What Does Viktor Bout Know?

The world’s most notorious arms dealer is coming to America to stand trial. And that has Russia very worried.

BY DOUGLAS FARAH | AUGUST 20, 2010

It looks like the luck of Viktor Bout, one of the world's premier weapons traffickers, has finally run out. The surprise decision Friday of a Thai appellate to overturn a lower-court decision and allow Bout's extradition to stand trial in the United States on charges of trying to sell weapons to Colombian guerrillas means he should finally get his day in court.

Unfortunately for him, the purported buyers for his surface-to-air missiles, unmanned drones, and sophisticated anti-tank systems -- who he thought were from the Revolutionary Armed Forces of Colombia, better known as the FARC, a designated terrorist organization -- were informants of the U.S. Drug Enforcement Administration.

His arrest in Bangkok in March 2008, where he met with the informants to seal the deal, set off tremors in many high places, particularly in Russia. The immediate reaction of the Russian foreign minister and other officials, who denounced the decision and equated it with an attack on the Russian state, shows the importance they place on keeping Bout from talking in open court. Why? What are the Russians so afraid of?

Bout's importance was not just that he exploited the gaping holes in the new world economic order to reportedly move hundreds of thousands of weapons and millions of rounds of ammunition to obscure corners of the world to fan conflicts involving unspeakable human rights atrocities. Nor is it that he was simultaneously able to reap millions of dollars in profits by flying for the United States government, the United Nations, the British government, and other legal entities.

What made Bout unique was his ability to merge private profiteering with state interests in the new globalized world of unfettered weapons flows. Dubbed the "Merchant of Death," Bout, often under the protection of his Russian superiors in the military intelligence structure, created a one-stop shop for weapons that could be delivered virtually anywhere in the world. His access to former Soviet arsenals, aircraft, and crews would not have been possible without state protection.

It was this quantum leap in the ability to provide rag-tag and violent groups like the Revolutionary United Front (RUF) in Sierra Leone and Charles Taylor in Liberia that drew the attention of U.S. and European intelligence services in the mid-1990s. As rebels launched their campaigns of mass amputations and systematic rape to take over lucrative diamond fields, they used weapons purchased through Bout and often paid with commodities.

But it was the same access to rogue aircraft in growing swaths of ungoverned spaces in Africa and Afghanistan that made him useful to the governments that were pursuing him. Need supplies for U.S. troops flown into Baghdad in 2003 when U.S. forces lacked airlift capacity? Bout's planes were available. Need to fly emergency food aid into the Democratic Republic of the Congo? Bout had the planes and pilots. From gladiolas to frozen chicken to AK-47s, Bout was the deliveryman par excellence.

And as Vladimir Putin consolidated the badly fractured intelligence services again over the past several years, Bout was less a rogue agent and more a part of the rapidly expanding Russian arms network. No longer free to operate on his own, he was spotted by European intelligence services in Iran in 2005 and Lebanon in 2006, allegedly delivering Russian weapons used by Hezbollah in the war with Israel that summer.

If the extradition goes through (and under Thai law there are no further appeals allowed), what could Bout offer if he opted for a plea bargain? He could likely tell a great deal about the Russian-led networks that continue to arm jihadi movements in Somalia and Yemen. He also likely knows how the Russian military intelligence and arms structure works, including its interests from Iran to Venezuela and elsewhere. His knowledge base, although he is only 43 years old, goes back more than two decades and possibly extends to the heart of the Russian campaigns around the globe.

No matter what happens with Bout, those quasi-state arms networks will not disappear. But without his unique capabilities, acquiring large amounts of weapons and ammunition has become more difficult and more costly for some of the worst groups in the world. The full-service enterprise has become a series of boutiques, making shopping more time consuming, expensive, and vulnerable to law enforcement and intelligence.

It is unlikely he will turn on his Russian handlers. They have his wife and children, and despite his amoral sales record, he is widely known to be a family man. He endured more than two years in a Thai prison, losing more than 70 pounds and never showing any signs of doubting he would ultimately walk away. He has been, so far, a soldier's soldier. But if he turned, the stories he could tell would make the Kremlin wish it had kept an even closer eye on him.

