Judgment Day for Rwanda

Paul Kagame is proving to be a pliant Western ally. But a shocking new U.N. report shows why the Rwandan president can no longer claim to be a victim -- and it's time to hold him accountable.

BY JAMES TRAUB | SEPTEMBER 3, 2010

Anneke Van Woudenberg, an authority on the Great Lakes region with Human Rights Watch, told me that, thanks to allies like the United States and Britain, "any attempt to present the information contained in this report has been blocked, subverted, or really discouraged." And that, in turn, has emboldened the Rwandans. "The report starkly shows the consequences of a culture of impunity," she says. "You see the same crimes being committed again and again. And we're continuing to document those same abuses today. This is the kind of horrific cycle you get when you bury the truth, when you don't hold perpetrators to account." For this reason, Van Woudenberg views the report as a document of "immense historical importance."

It is not simply Rwanda's suffering that has bought it the protection of powerful states. "They have made themselves indispensable," says Fabienne Hara, a vice president of the International Crisis Group with long experience in the region. Washington has come to regard Rwanda as a "little military machine" to provide peacekeepers throughout the region (thus the seriousness of Rwanda's threat to withdraw its troops) and as a friendly "entry point" for intelligence and regional diplomacy -- a Central African Ethiopia. What's more, Kagame has turned Rwanda into an extraordinary success story, with a bustling economy, sound finances, and a highly effective military. And all he has asked in exchange -- like Israel -- is protection from international judgment as he makes his way in his very dangerous neighborhood.

There is disagreement among experts about how policymakers should wield the study. Hara and Van Woudenberg would like to see Washington and London press Kagame to limit his meddling in eastern Congo. Phil Clark, an Oxford University researcher and regional scholar, fears that the report's publication will widen fissures within the ruling elite in Kigali and thus imperil Kagame's hold on power. Whoever succeeds Kagame is likely to be a less-stabilizing figure, he argues.

Perhaps the report should have appeared a year from now, or a year ago. What matters is that the United Nations will place its imprimatur on allegations that have been circulating for years. Rwanda's friends have allowed the country, quite literally, to get away with murder. That tidy transaction must now come to an end. Rwanda is an important U.S. ally -- but allies, too, need to be held to account.

ALEXANDER JOE/AFP/Getty Images

 

James Traub is a contributing writer for the New York Times Magazine and author of, most recently, The Freedom Agenda. "Terms of Engagement," his column for ForeignPolicy.com, runs weekly.

BUDAHH

2:23 AM ET

September 4, 2010

What the heck does Israel have to do with geonocide in africa

Why does the writer bring up Israel as an example to mass murder and the targeting of civilians by animals who cruelly murder for the sake of murder, we are in a fight for our life and act in self defense people like you make me sick.

You should focus on real atrocities going on in the world like in Africa and quit connecting Israel to everything, that is a very racist thing to do.

Why don't you talk about Iran killing it's own civilians, or maybe the Turks who gassed Kurd's not too long ago, maybe what the Russians are doing in Chechnya, or maybe you can tell us how many civilians died in Sri Lanka in their last conflict, how are the rights of minorities in china, what about Sudan.

Maybe i didn't understand the connection well but the fact6 that you try to compare Israel with the worse human rights violators is absured and you should find a new job

 

KANYARWANDA

5:50 AM ET

September 4, 2010

Israel/Rwanda

Rwanda is always compared to Israel because Tutsi Criminals thinks they are the Jews of Africa. They always play the victim when in fact they are the trouble makers in central Africa. And you Jews condone this behavior. US/UK/Israel are all supporters of those murders in Kigali.

 

ABLITZ

8:10 PM ET

September 6, 2010

And what side are you on?

And what side are you on? "Tutsi Criminals"? You do know the FDLR are even more guilty of destabilizing Congo than Kagame and Co.?

Everyone's guilty there, pointing fingers at one side just makes it worst.
By the way, in the scheme of things Israel does very little in terms of Rwanda. Yeah Kagame sees Rwanda as an "Israel" of sorts as a way to provide so-called Tutsis a safe haven.
I've seen people trying to support claims that Israel props up Kagame and the worst I've seen is Israel has sold Riot Gear the the regime.

 

ANDREA.MUELLER

4:10 AM ET

September 4, 2010

Rwanda

The most interesting comment I have read so far about the issue is the comment
of the "Grande Dame" of Great Lakes Journalism in Europe, Colette Braeckman. Her blog-post on the issue (in french at: http://blogs.lesoir.be/colette-braeckman/2010/08/27/la-verite-due-aux-morts-et-les-interets-des-vivants/) is entitled "The moral duty towards the victims vs. the interest of the living".

