The Japan Syndrome

China's teetering on the verge of its own lost decade, and a meltdown in Beijing would make Japan's economic malaise look like child's play.

BY ETHAN DEVINE | SEPTEMBER 30, 2010

This year, China overtook Japan as the world's second-largest economy, a shift in the global pecking order that surprised nobody who has been paying attention for the past 20 years.

What was truly surprising is that Japan was still No. 2. Like a distant uncle whose death notice reminds you he was alive, Japan is noteworthy for its furtive slinking from the world stage. It is an extraordinary disappearing act for a country whose global hegemony was seen as a fait accompli just 20 years ago. But the ur-Asian-export juggernaut has slipped into a permafunk of its own making. Japan as Number One now languishes as the 400,000th most popular book on Amazon.com while When China Rules the World is a bestseller.

The funny thing is that China borrowed much of its economic model from Japan: producing low-cost exports to fund investment at home while aggravating trading partners. At times, it seems like only the names have changed. Where Detroit automakers once denounced Honda and Toyota for dumping cheap, fuel-efficient sedans on American housewives, Treasury secretaries now wring their hands about the undervalued renminbi while China's trade surpluses yawn.

As pleasurable as it must be for China's leaders to have beaten Japan at its own game, the joke might soon be on them. In fact, they would do well to veer off of Japan's development path promptly. Sure, Japan's export boom funded stellar growth for four decades. But its undervalued currency eventually helped blow one of the largest bubbles in history, the bursting of which still hobbles Japan today. Japan's famously dismal demographics didn't help, but China's aren't much better. Beijing's one-child policy, introduced in 1979, has worked its way up the population pyramid such that China's supply of rural workers ages 20 to 29 will halve by 2030. Worse yet, China is much larger than Japan -- which means that the global consequences of a crash would be far greater. For the moment, Beijing is riding high, but China's sustained success depends on understanding where Japan went so badly wrong.

Some answers can be found 250 miles north of Tokyo in Kamaishi. The furnaces went out in 1988, and the birthplace of Japan's steel industry is now a sleepy fishing town. Kamaishi has drafted a number of renewal plans under the motto "City of Steel, Fish, and Tourism." Of the three, the fish are most reliable, but steel and tourism come together in an unexpected way. While the number of annual visitors is down by half since the 1990s, Kamaishi's shuttered steel mill still attracts a particular brand of tourist -- those fascinated by ghost towns. The Kamaishi Iron Works was once considered one of the finest haikyo, or modern-day ruins, in all of Japan.

But it seems even haikyo tourists are growing weary of Kamaishi -- recent blog entries complain that the site is now too decomposed, "a ruin of a ruin." Not even the receipt of Iwate prefecture's "Lively Non Flatland Area Prize" several years ago has kept people in Kamaishi, and the population continues to dwindle, from 100,000 in the 1960s to just 45,000 today. Nippon Steel, formerly the town's largest employer, has tried valiantly to help the city move on. But employment schemes such as stuffing old mills with racks of moist logs for the cultivation of shiitake mushrooms and miniature orchids have had little effect, and the company eventually abandoned its most symbolic sop to town spirit: In 2001, the once-formidable Kamaishi Nippon Steel Rugby Club was downgraded to an unaffiliated amateur club, the Kamaishi Seawaves.

Getty Images

 

Ethan Devine is a partner and portfolio manager at Indus Capital Partners, an investment firm specializing in international markets.

MANDREWSF

8:29 PM ET

September 30, 2010

Crash in China unlikely

Westerners often forget that Japan in the 60s experienced a bubble and crash. However, by the 80s Japan's per capita income was 125% that of America's. China's current level of overall development is roughly identical to Japan's state of development in the early 60s. There has been a lot of talk about China's potential collapse, but China's economic development is still on very high gear and aside from major cities such as Shanghai and Beijing, property price has largely been brought under control by the central government. The Chinese stock market contains a relatively small percentage of Chinese capital. At worse China will experience what Japan experienced in the 60s. Its macroeconomic growth and its steady socio/political transformation will continue unabated.

 

SAM FROM CALIFORNIA

9:39 PM ET

September 30, 2010

There are also other things the Chinese can do:

for one, they can provide better health care and pensions to its citizens. One reason there is so much saving in China is that the people need to save for a "rainy day". Their state-owned enterprises have made good profits in recent years, surely it would boost the popularity of their government if they did more to try to provide accessible health care to everyone. Not needing to save for health care would surely allow for higher levels of consumption from all economic classes.

 

MENCIUS

5:39 AM ET

October 1, 2010

Red Plenty . . .

" The speed of a flotilla is not determined by the fastest ship, but the slowest one."

Premier Wen Jiabao, 2007.

http://english.people.com.cn/200703/19/eng20070319_358925.html

You have to wonder, if those words might not come back and smack you in the face, one day . . . its almost the same as believing that the opposite, might be the case. (Personally, I would proffer that the median speed, is the one that ultimately determines it.)

