Chávez's Secret Nuclear Program

It's not clear what Venezuela's hiding, but it's definitely hiding something -- and the fact that Iran is involved suggests that it's up to no good.

BY ROGER F. NORIEGA | OCTOBER 5, 2010

The "cement plant," in fact, processes ore from the Impasco mine, according to sources familiar with the facility. The facility, located in southern Monagas state, was built in 2007 by Edhasse Sanat, a firm owned by Iran's Ministry of Mines. According to eyewitnesses, the plant has yet to produce a bag of cement but, instead, serves as a conduit for moving ore to a port on the Orinoco River, where it is transferred onto Iranian-flagged vessels on the Atlantic Ocean. Once it reaches the open sea, there is nothing to prevent its delivery to Iran.

The "tractor factory" in the state of Bolivar is a second facility that provides Iran a benign cover for its activities in this remote region. Operated since 2006 by a Venezuela-Iran joint venture, the facility produces few tractors and is housed in a military-style compound protected by Venezuelan National Guard troops, according to two eyewitnesses who have visited and videotaped the facility in recent years.

Deep suspicions about the actual purpose of that facility were raised in December 2008 when Turkish customs authorities intercepted a shipment sent from Iran to the "tractor factory" in Venezuela. According to media reports, 22 cargo containers and crates labeled "tractor parts" were found to contain barrels of nitrate and sulfite chemicals -- bomb-making material -- as well as components of what Turkish experts described as an "explosives lab." Moreover, this suspicious cargo was being delivered by the Islamic Republic of Iran Shipping Lines (IRISL), which was sanctioned by the U.S. Treasury Department in September 2008 for providing logistical services to Iran's Ministry of Defense and Armed Forces Logistics.

In addition to providing physical cover for Iranian operations, banks and other purportedly commercial ventures established in Venezuela afford Iran access to the international financial sector in violation of several Security Council resolutions intended to deny funds to the country's illicit nuclear weapons program. Resolution 1803 (2008) warns governments to "exercise vigilance" against Iranian banks, specifically Bank Saderat, "to avoid such activities contributing to the proliferation of sensitive nuclear activities." Documents retrieved from Venezuelan government archives (available in Spanish here) show that by 2007, Iran's Bank Saderat had already incorporated the Banco Internacional de Desarrollo (BID) in Venezuela. All of BID's founding directors are Iranian, and it appears to operate today as a Venezuelan bank that is actually a wholly-owned front for Saderat. Records of Iranian firms operating in Venezuela reflect dollar-denominated transactions carried out by BID in contravention of U.S. law and U.N. resolutions.

The United Nations had good reason to single out Saderat as a possible conduit for funds used to finance terrorism and nuclear proliferation. In 2006, the U.S. Treasury sanctioned Saderat for serving as a conduit for funds to the Lebanese Shiite terrorist group Hezbollah. Only two months ago, the European Union froze BID's assets for its role in supporting Iran's "nuclear or ballistic missile activities." Yet Chávez's government continues to allow BID to move money through Iranian front companies and Venezuelan partners in order to evade international sanctions.

Ignoring what Chávez and his friends are up to right under our noses is no longer an option. If the United States and the United Nations are serious about nonproliferation, they must challenge Venezuela and Iran to come clean and, if necessary, take steps to hold both regimes accountable. Unfortunately, U.S. policymakers continue to shy away from issues that might lead to a confrontation with the irascible Chávez. But Venezuela's willingness to flout international law and abet Iran's activities close to U.S. shores is becoming too flagrant -- and ultimately, too dangerous -- to ignore.

BEHROUZ MEHRI/AFP/Getty Images

 

Roger F. Noriega was U.S. ambassador to the Organization of American States from 2001 to 2003 and U.S. assistant secretary of state for the Western Hemisphere from 2003 to 2005. He is a visiting fellow at the American Enterprise Institute and managing director of Visión Américas LLC, which represents U.S. and foreign clients.

