Debacle in New Delhi

How can India be a superpower if it can't even build a bridge?

BY SADANAND DHUME | SEPTEMBER 22, 2010

View a slide show of New Delhi's Commonwealth Games crisis.

What was meant to be India's coming out party is quickly turning into a walk of shame. Only 10 days remain before the curtains go up on New Delhi's Commonwealth Games, the 19th edition of a quadrennial gathering that brings together the 70-odd nations of the former British Empire, and India's capital is a city in disarray.

For More

In the past week, Islamist terrorists claimed credit for injuring two Taiwanese tourists in a drive-by shooting; a pedestrian bridge near the event's flagship stadium collapsed, injuring 23 workers; a Scottish official declared the athlete's village "unfit for human habitation"; and Britain, Australia, Canada, and New Zealand issued travel advisories warning their citizens of more terrorist attacks during the games.

Ratcheting up the pressure on India, officials from England and New Zealand have raised doubts about whether the games will go ahead as scheduled. On Wednesday, Sir Andrew Foster, the chairman of England's Commonwealth team, told the BBC that the future of the event remained "on a knife edge." And what was a trickle of top athletes pulling out threatens to turn into a flood. Among those who won't be in Delhi come October: Jamaican sprinters Usain Bolt and Shelly-Ann Fraser, Australian tennis stars Lleyton Hewitt and Samantha Stosur, Scottish cyclist Chris Hoy, and English triple-jumper Phillips Idowu.

Cancellation still appears unlikely. Depending on whom you ask, and on whether you include a broader aesthetic and infrastructure facelift for Delhi timed to coincide with the games, India has sunk between $3 billion and $10 billion on the event. With national prestige riding on a successful outcome, it would take a catastrophe -- say a major terrorist attack or flooding on the streets of Delhi -- for the government to throw in the towel. And decisions by individual competitors notwithstanding, few countries would risk a diplomatic row with India by pulling out over the state of athletes' apartments and amorphous fears of terrorism.

Nonetheless, the controversy over the games highlights the gulf between India's lofty ambitions and its often messy reality. Over the last 20 years, liberalization and globalization have unshackled many of the country's most productive citizens from heavy-handed socialism and raised living standards faster than at any time in the nation's history. But even as the private sector booms -- swelling the middle class and producing billionaires by the fistful -- the quality of governance remains abysmal. Neither the courts nor the electorate punish public servants for amassing private fortunes. In parts of the country, the political and criminal classes are hard to tell apart.

Even before the most recent spate of bad news, the run-up to the Commonwealth Games has been plagued with scandal: multimillion-dollar stadiums with leaky roofs, fly-by-night firms accused of collecting hundreds of thousands of dollars without a written contract, and absurdly overpriced equipment and supplies, including $8,700 air-conditioners, $19,500 treadmills, and, most famously, $80 toilet paper rolls. Needless to say, Delhi is hardly the only city in the world where politicians and building contractors collude. But somehow, in other places, overpriced roads and bridges don't seem to fall apart with such alarming regularity.

For India's burgeoning middle class, the Commonwealth Games' natural audience, daily reminders of official ineptitude and corruption are hard to swallow. A popular joke on Twitter about Suresh Kalmadi, chairman of the organizing committee and a member of the ruling Congress Party, sums up the national mood: "Suresh Kalmadi tried to hang himself but the ceiling collapsed!" Delhi Chief Minister Sheila Dikshit and national Sports Minister M.S. Gill are the other popular villains. The comparison with Beijing's immaculate hosting of the 2008 Olympics only adds insult to injury.

Of course, as with so much else in India, there's always the chance the games will come together at the last minute in the madly disorganized but ultimately enjoyable manner of a Punjabi wedding (to use the Indian media's favorite metaphor). Early troubles with stadiums appear to have been resolved for the most part -- at least until Wednesday, when part of a false ceiling collapsed at a weight-lifting venue. A frenzied clean-up job will likely make the athlete's village "fit for human habitation." And barring further mishaps, once the games begin, the media's attention will naturally shift from organizational deficiencies to athletic performance. But the games' deficiencies might actually be a home-field advantage: The absence of many international stars will likely give India's traditionally underperforming athletes their 15 minutes of Commonwealth-wide fame.

Larger questions about India's governance capabilities remain. The Indian middle class -- at best, 300 million people out of a population of 1.1 billion -- may not have the numbers to decide elections, but it needs to demand a greater say in the country's governance. This means finding ways to translate its economic muscle into political clout. Until Indian politicians are held to the same standards as their counterparts in advanced democracies, the country will have to continue to suffer the ignominy of collapsing bridges, sub-par apartment complexes, and $80 toilet rolls.

MANPREET ROMANA/AFP/Getty Images

 SUBJECTS: DEVELOPMENT, INDIA
 

Sadanand Dhume is a columnist for the Wall Street Journal online, based in New Delhi and Washington, D.C. Follow him on Twitter @dhume01.

