What Arabs Really Think About Iran

The Arab world might have soured on President Obama, but opinion polls show that they haven't rushed to embrace Iran.

BY DAVID POLLOCK | SEPTEMBER 16, 2010

It is no secret that Arab public opinion toward U.S. President Barack Obama has soured since his June 2009 speech in Cairo, Egypt. According to a slew of recent opinion polls, Arabs have been deeply disappointed with Obama's accommodations to Israel. Analysts have suggested that this discontent has caused Arabs to embrace Iran and its nuclear program, and are hostile to U.S.-led attempts to isolate and pressure the Islamic Republic. But on this front, the numbers tell a very different story.

Prof. Shibley Telhami, for example, contended that Arab opinion is "shifting toward a positive perception of Iran's nuclear program." Telhami, who is a senior fellow at the Brookings Institution and a prominent analyst of Middle Eastern public opinion, asserts that Arab publics even have sanguine views about the consequences for the region if Iran was to develop a nuclear weapon.*

But since last autumn, when Obama reached a public compromise with Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu on the hot-button issue of Israeli settlements, a number of different polls have measured Arab attitudes toward Iran. In every case but one, these surveys have consistently demonstrated heavily negative views of Iran, its nuclear program, and of Iranian President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad. The mistake of Telhami, and other analysts, is to rely on a single 2010 Zogby poll to make their judgment, rather than considering the full range of polling on the issue.

The Zogby poll, which was conducted from June 29 to July 20, found that 58 percent of those surveyed in six Arab countries -- Egypt, Jordan, Saudi Arabia, Lebanon, Morocco, and the United Arab Emirates -- believe that Iran is "trying to develop nuclear weapons," not "conducting research for peaceful purposes." This was exactly the same result as last year's Zogby's poll, but the 2010 survey reported an astonishing 50-point net shift on a related question: whether Iranian nuclear weapons would have a positive or negative effect on the Middle East. A year ago, 46 percent of those surveyed believed that the effect would be negative and 21 percent believed it would be positive; this year's poll found that 57 percent thought the result would be positive versus 29 percent who responded that Iran's possession of nuclear weapons would have a negative effect on the region.

Much of this shift is attributed to Egypt, where an amazing 69 percent of respondents, even among those who doubt Iran's professions of peaceful intent, still reportedly claimed that Iran's possession of nuclear weapons would be a good thing for the region.

There is no persuasive explanation why these numbers shifted so greatly over the past year -- or why they differ so greatly from those reported in every other published Arab poll over this same period. And there are many underlying reasons why a large percentage of Arabs might fear, resent, or just generally dislike Iran: the Sunni-Shiite sectarian split, along with intra-Shiite divisions; the historic and ethnic Arab-Persian cleavage; opposition to Iranian subversion, terrorism, or occupation in Iraq, Lebanon, and most Persian Gulf states; and, especially in the past year, disgust with Iran's brutal dictatorship, and disapproval of Ahmadinejad's condescending and hypocritical attitude toward Arabs and Arab causes. Given the lack of any convincing explanation for the near-seismic shift that Zogby reports, this poll must be considered an unreliable outlier unless some compelling new supporting evidence emerges.

The Zogby poll's findings are even more peculiar given that a Pew Global Attitudes Project Survey asked very similar questions in Egypt, Jordan, and Lebanon a mere two months earlier, and reached very different results. In the Pew poll, solid majorities in all three Arab countries reported unfavorable views of Iran: Egypt, 66 percent; Jordan, 63 percent; Lebanon, 60 percent. Views of Ahmadinejad were even more negative: Among Egyptians, 72 percent said they had little or no confidence in him; 66 percent of respondents in Jordan and 63 percent in Lebanon said the same.

