The Great Battery Race

A 19th-century technology could determine which nation triumphs in the 21st. Steve LeVine reports from the global competition to replace the combustion engine.

BY STEVE LEVINE | NOVEMBER 2010

In 2007, the Chinese government approached Wan Gang, a 54-year-old engineer-turned-university-president from Shanghai, with a remarkable offer. Chinese President Hu Jintao had taken up the political mantra of "scientific development," and the authorities wanted someone of Wan's caliber to serve as the country's minister of science and technology -- so badly, in fact, that they were willing to violate longstanding convention and elevate Wan even though he wasn't a Communist Party member. It was the first time in more than five decades that such an exception had been made for a government minister.

What made Wan of such interest to Hu was his expertise in a once-obscure corner of automotive engineering: After 10 years working for the Audi car company in Germany, he was a world authority on electric-vehicle technology. Just as important, Wan possessed the technical know-how necessary to supervise groundbreaking research in advanced batteries, the make-or-break component that could separate an electric vehicle that consumers would actually want to buy from an expensive exercise in engineering vanity. Shortly after returning to China, he was named the chief scientist on the country's blue-ribbon research panel for electric cars.

The Chinese government saw in the technology that Wan had mastered a potential future pillar of its economy. Starting virtually from scratch, Beijing announced last year it would become the world's largest producer of the vehicles within the next few years. "China is committed to developing clean and electric vehicles," Wan told me when I met him in Chicago this summer. "Batteries and clean vehicles are a national strategic priority."

For More

Gaming the Electric Car Chase
As the four front-runners sprint around the track, some favorites could end up in the dust.

Plug and Play
The fast, clean, green automobile, coming soon to your driveway.

Indeed, the battery, among the most humble and unsexy of inventions, might just be the most important technological battleground of the next two decades. The discovery of the next key breakthroughs in the field could mean not just a fortune for a handful of companies, but the remaking of whole economies -- and the rebalancing of geopolitical power that typically accompanies such shifts. A Chinese triumph could speed the country's global advance; an American one could give U.S. dominance a new lease on life.

Two developments have brought us to this pass. Developed countries and rising powers alike are looking to curb their oil-guzzling habits, for any number of reasons: climate change, unsavory petrostate politics, the looming fear there simply isn't enough petroleum on the planet to satisfy everyone. The result is a new global interest in alternatives to petroleum and the internal combustion engine -- most prominently advanced battery technology, the necessary precondition for the development of an affordable, powerful electric car.

But the world doesn't just need a better car -- it also needs a better means of building and sustaining economies. Over the last 20 years, Asia's growth has been mostly driven by manufacturing exports, while the United States' was fueled first by Silicon Valley's tech boom and later by elaborate (and ultimately ruinous) financial instruments. But those platforms have reached or are nearing their limits, and in the scramble to avoid another recession, the world's great economies are looking for the next big thing, an engine of economic growth for the future.

These two aspirations -- for a less oil-dependent world and for a more prosperous one -- are rapidly converging in a global race for a better battery. By 2030, experts say, advanced batteries will swell into a $100 billion-a-year business. They will also enable an electric-car industry on the order of half a trillion dollars, on a par with the global pharmaceutical industry and capable of spawning companies on the scale of ExxonMobil, General Electric, and Toyota. "It is a matter of national wealth and national economic advantage in a way that few new things in society can be," Peter Harrop, who heads the Britain-based technology consulting firm IDTechEx, told me. "But it is a high-stakes game. It is going to be beneficial [only] to certain companies in certain countries."

Two of the likeliest beneficiaries are Japan and South Korea, the top producers of today's cutting-edge batteries and the favorites to develop tomorrow's. But the more interesting -- and potentially world-changing -- rivalry is between the United States and China, both of which are scrambling to get into the game. Each country has a great deal to win by establishing itself as an early leader in advanced batteries, in competition or in partnership with East Asia's technological heavyweights. The contest has taken on ultraserious geopolitical heft for the United States, at its lowest economic ebb in recent memory, and for China, eager to cement its position as a globally influential superpower. Both countries' governments have adopted an unapologetically hands-on approach, attempting to drive innovation from the top down and viewing the project through the lens of national strength. The analogies tend more toward the Manhattan Project than Microsoft.

Eightfish/Getty Images

 

Steve LeVine is a contributing editor at Foreign Policy and an adjunct professor at Georgetown University's Security Studies Program.

BUDAHH

7:21 PM ET

October 14, 2010

 

IAN

11:22 AM ET

October 15, 2010

Excellent article

Informative about one of the biggest movements in this era. Showing both the scientific point of view including their needs and desires and the foreign political view and how governments are feverishly working openly with companies, throwing money at them in order to provide a possible new economic boom for their country. Well written, interesting.

I like it.

