These Terrorists Aren't Playing Games

All India is abuzz over New Delhi's incompetent planning for the Commonwealth Games. But it's the return of terror that the city should be most worried about.

BY PRAVEEN SWAMI | SEPTEMBER 22, 2010

NEW DELHI -- Given the grim levels of violence to which Indians have become accustomed in recent years, the Sept. 19 attack on tourists at New Delhi's historic Jama Masjid mosque was almost trivial. Two men riding on a motorcycle fired from a 9-millimeter automatic weapon, injuring two journalists from Taiwan, before disappearing into the alleys around the mosque. Minutes later, a bomb went off inside a car parked nearby -- but fizzled because of errors in its fabrication.

In a letter emailed to newsrooms an hour after the assault -- the latest in a series of similar warnings released to the media -- an organization called the Indian Mujahideen took credit, casting the attack as retaliation for the killings of protesters by police in Indian-administered Jammu and Kashmir. The letter castigates the international community for "lending outright support for Indian idol-worshippers' massacres of the innocent people."

"We will now rightfully play Holi with your blood," it warns Indians, referring to a Hindu spring festival during which revelers throw colored powder and water on one other.

The Jama Masjid attack was a far cry from the sophisticated November 2008 massacre in Mumbai, but it suggests that India's jihadi movement can no longer be ignored. It also demonstrates the durability of the Indian Mujahideen, whose bombings claimed hundreds of lives between 2005 and 2008, and raises the prospect that it is regrouping. In their email, the militants threatened to disrupt the Commonwealth Games, scheduled for next month in New Delhi. India's various failings in planning for the high-profile sporting event have garnered all the headlines, but a larger, more successful attack -- if demonstrated to have been carried out by a terrorist group linked to Pakistani jihadi groups -- could spark a regional crisis between two nuclear powers.

Much of the Indian Mujahideen's leadership is drawn from the Students Islamic Movement of India (SIMI) -- a banned Islamist student group founded in 1977 by Jamaat-e-Islami, India's largest Islamist political party. From the outset, SIMI made clear its belief that the practice of Islam would remain incomplete until a caliphate was established. SIMI's strident Islamism soon led the Jamaat to distance itself from the organization.

SIMI appealed to an emerging class of educated, middle-class urban men who felt economically marginalized and politically disenfranchised by anti-Muslim chauvinism in India. By 2001, when the group was outlawed, SIMI boasted more than 400 ansar, or full-time workers, and 20,000 ikhwan, or volunteers. As scholar Yoginder Sikand has noted, the organization provided "its supporters a sense of power and agency which they were denied in their actual lives."

After December 1992, when Hindu extremists smashed a mosque in northern India, SIMI's polemics became increasingly bitter. In a 1996 statement, SIMI called on Muslims to follow the path of the 11th-century warlord Mahmood Ghaznavi and avenge the destruction of mosques in India. At SIMI's 1999 convention, the language was inflammatory. "Islam is our nation, not India," thundered Mohammad Amir Shakeel Ahmad -- one of several SIMI-linked operatives of Lashkar-e-Taiba, the Pakistani jihadi group, who was arrested in 2005 for smuggling in military-grade explosives and assault rifles for a planned strike in the state of Gujarat.

The idea of the Indian Mujahideen was born, as it were, over tea and biscuits, at weekend SIMI meetings in Mumbai attended by three of the network's key organizers: Sadiq Israr Sheikh, Abdul Subhan Qureshi, and Riyaz Ismail Shahbandri. The three men, frustrated by SIMI's failure to turn its ideological position into a concrete program of action, turned to organized crime networks within India, and through them Lashkar-e-Taiba, to set up the Indian Mujahideen.

Born in 1978 to working-class parents from the North Indian town of Azamgarh, Sheikh had grown up in the Cheeta Camp housing project in Mumbai. His parents had a troubled relationship, and the family struggled to survive; still, he made his way through middle school and became certified as an air-conditioning mechanic. But Sheikh never found a regular job, and he felt cheated of a share in the economic opportunities emerging around him.

MANPREET ROMANA/AFP/Getty Images

 

Praveen Swami is associate editor of the Hindu.

MARTY MARTEL

6:56 AM ET

September 23, 2010

India's secular seclusion

India somehow still seems to love its blissful confinement to the negotiating table. The 'will' to take on the terrorists is nowhere in sight.

India, which has been at the receiving end of jihadi violence for centuries (since 725AD), is in deep slumber ... secular slumber.

India, predominantly Hindu and targeted by the terrorists precisely for that ... though it may imagine otherwise, rather unwisely ... remains suspended in secular seclusion! Any association of terror with the religion of a minority is taboo even when it is glaringly apparent.

It does not seem to occur to Indian government that for it to be secular, it has to be alive first! So as bombs go off in crowded places with chilling regularity, a Pavlovian spirit of slavishness, slip-shod logic and self-defeating tolerance takes grip of everyone.

From the public to prime-time pundits to pen-pushers of the print to politicos, all are coy, confused and confounded about how to react.