DISHA

1:03 AM ET

September 23, 2010

It saddens me to admit as a

It saddens me to admit as a citizen of India that this article is bang on target.

It was bad enough that the final budget was twice the planned one, but incidents such as the collapsing bridge and statements about our "different levels of hygiene" are truly disgraceful.

In a way i am glad of the unceasing rain. By delaying the many many last minute preparations (indeed, one might argue all the preparation was last minute), it is ensuring that the organizers and ministers will at last be held accountable.

The Games are truly highlighting the Indian paradox- a country aspiring to be a future superpower, and spending 10 billion on the games while slums have been relocated on the road side not 2 minutes away from the games village because of flooding. And the government has yet to do anything to help the citizens of those slums...

 

VODKA

2:35 AM ET

September 23, 2010

Truth, the whole truth and

Truth, the whole truth and nothing but the Truth......... super power india???? are you kidding me. First feed the hungry remove the biggest slums in the world and then day dream. First DESERVE then DESIRE...

 

DUDE91

10:09 AM ET

September 24, 2010

You are getting on the wrong

You are getting on the wrong track buddy. We are showing more economic growth than any north american country as well as European country. When you people were struggling with recession we didn't even feel the slightest hint of it.

The slums are changing , Slowly but surely. Our growth story is much more promising than any other country at the moment.

 

ARYABHAT

3:21 AM ET

September 23, 2010

In the wider perspective - it is not THAT bad

While I absolutely agree that this is emberassing to India and Indian Govt. that Games facilities are not up to the standard. That too when India likes to assume itself winning when competing with China.

However, this need to be seen in larger context. Delhi Airport is a few years ahead of Heathrow (Making this Delhi-London comparision as this was part of overall Commonwealth games plan) and Delhi Metro is delivered on time with better quality.

Yes, it will be like Punjabi wedding, messy in the beginning and sweet in the end. Or so I hope.

In any case, Head must roll - especially with regards to rampant corruption.

 

SOMO

9:27 AM ET

September 23, 2010

In the wider perspective - it is not THAT bad

@ aryabhatt

really ?

what would be worse ?

40% of the population is BPL, has no electricity, but we organise Common wealth games. spend millions steal more than is spent and then have things collapse.

the politicians are not yet held accountable no arrests no nothing. reminds me of the wild west.

what do the people who are earning less than 2$ a day (nearly 70% of India) got to do with an airport ? they have never seen one and are not likely to see one either.

for gods sake dont compare Heathrow to New Delhi Airport. compare it when New Delhi handles as much traffic as heathrow.

there is National pride and then there is your post.

I am an Indian living in India.

 

ARYABHAT

4:44 AM ET

September 24, 2010

@ SOMO, Yes, it isn't THAT bad

My friend, I fully agree that corruption has to be punished In fact I wrote that "Heads must roll" for that.

As for comparision of Delhi with Heathrow, please see that this article and discussion is in perspective of commonwealth games. Please tell me if not with London, which city it should be compared? I have been to both airports and must admire a good thing when it is there. Even if it is one's own country.

40% of the population is under BPL and that is a SHAME. No doubt. And commonwealth games in my opinion is a waste of money. But that is not here the debate. Debate is the fiasco of preparation of games that undermines India's image.

I am in no way defending the status and unpreparedness of this event.

However, please understand that England, Aussie and Canadians will be glad to clap and say - "Hah, Browns can't manage a single project like even CWG." Which is only one part of the overall picture. Airport, Metro, such projects directly linked with CWG are on time and delivered correctly. BBC and some media will never show that. You as an Indian, are right to criticise Govt for non-performance. However, we also need to question this bias of the media, showing only negative side. e.g. I challange you to get ONE good BBC report about even Indian IT without showing slums of India. NDTV or DDI will not make a report on UK's finance Indistry and include their Drug abuse in UK, will they?

 

JBROCKLE

11:33 AM ET

September 23, 2010

Significant, but don't read into it too much

I think one has to be careful about reading too much into something like this. I don't think you can make grand statements about geopolitics and a superpower race with China.

On the other hand, it is inevitable that this will be compared to China's fantastic delivery of the 2008 Olympic games which despite some of their own, lesser, problems were spectacular in the end. (Obviously I understand the difference in budgets)

There is no denying that it is hugely embarrassing for India on the global stage.

 

CECIL DE BAKKEL

12:23 PM ET

September 23, 2010

UnCommonwealth Games

When one always pulls all-nighters, don't expect an A+. The phrase "By the skin of our teeth" has more margin for error than this event for which all the work was supposed to be finished by 2007. I wouldn't blame the star atjhletes to be a no-show. SO are many Delhites who are taking a vacation during the two-weeks. I bet it was the "Shining India" BJP party who signed up for this event to embarrass the Congress Party.