BIRDFLEW

6:38 PM ET

October 5, 2010

Yawn. Here comes the all too

Yawn. Here comes the all too predictable demonisation of Venezuela by the US press... I noticed Time's also running an article titled "Are Basque Terrorists Being Trained in Venezuela?".

So just to clarify - you have a complete lack of evidence of any wrongdoing by Venezuela except a research agreement with Iran? Tenuous at best. Speculation is not a worthwhile alternative to evidence.

But hey, evidence never really concerns the Americans when there's an agenda to be had.

 

CARMEN SAN CARLOS

11:33 AM ET

October 6, 2010

ETA terrorists and Chavez

Two ETA terrorists, Juan Carlos Besance y Xabier Atristain, captured in France on September 29 have admitted they travelled in 2008 to Venezuela for training. They were received by Arturo Cubillas Fontán, who is now a member of the Chaves government... incidently in charge of the war against the latifundistas and responsible for most of the expropriations of property.
Last March a Spanish judge accused him of being the go between between the Chaves government and ETA.
Instead of yawning Birdlew, open your eyes.

 

CURVEBALL7

5:59 PM ET

October 6, 2010

To Carmen

If you want to cite facts, don't just cite half of them. The Venezuelan government decided to investigate the allegations against Cubillas after Moratinos talked with Maduro. Both Spain's Minister of Interior & de la Vega has stated on record that they do not believe the Venezuelan government had any knowledge of any go between Cubillas might have had with ETA. So before you go making insinuations that don't hold water and trying to villanize a government just because it doesn't give first priority to its country's economic elite (nor those of the international community), try first understanding that the complexities of reality don't always fit nicely with your expectations.

 

SAM FROM CALIFORNIA

7:37 PM ET

October 5, 2010

This all sounds pretty speculative

Chavez openly declared ages ago that he is interested in nuclear power, and was looking for Iranian and Russian help. As for those "Tractor factories", they could be producing anything, from APCs for the Venezuelan army to light tanks to fight in the jungle. I think you need more solid evidence than this.

 

AR

7:43 PM ET

October 5, 2010

Thank you Sam and Bird. Mr.

Thank you Sam and Bird. Mr. noriega is the paid mouthpiece of a well known neo con outlet in dc, the american enterprise institute. This article is part of their propaganda drive to raise the animosity between the US and Venezuela. I'm glad there are people who do not buy into this bs.

 

CARMEN SAN CARLOS

11:34 AM ET

October 6, 2010

Chaves

Not propaganda, its a reality.
No problem between US and Venezuela. The problem is with Chavez.

 

AR

3:49 PM ET

October 6, 2010

The Basque people deserve an

The Basque people deserve an independent state of their own. They will get it one way or another, whether it is thru violence (ETA) or diplomacy.

 

XMASTER4000

8:33 PM ET

October 5, 2010

Who is surprised?

Whoever believes that Chavez intends to pursue a pacific, harmless and secure nuclear program clearly hasn't been paying attention to regional politics, hasn't read this guy's biography, doesn't understand the extremist communist-era-like ideology he is pursuing with the "Bolivarian Revolution" in Venezuela and/or doesn't live in any Latin American country. The only comfort we have is the knowledge that Venezuela currently lacks the infrastructure, manpower and political stability necessary to pursue such a project, and it will remain like that for quite a while. In the meantime, going nuclear will just be another one of Mr Chavez' egomaniac dreams.

 

AR

9:00 PM ET

October 5, 2010

Maybe you should stop

Maybe you should stop drinking the kool aid.

 

SAM FROM CALIFORNIA

4:54 PM ET

October 6, 2010

hmm

Hold on a minute, haven't he and his allies repeatedly won elections? Despite claims to the contrary, his party still got more votes than the main opposition block in the last election, and Morales has only ever won with a fairly overwhelming margin. After 12 years, Chavez remains more popular than Bush did after 6, with approval ratings roughly around 50%. So it does seem that at least *some* people who live in Latin America support these leaders :P

Whether or not their nuclear program is peaceful or not is another issue, but it's a lie to claim that these governments are unpopular among their own people. And confronting Chavez and his allies on these issues often allows them to play the victim to their own people, buying them more political capital.