The Pew poll also found predominantly negative opinions toward Iran's nuclear program in all three Arab societies, not to mention the other predominantly Muslim countries surveyed in the poll. In Egypt and Lebanon, two-thirds opposed the prospect of Iran's acquiring nuclear weapons; Jordanians felt the same way, but only by bare majority (53 percent vs. 39 percent). In all three countries, support within those majorities ranged from 66 to 72 percent in favor of tougher economic sanctions against Iran. In Egypt and Jordan, among the majority that opposed Iran's acquisition of nuclear weapons, those surveyed also believed by wide margins that it was more important to succeed in thwarting this possibility than to avoid a military conflict.

Oleg Nikishin/Getty Images

 

David Pollock is a senior fellow at The Washington for Near East Policy and author of "Actions, Not Just Attitudes:  A New Paradigm for U.S.-Arab Relations (2010)."  From 1987 to 1995, he was the branch chief for Near East/South Asia/Africa survey research at the U.S. Information Agency, and then served in several State Department advisory positions from 1996 to 2007.

AVILLA

7:44 PM ET

September 16, 2010

Remarkable.

An entire article built around a premise already disproven in a very large study, that then attempts to discredit that study by dragging up OTHER studies conducted over a year ago. Truly an outstanding journalistic effort.

People rely on the most recent Zogby study because--here's the thing--it's the most recent study. Obviously, this whole drama changes day-to-day. The Middle East's perception of the West (especially America) goes down day-to-day. And, apparently, their perception of Iran goes up day-to-day in response.

It's a difficult concept to understand, I know, especially for yet another member of "The Washington Institute for Near East Policy".

 

AVNER STEIN

10:38 PM ET

September 16, 2010

Doesn't matter

Who cares what Arabs think?

Citizens of the Arab world are one of the most intellectually inferior and knowledge-deprived people on Earth. Their education system is so EFFED beyond belief. Kids are taught that Jews are apes and America wants to destroy the Islamic world.

Arab children are instilled at a very early age with a jaded perception of the view. This is why the Arab world is a mono-culture, and dissent is not tolerated.

The leadership did this on purpose to keep the people obsessed with the USA and Israel - countries that pose no threat to Arab integrity, to prevent an overthrow over their own government.

Imagine if all that time and energy Arabs wasted blaming Israel and Jews for allt heir problems and oh, I don't know - gave women rights, ended persecution of religious minorities, normalized relations with israel and ended their pointless war, and finally joined the 21st century.

what a great arab world that would be.

 

BUDAHH

2:34 AM ET

September 17, 2010

We didn't kill a million, Muslim fanatics and their religious

guides did, blame the U. S for muslim barbaric behavior

 

DMOLONEY

9:13 AM ET

September 17, 2010

"Absent the US led invasion

"Absent the US led invasion there would >1 million civilians ALIVE"

The iraq war unquestionably cost many peoples their lives but the million figure is more than likely an over-estimate.

http://w4.ub.uni-konstanz.de/srm/article/view/2373

 

AVNER STEIN

11:41 PM ET

September 17, 2010

LOL!

99.9% of MUSLIMS ARE KILLED BY OTHER MUSLIMS ANTI-ZIONIST JOO.

Get that through your thick skull. The 8 year egyptian-yemen war killed TWICE as many people as the 100 years of conflict between Arabs, Jews, and Palestinians. The Iran-Iraq war killed over a 1 million. The Sudanese War killed 3 million. The Somalia War has killed 450,000. The Turk-PKK war has killed 50,000. The Islamists in Kashmir have killed 80,000 Hindus since 1989.

Need I go on?

The Muslim world was killing themselves well before Israel and the USA showed up you troll.

 

BUDAHH

2:32 AM ET

September 17, 2010

Forgot to mention all the Gulf states??????

If you ask about all the gulf states which are close to the Persians you will hear a whole different tune. These countries feel threatened by Iran more than anyone, with large Shia populations in all of them and Iran meddling in their business they know the consequences of Iran with power and their biggest fear is nuclear power.

Look at the last attempt of overthrowing government in Bahrain, Huti rebels in yemen, If you ask around the gulf you will hear a different story, the arab gulf states are not happy with the way the U.S is handling Iran and they feel that they were left out to hang by the U.S.

