The Bordello State

Italy's descent under Prime Minister Silvio Berlusconi.

BY JAMES WALSTON | SEPTEMBER 14, 2010

Ahi serva Italia, di dolore ostello, nave sanza nocchiero in gran tempesta, non donna di province, ma bordello!

Related

The Truth About Italy 
Ambassador to the United States Giulio Terzi responds to James Walston.

Quoting Dante is, I admit, the last resort of a scoundrel or at least the indolent scribe. But this one, from Purgatorio,* is too apposite not to use. Roughly translated, it reads, "Alas enslaved Italy, inn of sorrow, a ship without a helmsman in a great storm, not a queen of her provinces, but a whorehouse." It was also the title of a book by Paolo Sylos Labini published posthumously in 2006; Sylos Labini was not only one of Italy's most distinguished economists, but a man of absolute integrity who consistently and very openly refused to compromise with Power (even "power" with a small "p"). His last work described, analyzed and criticized the Italy of five years ago. "Why have we sunk so low?" he asked. "I exhort my fellow citizens to carry out an unflinching critical examination of our civic consciousness if we want to rise from the abyss." His appeal was more or less an economist's defense of the market economy and its rules, which defend the community against unbridled economic and political power. Italian prime minister and billionaire Silvio Berlusconi's massive conflicts of interest have made a mockery of these rules.

Today's Italy has been battered by even more internal storms, as well as the obvious international economic ones; since then, the prime minister's residences have become brothels -- and not just metaphorically. Above all, the ship of state is close to being rudderless. So I am not the only person in Italy quoting Dante these days.

There has been a lack of clear leadership since the end of July, but over the last fortnight the lack of direction has become paroxysmal. For most of August, Berlusconi threatened elections in order to bring Gianfranco Fini, the rebellious former ally who broke with the prime minister in July and formed his own party, and his followers to heel. Then, as polls showed that the only real winner in an early vote would be Umberto Bossi and the Northern League, which favors autonomy for Italy's north -- and, worse, that there was a good chance that Berlusconi would not win a majority in the Senate -- he started backpedaling. These last few days, his public statements once again refer to "three more years in order to carry out the Great Reforms." The immediate aim is to pass a motion supporting a five-point plan concerning the economy, the South, fiscal federalism, justice, and security. The most controversial issue is "justice," which for Berlusconi means giving the himself immunity from prosecution ("in order to get on with the job of governing," he says). Devolved spending powers are fundamental for the Northern League, but others in the center-right are worried that poorer parts of the country will lose support.

Berlusconi boasts constantly that his personally run foreign policy is the envy of Europe, but the reality is different and as counterproductive as much of his domestic policy. Last week, he used his presence at the Kremlin-organized Global Policy Forum in Yaroslavl, Russia, to take a swipe at Fini (without naming him), saying there were some who had created "little political businesses" (aziendine) in Italy; then he made the nth complaint that "communist judges" were stopping him and his people from governing; and finally, to cap his effusive welcome to Libyan dictator Muammar al-Qaddafi two weeks ago, came the remarkable statement that his hosts Prime Minister Vladimir Putin and President Dmitry Medvedev were "God's gift to democracy" (pity that the Economist had beat him to it with a cartoon showing Putin's real love of democracy and the press). More embarrassing still was the news that one of Libya's Italian-donated coast guard launches had machine-gunned an Italian fishing boat.

Meanwhile, Berlusconi's domestic woes are multiplying. The editor of one of his own papers, Vittorio Feltri in Il Giornale, criticized the prime minister this week for being indecisive and lacking leadership. Worse, his personal approval ratings are at 37 percent (down 4.9 percentage points since June), with his People of Freedom Party below 30 percent (down from 33.2 percent in June and 37.4 percent in the 2008 elections), according to an early September Demos poll. We will know whether the "three more years" proposal has any chance whatsoever at the end of the month when the Chamber of Deputies, Italy's lower house of Parliament, debates Berlusconi's five-point plan and votes on it. In the meantime, the prime minister appears to be on a shopping spree, hoping to pick up independents to make up the loss of defectors to Fini -- he needs 19 to have a secure majority.

MAURICIO LIMA/AFP/Getty Images

 

James Walston is professor of international relations at the American University of Rome. He blogs at italpolblog.blogspot.com, where an earlier version of this article appeared.

FRANKS

5:21 AM ET

September 15, 2010

Hell or purgatory?