 

FS2882

12:00 PM ET

October 6, 2010

no proof

the article shows no proof about the accusations....
if Chavez wanted nuclear energy it could always use other allies like Brasil and Argentina.
I agree with most of the comments, its nothing more than neocon propaganda.

 

PUBLICUS

12:41 PM ET

October 6, 2010

Serious vs the facile

This piece by (former) Ambassador Noriega is well researched and source documented in the accepted standards and practice of US journalism. The flippant and facile efforts to dismiss the real and somber issues and matters presented in the piece fail wholly and completely - indeed pathetically.

The AEI has more to say than I care to pay attention to, however, the organization is well onto the CPC/PRC which is having its CPC cadres learn (Latino) Spanish and to move to South America - Panama on the Ismus especially - to include Venezuela, in order to establish an influential presence in S America in economics (small business in particular), politics and government; society.

CPC cadres, as the CIA well knows, want eventually and with (ironically the most conspicuous) stealth to gain controlling influence over the Panama Canal, a strategic miscalculation by the ham handed and bull minded klutzes in Beijing that sooner or later surely will produce another horrific threat to civilizations, such as the 1962 Cuban Missile Crisis. It's past time for all but one of you comments clowns above to get serious.

Iran historically is a thousands year old oligarchy of elite autocratic and authoritarian rulers, most recently the Islamic Republic of Iran which shares a new 21st century authoritarian mode with its historical elite, autocratic authoritarian brethren of CPC/PRC. With Venezuela and other comrade countries, and left to themselves, this axis of oil, a canal and elite autocratic (kleptocrat) rulers will precipitate only the worst outcomes imaginable.

 

AR

3:52 PM ET

October 6, 2010

Show me one nation that is

Show me one nation that is not a plutarky. In which nation do the rich not have more say politcally, economically, and intellectually than the poor?

 

PUBLICUS

3:21 PM ET

October 7, 2010

You missed the boat, long ago

The answer to your glib question - in democracies.

In democracies of the West especially, but in developing democracies as well.

All democracies have their ugly warts, and just simple warts.

But dictatorships such as the Communist Party of China of the People's Republic of China, the elite and ruthless rule of the ayatollahs of fascist Iran, the general Chavez who engaged in military mutiny against his government, have more than warts - they are malignant diseases, fatal to their peoples and to themselves (and against those of us who have had to fight, suffer, die to defeat them).

Which is why history proves that fascist governments never win. Fascist dictatorships cannot overcome the power and the strength of democracies (for all of our warts).

Chavez attempted a coup d'etat against his government while he was a fascist general in the Venezuelan army, then carried on against actions against him while he was fascist general in charge of the country. Chavez's record and personal history proves that when the time comes that Chavez cannot win an election, there won't be any more elections - he will declare himself 'president' for life.

That's your guy.

 

AR

5:05 PM ET

October 13, 2010

The sad part is that you

The sad part is that you really think you have democracy. Just because you have a little bit more choices, and because the oligarchs sit on hundreds of years of profit from slave explotation, worker explotation, the scraps that fall off the table are enough to convince monkeys such as yourself that you are free and independent.

Pultarky is the name of the game and it has been since the dawn of man. Just because you do not see it or choose not to see it, doesn't mean that the world is not run by the few and rich. This isn't a conspiracy either, many of these people have competing interests and often work against each other, but it doesn't take a brainiac to realize the world is made more unfair and unjust by these scum.

Finally, how can Chavez be a leftist/commie and a facist? You sound like the red necks who keep referring to Obama as both, which is not possible.

 

WHITEBOARD

12:47 PM ET

October 6, 2010

incorrect translation

The phrase "nuclear energy" is not written in Farsi in that document. The word "nuclear" is not written in Farsi that document.