Lebanon doesn't count as a country that the pole can use because of Hizbullah and their large support for Iran.

No offense to Arabs but their Media doesn't really display a truthful point of view on the middle east, so how can they even have the slightest idea about real news or developments, they are being baby fed lies by the arab media for years and are discouraged to think for themselves or outside the box like avner said their views don't mean didlly sh......t , their rulers decide everything, it isn't as if they can go vote them out the next election. the only thing is they can cause some rioting and unrest if someone attacks iran. But i bet you the Saudi's will be willing to pay those 60 billion so that the U.S will take out the Iranian nuclear program instead of buying weapons. No matter what their population thinks

 

AEHSAN

4:11 AM ET

September 17, 2010

Thanks for the condescending racism

Its all over the anti-arab/anti-muslim comments. Not worth saying much more other than the ignorance shows in the vitriol. Go bomb Iran and then act surprised why no one loves you and why the world "hates you for your freedom".

 

GDE

4:17 PM ET

September 17, 2010

Incentive

USA and Israel have not only threatened Iran with conventional military attacks, both not only use chemical/radioactive WMDs in "conventional" warfare, but they have mutually threatened Iran with nuclear attack. This was publicly leaked in 2003, specifically citing Iran as the target, and it is public knowledge that hostile nuclear weapons patrol off the coast of Iran frequently.

USA and Israel both justify their extensive nuclear weapons programs as deterrents to attack. While their rhetoric says otherwise, the actions of USA and Israel strongly demand that Iran develop nuclear weapons as a deterrent.

The facts I stated were published in major newspapers, and are not disputed. My conclusion is obvious looking at the facts. Why is it I rarely if ever see anybody else say it?

 

GDE

8:47 PM ET

September 17, 2010

erratum

Mistake in comment: Incentive.

Ignore the second "not" in the first sentence. Both the US and Israel DO use chemical/radioactive WMDs (including depleted uranium and white phosphorus) in "conventional" warfare. And, even without the chemical/radioactive weapons, US bombing campaigns do add to be WMDs, even if individual munitions do not qualify.

 

UFC RESULTS

5:10 AM ET

September 24, 2010

No nukes

It is far more important to Israel that Israeli enemies not get nukes, than that Israel keep nukes. ufc 119 results and ufc 120 results
Get all the nations in the region to agree not to have nuclear bombs, along with stringent inspections. Everybody is then better off.

 

WGALLEGO680

3:52 AM ET

October 16, 2010

What Arabs Really Think About Iran

The Arab world might have soured on President Obama, but opinion polls show that they haven't rushed to embrace Iran. USA and Israel have not only threatened Iran with conventional military attacks, both not only use chemical/radioactive WMDs in "conventional" warfare, but they have mutually threatened Iran with nuclear attack. This was publicly leaked in 2003, specifically citing Iran as the target, and it is public knowledge that hostile nuclear weapons patrol off the coast of Iran frequently. USA and Israel both justify their extensive nuclear weapons programs as deterrents to attack. "There is no persuasive explanation why these numbers shifted so greatly over the past year -- or why they differ so greatly from those reported in every other published Arab poll over this same period. And there are many underlying reasons why a large percentage of Arabs might fear, resent, or just generally dislike Iran: the Sunni-Shiite sectarian split, along with intra-Shiite divisions; the historic and ethnic Arab-Persian cleavage; opposition to Iranian subversion, terrorism, or occupation in Iraq, Lebanon, and most Persian Gulf states; and, especially in the past year, disgust with Iran's brutal dictatorship, and disapproval of Ahmadinejad's condescending and hypocritical attitude toward Arabs and Arab causes franklin click here. Given the lack of any convincing explanation for the near-seismic shift that Zogby reports, this poll must be considered an unreliable outlier unless some compelling new supporting evidence emerges. " the only thing is they can cause some rioting and unrest if someone attacks iran. But i bet you the Saudi's will be willing to pay those 60 billion so that the U. S will take out the Iranian nuclear program instead of buying weapons.