Even if democratic life in this country is short to an Inferno (and I totally agree with you), you cited a verse of Dante's Purgatory
http://it.wikisource.org/wiki/Divina_Commedia/Purgatorio/Canto_VI#Ahi_serva_Italia

 

ALESSANDRO POLITI

11:58 AM ET

September 15, 2010

Fascinating, but alas Italy may inspire other democracies

Nice piece, congratulations, but...

on the political analysis side you and Viroli are unfortunately both wrong, together with former Sen. Guzzanti.

This is neither a feudal lordship, nor a renaissance signoria, nor a Communist dictatorship: it might be the future for several advanced democracies...

it is democrablanda: a democracy without rule of law, maintaing all the trappings of a formal democracy.

Others have invented dictadura, dictablanda and democradura, but Italy has this dubious privilege, being also the most advanced and unlucky political laboratory in the world.

Do you think that is is just an Italian recipe? It is one of the logical consequences of the 1988 deregulation: quit as a government economic control, and economic power will control you.

Yours sincerely

Alessandro Politi

 

CHQUINTANA

2:14 PM ET

September 15, 2010

Great article 100% true!

I've been in Italy since 2005 and the article is short in describing the mess this country is in right now. A lot of people still think that Berlusconi is the best option in a country that doesn't have political alternatives. His defenders are fanatics willing to defend Il Cavalieri under any circumstances. This is a country without any social or political future.... it is indeed a living hell.

 

GMAZZINI

5:34 AM ET

September 16, 2010

Good article but more analysis is needed

The article is a good snapshot of the current situation but it does not take in account a number of pending issues.
I found this book illuminating to understand contemporary Italy.

http://www.amazon.com/Italy-Today-Sick-Man-Europe/dp/0415561604/ref=tmm_pap_title_0?ie=UTF8&qid=1284629519&sr=8-2

 

FEDERICA

5:28 AM ET

September 20, 2010

Do you forget Clinton-Lewinsky?

Italy is heaven compared US.

 

ZIZZANO

7:43 AM ET

September 20, 2010

Clinton lewinsky

I remember. But in Italy mrs. lewinsky should be minister now. That's the difference!

 

NICKFROST

10:42 PM ET

September 20, 2010

@Federica

You are a clear example of what is going wrong in Italy: you are comparing two totally different situations; you even say that the Clinton case is worst than the Italian one (Clinton apologized to his people on TV, I have yet to see Mr Berlusconi do the same - and Monica Lewinsky has not been made a minister, not even a deputate). But you don't spend a word condemning the unethical behavior that is ruling and ruining Italy...

 

CANABLACH

5:05 AM ET

September 16, 2010

The Bordello State

"There has been a lack of clear leadership since the end of July"
Italy has not been having a clear leadership since Cavour: and he spoke french.

 

COGITOERGOSUM

9:06 AM ET

September 16, 2010

WAITING GARIBALDI

We were stopped at GARIBALDI said: WE HAVE MADE IYALY, WE MUST NOW ITALIANS!

 

NITTIG

3:00 AM ET

September 20, 2010

Bordello's state

Your quotation is a mistake:Garibaldi didn't say that, but Massimo D'Azeglio did....

 

RODIN

4:39 AM ET

September 21, 2010

ahah, this is a good one!

ahah, this is a good one! thanks

 

COGITOERGOSUM

8:52 AM ET

September 16, 2010

THE CIVIL DEATH

When the policy of a democratic country colluding with MAFIA, CAMORRA and NDRANGHETA is intended to CIVIL DEATH

 

AMKZAMORA

2:06 AM ET

September 17, 2010

Title Shows Poor Judgement

For however positively one might evaluate the analysis offered in this article, the title risks being offensive. What would have been the case had an Italian, in a journal that boasts of cultural status, headlined an article about the United States "The Prostitute State" or "The Whorehouse State"? Labini can speak of his own country in these terms and be understood, even if opposed. And Labini can cite Dante to support his case and be understood, even if opposed. I respectfully submit that the author of this article can do neither without the risk of offending. The judgement he expresses in the first sentence is not mere rhetorical flourish, but true.

 

LUCA BOCCIANTI

3:11 PM ET

September 18, 2010

I absolve the tile

dear Amkzamora,

many thanks for your concern, but as an Italian I absolve the title, referred to the current situation.

The first thing to do if you want to change a situation for the better is to call things with their name.

