In Praise of Laziness

An investigation into 14th-century heresy explains why the French refuse to get off their derrières.

BY ROBERT ZARETSKY | SEPTEMBER 24, 2010

All history is contemporary history -- even for histories the future still holds in store for us. This year marks the 35th anniversary of the publication in France of Emmanuel Le Roy Ladurie's Montaillou. The book's subject -- everyday life in an isolated village in 14th-century France -- as well as its narrative (there isn't one) should have led to instant and enduring obscurity.

Instead, the book became a surprise bestseller and remains popular enough to have justified an anniversary edition of the English translation a few years ago. The reasons for this historical investigation's unlikely success in the France of the 1970s have endured through today; understanding them will help us fathom the massive strikes that are currently paralyzing the country and threatening to eviscerate the economic and social reforms proposed by the conservative government of President Nicolas Sarkozy.

Montaillou quietly placed itself in the French literary tradition that treats laziness with the gravity and intelligence it deserves. An earlier representative of this tradition is Paul Lafargue's call to arms, The Right to Be Lazy, while a more recent addition to this genre is Corinne Maier's Bonjour Laziness. While Lafargue's pamphlet was published in the late 19th century and Maier's small book appeared in the early 21st century, they address the same phenomenon: the soul-numbing nature of modern work. Whether it takes place at the factory or office, work has become mechanical and meaningless. Rather than a trend, it is a perennial subject in France.

It is not accidental that the syndicats, or unions, behind the recent strikes in Paris represent France's great mass of fonctionnaires, or white-collar workers whose job it is, well, to make the state institutions function. This is the sort of job, according to Maier, where "qualifications are irrelevant -- the only requirement is that you leave your intellect, personality, and imagination at the door." Lafargue would not have disagreed: The modern workplace, he declared, condemns man "to play the part of a machine turning out work."

But as Ladurie makes clear in his remarkable book, the jig was already up more than half a millennium ago.

At the turn of the 14th century, the small town of Montaillou attracted the attention of the Inquisition, whose efforts to extinguish the flames of heresy in southern France had nevertheless left burning embers in the most isolated parts of the realm. Few villages were more isolated than Montaillou -- it was and remains buried in the Pyrenees -- or more prone to the heresy du jour, Catharism. The world, in Cathar eyes, was a battleground between equally powerful forces of light and darkness, as well as a vast waiting room for souls that traveled from body to body until they were fully purified. The Cathars considered themselves true Christians and dismissed the Catholic Church as a pack of hypocrites and crooks.

This did not go down well with the papal authorities in Avignon, who dispatched an inquisitor to stamp out the sect. The Cathars' great misfortune was Ladurie's -- and his readers' -- great luck: The papacy's man in Montaillou was Jacques Fournier, an inquisitor of boundless energy and relentless curiosity. He grilled the villagers of Montaillou for days and weeks on end, leaving behind him not just dozens of terrified and shattered lives, but also a trove of transcripts based on his interrogations. Were it not for Fournier's frightening meticulousness, the existence of this society would have been forever hidden from us. (This meticulousness applies equally to the Vatican Archives, where Fournier brought and stored his register upon being named Pope Benedict XII, and which many historians, including Ladurie, consulted for their work).

PATRICK BERNARD/AFP/Getty Images
*This corrects original text that said, "one-and-a-half millennia."

 SUBJECTS: RELIGION, CULTURE, HISTORY, EUROPE
 

Robert Zaretsky is professor of history at the University of Houston's Honors College. He is author, most recently, of Albert Camus: Elements of a Life.

PENNFLYER

4:39 AM ET

September 25, 2010

Thank you for a great

Thank you for a great article!

But I bet that one might find this same attitude and lifestyle in many a small hamlet all over the world (including America) and maybe even in some metropolitan neighborhoods. The French are commendably and enviably spearheading an effort to defend against a kind of restless and harmful expenditure of energy in the name of civilization and progress, efforts that are very simplistic attempts to soothe the status anxiety resulting from said civilization and progress. I'm sure that in my life in America I have seen the honest refusal to buy into the destructive aspects of the advancement myth, although I have seen a lot more of inactivity and lethargy resulting from sheer resignation...

So:

The progressive economic energies released in large-scale civilizations can result in a real and profound sense of loss as we watch others gain more and more and a lot more. We acutely feel the loss of pride, of stature, of status.

The actual, comprehensible, actionable reasons behind such gains--in the context of an epically large-scale setting, as opposed to a village--are inscrutable, and mostly lie beyond the reach of satisfactory explanation schemes.