The correct translation of the phrase in question (written phonetically: dar zamineh enerjiehaye jaygzyn)"in the field of nuclear technology" is: "in the area of alternative energy".

The corresponding phrase in Spanish: "en el campo de la tecologia nuclear".

 

PUBLICUS

5:06 PM ET

October 6, 2010

Arse kissers

There are a lot of Chavez arse kissers hanging around this thread, hovering about it to slip in their facile and glib comments against the United States and for Chavez and his coup mentality.

We remember that Chavez attempted a coup d'etat against his government while he was a fascist general in the Venezulean army, then railed against coup attempts once he became the Great Leader of Venezuela. Chavez was pro coup while he was a fascist general, anti coup when he was general in charge of the country.

The locus of attention here is the attempts of Iran, the CPC/PRC and Chavez and his Latin American axis pals to gain control of the Panama Canal. I've stated that such madness is DEFCON 1 to the United States as the whole of the world of nations know and recognize - without any hesitation or doubt.

You idiots are playing with the worst of fires.

 

AR

5:07 PM ET

October 13, 2010

I think it's time for you to

I think it's time for you to stop hanging off of cheney's nuts ;)

 

PUBLICUS

9:10 AM ET

October 31, 2010

Cheney????

Dick Cheney is a dichkead.

I've been voting since 1966 and I've never voted for a Republican for president. The Republican party stole the election of 2000 so here we are now.

I was pleased to vote for Barack Obama as POTUS. Obama doesn't trust Wall Street and neither do I. The United States needs the health care reform and financial institutions reforms the Democrats in Washington have given us. SECDEF Bob Gates knows a good president when he sees one, and has made clear his knowledgeable view that Obama is a better president than Dumbya.

The mid-term elections will see many Republicans come out to vote but 2012 will be a different matter when the Obama-Clinton ticket wins.

As I'd said, the AEI has much more to say than I care to listen to, but it is well informed and has much insight in respect to the PRC/CCP. Beijing long ago closed the ideological spectrum to make communism and fascism meet as one.

 

EXOMIKE

5:47 PM ET

October 6, 2010

At long last Sirs, has FP so sense of embarrassment?

This article and many of the posts are fit only for the Freepers, the NY Post or their ilk. Has FP no decent Editors?
Mike Adams
Ft. Benning, Ga.

 

PUBLICUS

3:34 PM ET

October 7, 2010

Elaborate in specific terms

You good sir need to elaborate.

Otherwise your comment is a flying fragment that is, well, a flying fragment.

Specifically how, what, why, in which ways, whom in particular?

You fly in and out like a moth. We're sure you have much worthwhile to say. So why don't you just say it specifically and in some detail. We're confident you write well. Surely you can hold your own at a public discussion board.

Right?

 

USEYOURBRAIN

3:02 PM ET

October 7, 2010

Has it occurred

Has it occurred to some of these posters that in such a situation one can't always reveal all sources and material??? Maybe if and when someone (Chavez) is doing something sinister, he wouldn't be open and transparent about it. I always find it comical when people want to believe the best in someone who is clearly saying the opposite.

 

TAKENITORA

3:09 PM ET

October 8, 2010

Publicus and Carmen San Carlos

Noriega's essays are bad jokes. He's really reaching this time. It seems almost not worth to effort to point out, again, that it's the US that is obstructing nuclear disarmament.

First I thought that Publicus and San Carlos might be getting paid to write here, but after reading the odd attempt at psychoanalysis of Chavez, the Panama Canal conspiracy and the "arse-kissing" comments, I doubt they would be even trusted with that.

 

PUBLICUS

8:49 AM ET

October 31, 2010

@TAKENITORA

You can't wave your magic wand to try to dismiss fact and reality.

In the PRC majors in International Economics and Trade are learning Spanish (Latino) in addition to English because they are being focused on Latin America by Beijing.

Beijing is sending CP Cadre to live and work in Panama because there is a strategic and vital canal there.

A magic wand does not dismiss these facts and the realities behind them.