 

REBOCORRADO

9:14 PM ET

September 18, 2010

tira a campare

Good article on the malady of Italy. Bravo! As an Italian I often ask myself: does the ethnic Italian really exist? The majority of Italians may have now a common language and religion but not a common history, customs and characteristics. The complexity of the Italian character is constantly exploited. It seems to me that the majority of Italians accept a semblance of independence seen more as freedom from the influence and the control of a neighbouring province or city than from strengthening the institutions of the state. The pretence of independence allows a degree of authocracy, referred to the Greek "autos" (by himself) the master in power who dispenses favours, if a billionaire the better. Malpractice yes, widespread. People often accept a mere pretence of independence and tend to revere more a rich despot than a poor statesman. The Savoyard Joseph De Maistre, who died in the very first capital of Italy, Turin, wrote: "Each country has the government it deserves". Interestingly De Maistre regarded the monarchy as the only stable form of government, assisted by the authority of the Pope over temporal matters. Italy has both, a single ruler and an absolute monarch.
Twenty eight years ago, asked to comment on Nino Bixio's phrase of 1861 "l'Italia e' fatta, ora son da fare gli Italiani" (Italy is made, now one ought to make the Italians), Montanelli replied: "Gli Italiani non si faranno mai. Quella era l'Italia" (One will never make the Italians. That one -of 1861- was Italy". Berlusconi manipulates the Italians for personal gain. A fanatic minority supports him now. The new "duce" distributes "panem" and lavishes "circenses". The apathetic majority, in turn, hopes to reverse the situation in order, possibly, to do the same. In the meantime the Italians say: "Tira a campare", keep going somehow.

 

FEDERICA

5:30 AM ET

September 20, 2010

Visto che sei in italiano ti

Visto che sei in italiano ti scrivo in italiano.

Ma come possono i gionalisti americani fare osservazioni di questo genere? Hanno forse dimenticato che il loro presidente (Clinton ndr.) si è sbattuto la segretaria in un'ufficio pagato, tra l'altro, da loro?!?!?!? Ma è ridicolo! Almeno se Berlusconi fa queste cose, le fa a casa sua! Jesus christ

 

EKKIA

6:07 AM ET

September 20, 2010

Sorry, dear Federica,

but the situation is clearly totally different. Clinton had a single affair, risked to be impeached and was publicly processed and criticized; Berlusconi can basically do what he pleases and not only there's no process, no judgement and no critics, but the majority of Italy doesn't give a flying f*ck about his behaviour. Also, Clinton didn't appoint his affair(s) as Minister(s). Clinton hadn't a whole team of scantily-clad young women ready to do anything to share some of his money and power. This is not so much an article about Berlusconi, as about Italy.

 

ZIZZANO

7:33 AM ET

September 20, 2010

Dear Federica

As I have wroten before, the difference is that in Italy mrs. Lewinsky should be a minister now.

 

HIDALGO

10:41 AM ET

September 20, 2010

In Italy we have a Gomorrah government.

The Italian government is a Gomorrah government.
It 's very good abroad write this article.
Italians are now incapable of thinking, unable to see, unable to understand.
Only abroad see what happens in Italy.
Poor Italians.........
N.b.: I live in Italy. I'm Italian.
Berlusconi and his cronies are criminal mafia.

Monica Lewinsky did not become minister!
in Italy those who have made blowjob at Berlusconi became minister.
This is the difference!
Berlusconi è sick.... like Italians....

 

NICKFROST

10:46 PM ET

September 20, 2010

di nuovo @ Federica

Ma perchè, pensi che le escort di Berlusconi non sono in gran parte pagate dalle nostre tasse? Pensi che chi le offre a Berlusconi poi non si rifà delle spese aumentando i costi degli appalti (che paghiamo noi contribuenti)?

E le connessioni con la mafia? E le tasse evase? Ancora che fai il confronto con Clinton?

Ma per favore...

 

RODIN

4:49 AM ET

September 21, 2010

@Federica

A part from all the correct remarks others have made regarding your comment I would like to add one thing.
Do you know what really pisses me off? the fact that we call these lascivious ladies "escorts" as if there was some sort of intellectual different between them and the rest of the prostitutes.
And, on top of that, the current government is implementig a tough line on prostitution!!!! hammering away at the poor (mainly immigrant) girls forced to sell their bodies on the streets to the irreprehensible italians. Useless to name the Minster who is adopting this agenda nor to remind the audience of her shady past...right Federica?
It's the magnitude of the hypocrisy that stikes me...

