How Not to Get Played by Ahmadinejad

A reporter's guide to interviewing the Iranian president.

BY BARBARA SLAVIN | SEPTEMBER 14, 2010

Mahmoud Ahmadinejad is coming to New York again next week for the annual opening of the U.N. General Assembly. If the past is any guide, he will try to use the U.S. press as a prop to distract from his shaky standing at home.

Since he was first elected in 2005, the Iranian president has perfected the art of slipping and sliding around even the most seasoned interviewers. Typically, he answers questions with questions and deflects criticism by attacking the United States or Israel.

On previous trips, Ahmadinejad has insisted that Iran has "real elections" -- despite copious evidence to the contrary -- and that Iran's economy does "not face serious problems," unlike the U.S. economy (another dubious assertion).

Reporters need to be armed with in-depth knowledge of Iran's economy, politics, and society -- and even then they may have difficulty getting Ahmadinejad to admit the truth. When I first interviewed him in 2006, he simply denied that the number of educated youth seeking visas to leave Iran had risen significantly since his election and that wealthy Iranians had moved billions of dollars to Dubai (both facts were true).

In advance of this year's trip, the International Campaign for Human Rights in Iran has prepared a press guide with suggested questions, useful background on issues and prior interviews, and examples of what to avoid. The organization urges reporters to focus on Iranian human rights abuses in the aftermath of last year's disputed presidential election and remind Ahmadinejad of Iran's obligations as a signatory of international conventions on human rights.

The guide advises interviewers to be as specific as possible to make it harder for the Iranian leader to go off on tangents and indulge in generalities. Among suggested questions: Why did Ahmadinejad give another high position to former Tehran prosecutor Saeed Mortazavi, who has been indicted in connection with the detention of young demonstrators at Kahrizak prison last year? Many there were tortured and raped, and at least four young men died, including the son of a prominent official.

Instead of facing punishment, Mortazavi was made head of an anti-smuggling task force and was seated prominently at ceremonies marking the end of Ramadan led by Iran's supreme leader, Ayatollah Ali Khamenei.

Mehdi Khalaji, an Iranian scholar at the Washington Institute for Near East Policy, says interviewers need to be blunt, even rude, to "make Ahmadinejad stop and think. Ask him why he has so many problems with clerics in what is supposed to be an Islamic republic?" Khalaji, a former seminarian in Iran, suggests, "Ask him why the clerics hate him."

AFP/Getty Images

 SUBJECTS: POLITICS, IRAN, MEDIA, MIDDLE EAST
 

Barbara Slavin, a former assistant managing editor for the Washington Times and diplomatic reporter for USA Today, is the author of Bitter Friends, Bosom Enemies: Iran, the U.S. and the Twisted Path to Confrontation. She has visited Iran seven times and was the first U.S., newspaper reporter to interview Mahmoud Ahmadinejad.

FRIDA

10:33 PM ET

September 14, 2010

Once I heard a radio

Once I heard a radio interview of NPR with Ahmadinejad which I found very smart and right-on.

The reporter asked him about the freedom of speech and freedom of information in Iran and of course Ahmadinejad said that in Iran people have free access to information and have freedom of speech.
Then reporter asked him how come satellite is illegal in Iran? He said it is not! He simply had to lie.

I think this is a great question that can be asked again! Satellite is still illegal in Iran and people are not supposed to watch it. It is a simple example for proving a country wants to control what people hear or how they form their opinion.

Or you could ask them why some websites are filtered:
BBC persian
Voice of America
even nytimes.com

 

DENKZETTEL

1:03 AM ET

September 15, 2010

@citizenxyz

I think your comment reveals more about your own prejudices than about Frida's. It does not follow from the word "even" in front of nytimes.com does not mean that Frida considers that source to be "the voice of reason and wisdom." Maybe she does, maybe she doesn't. But in the list "even nytimes.com" makes sense because the first two sources, BBC Persian and Voice of America provide news in Farsi, the native language of most Iranians and therefore more vulnerable to Iranian propaganda that those services are trying to spread Western misinformation concerning Iran. By contrast, nytimes.com is not primarily aimed at readers in Iran and does not offer, as far as I know, news in Farsi. But despite this difference when compared to BBC Persian and Voice of America, *even* nytimes.com is blocked by the Iranian government.