But a few things are known for sure: as a rule, gains are made from some combination of effort, talent, training, and opportunity -- and then of course there's that thing called inheritance.

After some observation and some trial and error, some of us might come to hypothesize that in light of this inherently super-complex and bedeviled social system, the only realistic, measurable equalizers available to us for evening up are individual effort and talent.

And we damn well know that effort is 99% of it. Attitude, not aptitude. Perspiration, not inspiration. That's what gets real results in the long run, right? Therefore effort aka work is, if not the only viable route, certainly the most deserving of our focus.

And anyone who buys into this wholesale and gets bent out of shape about it will have a very hard time not burying him or herself in "work" to overcome the perceived source of deficiency: the unacceptably low sense of worth according to a very visible yardstick, and the resulting horror of status-anxiety. And by then, they're no longer chasing the cheese: the cheese is chasing them.

 

CEOUNICOM

12:46 PM ET

September 25, 2010

re:

Academics can write essays in praise of navel-gazing all they want, and the strikes are still unbelievably stupid. The author manages to write the entire piece (and a cute one at that, granted) without ever actually talking about the practical economic reality of the current French-labor hissy fit.

I mean, is it like academics have real jobs themselves? Professors in praise of cushy, state-subsidized employment that produces no meaningful economic benefit? You don't say. I am shocked.

 

TALDERSON

1:12 PM ET

September 25, 2010

"Much has changed in the

"Much has changed in the one-and-a-half millennia that have passed since Fournier shut down this network of Cathar peasants"

Whoa...

We've been transported to the year 2800!

Does that mean that there's a fact-check as well as a spell-check in Microsoft Word?

 

PASSPORT ADMINISTRATOR

9:38 PM ET

September 26, 2010

Error Fixed

FP regrets the error. We've been transported back to 2010 now.

 

TALDERSON

8:09 PM ET

September 27, 2010

Thank God! Although, I was

Thank God! Although, I was hoping for at least a jetpack.

 

PUBLICUS

6:13 PM ET

September 25, 2010

Jean Cauvin, Max Weber et al

The Frenchman John Calvin contributed mightily to the attitude and values of western civilization that, by the turn of the 20th century, the sociologist Max Weber termed the 'work ethic.' Calvin, a man of the 16th century, was expelled from Catholic France for espousing the religious views we know as as important component of the Protestant Reformation. While Calvinists organized as Presbyterians, the Reformation significantly aided in driving the transformation of the West from feudalism to capitalism.

Calvinism coincided with a period of global warming that produced temperatures greater than those we have today and which increased the population globally. However, unlike in China and India respectively, Calvinism in the West created a work ethic attitude that, with the Industrial Revolution, produced economic prosperity among a reasonably sized population - neither of which were occurring in India or China (nor could they have occurred in those two places of emperors and Buddhism/Hunduism).

France always has remained behind the curve of the transformation. While Calvinism freed sons from the sin of 'failing' to follow their father's otherwise honorable occupation - farmer, trader - France has continued to maintain a large agricultural component to its economy, agriculture being a highly visible remnant of the feudal system Calvin helped to dismantle in most other parts of Europe.

In North America Calvinism produced a prosperous (industrial) North of the United States while in the US South its (unfortunate) predestination aspect reinforced the slavery based plantation system of socioeconomics. Happily, the better aspects of Calvinism prevailed when this internal contradiction produced the Civil War initiated and lost by the Confederacy..

From John Calvin we get the notion that salvation comes to man by his own productive labor and by reinvesting the profits of his own productive labor to finance further ventures. From the French, we get cute and even clever art and culture, to include cuisine, but also the attitude in commerce, economics, finance, labor that la Republique long ago arrived at the Garden of Eden while the rest of us remain prisoners of Thomas Hobbes.

While the French in their Garden of Eden delusion are comfortable and contented to have long ago forgotten their black sheep Jean Cauvin, many others of us in the West are living in a 21st century that is traceable directly to John Calvin. Methinks the French built their streets more to take to them to protect their Garden of Eden fantasy than to use for real in commerce and productive communications.

 

JACK SATURDAY

3:23 PM ET

October 6, 2010

Calvin

Johnny Calvin was a lovely guy—he and his band of Protestant inquisitors used to visit the villages and farms of Switzerland and force the women to strip so that the thugs could see if there was “witch’s tit”—such as a mole or some such thing on women’s breasts—then they proceeded to the stake for a nice bonfire. He also preached the death penalty for disobedient children (so much for the cartoon Calvin), and presided over the beheading of at least one child. Americans, good Puritans, adopted some of his wonderful ideas by applying the lash in public squares. (Source, J.C. Pearce, The Biology Of Transcendence). Some commented on black slavery, saying that the blacks were "lazy and licencious," and that hard work would be good for their souls.