CHRISTOPHE ARCHAMBAULT/AFP/Getty Images

 SUBJECTS: LAW, RUSSIA, DRUGS & CRIME
 

Douglas Farah is senior fellow at the International Assessment and Strategy Center and author, with Stephen Braun, of Merchant of Death: Money, Guns, Planes and the Man Who Makes War Possible.

SAWADEE

5:45 PM ET

August 20, 2010

Wow.

What an interesting story.

This guy'll never turn. Too bad too, as he has to be dealing with the top-level Russian peeps on this one. It'd be interesting to see how far up the ladder his bosses go, and if I know anything about Russia, it goes all the way to the top, no doubt.

 

CAMAELJAX

9:16 PM ET

August 20, 2010

America's Darkest Secrets

Considering it is well known that the US and other Western governments have hired Bout many times in the past to do THEIR dirty work for them - a far more interesting question is what does he know about the darkest secrets and dirty games of the US and the West, that he could well reveal on the witness stand if ever brought to trial? The US/West doen't have a moral leg to stand on in this instance, and Bout is a sword that cuts both ways...

 

PUBLICUS

12:48 PM ET

August 22, 2010

Boot and baloney

The US wants Bout in order to gain leverage against Russia which, among other shady dealings, is constructing the nuclear facilities in Iran. It would be likely Bout was involved in that too and can provide useful important information to the West.

The claims Bout worked for the US and the West are unsupported declaratory statements. Absent facts or specifics, as they are, the declaratory ex cathedra pronouncements haven't any basis of validity or viability. The abitrary statements are rank piffle.

It stands to reason (and logic) if the US were involved in the Bout web, the US government should prefer to have him back in Russia living a protected, safe and secure life. Russia wouldn't want him rocking the boat if Bout had any specific supportable claims of working with the US as the US has a rap sheet on Bout as long as the Great Wall. Neither country would want to engage in such a back and forth were it to exist, which it doesn't unless and until concrete evidence or proof to the contrary could be presented.

The US wants Bout cause it has the goods on him. Bout can name names who populate the Kremlin and throughout the Moscow oligarchy of the fat and wealthy who deal regularly in the global black market of everything from arms to energy.

 

SETH EDENBAUM

4:40 PM ET

August 22, 2010

"The US wants Bout in order

"The US wants Bout in order to gain leverage against Russia which, among other shady dealings, is constructing the nuclear facilities in Iran. It would be likely Bout was involved in that too..."

"Bush noted Russia’s announcement that it would ship nuclear fuel to Iran’s first atomic power station, the unfinished Bushehr plant, and said such deliveries further reduced Tehran’s need to enrich uranium.

“If that’s the case, if the Russians are willing to do that — which I support — then the Iranians do not need to learn how to enrich. If the Iranians accept that uranium for a civilian nuclear power plant, then there’s no need for them to learn how to enrich,” he said."

 

AARKY

4:55 PM ET

August 23, 2010

Bout was Caught

Please take your comments to the Jerusalem Post for sympathetic viewers. We are supposed to be talking about a Russian Arms merchant, not the Iranian nuclear program.

 

PUBLICUS

3:28 PM ET

August 27, 2010

MCHAUN et l' autre les enfants terribles

Your coarse comments about a certain religion (which per se I personally couldn't care less about) reminds me of the quote, "No kingdom has known more wars than the kingdom of god."

Clearly, you sittith at his right hand in your pursuits.

Do you have a god? If you do, s/he needs to start beating swords into plowshares. Yesterday wasn't a day too soon either.

(I myself am free of such antiquated notions as religion and the one and only true god.)

 

CASSANDRAAA

12:59 PM ET

August 21, 2010

Bout's future in US custody

I'll bet you $1 that Bout "accidentally" dies while in US custody. The US doesn't want him to spill the beans on all the dirty stuff he's done for the CIA.

 

WITNESS1

2:44 PM ET

August 21, 2010

The CIA aren't the only one's who'll want him dead

We hear alot about the CIA's dealings in Latin America, but to perfectly honest, I'm still worried about what MI6 are doing in our ex-colonies. It would just be naive to assume that Britain doesn't have a presence in what was once the Empire, and that Bout doesn't know about this.