 

MIDDLE_CLASS

5:51 PM ET

September 23, 2010

Mr. Dhume suffers from middle class chauvinism

Mr. Dhume makes some acceptable points like:
Until Indian politicians are held to the same standards as their
counterparts in advanced democracies, the country will have to
continue to suffer the ignominy of collapsing bridges, sub-par
apartment complexes, and $80 toilet rolls.
But I strongly disagree with his portrayal of the middle-class
as the nice guys, and of `the others' (the poor) as the ones holding back India and its government. I quote him:
Over the last 20 years, liberalization and globalization have
unshackled many of the country's most productive citizens from
heavy-handed socialism and raised living standards faster than
at any time in the nation's history. But even as the private sector
booms -- swelling the middle class and producing billionaires by
the fistful -- the quality of governance remains abysmal.
and again:
The Indian middle class -- at best, 300 million people out of a
population of 1.1 billion -- may not have the numbers to decide
elections, but it needs to demand a greater say in the country's
governance. This means finding ways to translate its economic
muscle into political clout.
Come one Mr. Dhume. Is the success of economic policies judged by the number of Billionaires they produce ? What about the poor people it leaves behind and frequently rides over ? Did the labourers in the common wealth project loot money ? Or did the middle class netas, babus, agents and contractors do the looting ?

The Indian middle class has its interests well taken care of. The contractors, middle men etc. for the common wealth games project are from the middle class or upper class. Did the poor give Mr. Kalmadi the job of disbursing favours and government money ? The middle class apparatus gets votes from the poor but actually carries out the agenda that suits the middle class (or more precisely, government corruption hurts all classes, but hurts the poor much more that it hurts the middle class). Mr. Kalmadi and Professor Manmohan Singh are from the middle class or the upper class. Certainly not poor. There is very little difference between the lower class representatives like Mayawati and Laloo, and the middle or upper class representatives like Kalmadi, Professor Manmohan Singh or Jyoti Basu. They all steal.
The lower class representatives speak broken English - that is the only difference.

The middle class is also what supports the RSS and BJP. Go to Gujarat and stop an average middle class person on the street and ask about Mr. Modi and his government. They will spout sweet praises for their fascist leader.

Look Mr. Dhume, the middle class has, like the others some virtues: it can be forgiving and still hopeful of a bright future for the country. But its conscience is not clear. Let us count the total rupees paid by the middle class citizens as bribes to netas and babus. I claim that it is much larger than the total bribes paid by the lower classes. If my claim is true, then clearly, the middle class is sustaining corruption in government. If all the 300 million middle class folks refuse to pay bribes, I claim that corruption would reduce to a trickle.

- A middle class citizen of India

 

ARYABHAT

7:43 AM ET

September 24, 2010

@ MIDDLE_CLASS - Mr Modi was Poor!

Unfortunately I fail to see the point you are making here. IS Middle calss at fault for everythign that is bad in India and poor (who vote more in both % and absolute terms) are only victims? Come on! Democracy is only as good as its voters. And if it isn't good then only 300 million middle class many not be only at fault.

Some points for you to ponder - Narendra Modi was poor. He was a tea stall assitant at State transport bus stop in Amdavad where his brother had Tea stall. As for people of Gujarat liking him, lets face it, Gujarat has 78% employment against 28% of Indian national average. During his rule Agricultural GDP has doubled. Whom do you think has prospored? Only middle class? Actually they joined middle class because of the properity brought in by his rule. Before that they were poor. As for Fascist approach, your favourites Laloo and Mayavati are no less fascist! AND they keep poor people poor. Unlike Mr Modi.

 

MIDDLE_CLASS

8:13 AM ET

September 25, 2010

To Mr Aryabhatta

Thanks for your response. I had previously assumed that Modi was from a middle class background. You may be right in saying that not all politicians are from the middle class. But how poor was Modi ? It is not clear. Wikipedia says:

"Modi was born on 17 September 1950 to a middle class family in Vadnagar in Mehsana district of North Gujarat."

Now, Meshana district is one of the poorest in Gujarat. So. perhaps he really is from a poor family. Thanks for your tea stall factoid anyway. Somehow the idea of Modi as a child of ragpickers does not seem real.

The BJP used to say "India shining". Now it is saying "Swarnim Gujarat". Here is what a media outlet says (probably left-wing, but I dont know; All I know is that facts have a left-wing bias):

"This sorry situation of unemployment in Gujarat did not allow the state to advance into a prosperous state free from poverty.
Gujarat has a high 31.8 per cent population living below poverty line, says a Planning Commission report. This is higher than several major states such as Jammu & Kashmir (13.2 per cent), Kerala (19.7 per cent), Punjab (20.9 per cent), Himachal Pradesh (22.9 per cent), Haryana (24.1 per cent), Tamil Nadu (28.9 per cent) and Andhra Pradesh (29.9 per cent). "
Source: http://mediascanenglish.blogspot.com/2010/06/unemployment-rising-in-vibrant-gujarat.html

Now, I have to state that it looks like Gujarat is not doing any worse than the rest of the nation. But that is no defence ! Thats like saying India is shining because it is being governed better than Pakistan or Bangladesh are !