It's easy to see, if your eyes are open, why some people are so vehement in denouncing "laziness": several centuries of horrific violence, particularly on children, will produce a certain compulsive generational obedience, as well as buried hate wanting a target.

Today, 5% of the population is all that's required to produce everything we need, possibly 15% to perform essential services. This is an older, conservative estimate. (Source, J.T. Gatto, citing a Harvard study).

Huge masses, particularly now in the USA, worked their butts off and it came to nothing. Let's claim the cornucopia, high-tech industrial technology- it can take care of us all and repair itself in the bargain. Soul-destroying work is no problem for a robot, it doesn’t have a soul to destroy.

Jesus is quoted: "the Kingdom is spread upon the earth, and men [sic] do not see it." (Thomas Gospel)

 

FORLORNEHOPE

12:50 PM ET

September 26, 2010

Modern France

According to the OECD the French have among the highest levels of productivity per working hour, combined with the shortest working hours of all the developed nations. The French have made a national choice to put leisure above material wealth and why should they not do so? There is no sign that this model is not or will not continue to function as well as any other.

 

ALESIA

9:08 AM ET

September 27, 2010

I find it amusing that

I find it amusing that Americans of all people take such delight in putting down the French. From French wariness of including themselves in America’s dysfunctional military adventures around the world to American criticism of French society there is a lack of understanding in America of France far more than the reverse. France unlike America actually has a real ‘culture' and an attitude that attempts to make the most of the rather brief human life span. America, whose culture seems nothing more than a blend of the ‘media with retail consumption’ never has understood the real meaning behind the idea of ‘culture’ as an edifying term?

 

HITOMI

10:56 AM ET

September 27, 2010

Regrets, Alesia

You'll have to move past the political din and conservative salvos, past the vacuous jokes and sharpie caricatures, in order to recognize that a significant section of the US has an abiding and sincere connection to the French , as well as a willingness to engage French culture (reading Rene Char, Ananda Devi, Patrick Besson, Michel Houellebecq, etc.).

But naturally this would also entail you moving past the same nonsense--and the quantity of it is enormous--as conducted by the French. Complete dismissal of US "culture" as "unreal", as "nothing more than a blend of the 'media with retail consumption'", is as immature and ignorant as anything said of the French in the US. Perhaps even moreso: for while US criticism and dismissal tends to focus on political and social elements, the French counterpart purposefully neglects or deadens the cultural value of authors like Susan Howe, Jerome Rothenberg, and Nathaniel Mackey. Even worse, it ignores the extraordinary US historical contribution to music--without which the world you and I live in would likely be unrecognizable. Sorry, but attitudes like yours are part of the larger problem.

 

STEVE D

10:19 AM ET

September 27, 2010

In Praise of Laziness

The villagers of Montaillou opted to spend much of their day in "leisure," working as much as necessary to attain modest comfort but no more. This is rather like the worker who asked if he could work only four days a week. When the boss asked why, he said "because I can't live on three days' pay" (that is, he'd work only three days if he could). And it's like the experience the British had in India, where raising wages often resulted in less output because people simply worked shorter hours.

The villagers of Montaillou accepted the consequences of their choice, and that's the difference between them and the modern French strikers or many modern Americans. Lots of moderns want the Montaillou work ethic, BUT they also want the fruits of the modern work ethic, too. They want to work minimally (France), or work but not pay taxes (America) BUT they want electricity, Internet, highways, public education, modern medicine, garbage pickup, cable TV and all the rest. There are any number of remote villages in the Third World that offer a Montaillou level of existence if you really want that lifestyle. It's wanting to work like Montaillou but live like a modern American or European that many of us find objectionable.

 

DDSNAIK

1:02 PM ET

September 27, 2010

Well said. Steve

In light of today's growing economic uncertainties and the looming consequences from man-made climate change (to whatever extent one believes), plus the growing social and psychological disenchantment with corporate loyalty and the rewards (or lack thereof), one could justifiably argue the merits of seeking a Montaillou-ian life - as long as giving up the perks (?) of an individual materialistic outlook (4/5 BR houses and a shiny 6-cyl auto in every driveway and a retail center within few minutes ?) was palatable to that person.

I suspect, going forth, that more people will take that tradeoff along some spectrum of personal choice as more understand that the choice is already theirs to make.