 

INCANTATION

3:38 PM ET

August 21, 2010

Viktor Bout

The story of Viktor Bout is fascinating! I watched a documentary on him recently and heard that there is a film called "Lord of War" that is based on his gun-running! Will have to definitely have a look out for that now. Thanks for the great information, all the best Ryan @ Kettles and Toasters

 

JOHNCROZIER

8:38 AM ET

August 22, 2010

Really interesting story but

Really interesting story but wow are some of those sentences long!!!!!

Bout seems to be an excellent example of the illegal activity that the 'shining lights' of western society heap upon the world.

 

PUBLICUS

11:52 AM ET

August 23, 2010

Shining lights, dim bulbs

Yeah, the shinning lights of Eastern society have really shown the way, such as Mao, Tojo, Hirohito, Pol Pot, Marcos - we could continue back along a long line through just fairly recent history.

Focusing on the 20th century forward, these thugs and the many others had no higher standards legal or moral within their own societies by which they could be held accountable. The only standard was to seize power and hold it at all costs. The UN could routinely condemn but never do much more, and then not always.

Its a cliche' to criticize those in Western society who stride beyond the bounds of civilization because countries of the West generally hold their leaders to defined sovereign moral and legal standards and there are supranational institutions such as the ICC and other similar bodies of human rights jurisprudence, institutional transparency and the like.

The aged and feeble Pinochet was himself surprised to escape justice but Melosovic did find himself standing at the gates of hell then passing through. In Cambodia it is the Western driven international system, which had failed so miserably at the time of the Khymer Rouge that is attempting to assert new standards of human rights.

Morally eastern society is nothing but a dim bulb.

 

JEANE06

9:37 PM ET

August 22, 2010

Artigo

Que história interessante.

Parabéns pelo artigo...

 

JOEL Z. WILLIAMS

4:41 AM ET

August 23, 2010

More to This Story Than Meets the Eye

What is missing in this story? It seems that none of the commentators noticed that he was trying to sell unmanned aerial drones. Could the reason that the DEA chose to go after Bout right now is thesmuggling/ terror threat that UAV pose? You thought 200mph cigarette boats were hard to stop bringing in cocaine to Miamia through the everglades? Can you imagine a drone that could skim across the Gulf of Mexico at 100ft.(invisible to radar) laden with kilos?

What if those UAVs were programmed to fly across the border directly from mexico? Using GPS tech they could launch these things round the clock to remote pick up sites all over. And that's if they're just ferrying dope, not explosives or poison. There's no way to track that threat reliably. Bout should have just stuck to AKs and RPGs.

 

WALDOTHEELDER

9:07 AM ET

August 23, 2010

Viktor knows plenty

Get him to the US as a priority before the thugs in MMoscow get to him. His links to the Soviet military, the GRU and arms dealing is worth the cost of a first-class, expenses paid ticket for me to join the interrogating team. This could be a mighty coup for counterintelligence.

 

GDE

6:20 PM ET

August 23, 2010

jurisdiction

Bout is alleged to have committed a crime in Thailand against Columbia. Why would a Thai court approve extradition to a third country?

 

...

10:55 AM ET

August 24, 2010

the cold war continues

the usa doesn't like competition! they would like to be able to sell weapons without seeing anyone else get involved... the usa also likes to be the label-er of last choice - they get to label different groups terrorists and etc, but the label really needs to be applied to them!
this is like a continuation of the cold war.. the writer speaks from a very us centric position in all of this...
bout is just a useful tool for all of these jackasses that want to profit off war... looks like he has pissed off the us more then russia here, so the us now wants to adopt a mantel of moral superiority.. what a joke!

 

PUBLICUS

2:48 PM ET

August 27, 2010

Bout MCHUAN

So says MCHAUN of moi (11:27, August 22):

"It's really sweet but kind of sad to hear Children like Publicus who want to see the best in the Bush Family and their Friends and it must really hurt to have to deal with the continued exposures of the most toxic and debased outlaw Government in the World. (Actually the Jew Government is slightly nastier, but on total volume of rotteness, the Bushes win hands down.)"