And apart from all that, what's your point? That Iran deserves praise for blocking its citizens' access to BBC Persian, Voice of America, and nytimes.com because you don't like their politics? I think Ahmadinejad may have a friend in you...

 

NICHOLAS19

3:35 PM ET

September 20, 2010

Are you an Iranian die-hard

Are you an Iranian die-hard supporter of the Islamic State?

If not, I find it surprising that you would call the BBC propaganda. That's a ridiculous thing to say...

 

MAX SITTING

7:51 AM ET

September 15, 2010

The tough reporters

I just wonder why all these "Reporters who do not have to fear imprisonment or exile for doing their jobs" by asking tough questions in pursuit of the "truth" never bother to ask tough questions to American leaders.

You need only think of the press conference given by Bush on the eve of the Iraq war for a good laugh at tough minded questioning.

Hey, and like you said Barb, they don't have to fear any adverse consequences, like the terrible, terrible, terrible, terrible, terrible, terrible, terrible consequences they would endure in Iran.

So why are you tough guys such chicken shits when it comes to asking tough questions to our leaders?

 

NICHOLAS WIBBERLEY

7:54 AM ET

September 15, 2010

Devil's Advocate

“International pressure led Iranian authorities to free American hiker Sarah Shourd and convinced Iran not to stone to death Sakineh Mohammadi Ashtiani, a woman convicted of adultery”. These statements are questionable. We do not yet know that Shourd and her companions were ‘hiking’; consider what the US authorities would make of three Iranian adults picked up without papers off the Florida coast who claimed to be fishing.

Shourd ’s release was an act of mercy from Ahmadinejad that the prosecutor at first resisted, so the President might more appropriately be thanked for his intervention.

The stoning sentence was passed by a Sharia judge because it is for the time being still on the books, but stoning is banned in Iran and the sentence was overturned by a higher judiciary. This sequence will be followed until the complex process of updating Iranian law is completed.

Iran certainly has its problems including its Green Tea Party but so do most countries and it is hard to imagine how it might be otherwise with Iran considering the incessant demonisation and vindictive sanctions imposed by the US/Israel double act. Ahmadinejad is the third most popular leader among Middle Eastern Arabs and 97% of Egyptians polled recently for the Brookings/Maryland Arab Public Opinion Poll think Iran perfectly entitled to its nuclear program.

Media freedom would be just fine if the media were accurate and responsible but most journalists are mere gossipmongers with doubtful and often irresponsible agendas as one may judge by the recent Koran burning business; that it should be thought necessary to suggest reporters might arm themselves with in-depth knowledge before interviewing the President of a country would seem to confirm this.

The opposition of some clerics likely derives from Ahmadinejad ‘s efforts to excise some of the less attractive elements of Sharia Law like stoning.

One might also ask oneself why someone so consistently and hideously misquoted should bother to answer contentious leading questions with truths that will only be twisted to create sensation and foster antagonistic attitudes.

As for holocaust denial, I imagine he expresses it to provoke Netanyahu and it works every time. Naughty, perhaps, but irresistible, particularly considering the nonsense Netanyahu utters about him and so much else.

Ahmadinejad sits on the throne of Xerxes, an ancient elevation not remarkable for any preoccupation with the selective niceties of human rights or the pernicious consequences of unbridled democracy, but providing its custodian with a perspective and consequent patience not available to the President of the US; a nation figuratively speaking scarcely post pubescent.

The Devil’s advocacy rests.