Cheers

 

PUBLICUS

1:44 PM ET

September 27, 2010

Work like Montaillou but live modern

It's an oxymoron, i.e., it's impossible. The Garden of Eden always has been a fairy tale, same as the France of recent times - a delusion from the beginning of recorded time re-imagined in present day France.

An oxymoron is definitively a contradiction which, with respect, is the nature of your post, Steve D. It's an old truism that we can't have it both ways. Certainly not foreseeably.

I'm semi retired so I meet my present task demands with the same determination as I always have, but also love the leisure that being semi-retired allows and provides. However, a nation of people aged 18 to 60 cannot take or assume the same attitude or presume a due leisurely pace of a new blend of work and leisure that being semi-retired offers.

It's essentially a matter of the philosophy of the benevolent socialist state versus the philosophy of the limited state. That's the rub between those of us in the US in contrast to the smug and contented French to are certain they some time ago arrived

 

RANDOM1

1:17 PM ET

September 27, 2010

I Disagree

"...Maier insists that the laziness she abhors is the intellectual and moral laziness encouraged by the corporate world. Instead, she values -- as did the Cathars of Montaillou -- a life fully lived."

I don't want to pull comments out of context, but can this article be neatly summed up as 'The French are fabulous and creative - enjoying life to the fullest - while the remaining world labors in the wheel of existence.'

To be clear, yes, we all long for the romantic ideal of a French countryside existence. With the food, wine, etc, etc. But, in keeping clear, let's be honest and avoid using the word creative in describing the French. I am not talking about foodstuffs, clothing, modern art, or other pleasures of existence. I am referring to real ingenuity. The kind of creativity that gives rise to disruptive technologies and paradigm changes.

That doesn't happen in France. It is used to, but not anymore. The quote "The French would rather eat and make love with their faces" is applicable to both fighting and accomplishment. That sort of development - real technology, changes in processes, thought breakthroughs - that happens places where laziness is not celebrated (or even begrudgingly accepted).

The problem with their laziness - and culture overall - is sure to manifest itself in real, painful events. They may seem far off, but in the annals of history it will be very obvious how decadent (lazy) they were. Competition has a way of rooting out laziness. The French are still living by the leave of, well, the French when they weren't so damn lazy. It also helps that they received plenty of helping hands along the way (and are insulated by parts of Europe not quite so lazy), but that will not last forever.

 

GAUTHIEREYMARD

4:35 AM ET

September 28, 2010

A few examples of innovating

A few examples of innovating companies/programmes (only the largest, I don't want to get into details).

No foodstuffs, clothing, modern art, or other pleasures of existence. Only world-class companies, in many cases among the largest in the world in their categories, that have implemented new processes and technologies, while working on a 39-hour work week, retiring at 60, getting 5 (or more since the 35-hour week) weeks of paid holidays.

I usually don't take the defence of France when it comes to its economy, but ignorant comments compelled me otherwise.

- Defence & Aerospace:
ArianeSpace
Dassault
Thales
SAFRAN
Eurostar
Alstom

- Automobile:
Renault
Peugeot Citroen

- Banking/Insurance:
BNP Parisbas
Société Générale
Crédit Agricole

- Energy/Resources:
Air Liquide
Areva
EDF
Lafarge
Suez
Total
Veolia

- Construction:
Vinci

- Media/Communications:
Havas
JCDecaux
Publicis
Lagardère
Vivendi
Alcatel Lucent
Orange

- Retail:
Carrefour
Auchan
Danone
PPR
LVMH

- Pharmaceuticals:
Sanofi-Aventis

- Industry:
Michelin
Saint-Gobain

- Food:
Pernod Ricard
Sodexo

 

RANDOM1

5:04 PM ET

September 28, 2010

Re Gauthiereymard: (shaking

Re Gauthiereymard:

(shaking my head) I don't want to be snarky, I really don't, but in trying to cite innovation you merely listed large (French) companies.

1. that is not absolutely a sign of innovation (being big). in many cases it is indicative of protectionist measures
2. you referenced the food (foodstuffs) and retail (clothing) industries
3. implementing new processes and technologies is not the same as actual development

Please don't try to argue that the French are innovative with respect to disruptive technologies. Not in modern times anyways. You could cite contributions to engineering - real significant engineering feats - such as the Suez canal, etc.

In the meantime...wow, they got a great lifestyle (btw - the hours limitations does not apply most of the managerial, executive, etc level. and, yes, that level in many cases is responsible for actual innovation)

 

NICHOLAS WIBBERLEY

2:18 PM ET

September 27, 2010

and I disagree with Random1

Sounds like a prize poodle confronted with a working sheepdog, but that’s OK; the sheepdog is a tolerant beast, just wants to get on with the job, be fed, and lie by the fire.