Let's look at the record.

In 1976 I voted for Jimmy Carter. I didn't vote for Carter in 1980 but I didn't vote for Reagan either. In '84 I voted for Mondale. In '88 I voted for Dukakis. In '92 I voted for Clinton and Clinton again in '96. In 2000 I voted for Gore. I voted in '04 for the (then) junior US Senator from my native state, John Kerry.

In 2008 I voted for Barak Hussein Obama.

The Bush Family Dynasty disgusts me, as do all dynasties everywhere, anywhere. Geo W (2001-09) is a person with dyslexia and while I hire people with dyslexia and other challenges, I do not believe for a moment that a person with dyslexia is qualified to be the nominee of a major party for the office of president of the Untied States, much less actually be POTUS. Maybe in another life, but not in this world as we live in it presently and foreseeabily. Moreover, adding complexity to the original complication, we've seen the real life consequences of having a POTUS who was politically illegitimate.

Your presumptions are wrong. Your presumptuousness is a pathetic self embarrassment. You need to stand corrected.

 

PUBLICUS

4:23 PM ET

August 27, 2010

US a toxic and outlaw government?!?

MCHAUN , you are insane.

The United States Government is hardly angelic, but neither is it the fallen angel himself.

In the real world of people places, things - time, place and circumstance - the US government and its people remain rooted the the European Enlightenment and are extending its precepts by redefining human rights and relations.

Of course you haven't any idea of what I and others are talking about. Which is par for the course indeed. Your ilk are loaded with intellectual cliches and, moreover, are in a serious self inflicted cultural deficit and deficiency. If you in your anti American pathology are not western European or Australian, you should be.

 

PUBLICUS

10:48 AM ET

August 28, 2010

aBout tug of war: US and Russia

The following piece about Victor Bout, "Why the 'Merchant of Death' Won't Ever See Trial" is written by Robert Amsterdam and originally appeared in the online Huffington Post.

It interestingly discusses the machinations between the US and Russia with the Thailand government playing both ends of the stick but also getting tossed about in the tempest between the two major powers.

Although Amsterdam is in the employ of the Thai former PM and almost dictator Thaksin Shinawatra, and bends events towards Thaksin (Toxin) and against the Thai government, there none the less are insights of value contained in Amsterdam's piece, which edited here for brevity now follows:

By Robert Amsterdam.
International lawyer on emerging markets, politics of business, and rule of law
Posted: August 27, 2010 11:12 AM
http://www.huffingtonpost.com

Why the "Merchant of Death" Won't Ever See Trial

The recent decision by a Thai appeals court to extradite the alleged arms dealer Viktor Bout, touted as the "Merchant of Death" in popular books and movies, raised many hopes that this important case would finally see trial before a U.S. court. This opportunity, however, may yet be squandered.

The allegations against Bout, which are well documented by Amnesty International, the United Nations, and a number of other NGOs, may yet be outweighed by the complex political considerations, as Russia, the United States, and Thailand assemble to form a Bermuda Triangle of disappearing accountability.

On behalf of Russia, there has been an intense and protracted diplomatic effort to persuade Thailand to repatriate him out of the fear of what state secrets (and crimes) he might spill once put on the stand. Though Bout has consistently denied any involvement with the Russian government or collaboration with the FSB, the personal ties to highest levels of the Kremlin, including the powerful Deputy Prime Minister Igor Sechin, are well established.

Douglas Farah, author of the book on Bout, recently described what kinds of intelligence Bout might be able to share with U.S. authorities: "He was spotted by European intelligence services in Iran in 2005 and Lebanon in 2006, allegedly delivering Russian weapons used by Hezbollah in the war with Israel that summer. (...) He could likely tell a great deal about the Russian-led networks that continue to arm jihadi movements in Somalia and Yemen. He also likely knows how the Russian military intelligence and arms structure works, including its interests from Iran to Venezuela and elsewhere. His knowledge base, although he is only 43 years old, goes back more than two decades and possibly extends to the heart of the Russian campaigns around the globe."