 

STEVELEVINE

3:29 PM ET

October 15, 2010

Response

Many thanks to you both. We will be seeing more on this topic. A  main question -- perhaps the main question -- will be who has the tenacity to stick it through a probably two- or three-decade long race.

 

TOM G

4:05 PM ET

October 17, 2010

why does humanity always do this.........

why do we always do this, we have an opportunity to develop a totally new form or energy generation using an infinite fuel source called hydrogen and in the process end both the dependence on the limited supplies of oil and reverse man's impact on the environment while maintaining our current way of life and instead people are thinking again to go for the relatively easy option batteries which are even worse as they still need power generated by fossil fuels and maintain even increase the current output of dangerous emissions causing us to screw up more and force us backwards its insane when you think about it , seriously why doesn't FP ask that question and see what answer they get?

 

STEVELEVINE

4:54 PM ET

October 17, 2010

Hydrogen

Hydrogen poses numerous problems of its own that many experts believe won't be surpassed. In terms of its use in a fuel cell in a vehicle, one major problem is its volatility.

Natural gas-burning power stations produce less than half the CO2 as both oil and coal. That in itself would satisfy much or all of the greenhouse gas-reduction goals currently under discussion.

As for whether fossil fuels as a whole can be bypassed as a fuel, no one can point to a currently known alternative with a chance of becoming this across-the-board substitute any time soon, and perhaps not this century.

That is a big reason why batteries are currently considered a holy grail.

 

CARDSHARP

7:27 AM ET

October 19, 2010

Exactly, hydrogen is NOT a "free" source of energy.

Hydrogen is produced by electrolysis of water which requires electricity. It is not a energy source persay so much as a way electricity can be stored in gas form.

 

CARDSHARP

7:32 AM ET

October 19, 2010

Another problem is

portable storage. Hydrogen is incredibly hard to compress in tanks. It has very little van der waals forces holding the molecules close to each other.

 

RK683

11:46 AM ET

October 18, 2010

Energy Density Gasoline vs Batteries

The reason we use gasoline in our automobiles is really very simple.

Gasoline is incredibly energy dense, easy to transport, easy for the customer to use in his vehicle. & cheap to store.

Batteries have so far lagged behind on all these important qualities. They hold relatively small amounts of energy per volume, take a long time to recharge & suffer from low service life.

If these problems are solved, adoption of electric vehicles will become a no-brainer. In addition, such improved batteries could be used at wind farms & solar power stations to reduce the variability inherent in those means of power-generation.

I am very interested in the concept of Battery-Leasing & Battery exchange stations, since they appear to address some of the issues regarding, range, ease of use etc with current technology.

Excellent article, I hope to see more reporting on political efforts to direct money and attention to this research.

Thanks.

 

AMA2002

12:32 PM ET

October 18, 2010

LITHIUM

I am working on a huge lithium ore reserve in Upstate New York, one that is 3X that of typical crustal abundances.

Please visit Great Sacandaga Lake Deepening Project.

 

LEEDO TOELG

4:47 PM ET

October 18, 2010

Another strategy

We should let the Chinese spend billions perfecting new battery technology, and NOT follow suit. Then, when they roll out the new batteries, we simply copy the technology and make millions of pirate copies. The irony would be delicious.

 

CARDSHARP

7:31 AM ET

October 19, 2010

Sorry but China won't be perfecting technology so much as

figuring out how large scale implementation work. The majority of leading edge battery research is still done in the states (albeit probably by Chinese post-grad).

 

JOE PALUSKA

9:03 PM ET

November 9, 2010

battery switch technology

From our perspective, the key to making electric cars a mass market reality is by separating ownership of the battery from the car. Change the business model so that consumers pay for electric miles much like they do today with gas miles and treat the battery as a consumable and as part of the infrastructure.

Our company is Better Place, and we're seeking to displace gas miles with electric miles by building charging infrastructure across entire markets that enables consumers to drive long distances in electric cars by swapping out depleted batteries for fully charged ones.

You can check out our Tokyo electric taxi project here:

http://www.betterplace.com/the-company-multimedia-videos-detail/index/guid/ac58e4e7-0461-4e26-b771-2ceb72dcb5c8

We'll replicate the Tokyo project in the SF Bay Area next year.

Even more importantly, we're deploying our infrastructure across all of Israel and Denmark - our first two markets - for commercial launch next year.

To the author's point, there is indeed a great race on, which we've influenced since our founding three years ago.

We can confirm that China is moving faster than the US and is expected to name EV as one of its seven industrial pillars in its next five-year plan. China is also evaluating battery switch technology as they understand the impact it has on the economics of electric cars as well as the electric grid.

The US still has time to act to be competitive with China, but time is of the essence as the industry won't be up for grabs for long.

Regards,

Joe