The stoic leaders exhort the nation to be calm, as if it were raring to bark and bite like Bush. The media waxes eloquent on the country's resilience in the face of terror, forgetting that bombs or no bombs, those alive have to go to work for their daily bread. The world sheds tears and then advises restraint, a virtue they themselves have shelved in similar situations, while the killers for their part start preparing for their next brutal assault, cocksure that they can pick and choose their targets so sedated by secularism.

Add to that the imposed guilt of Babri Masjid and Gujarat being drilled into the Indian psyche day in and day out by rational intellectuals amidst the masses and the media, much to the Jihadis’ joy. Should we not be paying an eternal price for those sins? Were not the Jihadis just lambs before that, tolerant to boot and lovers of 'kafirs'?

What delusions!

Really, in a country inhabited and led by mere men of straw, no provocation can truly become the last straw.

Indian Jihadis have achieved self-sufficiency long back. The internalizing of Islamic terror, with inaccessible pockets and even corridors inside India is a harsh reality. Here RDX is a cottage industry with a high degree of indigenization and vast employment opportunities for inflammable youth, Indians for sure but Muslims first, waiting to be ignited.

In short, barring announcing themselves through neon signs, the Islamic terror network is as conspicuous as an over-bearing mother-in-law! Yet, the long arm of law remains folded, in secular deference to minority sentiments. Even when it is apparent that the so-called moderates in them have no voice.

Indian authorities are politically inhibited from raiding the numerous city blocks of terror right under their own noses!

On the contrary, the rulers bend over backwards with bouquets of reservations and what not in a wishful fit of appeasement, reminiscent of a sheep's optimism when faced by wolves.

Now does a nation, so committed to hara-kiri, really need any other enemies?

 

VIDYUT

11:42 PM ET

September 24, 2010

Brain dead

Actually, the government is paralyzed by its own vote bank politics. The concept is that entire batches of people will vote for them if something is done for their group. So we have the Muslim votes, the dalit votes, the Hindu votes, the businessmen, the farmers, urban, rural, regional.... never realizing that if they govern well, they will be able to be on the side of all of them. The great Indian fantasy is that if one group prospers, its taking away something from the others. India hasn't moved away from its pre-independence experience of scarcity. Economic progress may have happened, but no one is willing to trust it.

Thus, you will have politicians sitting on their hands rather than do something radical that would lose them votes. They forget that this is the country where the Muslims refused burial space to the 26/11 attackers. The people are a nation, but the government seems to be in pieces. There is a reason for it too. The parties not in power are focused on besmirching those that are, rather than the country. So, the smallest mistake will be plastered in the papers - totally forgetting that people who act will sometimes make mistakes - so we have utter inaction. Do nothing that could backfire on the image and that backfires because they do nothing.

The whole thing is about politicians rather than government.

 

HAMDU

12:58 PM ET

October 10, 2010

Even when it is glaringly apparent

The stoic leaders exhort the nation to be calm, as if it were raring becertube to bark and bite like Bush. The media waxes gztlr eloquent on the country's resilience in the face of terror, forgetting that bombs or no bombs, those alive have to go to work for their daily bread. The world sheds tears and then advises restraint, a virtue they themselves have7ra shelved in similar situations, while the killers for their ucakbiletitcpart start preparing for their next brutal assault, cocksure that they can pick and choose their targets so sedated by secularism.

Add to that the imposed guilt of Babri Masjid and Gujarat being drilled into the Indian psyche day in and day out by rational 31cilerintellectuals amidst the masses and the media, much to the Jihadis’ joy. Should we not be paying an eternal price for those sins? Were not the Jihadis just lambs before that, tolerant to sinemaboot and lovers of 'kafirs'?

 

JULIA MIRON

4:29 PM ET

October 22, 2010

These Terrorists Aren't Playing Games

All India is abuzz over New Delhi's incompetent planning for the Commonwealth Games. But it's the return of terror that the city should be most worried about. Actually, the government is paralyzed by its own vote bank politics. The concept is that entire batches of people will vote for them if something is done for their group. So we have the Muslim votes, the dalit votes, the Hindu votes, the businessmen, the farmers, urban, rural, regional. "The Jama Masjid attack was a far cry from the sophisticated November 2008 massacre in Mumbai, but it suggests that India's jihadi movement can no longer be ignored. It also demonstrates the durability of the Indian Mujahideen, whose bombings claimed hundreds of lives between 2005 and 2008, and raises the prospect that it is regrouping pleasant. In their email, the militants threatened to disrupt the Commonwealth Games, scheduled for next month in New Delhi. India's various failings in planning for the high-profile sporting event have garnered all the headlines, but a larger, more successful attack -- if demonstrated to have been carried out by a terrorist group linked to Pakistani jihadi groups -- could spark a regional crisis between two nuclear powers. " The media waxes gztlr eloquent on the country's resilience in the face of terror, forgetting that bombs or no bombs, those alive have to go to work for their daily bread. The world sheds tears and then advises restraint, a virtue they themselves have7ra shelved in similar situations, while the killers for their ucakbiletitcpart start preparing for their next brutal assault, cocksure that they can pick and choose their targets so sedated by secularism. Add to that the imposed guilt of Babri Masjid and Gujarat being drilled into the Indian psyche day in and day out by rational 31cilerintellectuals amidst the masses and the media, much to the Jihadis joy.