China Won't Revalue the Yuan

No amount of hectoring by Barack Obama is going to change the calculus of Chinese leaders. An undervalued currency may be critical to their very survival.

BY JOHN LEE | SEPTEMBER 24, 2010

President Barack Obama had an intensive discussion about the yuan with Wen Jiabao Sept. 23 on the sidelines of the U.N. General Assembly meeting in New York, if White House officials are to be believed. In response, the Chinese premier reportedly assured Obama that China will press ahead with currency reforms, thereby delaying the disagreement until their next meeting. In reality, Washington remains naive to expect any significant rise in the value of the yuan, and Beijing remains disingenuous in offering such a prospect in the first place.

Beijing does not doubt that a re-evaluation of the yuan upward is in China's long-term interest. As Chinese economists continually warn, their economy is way too dependent on exports and fixed investment and not enough on domestic consumption. The Chinese people consume around the same quantity of goods and services as France, a country with one-twentieth the population. Because China imports around half of its consumer products from overseas, making imports cheaper through major reform would be one way of boosting the purchasing power of its citizens.

Yet, since the announcement in June that China would eag its currency peg, the yuan has risen approximately 1.8 percent against the dollar and actually fell against a basket of major international currencies prior to this week. For Obama, the issue is ostensibly about creating export manufacturing jobs for Americans. But the president should be aware that Beijing is even more determined to ensure that its currency remains artificially low.

The first reason, though this is not a viewpoint widely held by the country's economists, is that a large number of Chinese Communist Party officials think that the United States is deliberately attempting to orchestrate a Chinese slowdown by pushing for the re-evaluation of the yuan. These officials point to the 1980s, when the U.S. Congress was making similar demands on Japan to revalue the yen upward. As the U.S. dollar fell from 240 yen to 160 yen over two years, Japanese growth subsequently slowed. Tokyo responded by boosting government spending and lowering interest rates, leading to the rise of a real estate bubble that eventually burst and is still haunting the Japanese economy today.

China now has its own real estate bubbles, the result of record government spending and bank lending in 2009. A recent study conducted by the People's Bank of China estimated that around a quarter of homes purchased in the first six months of 2010 in Beijing were bought for investment and speculation purposes. In "hot" regions such as Tongzhou district and Wangjing area, the figure is closer to 50 percent. Beijing is already committed to deflating these bubbles before they pop -- meaning that its appetite for any further slowdown in exports is close to nil.

Michael Reynolds-Pool/Getty Images

 

John Lee is director of foreign policy at the Center for Independent Studies in Sydney and a visiting fellow at the Hudson Institute in Washington. He is the author of Will China Fail?

YXJ8US

9:47 PM ET

September 24, 2010

China Won't Revalue the Yuan

"Beijing will do nothing else but offer empty promises."
It seems this time even empty promises were not offered.
1. why china has to raise yuan against USA to please american politicians at the cost of chinese people? If China really does that, won't the chinese government again be instead criticized by the westerners that china cannot even take care of its own people.
2. I guess even Obama himself, and many American, cannot prove how the rise of yuan against dollar will solve the trade deficit and high unemployment problems. Though the media always talks about this and creates the illusion that that is really the solution. But after all, mass repetition of a false theory won't make it true.

 

GOU ROU HAO CHI

10:23 AM ET

September 26, 2010

Crappy Houses For Chinese Millionaires

"A recent study conducted by the People's Bank of China estimated that around a quarter of homes purchased in the first six months of 2010 in Beijing were bought for investment and speculation purposes."

How many of us here have actually walked through many of these spec houses, flats, apartments, condos? In China. All 64 million of them?

I have walked through many. Maybe even unlike Mr. Lee. From my perspective. What ever it might be worth, or worthless.
And from a quality point of view. Many or most are worth no more than sht

And. From the perspective of reasonable urban planning. These developments are also worth sht

Most just need to be torn down.
And rebuilt.
Once the Commies are kicked out.

 

MEGAKIDS

12:37 PM ET

September 26, 2010

Crappy Comment As Well...

After spitting nonsense on 3 paragraphs the final true statement came out: commies kicked out! My friend, keep dreaming for another 100 years. If the economy goes on, even just at a low 5-6% your motherland will sustain for a long time. Yuan's value has nothing, or little to do with US economy. The foundation of US manufacturing is rotten to the core. People are lazy and political structure outdated. There is no cure in the short term.

 

GOU ROU HAO CHI

2:11 PM ET

September 26, 2010

Please build better housing.

Please build better housing. With better urban planning. With more government regulation. With less crappy government.
Then you will live less of a crappy life.

 

MARTY MARTEL

3:54 PM ET

September 26, 2010

How long can China keep piling up huge trade surpluses?

While China keeps offering empty promises that US knows China will not fulfill, the real question is how long can this one way trade last where China keeps exporting and piling up huge trade surpluses with US and EU?

How much forex reserves China has to amass before the world including US/EU says ‘enough is enough and no more‘?

How long can China keep piling up huge trade surpluses with so many countries including US/EU before those countries say ‘enough is enough and no more‘?

This can NOT last forever and at some point in time, the world has to revert to old-fashioned protectionism and discard WTO.

 

RKERG

10:51 PM ET

September 26, 2010

false data is as false data does

when you are a totalitarian state pretending to be a communist state that is embracing a few capitalist principals, the gigantic flaw in your argument is the lack of transparency and freedom of the press and academia. China can print really good growth numbers year after year, but, in the end, they won't let anyone try and verify them. It is just lies and the great experiment is nothing but a hollow failure designed to keep those in power, in power.

 

HAMDU

2:22 PM ET

October 10, 2010

I can understand china wanting

Rather than spending time and brain power to figure out becertubeall these "issues", why don't you Americans start to spend more on education, start saving, consume less, 7rabuild public
transport network and renewable energy sources. Use the military for peace keeping rather than invading everywhere which you have no resource to sustain, nor morality to change. gztlr Get your own house in order first, and trust that all other issues will be taken care of. China has no time nor any intention to nuke you, and she couldn't be 7rabothered what you do with Isreal and Palestine. as long as you stay out, mind your own business. ucakbiletitcYou need money, China will buy your treasury bills, but don't dig too deep a hole. It's already looking like a huge grave!

The USA has less than 5% of the world population and we use 25% of the world's oil. We aren't ready to 31cilergo down to using 5% of the world's oil. Carter tried to get us to do that with "the moral equivalent of war" and we voted him out. We sinemafound ways to make arabs sell oil cheap instead. It would take a real war to get the USA to cut down oil use.