From Bad to Worse

Things are going south in Afghanistan's north.

BY ANNA BADKHEN | SEPTEMBER 13, 2010

The man who sheltered me in Afghanistan last spring is very ill. Cancer cells are pulsing in his bloodstream. Every few days, his sons email me updates about his health: He is a little better. He is having nosebleeds. He is very weak. He is in pain. He is singing to his wife. All summer, his children and grandchildren, his wife, and innumerable doctors and charlatans have been sitting vigil in his house in Mazar-e-Sharif, watching his wasted body thrash about, watching his leukocyte count oscillate, watching his narrow chest rise and fall. Watching for signs of something -- anything -- to give them succor.

Lately, it seems as though the whole of Northern Afghanistan is laid up on my host's narrow mattress. Violence convulses the ripsaw shadow of the Hindu Kush, then quiets again, leaving us to hang on the war's every tremor, to watch minute fluctuations for a miracle while the conflict eats away at Khorasan's saline plains.

I returned to Northern Afghanistan in April to document for Foreign Policy the implacable spread of the Taliban in the region (the dispatches I wrote were recently published as an ebook, Waiting for the Taliban); I left the region in May. At the time, the Taliban were terrorizing travelers in Kunduz and Baghlan provinces, along the main route that NATO uses to bring in supplies from Tajikistan; launching swift attacks on government forces in Takhar Province; and flagging down traffic at impromptu checkpoints on the ancient roads of Balkh.

How to measure the progress of the war since my visit? Violence has been metastasizing across the north. A string of bombings in Kunduz killed at least 19 Afghan police officers in the last five weeks. Last month, 10 Western aid workers, members of a medical team, were slaughtered in Badakhshan -- the remote redoubt of the legendary Northern Alliance leader Ahmed Shah Massoud, where the Taliban did not dare venture even when they were ruling most of the country from Kabul. It was the largest massacre of relief workers in Afghanistan in years. The United Nations, which last winter considered parts of the north volatile, now regards a large swath of the region as extremely dangerous for its personnel.

For More

Click here to purchase Anna Badkhen's Waiting for the Taliban: A Journey Through Northern Afghanistan.

Of course, deadly bombings, ambushes, and suicide attacks are a trademark of most wars of occupation. Anyone associated with the occupier -- in Afghanistan, this includes virtually all Westerners -- becomes a target of elusive insurgents. (My host in Mazar-e-Sharif took tremendous personal risks when he let me stay at his house.) The rebels operate swiftly, easily finding shelter among the civilian population, many of whom seem to be on their side.

But another recent event in the north demonstrated that the extremist militia is not simply gathering momentum in the region, but that it has already settled in, and that it is quite comfortable: the public stoning, at the order of a Taliban court, of an eloped couple in Dasht-e-Archi, a sun-scalded expanse of rice and wheat farms in Kunduz Province.

Hit-and-run attacks require little planning and can be carried out spontaneously by highly mobile, small, and bold guerrilla groups. On the other hand, the process of convening a court, passing a verdict, summoning the convicts, and executing them, on schedule, during a planned public ceremony (news reports suggested that about 200 villagers participated in the executions, while a larger crowd of men looked on) reflects more than brazenness. It bespeaks a confident command of the region. It bespeaks a fully functional government.

MASSOUD HOSSAINI/AFP/Getty Images

 SUBJECTS: AFGHANISTAN
 

Waiting for the Taliban is available at Amazon.com. Anna Badkhen's book about war, friendship, and food, Peace Meals, comes out next month.

MARTY MARTEL

6:59 AM ET

September 14, 2010

Thank Bush permission to Musharraf to evacuate Taliban

George W. Bush allowed Pakistan to spirit away by airlift hundreds, if not thousands, of Taliban operatives cornered by the advancing Northern Alliance in Kunduz. Pakistan relocated those Taliban cadres including Mullah Mohammed Omar in Quetta, the provincial capital of Baluchistan from where Mullah Omar’s QST has been planning raids in Afghanistan ever since. That Bush action allowed Al Qaeda/Mullah Omar/Haqqani to live and fight another day by guaranteeing a safe sanctuary in Pakistan.

While capturing and killing some Taliban and Al Qaeda leaders based on US intelligence, Musharraf continued to shelter, protect and support Mullah Mohammed Omar’s QST and Haqqani’s HQN.