Laloo and Mayawati do not belong to organizations that idolized Mussolini ! They do not belong to organizations that mimic the uniform of Fascismo thug followers of Mussolini. All of the Hndutva mullahs do that. The Congress stalwarts do that only at night. But the crooks from the left (Laloo, Mayawati) dont even do that at night. Nor do they instruct the police the look the other way when a mob sets out to burn a city. Modi gave exactly such instructions in 2002. Modi was backed up by the hindutva talwars ruling Delhi at that time. Mussolini has a similar record.
That is why Modi is fascist.

No I am no laying all the blame on the doors of the middle class. But I am saying that they cannot pretend that it is the poor who are responsible. No nation deserves the kinds of governments we have been having since 1991.

If you were duped into buying food contaminated by toxins and pesticides, having no other source of food, would you be deserving of the food you get ?
The poor (indeed all of India) have been duped in the elections, but they dont deserve the punishment meted out. Come on now Aryabhatta. Did India deserve to be colonised ? The colonial rule lasted because Indians consented and cooperated. If we did not consent, the British would have had to leave.
So tell me sir, do the poor who have no real economic or political power
really deserve the governments we have been having ?

 

ARYABHAT

5:57 AM ET

September 27, 2010

@ Middle_Class - Can't convince a closed mind

My Friend, With regards to Modi's background, you have to look at WIKIPEDIA, and then guess that Mehsana is a poor district so Modi might be middle class! However, As you could not find anything perhaps more in Wikipedia about Modi you are calling his Tea stall background as "factoid" !!!!!! Wow, clever choice of words to belittle an argument that you just couldn't accept!

As for Mayawati or Laloo v/s Modi, remember that what they "Practise" is more importnat then what they preach. Laloo, Mayawati and Mulayam are exploiting poor AND are fascist!

As regards to unemployment, I would place here the answer given by Cabinet Minister in Parliament :
http://hindufocus.wordpress.com/2010/08/31/gujarat-vs-west-bengal-contrasting-states/

"Labour minister Mallikarjun Kharge told Rajya Sabha in response to a question that in the three years — from 2007 to 2009 — Gujarat had managed to place 1,78,000, 2,17,000 and 1,53,000 workers, respectively, through employment exchanges. "

However, I can't convince a closed mind. No one could. You have made up your mind that Modi is bad, so logic is useless and I stop here.

 

JOHN LINDAUER

11:04 AM ET

September 24, 2010

Indian growth statistics are an illusion

This article suggests India is becoming important country with a rapidly growing economy. Years ago I did an in-depth study of the Indian economy and concluded it was stagnant and would remain so until it bureaucracy changed. Last year I revisited the study in response to the reports of rapid economic growth. What I found - the Indian bureaucrats are still using the old Soviet model of claiming rapid growth when nothing of the sort is occurring outside of a few "new" industries such as call centers where new regulations and restraints have not yet been promulgated.

At this point, India's stagnation is deeply entrenched with no light on the horizon. The only answer I can see is for the national government to pass a blanket repeal all national, state and local laws, regulations, permits, reports, licenses, zoning, fees, taxes etc etc relating to employment and production so that any person or company domestic or foreign is totally free to produce any product or service anywhere in India at any time using any technology and employing any labor in any way at any wage and selling it anywhere at any price. In other words, total economic freedom to set lose the Indian economy from the dead hand of the regulatory raj.

The economy would boom and, no doubt, specific mistakes and problems would appear. These could then be handled with new laws and regulations designed to handle actual problems. The difference being that today's laws and regulations are generally designed to prevent anything from happening so there will be, by definition, no problems whereas the new laws and regulations would be designed to solve specific real problems. The difference is huge.

Until something like this occurs India will continue to be a failed state and minor player on the world stage with a stagnant or declining per capita income.

 

ALI

5:20 PM ET

September 24, 2010

India over rated

this fiasco is an ultimate proof of india being over rated by US/west, people inside and outside india need to focus on lives of 400 million people who are living worst life than of life in african poor states.....US just wanted to lift india against china after win over soviet's. But its too early too rely on one of the world's most corrupt goup of individuals ...The Great Indian rulers!

 

BULBUL2010

1:18 PM ET

October 6, 2010

Really?

1. Bolt, how will you become a world champion racer if you tripped over the stairs?
2. Pavarotti, how will you become a world class tenor if you sneezed?
3. How will you be successful in life if you got an A-?

Come on, please get some sense of proportion?