to watch a detailed video chronicle of the hit team's movements, all of it culled from closed-circuit surveillance cameras positioned around the emirate.

The murky business of state-sponsored "targeted killing" will never be the same again. It has been nearly seven months since Mabhouh died, but the repercussions from his death keep on rippling outward: political, diplomatic, military, even technological. For one thing, assassins don't like publicity, and having the faces of the hit squad splashed across the world's websites and TV screens is presumably not something the planners of the Mabhouh assassination had in mind. The whole case has even led some to speculate that closed-circuit TV (CCTV) cameras (and the face-recognition software that the Dubai security services may have used along with them) will make such covert operations a thing of the past.

Those predictions may be premature. What's clear, though, is that the case has produced myriad complications for Israel's public image in the world -- and has also further dented the mystique that once surrounded its vaunted security services. Israel, predictably, became the prime suspect as soon as Mabhouh's death was ruled foul play. Mabhouh, a seasoned Hamas operative, had admitted to the kidnapping and killing of two Israeli soldiers; according to media reports, his job in recent years involved managing Hamas weapons procurements (in part from the Iranians). It's easy to imagine that the Israelis might have wanted him dead.

To be sure, on one level the hit was a highly professional affair that bore all the hallmarks of a well-planned Mossad operation. Mabhouh's killers managed to get into his room without attracting attention and may have been waiting for him when he arrived. They subdued him with an injection of succinylcholine, a fast-acting muscle relaxant, then finished him off by suffocating him. The idea was to make it look like a natural death -- which seems to have worked at first, gaining the team members enough time to make their escape. There's even been some speculation that the team was actually planning to kidnap Mabhouh -- who inexplicably arrived in Dubai without his usual complement of bodyguards -- so that he could be exchanged for one of the Israeli soldiers still held captive by Hamas, and that the killing was actually a matter of a mistaken dosage.

Based on the killers' otherwise adept handling of the operation, however, it's hard to believe they would have made such a blunder. During their stay in the emirate, members of the team used encrypted mobile phones to stay in touch with each other; Dubai forensics experts later traced some of the calls to a number in Austria that may have figured as the operation's command center. The Dubai CCTV chronicle traces the remarkably fluid choreography of multiple surveillance teams: one pair of chubby operatives carries tennis rackets as they chat in a hotel corridor, monitoring movements in Mabhouh's corridor. The cameras caught other operatives donning disguises in hotel bathrooms in an effort to throw off possible countersurveillance. Within hours of the killing they had scattered to far-flung destinations including Hong Kong, Paris, and South Africa. Peter Elvinger, the French-passport holder who booked a hotel room across the hall from Mabhouh's, left the country before the hit even took place. Israel, needless to say, denied involvement.

David Silverman/Getty Images

 

Christian Caryl is a contributing editor to Foreign Policy. His column, "Reality Check," appears weekly on ForeignPolicy.com.

Facebook|Twitter|Reddit

AVNER STEIN

9:16 PM ET

August 10, 2010

EVERYTHING

is Israel's fault.

Arab despots don't oppress their people without Israel's consent.

This article is pure CONJECTURE. Arab states are banning blackberries because it enables citizens to access world media without government looking over their soldiers.

And then there's the fact that Dubai is an apartheid state where slavery is legal and Al-Qaeda/Taliban/Hezbollah/Hamas assholes send all their money.

Next time I hope the IDF sends predator drones to bomb Dubai, none of these mossad crap.

 

AVNER STEIN

12:02 AM ET

August 11, 2010

I agree

Arab states never take responsibility for their actions. Everything is Israel's fault.

Strategy: Deflect, ad-hominem attack, invoke buzzwords (apartheid, racist, Israel is the devil), cheap sarcasm, rinse and repeat

 

JACOB BLUES

9:43 AM ET

August 11, 2010

Caryl needs a reality check of his own

Aside from this being a rehash of the hit on a HAMAS terrorist leader, where is the discussion of RIM's blackberry?
.
.
And given that the tiny paragraph at the end of this blather has absolutely nothing to do with his original argument on the HAMAS hit, why bother to put this up as a reason for the UAE's government to ban blackberrys?
.
.
This reads like it was put together by the Hassan Nassrallah school of legal writing. Throw some personal conjecture on the wall, add a glove, scream about the Bruno Magli's not fitting, and blame Israel. Repeat until the masses believe your story.
.

 

FERGHIO

7:55 PM ET

September 8, 2010

Jacob, your comment is the

Jacob, your comment is the most valid I have seen on this forum. If you read this pls check my post...

 

JKOLAK

7:22 PM ET

August 11, 2010

Why should America care about

Why should America care about cash cards being used to kill a terrorist?

 

JACOB BLUES

10:13 AM ET

August 13, 2010

Of course the swiss cheese argument put forth by Caryl ignores

the fact that Saudia Arabia also decided to ban RIM's Blackberry, and they had no issue with a HAMAS terrorist getting killed on their grounds.
.
But why worry about reality. The bash Israel crowd takes whatever excuse it can manufacture to smear the Jewish state.

 

FERGHIO

8:01 PM ET

September 8, 2010

Blackberry Ban

Greetings all,

I am from the UK and work for an IT company which is based in NJ. The reason Blackberry's are being banned is because RIM (Blackberry manufacturer) has it's servers based in Canada. The REAL reason behind the ban stems from BBM (IM for Balckberrys) being so well written it is virtually impossible to break the encryption code. RIM have refused to allow this code to all governments (predominantly in Middle East and South Asia) - good for them! And who would have thought the Government monitors everyone?! :)

However the terrorist attack in Mumbai, India last year (perpetuated by fundamentalists allegedly sponsored by Pakistani Secret Service acting as a proxy for this group) was co-ordinated via BBM. With over 200 deaths.

Hence one can understand an Islamic country being fearful for its safety given the heinous behaviour of some extremist elements within the general population. Therefore if they cannot monitor comms because RIM will not allow them to (again, I reiterate the fact that RIM should not have to) they leave themselves open to not only an attack resulting in 200 lives but worse. Imagine rogue elements seizing power in Pakistan - a nuclear armed state. With Islamic extremists who will stop at nothing to wipe out the infidels. It does not bear thinking about.

I am no apologist for these intolerant people who use their 'peaceful' religion as an excuse, however I am a realist. The UK is home to a large Muslim population which is growing and in some instances Sharia law is almost being written into our 'constitution'. The vast majority are the most loyal, genuine people you will ever meet however this conflict between religions/civilisations is escalating rapidly.

I apologise for my lengthly post however I have worked in the Middle East and living in the UK the tolerance for Islam in Britain is not reciprocated in the Muslim world. Far from it.

But I believe the fundamental Muslims need to look at their 'interpretation' of Islam as it is wrong. They are turning what is essentially a peaceful religion (and a variation of Christianity & Judaism) into a parody of itself. How many Buddhist suicide bombers do you hear of? Exactly.

Rant over! But all of this bull5h1t stems from ignorance...