 

SIDROCK23

9:41 AM ET

September 15, 2010

Ahmadinejad Vs Bush & blair

say what u want about ahmaidnejad but at least he's not illegaly invading other countries and is not responsible for a million dead iraqis. its funny how people want to bash him for the idiotic things he says, but blair is recieving a stupid award for "conflict resolution", WTF? what ahmadinejad does in his own country is their business. but bush and blair are parading around the world as some sort of champions for democracy and freedom. both bush and blair should be stoned to death

 

WPC09

11:19 AM ET

September 15, 2010

Re Iran and US/Brisith policy

I am curious how the US and Britain became responsible for all the dead in Iraq. Homicide bombers have been responsible for killing many of those innocent people - fellow Muslims for the most part.

If one takes the view that "What Ahmadinejad does in his own country is their business," then every country should wash its hands of any moral responsibility for the welfare of others who are mistreated. If all countries operated this way, every member of the Baha'i community in Iran (the largest non-Muslim religious minority) would have been massacred. Because principled nations and organizations have spoken out and made their views known to the Iranian government, there is at least some mitigation of the their desire to kill or expel all Baha'is from the country.

Of course, the world did as you suggest in the mid-1990s and 800,000 Rwandans were slaughtered. I hope you sleep well at night.

 

NICHOLAS WIBBERLEY

1:12 PM ET

September 15, 2010

WPC09

It is not a question of ‘washing your hands’, you are not Pilate. Be glad you live where you do, that is enough. If you want to campaign, start at home or book a ticket and go join a resistance movement, but don’t seek to assuage your sensibilities from the anonymity and security of a comment column. Life is tough, bleak, short and brutal. Live with it.

 

FRESHTEH661

4:11 AM ET

September 18, 2010

always lies about Iran

How do you expect reporters to ask questions from him when they really don't know what happens in Iran? for instance here is written Hamadi Nejad's daughter married Mashaei's son but it is exactly vice versa. i Mean Ahmadi's son to Mashaei's daughter. or a reader says Bahaee's are the biggest religious minority in Iran but if they had just read some extra information they would know that the biggest religious minority in Iran are Christians! and the Jews ( about 25 thousand) that are the biggest community of Jews in the Middle east after Israel itself and they are easily leaving side by side with us - the Muslims.
the misunderstanding comes from those who have no other sources on Iran except the Green's liar-web sites that just spread rumors and lies . that's why they never understand that Ahmadi Nejad is a president whom the people truly chose him and what he says about the west specially the US and Britain are mere facts. he just tries to put a mirror before them and make them face themselves and their lies in it. something that nobody in the world dared to do so except late Imam ( Ayatollah )Khomeini. ahmadi Nejad is just a school boy in the school of shia'ism . He tries to unearth the facts that have been buried for decades after WW2.
it's obvious that the West and especially the US don't like it and they tri to smear him by the so-called free Media! that are free of weaving any lie they want to justify attacks on Iraq, Afghanistan , Yemen ,.... and at the end of the road Iran!

 

HAMDU

1:18 PM ET

October 10, 2010

Gainesville pastor.

Bahaee's are the biggest religious minority in Iran but if they had just read some extra information they would know that the biggest religious minority in Iran are Christians! and the Jews ( about 25 thousand) that are the biggest community of Jews in the Middle east after Israel itself and they are easily leaving side by side with us - the Muslims.
the misunderstanding comes from those who have no otherbecertube sources on Iran except the Green's liar-web sites that just spread rumors and lies . that's why they never gztlrunderstand that Ahmadi Nejad is a president whom the people truly chose him and what he says about the west specially the US and Britain are mere facts. he just tries to put a 7ramirror before them and make them face themselves and their lies in it. something that nobody in the world dared to do so except late Imam ( Ayatollah )Khomeini. ahmadi Nejad is just a school boy in the ucakbiletitcschool of shia'ism . He tries to unearth the facts that have been buried for decades after WW2.
it's obvious that the West and sinemaespecially the US don't like it and they tri to smear him by the so-called free Media! that are free 31cilerof weaving any lie they want to justify attacks on Iraq, Afghanistan , Yemen ,.... and at the end of the road Iran!