 

BEV41078

12:38 PM ET

September 22, 2010

Italian DNA

Your article is spot on, as an Italian living in Milan I can confirm that Italy is a country with no morality or ethics. Corruption and tax evasion is the national sport. Berlusconi has admitted having a go at prostitute; he also had something on the go with a minor, it is normal for him to have parties with 20 / 30 girls. Most of politicians in Berlusconi party have posed naked in calendar
http://www.grandesalento.org/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=832:ecco-tutte-le-soubrette-del-pdl-ecco-chi-rappresenta-il-popolo-italiano-nel-parlamento-e-chi-lo-rappresentera-in-europa&catid=44:elezioni-2009&Itemid=100073

his party member has endorsed women to prostitute themselves to into high places. What about his close links with Mafia, his right hand man has being convicted wrt to mafia, his layer convicted for corruption of a judge. His party is full of politician that have problems with the law.
All of this with the support of about 12 million Italian votes, 80% call themselves Catholics. This shows how corrupt Italian DNA has become.
All I can say, after Greece Italy is next. Our debt is growing considerably, economic growth is low.

 

ANDREACCHIO

9:56 AM ET

September 25, 2010

Questioning Mr. Walston's bordello

A critical response (in Italian) to Mr. Walston's article was given by Mr. Giulio Terzi, the Italian ambassador in the USA, whose statement may be found online under the title of "La verità sull'Italia" (published by the Italian news-agency "L'Occidentale," 25 Sept. 2010).

Mr. Walston replied on ForeignPolity (2010/09/21).

A side comment: No doubt there are dire moral/political problems in Italy (read more on this by G. Leopardi) but Mr. Walston might have been more convincing had he taken a less contentious stance. Is the fact that Berlusconi's (intentionally advertised) "love life" does not bother Italians as much as it does Mr. Walston really due to the degeneracy of an Italian People standing in the midst of more morally-enlightened detractors?

At first glance, to answer in the negative might seem to serve the cause of moral relativism. But is this really so?

Perhaps what we are facing here is a sign of the limits of international or secular moral homogeneity, which is supposed to stand upon mere conventions and sentiments (shaped by unquestioned evolutionary "forces"). At any rate it is difficult to fully account for Mr. Walston's (and other commentators') flare of indignation without suspecting that Italy's Prime Minister may be among the most prominent living manifestations of what contemporary global-minded conformism wishes to sweep under the rug of its lofty promises and expectations.

Maybe Berlusconi is the "missing link" between the unenlightened statesman and the enlightened politician. Or maybe he is the sign that there is something important (no, not the call-girls) that has been left behind--something that is needed most by those who want it the least.

If the Italian People keeps voting for Berlusconi, perhaps there is something *positive* about him that Mr. Walston is leaving out of this picture--something that escapes his vision of how Italy ought to be today. Or must we uncritically suppose that Italy's vox populi is just as deluded as what its detractors want everyone to believe?

 

YARINSIZ

8:57 AM ET

October 10, 2010

The Savoyard Joseph De

The Savoyard Joseph De Maistre, who died in the very first capital of Italy, Turin, wrote: "Each country has the government it deserves". Interestingly De Maistre regarded the monarchy as sesli the only stable form of government, assisted by the authority of the Pope over temporal matters. Italy has both, a single ruler and an absolute monarch.

 

HAMDU

2:42 PM ET

October 10, 2010

Walston is leaving out of this

The complexity of the Italian character is constantly becertubeexploited. It seems to me that the majority of Italians accept a semblance of independence seen more asgztlr freedom from the influence and the control of a neighbouring province or city than from strengthening the institutions of the state. The pretence of independence 7raallows a degree of authocracy, referred to the Greek "autos" (by himself) the master in power who dispenses favours, if a billionaire the better. Malpractice yes, widespread. People often accept a mere pretence of independence and tend to revere more a rich despot than a poor statesman. ucakbiletitcThe Savoyard Joseph De Maistre, who died in the very first capital of Italy, Turin, wrote: "Each country has the government it deserves". Interestingly De Maistre regarded the monarchy as the only stable form of government, assisted by the authority of the Pope over temporal matters. Italy has both, a single ruler and an 31cilerabsolute monarch.
Twenty eight years ago, asked to comment on Nino Bixio's phrase of 1861 "l'Italia e' fatta, ora son da fare gli Italiani" (Italy is made, now one ought to make the Italians), Montanelli replied: "Gli Italiani non si faranno mai. Quella era l'Italia" (One will never make the sinemaItalians. That one -of 1861- was Italy". Berlusconi manipulates the Italians for personal gain.