 

RANDOM1

5:09 PM ET

September 27, 2010

Are you going to explain the

Are you going to explain the source of your disagreement?

I'm not sure I follow the analogy presented in your post. Feel free to speak more clearly/directly. Do you feel France is a cradle of innovation? Do you feel their economy and lifestyle is sustainable indefinitely regardless of competition in an increasingly global economy?

 
 

ANGELA ST JAMES

4:34 AM ET

September 29, 2010

Viva Spain!

The French having a lust for life? The French the world's champions of lazy? Must be joking.

Consider the Spanish.

Every day begins with the thought: how can we work as wee as possible? How can we borrow more from our fiscally more responsible brethen from the North? How can we screw another Euro from UK, German and Swedish retirees who live in our sunny land?

The wonderful people of the Hispanic peninsula invented lazy and brought this sacred art to perfection.

Now that's lazy!!!

 

ITONLYSTANDSTOREASON

5:29 PM ET

September 29, 2010

Not the Same Thing

Sure, the French like to have a life outside of work.

But Zaretsky is conflating this with something else entirely - the unilateral breaking of a contract.

You spend your life working with certain guaranties about pensions and retirement. You trust the management of the government and the economy to the graduates of the elite schools that have always staffed the managerial and administrative positions - like Oxford or Cambridge across the channel, but chosen by merit and educated at the public expense, rewarded with position and status.

And after decades over which you adhered to your side of the social contract, they say: "Sorry - it's screwed up! It's not our fault really, and you're just going to have to give some more years of your life for the good of the system."

Meanwhile, Sarkozy dines on the yachts of billionaires and marries a glamour model/pop star/trophy wife, and blames social problems on the gypsies.

A strike sounds like the least you could expect.

 

PUBLICUS

8:43 AM ET

October 1, 2010

Adults Needed and Welcome

Countries such as France and Spain need adult supervision, and they finally are getting some.

Sarkozy was elected to shake up the place, Zapatero was elected to get Spanish soldiers out of Iraq and elsewhere. Zapatero then proceeded successfully to set up an excellent confrontation against the reactionary Catholic Church. Now, after years of seasoning as PM and learning to deal with reality, Zapatero is tending to the serious and responsible business of addressing the country's economy.

Mssr. Chiraq failed miserably during his presidency, retreating from the usual suspects once they predictably took to the streets -a reliable reform stopper of the past. Previous recent governments of Spain never quite made the mess the Spanish face today nor had they tried seriously to address the central issues of the Spanish economy. This pathetic trail of failures in France and Spain are the evidence that adults are needed who can exercise social responsibility while being fiscally realistic and responsible.

Worth more than honorable mention in the right of passage we're currently witnessing in Western Europe is Berlesconi who, for all his sleaze and filthy wealth, also must enforce some order to the socioeconomics of the sloppiness that is contemporary Italy.

If these Garden of Eden countries and the culture of paradise gained that each has self-created don't finally grow up, the far more disciplined Germany with its austere yet strong social state will be dictating the fiscal and economic policies of their delusional southern neighbors.

Vichy anyone?

 

PUBLICUS

9:52 AM ET

October 1, 2010

Rite

That's of course "rite of passage." Regret the oversight.

 

CHOPPY1

2:42 PM ET

October 1, 2010

If the French find their jobs mind-numbing, maybe it's because

their economy doesn't generate jobs that require creativity and yield satisfaction. If they opened their economy more, maybe people would actually enjoy work.

 

CYRILLE CLéMENT

4:10 AM ET

October 13, 2010

That is a very relevant

That is a very relevant article, very well argumented and its conclusions are correct. These new protests we have had once again yesterday are not strategically oriented, they are just a last attempt to say "no" to an order which will be, anyway, settled, since the corporate man always wins in the end. So, the stake is rather the survival of a spirit through a "manifestation" of it, the impression of still being "free" (the French do not have the notion of "inner freedom" that the Eastern Europeans have and therefore need an "expression" of their anger) than a "winner", a thoroughly minded attempt to counter-balance a decision from above and a serious threaten for the final achievement of the new administrative order.

These present day demos in France can be seen as a "local friction" (in Clausewitzian terms) in a permanent, ongoing socio-cultural division and opposition between "formal freedoms" which are considered by their opponents as mindless, empty, coming from the outside of the being and forcing people to the conformism of an effective machinery and "spiritual liberty" which is perceived by the "rulers" as an impotent opposition to progress, a residu to be reduced, a vain desire of ineffectiveness.