Global Cities Index Methodology

How we compiled the 2010 Index.

AUGUST 18, 2010

The Global Cities Index ranks cities' metro areas according to 25 metrics across five dimensions. The first is business activity: including the value of its capital markets, the number of Fortune Global 500 firms headquartered there, and the volume of the goods that pass through the city. The second dimension measures human capital, or how well the city acts as a magnet for diverse groups of people and talent. This includes the size of a city's immigrant population, the quality of the universities, the number of international schools, and the percentage of residents with university degrees. The third dimension is information exchange-how well news and information is dispersed about and to the rest of the world. The number of international news bureaus, the level of censorship, the amount of international news in the leading local papers, and the broadband subscriber rate round out that dimension. The final two areas of analysis are unusual for most rankings of globalized cities or states. The fourth is cultural experience, or the level of diverse attractions for international residents and travelers. That includes everything from how many major sporting events a city hosts to the number of performing arts venues and diverse culinary establishments it boasts and the sister city relationships it maintains. The final dimension-political engagement-measures the degree to whicha city influences global policymaking and dialogue. How? By examining the number of embassies and consulates, major think tanks, international organizations, and political conferences a city hosts.

 SUBJECTS:
 

SDUB

2:50 PM ET

August 25, 2010

Do cities deserve all the hype?

There’s been much talk about the glorious coming of a broad urbanization age, but discussing the reality with a friend yesterday brought out realization of the possibilities of resultant disasters. One thing for sure is that the increased competition encourages progression in all commercial outlets, but is that necessarily the best thing for us? ...

http://seanrwatson.blogspot.com/2010/08/do-cities-deserve-all-hype.html

 

GREENFUTURE

11:20 PM ET

September 1, 2010

but really, what is your methodology?

This description merely continues to tease. What is your methodology of 25 metrics? What is your measure of goods passing through each city? Your summary table says you calculated each city's GDP. I've love to know how. Calculating (or, more properly, estimating) a gross product for a locality is very difficult, and I bet I'm not alone among your readers in wondering what basis you used. How about a lot more transparency?

 

VISION2050

7:34 AM ET

September 12, 2010

Agree we need to see a methodology

In a time where so few are taking transparency and science serious it is crucial that serious publications like FP don't just list a few factors and call that a methodology.

There are a number of projects in the pipeline doing similar work (like the Low Carbon City Development Index, http://dpamlin.blogspot.com/2008/09/copenhagen-declaration-for-low-carbon.html) that also is exploring the global impact of cities. Transparency around methodologies and data will allow for synergies and a possibility to compare between different ways of approaching cities development.

Two key questions:
What data are used (and what are the sources)?
What are the formulas used (and what are the assumptions behind these)?

Why not move into the 21st century and have the index as open source and allow those who want to use other assumptions?

best of luck with the work

 

WALFAFALFA

5:49 PM ET

September 9, 2010

global cities

San Francisco doesn't represent San Jose, CA. San Francisco doesn't deserve to be there since there's not enough population and fortune 500 companies there. The capital of Silicon Valley is San Jose, not SF. This is so 1970's of you guys. When are you guys going to wake up and realize that we're 2010, not 1976. You guys are so ignorant and not smart at all. San Jose Pop:1,023,000 and SF pop: 841,000. San Francisco only has tourism industry and while San Jose is the high tech capital of the world. San Francisco is too small and insignificant to be on the list. San Jose would be more of representative on this list. Silicon Valley not important?

 

GVFRH

4:11 AM ET

September 18, 2010

Nice blog. I will keep

Nice blog. I will keep visiting this blog very often. download hulu