The Worst Job in Japan

Less than three months into his term, Japanese Prime Minister Naoto Kan is already fighting to hold onto his office. But what's crazier is that anyone wants to take it from him.

BY TOBIAS HARRIS | AUGUST 31, 2010

In the year since voters in Japan overturned half a century of nearly unbroken rule by the Liberal Democratic Party (LDP), the country's politics have only grown more unpredictable. In June, then-Prime Minister Yukio Hatoyama -- whose Democratic Party of Japan (DPJ) had been swept into power in the revolt against the LDP last August -- resigned, his popularity torpedoed by indecisiveness and allegations of corruption. Less than three months later, it is possible that Japan could change prime ministers again: Naoto Kan, who replaced Hatoyama in June only to lead the DPJ to a disappointing defeat in July's upper-house election, now faces a challenge from within his own party in Sept. 14's party leadership election.

More bizarrely, the challenger is Ichiro Ozawa, a longtime behind-the-scenes power broker and former party leader, who was run out of power shortly after the DPJ's ascent last year over a political financing scandal for which he is still under investigation and could face indictment. With Hatoyama's encouragement, Ozawa (above right, with Kan in 2006) has entered the race despite his legal problems -- and steep opposition to his candidacy within the DPJ and in the public at large. A snap poll conducted by Kyodo News, a wire service, found that roughly 70 percent of the public want Kan to remain as DPJ leader, compared with only 15.6 percent who support Ozawa. The gap is even wider among self-described DPJ supporters: 82 percent for Kan versus 13 percent for Ozawa.

Although an Ozawa upset looks unlikely, its ramifications would be cataclysmic enough that his challenge is being taken seriously. Not only is the fallen leader widely disliked among the public at large, but he is also deeply distrusted among senior members of his own party. The government's and party's leadership are both stocked with Ozawa's critics, whom Kan took on board in an effort to limit Ozawa's influence. Were Ozawa to somehow win back the party leadership, it is probable that it would break the DPJ, forcing anti-Ozawa politicians out of the party and into cooperation with reformist politicians in other opposition parties -- a realignment long desired by some Japanese politicians, but a shake-up that Japan can ill afford at a time of economic uncertainty.

Which is maybe the most mystifying aspect of Ozawa's quixotic challenge: Why would he even want the job? Kan, even if he wins, is trapped. The DPJ leadership has been effectively reduced to a minority government since its losses in July, lacking a two-thirds majority in the lower house that would enable it to overcome upper-house inaction or rejection of all but budget bills without the cooperation of opposition parties.

And the Democrats' infighting is occurring against the backdrop of growing fears that Japan is on the brink of a double-dip recession. The yen recently reached a 15-year high against the dollar and, more significant for the competitiveness of Japanese manufacturers, highs against the euro not seen since 2001. The Kan government is considering intervening in foreign exchange markets, even as it pressures the Bank of Japan to do something about ongoing deflation. And Kan is trying to somehow hammer out a new stimulus plan, to be considered by legislators in the fall, while also trying to get budget deficits under control.

Kan, in short, is hemmed in on all sides, unable to do much more than attempt to put out his administration's fast-multiplying fires. The critical reforms to Japan's creaky political process that his party promised in the 2009 election have been essentially abandoned. For the foreseeable future, change will be halting -- and the Japanese people will inevitably be disappointed by their leaders yet again.

KAZUHIRO NOGI/AFP/Getty Images

 

Tobias Harris is the author of Observing Japan, a blog on Japanese politics, and a Ph.D. student in political science at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology.

Facebook|Twitter|Reddit

MAREO2

6:46 PM ET

August 31, 2010

calling for Japan to be the "U.K. of Asia."

Is a joke? We are the bogeyman of Asia. If we try to rearm and send many troops abroad the chinese and koreans are going to say that the Japanese Empire is back. In fact the koreans hate us more than they fear each other. They get closer to China just for fear to us. South koreans rather die before accept help from us if north koreans invade them. Is like try to make a policeman from the grand son of the worst raper and murderer on the history of the neighborhood. MacArthur wanted to make. Japan an unarmed neutral, the Switzerland of the Far East. When the US did that it is was just as stupid as when the past US administration disbanded the armed forces of Irak. You reap what you sow.

 

PUBLICUS

3:45 PM ET

September 2, 2010

Apologies go a long way

Indeed, Japan of strategic necessity may well find at long last that an apology to S Korea by the Emperor for the crimes of Japan from 1910 - 1945 and for a thousand years before would transform relations for the better, practically overnight.

