The War Criminal Next Door

Why are there 1,000 suspected torturers and génocidaires in America right now?

BY NICK DONOVAN | SEPTEMBER 9, 2010

The film Marathon Man is one of the great paranoid thrillers of the 1970s, infamous for the scene in which the Nazi dentist played by Lawrence Olivier drills through Dustin Hoffman's teeth into his live nerve below, repeatedly asking "Is it safe?" This is the stuff of Hollywood horror films, but another scene is more plausible: Olivier -- whose character is loosely based on S.S. doctor Josef Mengele -- ventures into New York's diamond district, where he is recognized by Holocaust survivors. One elderly woman, slowly at first and then with increasing hysteria, begins shouting at passers-by to stop him before he escapes. 

Like the woman in the film, many victims of modern-day atrocities have sought asylum in North America or Europe -- and so have their persecutors. More than once, the Marathon Man scene has played out in reality. Ethiopian refugee Edgegayehu Taye was working as a waitress at the Colony Hotel in Atlanta, Georgia, when she saw her former torturer, a man who had supervised while she was whipped with a plastic cable, standing by the elevator in a gray bellhop's uniform. Eugenio de Sosa Chabau was tortured 14 times by a man named El Enfermero, "The Nurse," for his opposition to Castro's rule in Cuba. After 21 years of imprisonment, de Sosa finally managed to flee to Florida. Visiting his elderly aunt at a nursing home in Miami, he was startled to see El Enfermero there -- now wearing the white uniform of a real nurse.

Today, authorities estimate that there are at least 1,000 war crimes suspects in the United States, and the real number is probably much higher. British immigration officials have taken action against 513 suspects in the last four years. Just like refugees, oppressors often flee at the end of conflict. Disguised, flying under the immigration radar, they enter North America and Europe.

In Britain, Italy, and France, alleged Rwandan génocidaires have been found working as doctors, priests, and even once as a member of a government task force. After being convicted in absentia for his role in a massacre in 1994, Haitian Maj. Gen. Jean-Claude Duperval was eventually found operating tourist boats in Disney World. Another suspected perpetrator in the same massacre won $3.2 million in the Florida State Lottery in 1997 before being deported a few years later. Three years ago, the alleged chief interrogator at a torture center in Argentina was found running a genteel antiques shop in The Plains, Virginia.

Some of this may be inevitable: There are a lot of war criminals out there -- and, because the technology of mass murder has become less sophisticated in recent years, the number is growing. In the Nazi extermination camp at Belzec, it took 150 S.S. guards nine months to gas up to half a million Jews. Modern-day, low-tech mass atrocities, by contrast, involve hundreds of thousands of killers. In Rwanda, it is estimated that there were perhaps 200,000 génocidaires in the 1994 slaughter, while 20,000 Sudanese are thought to have taken part in atrocities in Darfur, Sudan.

Very few of these people have ever been brought to trial, especially when you look beyond the high-profile examples. Academics estimate that between 92 and 101 million people died in 313 conflicts since 1948. While the perpetrators of these deaths number in the hundreds of thousands, only 823 suspects have been indicted by internationalized tribunals and courts. Some of the rest have been brought to trial in their own countries, but many of them are still at large.

JOHNNY EGGITT/AFP/Getty Images

 

Nick Donovan works at the Aegis Trust, which works internationally to build up legal cases against suspected war criminals.

Facebook|Twitter|Reddit

ABERCROMBIEUK

9:13 PM ET

September 8, 2010

Maybe justice is not useful in here !

Well, now and before the trial of war criminals is clearly no legal basis, its nothing more than use its coercive power over those who, under the guise of legitimacy to defeat those who bear a responsibility for no reason, no any justice at all.

 

BLACKADDER60

11:35 PM ET

September 8, 2010

I'll start believing in this

I'll start believing in this whole bussiness of fighting war crime and warcriminals once Bush, Blair & Netanyahu apear at the Hague to answer for their actions, untill then I will call it what it is. A sham meant to persecute those who are not the willing tools of western neo-colonialist and neo-imperialist policies.

 

BLKDEATH

1:57 AM ET

September 10, 2010

Re: I'll start believing in this

Remember, it's only the losing side that gets prosecuted. If the Allies had lost war, it would have been Churchill, Roosevelt, and Stalin on trial.
On another note, I am surprised that the author didn't point out that the reason we did and can still prosecute Nazis is because they were efficiently German. They kept records of everything. They wrote down their victims' names and gave them numeric identifiers and recorded the date of their deaths. Maybe not for all victims, but enough for a prosecution. I think modern day perpetrators of genocide have learned from their mistake.

 

GDE

6:46 PM ET

September 10, 2010

Correct

BlackAdder60 and BlkDeath are both correct. But, when it comes to numbers, the Bush (and now Obama) minions probably number in the millions. If we count those who took an active role by at voting or otherwise supporting torture and genocide, it is over 100 million.

 

LOCOJHON

12:37 PM ET

September 9, 2010

So, Henry Kissinger 'feared economic chaos' eh?

,,,and it had nothing at all to do with him having to answer to criminal prosecutions should the USA sign on.
Nothing at all to do with that,,,yeah, right!
Kissinger and a whole lot more like him would likely experience "economic chaos" all right--as soon as they were turned over and passed Noriega-like through one country system after another for the rest of their lives.
I totally agree with BLACKADDER60's comments, and in addition wonder why, in the above article, in a casual listing of some countries hiding criminals, why the US was not at least mentioned as having had a long-standing history of intentionally doing so, going back as far as now-admitted/acknowledged recruitment of Nazi war criminals after WW2 (or safe transit/harboring them elsewhere) through the ranks of almost every coup in LatAm, to the modern day era where criminals the likes of plane bombers/terrorists or (CIA-corrupted?) coup-leaders are at least harbored, or at the most live in exclusive hideaways or get to hold teaching positions in universities, including in Washington DC.
IMO, we'll never sign or meet with any obligations/conditions to do so.
Unfortunately.
locoto

 

AVOCADO

12:51 PM ET

September 10, 2010

War criminals in the US? Sure!

Don't forget to look at the war criminals who own multi-million dollar mansions and estates who are US citizens! It's none other than the now Sri Lankan "leaders", oops, dictators, who have without any accountability slaughtered tens of thousands of that country's minority Tamils in a matter of weeks, successfully carrying out ethnic cleansing. The Rajapakse brothers and the US green card holder Fonseka, the army general who was responsible for carrying out the slaughter of tens of thousands of Tamil women and children, are now existing as if they are god's gift to the world. Why is the US not concerned about its own citizens who are genocidal maniacs, committing mass murder in other parts of the world?

Oh that's right, when war criminals are "important allies", you can turn the other way. Hypocrites.