I hope that ultimately, the long term goal of the CCP is globally benign, Dennis Wilder, left us some very useful insights, before he left office :

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cEUpeUclMXE

If the above article interested you, and you want a light read, for a plane journey, or a weekedn away, try this :

http://www.faber.co.uk/work/red-plenty/9780571225231/

 

ANDREWP111

9:38 AM ET

October 1, 2010

China can't crash

China can't crash until the oil runs out, because central planners can always keep things running by printing money, and by controling prices and wages by diktat. If they had to, they could do what Hitler did - a massive armament campaign to keep everyone employed. They could put their massive industrial overcapacity to work building the largest mechanized army, navy, and air force the world has ever seen. They have the people to man that army, and they could make a massive investment to build a military base on the moon complete with a mass driver that is capable of pounding any country on earth to dust.

China's biggest hurdle in sustaining their economy is the same as ours - peak oil. What will happen when the world's supergiant oil fields run down to the point that the decline can't be hidden? Something to think about.

 

ALEXBC

5:12 PM ET

October 1, 2010

Really now...

You don't think/realize that printing lots of money (which leads to inflation in a society where the average person still makes less than $3000.00 per annum), controlling prices and wages (which leads to strikes), or starting wars (which would be more disastrous than Nazi Germany's, due to the relative weakness of China's military compared to its American-allied neighbors) are all great ways to initiate a crash?

Then again, you talk about them building a "mass driver" on the moon, so perhaps you're not too rooted in reality to begin with.

 

MARTY MARTEL

2:43 PM ET

October 1, 2010

China is NOT Japan

It is mere wishful thinking on the part of Ethan Devine to think that China will follow Japan syndrome to economic meltdown.

For one thing, China is a super power - economic as well as military, unlike Japan ever was.

China has learned from Japan and is NOT investing in real estate which can crash.

Instead China is investing in natural resources, manufacturing industries and governmental securities. Besides China is rapidly modernizing its own industrial base military using its massive forex reserves. Already China is world leader in high speed rails and green technologies.

To add, China’s one party dictatorship affords China the luxury of enforcing economic policies that suit them by fiat if need be since they don’t have to answer to anyone unlike Japan.

China has already become a lender of last resort to many a companies and many a countries in the world with its massive and ever-increasing forex reserves.

With its UNSC seat with veto power and massive military build-up, China will achieve a super power status at par with US that Japan can never dream of.

 

ALEXBC

5:03 PM ET

October 1, 2010

Wrong

You seem to have a habit of being very wrong on issues pertaining to China, or at least extremely misinformed.

1. China is not a "superpower." I do not think anyone even knows what it means to be a "superpower," seeing as how it may be a one-case phenomenon (the United States). China's military is still a domestic defense force and its civic institutions are nowhere near as developed as those in Japan, let alone America.

2. Guess what? Japan also invested in "natural resources, manufacturing and governmental securities." As an island nation that imports everything, it had no other choice. It used to be a world-beater in steel production and held, at the time (1989), the largest forex reserves of any country to that point. By the way: China cannot, and does not use its forex reserves to "modernize its own industrial base." Doing so would wreak havoc with the value of the yuan. Instead, Beijing has tranferred its trade surplus onto American and Japanese bonds.

3. China being a "leader in high speed rails and green technologies" is a Western myth. 70% of China's rail projects are funded through debt. During the decade that China apparently dazzled Westerners with its infrastructure binge, domestic consumption plummeted: this reveals that these projects may be of questionable value, seeing as how many Chinese cannot even benefit from them. The Chinese who are purchasing new cars aren't even filling up all of China's excess roads, many of which lead to nowhere and we built simply to keep the artificial GDP machine ticking. Its green technology push is minimal and has not even come close to reducing the nation's dependence on coal: if anything, China is now more desperate for coal than ever before.

4. Japan also had a one-party system (LDP) that didn't exactly square with Western models; the arguments you make here about them being able to just do whatever they want are the EXACT same arguments made by proponents of 1980s Japan, 1950s USSR, and 1930s Germany.

5. The forex reserves are evidence of economic imbalance. China has purchased $2.4 trillion worth of dollars and yen (mainly) to suppress the value of its currency and subsidize its exporters at the expense of its households. The US, in the 1920s, and Japan, in the 1980s, were previous record-holders in the forex department, and like you do here, they were touted by many cheerleaders as being unstoppable because of that fact, when in fact they were at points of extreme vulnerability.

6. Do you really think the UN has so much power? I don't even think China thinks so. China reaching parity with the US is many years away, if ever.

 

GRANT

8:51 AM ET

October 3, 2010

Authoritarian states can do

Authoritarian states can do some work to improve an economy, look at Indonesia prior to the 1990s. The problem is that in most cases they grow too worried about domestic unrest and too tied to economic elites (as is the case many states but is pronounced in places where corruption is high).

On the military I'd say you're misreading it. A military build up doesn't create power so much as be a symptom of increased power. Mistaking one for the other is a good way to create unsustainable debt.