Obama administration has compounded that Bush blunder by continuing to ignore Afghan Taliban’s Pakistani connections in fueling and sustaining Afghan insurgency as reported by Matt Waldman in ‘The sun in the sky‘ on 6/13/2010, corroborated by WikiLeaks leaks on 7/25/2010 and then further corroborated by Chris Alexander, Canadian ambassador to Afghanistan from 2003 to 2005 and Deputy Special Representative of the UN Secretary-General for Afghanistan from 2005 until 2009 in his article on 7/30/2010 titled ‘The huge scale of Pakistan‘s complicity‘.

As Afghan President Karzai told a news conference in Kabul on 7/29/2010 after WikiLeaks leaks, “The time has come for our international allies to know that the war against terrorism is not in Afghanistan’s homes and villages. But rather this war is in the sanctuaries, funding centers and training places of terrorism which are in Pakistan. Our international allies have the ability to destroy these Pakistani sanctuaries, but the question is why they are not doing it?“

Even Afghanistan’s national security advisor Rangin Dadfar Spanta has asked the same question in a Washington Post article on 8/23/2010: “While we are losing dozens of men and women to terrorist attacks every day, the terrorists’ main mentor (Pakistan) continues to receive billions of dollars in aid and assistance. How is this fundamental contradiction justified? Despite facing a growing domestic terror threat, Pakistan “continues to provide sanctuary and support to the Quetta Shura, the Haqqani network, the Hekmatyar group and Al Qaeda. Dismantling the terrorist infrastructure “requires confronting the state of Pakistan that still sees terrorism as a strategic asset and foreign policy tool”.

Poor Karzai’s call to his Western allies ‘to destroy Islamist militant sanctuaries in neighboring Pakistan’ is falling on deaf ears in Washington where powers to be are hell bent on sacrificing Afghanistan to mollycoddle Pakistan.

 

DISIGNY

10:41 AM ET

September 14, 2010

"Falling Apart"?!

How could "Afghanistan" fall apart? It was never together. The only people who talk about it as a country are foreigners, who have their own deluded "Interests".

 

MELIKEBU

3:20 PM ET

September 14, 2010

 

SINSEMIILLA

10:55 PM ET

September 14, 2010

Idea

Get them to all stop fighting by giving them some herbs. Ain't no way a brother gonna pick up an AK and kill his neighbor with some cannabinoids helping out.

 

JAYDEE001

10:16 AM ET

September 15, 2010

Talibanistan - an apt

Talibanistan - an apt description of what Afghanistan's future is likely to be. The only question is how much of the US treasury and how many lives will be lost to the myth that the US and its allies might be able to attain something they can call 'victory' there.

This morning on NPR, Gen. David Petraeus, in discussing the rapid growth of Taliban power in the Northern provinces of that country, could not bring himself to admit that our meaningless adventure in Iraq had been a distraction in Afghanistan - although he did indicate that our efforts in Afghanistan had been 'under-resourced' and that an 'economy of force' had been necessary there. He's to be pitied for having to justify the ongoing military action after more than 9 years of wasted effort in Afghanistan.

We persist in this hopeless venture, despite our abject failure to bring Osama bin Laden and al Qaeda to justice, our inability to bring the Taliban to the bargaining table, our failure to kill or capture Mullah Omar, and our inability to root out the Taliban and al Qaeda leadership from their bases in Pakistan. We have not even been able to gain control of the Taliban stronghold in Kandahar, and the Marjah expedition (Operation Moshtarak) was a joke, since the Taliban simply retreated from the town and are waiting for an opportunity to return. Our attempts to install a 'government' there have been met with derision.

It goes on and on. Where is the leadership with enough sense to realize this will ultimately be a waste of personnel and wealth?

 

ARYABHAT

8:50 AM ET

September 17, 2010

Pakiban

There is no Taliban but Pakiban and ISI is its Nanny!

 

HAMDU

12:54 PM ET

October 10, 2010

David Petraeus, in discussing

Even Afghanistan’s national security advisor Rangin Dadfar Spanta has asked the same question in a Washington Post article on 8/23/2010: “While we becertubeare losing dozens of men and women to terrorist attacks every day, the terrorists’ main gztlrmentor (Pakistan) continues to receive billions of dollars in aid and assistance. How is this fundamental 7racontradiction justified? Despite facing a growing domestic terror threat, Pakistan “continues ucakbiletitcto provide sanctuary and support to the Quetta Shura, the Haqqani network, the Hekmatyar group and Al Qaeda. Dismantling the terrorist infrastructure “requires confronting the state of Pakistan that still sees terrorism as a strategic asset and foreign policy tool”. 31cilerIraq had been a distraction in Afghanistan - although he did indicate that our efforts in Afghanistan had been 'under-resourced' and that an 'economy of force' had been necessary there. He's to be pitied for having to justify the ongoing military action sinema after more than 9 years of wasted effort in Afghanistan.