 

KIGALI

6:23 AM ET

September 4, 2010

RWANDA

Very surprising that it took this long for the UN to report on this well known secret. Kagame and his armies have used congo as their backyard by going in and out at any moment they choose, taking (robbing) anything they deemed valuable. the atrocities of RPF didnt start with RPF crossing into Congo, the RPF started their killing the moment the attacked Rwanda in 1990. Anyone who resided in Byumba during 1991 or in Kigali in the middle of 1994 would attest to this. Every pwerful man in Africa is protected by somebody in the west, this is why the killings, the wars and injustice will never end. the former Rwandan president and the former billionaire Mombutu were well protected the France, in the name of protecting the francophone among other things. Now Kagame is being protected by US and England through Clinton and that other former british prime minister. it is about time to seriously bring these killers to justice otherwise the killing fields will just keep expanding.

 

AVNER STEIN

11:13 PM ET

September 4, 2010

Israel what?

I don't know much about the Rwanda genocide issue - but the Goldstone Report and the resolutions that mandated it was boycotted by major Western countries.

It was designed and written by people appointed through the UNHRC - the most powerful rights groups on the planet that happens to be run a Muslim/Arab majority, including Saudi Arabia.

The credibility of the report was tainted before it's release. The report itself was not compiled by 33 independent researchers like the Rwanda investigation, but 4 activists none of which had military training or experience. The majority of the report relied on 2nd hand information, coming from Palestinian rights groups, Amnesty International, and Human Rights Watch.

It was not an original or independent investigation. Goldstone himself said the report would not hold up in a court of law, and he would not be surprised if many of the findings were proven false.

And anyways, comparing the Gaza War to a genocide...jesus, how can foreign policy publish this garbage?

 

AARKY

5:32 PM ET

September 7, 2010

Genocide by Israelis

Mr Stein: No matter how you try to spin it it and twist it, the Goldstone report was a very careful and accurate report about the deliberate slaughter of hundreds of innocent civilians in the Gaza strip. That genocide was nothing compared to the genocide that has killed literally millions in Congo. The US government has a very bad set of double standards when it comes to terrorism. They shriek and beat their chest when it affects us. When it is to our advantage, the eyes and head is turned away from it. The scary thing is that Hillary Clinton actually sleeps well at night.

 

AVNER STEIN

1:25 AM ET

September 8, 2010

I read the Goldstone Report

3 times. It was not careful at all. I'm sure ignorant folks were stunned at the 500+ page report. It's so big, must be truthful!

Most of the report was copy-paste from AI, HRW, Palestinian rights groups, etc. It discounted satellite evidence from the IDF or Palestinian testimony collected in Israel by non-Palestinian sources (most of it confirmed Israel's allegations that the Palestinians exploited civilian status ).

And slaughter? Hardly. 1,100+ killed in 3 week campaign, seems pretty reasonable considering the amount of fire power Israel used and the suicidal tactics of Hamas. The gender ratio was astounding, 70% combat-age male.

 

JTAYLER

11:38 AM ET

September 5, 2010

Interesting point

"The credibility of the report was tainted before it's release. The report itself was not compiled by 33 independent researchers like the Rwanda investigation, but 4 activists none of which had military training or experience. The majority of the report relied on 2nd hand information, coming from Palestinian rights groups, Amnesty International, and Human Rights Watch."

Interesting point. I need to look into this.

 

JKAW

2:01 PM ET

September 5, 2010

Missing a lot, actually

Read:

http://www.monthlyreview.org/100501herman-peterson.php

to get a full picture of what happened going back to the 80's

 

AREAMAN

2:26 PM ET

September 7, 2010

1000 to 1 difference

The mutual genocide in central Africa has killed more than a 1000 times as many people as the war in Gaza. They are just now catching on to the genocide that took place 10 years ago in Africa. The little war in Gaza was front page news as it happened.

This is a kind of anti-black prejudice, where the lives of Africans just don't matter. It is also an infantilization of the Arabs of Gaza, and a demonization of the Jews.

For more info, do a web search on the Second Congo War. About 5 million people were killed. The killing is probably still going on, but our media are not up to date.

 

TURKANAMAN

2:53 PM ET

September 7, 2010

Justifying Inaction

Most of the world's major countries, having failed to respond quickly or effectively to the original Rwandan genocide in 1994, may now be finding it easier to justify their inaction then by saying the Tutsis are no better than the Hutus.

 

JKAW

5:15 PM ET

September 7, 2010

Turkanaman, Hardly, since the

Turkanaman,

Hardly, since the major countries you're probably referring to are on the Tutsi side.

 

NAGANIGI

8:01 PM ET

September 7, 2010

Cok tesekkurler bu güzel

Cok tesekkurler bu güzel siktiri boktan bilgi icin.

Naganigi Siki? ve Pornoda liderdir reistir.