Most importantly, Bout is a picture perfect representation of "one of the men" currently in power in the Kremlin, and say what you will about Vladimir Putin, he is very loyal to his friends. Even if we could discount what Bout might or might not share in the case of extradition (although his family is exposed in Russia), the extraordinary effort on behalf of the Russian government to bring him home far exceeds any reasonable consular advocacy you would see for even a moderately important man.

Tellingly, a high-ranking Russian diplomat has just published an article arguing that if Bout is put on trial, the "reset" with the United States is over, period. No Bout, no reset, no good relations. Although projected as a personal opinion, many are interpreting this article as a direct message from the Kremlin to the Obama Administration.

On behalf of the United States, there appears to be some disputes about how much they actually want to receive Bout at this point. We all recall the recent spy swap organized with Russia, which underscored just how eager the Obama administration is in preserving this perceived foreign policy success. What's to stop them for organizing another swap with Russia for some type of diplomatic concession - especially at a moment in which the new START treaty is getting tripped up?

It might not even matter: Thailand, which has rapidly been falling out of favor with the U.S. government over the mass killings of protesters earlier this year, has played the role of the obstructionist on this extradition ever since Bout's arrest in 2008. The ruling party even appears to be upping the ante, and looking for additional leverage on the Bout case to reinforce their illegitimate grip on power. In a hastily convened press conference at the Foreign Correspondents' Club of Thailand, today Viktor Bout's wife Alla read a statement dictated by her husband. Parts of the statement recounted the visit that Democrat Party MP Sirichoke Sopha paid to Bout in prison, prior to the Appeals Court decision that ordered his extradition to the United States. While denying the existence of a recording of the conversation, Bout essentially confirms the details previously reported in the press.

Sirichoke allegedly introduced himself as an aide to the Prime Minister and showed Bout the clippings of a news story describing an Ilyushin-76 airplane, loaded with forty tons of weapons, seized at Don Muang Airport on December 11, 2009. Sirichoke is reported to have told Bout that the shipment was intended for the Red Shirts and asked Bout to link former Thaksin Shinawatra to its cargo.

The question is why would someone as unscrupulous as Bout not agree to go along with Sirichoke's deal, if he thought that could help him avoid extradition and the prospect of spending the rest of his life in a US prison. To us, the most plausible answer is that Bout does not think the Thai government has any power to determine his fate - in other words, that Thailand's executive and judicial branches are just pawns in a much bigger game whose outcome ultimately depends on the United States and Russia.

All of these different motives and manipulations from different sides make it quite unlikely that Bout will be extradited, or if he is, some believe he will slip out and get home to Russia before he can say too much.

With regard to Russia, it is time that we understand that we are engaging in a reset with people like Viktor Bout - he is not just some criminal in Russia, he is part of the ruling elite, operating under their instructions, and I would be very surprised if they would be willing to give him up.

Together, there are just too many players on the board to envision justice being served in this case.

(Robert Amsterdam is an international lawyer retained by the former Prime Minister of Thailand Thaksin Shinawatra to advocate on behalf of the United Front for Democracy against Dictatorship (UDD.)

*****************************

I'm Publicus back again to note for the record that nowhere in the piece is the United States implicated or directly connected to arms deals with Bout.

 

DANIELLA

1:13 PM ET

September 21, 2010

This case is nothing but

This case is nothing but POLITICS
The US government wants the world to believe whatever they say, no prove, no evidence, no nothing. Just like the Iraqi weapon of mass destruction story. This case is all politics and nothing more.
1-Victor Bout was targetted by the PRESIDENT OF THE United States in 2004, a political targetting, rather than by a court decision or legal process.
2-Victor Bout's assets that allegedly frozen in the United States are not his, but they are the property of his friend Richard Chichakli - a man used as a skipgoat so the US can claim victory
3-Victor was acquitted by the Belgian court of any wrongdoing related to arms dealing after 10 -years investigation.
This is all politics, and politics is a reason to deny extradition under the Thai law, and the US-Thai extradition treaty, digi sport live period.
Is the United States trying to teach the Thai people how to administer their own law?