We know apologies go a long way in East Asia, formal apologies by governments especially.

Were the Nippon Emperor to make such a formal, full and complete apology, S Korea would have its long sought painful but closing day in court, as it were. Both Japan and the ROK moreover, could then move closer together in unity with the United States and the West in general to assure the CPC/PRC military planners never would dare in their fixed intentions to move someday at the right time against Japan, then S Korea which ultimately would mean against the United States.

The Emperor needs formally to apologize once and for all to S Korea. To hell with the CPC/PRC - if the Jung Gwo ever get a legitimate government and democratic society, then the proper apology finally could then be made by the Constitutional Emperor in the instance of the Jung Gwo.

Any Apology to a Communist Party of China (fascist) commanded People's Republic of China would be a bigger coup to the CPC than the 2008 Olympic Games in Beijing. So that counterproductive prospect needs to be given a definite pass. The CPC and the Jung Gwo would be infuriated by an apology to S Korea by the Emperor absent an apology to the Jung Gwo, thus ending any further possible overtures by the CPC/PRC towards drawing Japan into its controlling orbit.

The CPC/PRC would suffer a necessary strategic checkmate.

 

BILL888

3:09 AM ET

September 6, 2010

You got it all wrong, Pulicus

China was a democracy with former Gwo Min Dang ( now in Taiwan). However, Chinese people rejected fake democracy and chose a new experiment. Now that Socialist system have evolved into a new form of government and is still evolving. It has made China a strong nation that benefit all its people. China is a good standing member of the UN and bunch of other Official Organizations of the UN. It is also one of the five members of the Security Council Committee.

You seem to be always in defence of India. Well let's talk about India. There are many democracy in the world, but India is not it.

Pakistan is a democracy. Iran is a democracy. Sekkim was a democracy. Nepal is a democracy. India is a worse democracy than they are.

Is India really a democracy? Why does India prevent Jammu and Kashmir from joining Pakistan? Don't tell others it is because the Kashmiri people wish to stay in India. India is hegemonic state that bully all its neighbours. Since independent from its colonial master, India had invaded Pakistan and split East Pakistan to become Bangladesh. India had annexed Sekkim, an independant nation. India also made direct influence of Bhutan's foreign affair. India had funded the separatist in Sri Lanka. Also, India had made South Tibet an restricted area. India is an hegemonic fake democracy.

 

PRINT OSCAR

6:59 AM ET

September 14, 2010

The wors job is to get no joy in performing

The worst job is the job you get no joy in performing, but get paid the most. Makes it more difficult to follow your dreams. My name is Oscar and I`m a fan of Foreign Policy Magazine. I also like browsing sports betting sites and my favorite game is pariloto . I`m here because I like reading The Foreign Policy, the best online news magazine.

 

YARINSIZ

6:38 AM ET

September 28, 2010

Were the Nippon Emperor to

Were the Nippon Emperor to make such a formal, full and complete apology, S Korea would have its long sought painful but closing day in court, as it were. sesli chat Both Japan and the ROK moreover, could then move closer together in unity with the United States and the West in general to assure the CPC/PRC military planners never would dare in their fixed intentions to move someday at the right time against Japan, then S Korea which ultimately would mean against the United States.

 

REM686

4:18 AM ET

September 30, 2010

The Worst Job in Japan

Less than three months into his term, Japanese Prime Minister Naoto Kan is already fighting to hold onto his office. But what's crazier is that anyone wants to take it from him. Is a joke? We are the bogeyman of Asia. If we try to rearm and send many troops abroad the chinese and koreans are going to say that the Japanese Empire is back. In fact the koreans hate us more than they fear each other. "In the year since voters in Japan overturned half a century of nearly unbroken rule by the Liberal Democratic Party (LDP), the country's politics have only grown more unpredictable. In June, then-Prime Minister Yukio Hatoyama -- whose Democratic Party of Japan (DPJ) had been swept into power in the revolt against the LDP last August -- resigned, his popularity torpedoed by indecisiveness and allegations of corruption free electric. Less than three months later, it is possible that Japan could change prime ministers again: Naoto Kan, who replaced Hatoyama in June only to lead the DPJ to a disappointing defeat in July's upper-house election, now faces a challenge from within his own party in Sept. 14's party leadership election. " Japan an unarmed neutral, the Switzerland of the Far East. When the US did that it is was just as stupid as when the past US administration disbanded the armed forces of Irak. You reap what you sow.