 

CHIARO

5:26 PM ET

October 1, 2010

Dogs & Demons

For a comprehensive look at Japan's present-day malaise and its historic roots, read "Dogs & Demons" by Alex Kerr. The book came out in 2000, I think, and about five years later it was translated into Chinese, and was subsequently make recommended reading by the Communist Party. According to Kerr, the book is effectively serving as a means for back-door criticism of the regime among CCP cadres, where "Japan" is being used as a codeword for "China". As Kerr put it in an interview, "If you say these things about China, you'll get censored. However, if you say it about Japan, that's fine as far as the regime is concerned, and they all know that China faces the same problems."

Unfortunately for China, the repressiveness of the regime is going to make the pace of reform even slower than in Japan, where the old style of doing things (i.e. through wasteful pork-barrel spending on unnecessary infrastructure projects and the like) are now actively being challenged. Sure, the party leaders are in a position to force top-down reforms, but that's assuming they actually will.

 

FIRST ADVISOR

8:13 PM ET

October 1, 2010

Pros and Cons

I'm sure the State Council appreciates Mr. Devine's gentle warning, although the idea that China is headed for a Japan-like crash is a little far-fetched. I'm one of those who believes the Chinese will overcome their difficulties, by hook or by crook, so some will disagree with my views.

For one thing, if you have a reserve of 2 trillion US$ at 2.5 percent a year, then your income from that amount is US$50 billion a year. Out of that amount, you can provide $1,000 in health insurance to 50 million people, at around 7,000 yuan a year. There are more than 50 million old people in China, and then, of course, they must spend the money on Chinese doctors. Chinese doctors may not be the worst in the world, there's a lot of competition for that ranking, but they are right down there close to the bottom. Improving the medicine business in China first might be a higher priority than increasing social security health insurance. Pensions would be a better use.

What an annual income of $25 billion can be spent on is one-year severance pay packages for workers laid off by closing companies (far less than 25 million a year), who would walk away peaceably with that amount in their pockets. Once the experiment in allowing farmers to rent part of their land has run for a few more years, I believe the State Council will write the law to allow the existence of private property in rural areas, and the actual sale and purchase of rural land. That one small step would make an enormous difference to the consumer economy of China. The State Council might even introduce the radical concept of property tax, which would alleviate any threat of a real estate bubble like kung fu wizardry.

Mr Devine wants China to open its financial sector to outside investors, and we can all understand he is drooling with greed to get his hands on all that loot. Sadly for his insatiable desires, I sincerely doubt the State Council is dumb enough to let Americans buy any part of their financial sector. After all, the Chinese government has been burned to the bone by deceitful and nearly fraudulent derivatives from groups like Lehman Brothers in the past. They know very well that, 'Fool me twice, shame on me'.

 

ORMONDOTVOS

4:23 PM ET

October 4, 2010

Fool economics strikes again...

I don't see people who save and invest in infrastructure projects as wrong, and to tout America as a proper balance of manufacturing and consumption shows me an economist who has swallowed the Western Kool-Aid.

Henry Ford had it right: make useful things, and pay your workers enough to buy them. The key word there is "useful" as in not bombs and bullets.

China's doing fine, and unlike Cuba, they can't be strangled successfully. China can buy Cuban doctors, like Chavez did, and establish universal health care with prevention and rational care, like Oregon, instead of ridiculous levels of care for the extremely old, as Florida does.

A healthy economy should ignore fake comparative advantages enforced by international cartels. China's doing it right. This articles sucks, to wit:

"...when wages start lagging and the masses start realizing that their efforts are not being rewarded, then Beijing will have to take action."

Funny, the United States hasn't taken that action...

 

FREETRADER

10:40 AM ET

October 5, 2010

It's a riddle to try and

figure out whether you know less about the American or the Chinese economy. You expect a typical American worker, who makes around $50,000 per year, to riot in the streets, while the average Chinese wage earner at $2,000 per year is presumably content? You imagine that China will somehow provide 'free' healthcare for all, when in reality there are basically no social benefits or safety net? Are you aware that we are talking about China here?

 

COLIN_SPEAKMAN

11:51 PM ET

October 5, 2010

Where would next China be?

The difference between China and Japan is that China as a sleeping giant was able to awake, apply its resources and meet the ongoing demand for low cost production that all Western economies desire. Sure as costs rise, some may get switched to Vietnam, Cambodia and so on. But there is no "China 2" to threaten the PRC in the same way that China has challenged Japan.

China possesses the potential for a huge domestic market for manufacturing and services, has a population who are not debt burdened and a government that can push through change in a sensible plan. This contrasts hugely with the political deadlock and lack of continuity of leadership in Japan.

Yes China can learn from Japan but it is not the same situation. China won't endure a lost decade.

 

LASTMAN

10:32 AM ET

October 18, 2010

I agree that the situation in

I agree that the situation in China is vastly different from what has occurred in Japan. Japans growth was unable to last longer than it did because it basically reached full capacity. China on the other hand with it's population of 1 billion and extensive resources is far from the situation Japan found itself in.