The Great Battery Race

A 19th-century technology could determine which nation triumphs in the 21st. Steve LeVine reports from the global competition to replace the combustion engine.

BY STEVE LEVINE | NOVEMBER 2010

Today, Japanese companies like Panasonic, Sony, and Toyota dominate a $9 billion-a-year lithium-ion battery industry. The future of the business is bright enough that even Exxon is trying to get back into it, belatedly reinvesting in lithium-ion R&D. The world is fast moving from nickel-metal-hydride batteries -- an intermediary technology, also developed in the United States and commercialized in Japan, that is used in Toyota Priuses, among other things -- to lithium-ion ones, which store twice the power in the same space. Lithium-ion batteries power most of our laptops and cell phones. For the next decade at least, they will be the favored technology as well for hybrid-electric and electric cars, which for the first time are being seriously contemplated as a widely used replacement for the conventional internal combustion engine.

But as they have gone from curiosity to great green hope, electric cars have run smack against the limits of today's batteries, limits that are likely to keep such vehicles too expensive and underpowered to go mainstream if no one can figure out how to get past them. As it stands, lithium-ion batteries cost $1,000 per kilowatt-hour of energy output. Engineers say it's theoretically possible to bring that figure down to $300, but the laws of physics prevent going beyond that. Even if they hit that target, however, battery-powered cars would still have costs too high, ranges too limited, and recharge times too long to truly compete with conventional vehicles. (Lithium-ion batteries also have a rather unsettling tendency, on rare occasions, to burst into flames. This is unpleasant enough when it happens in a cell phone or laptop, but an entirely different matter in a car.) The Tesla Roadster, a lithium-ion-driven electric car that debuted in 2006, has the range and speed -- up to 130 miles per hour -- to compete with sports cars. But it takes more than 6,000 individual batteries to pull it off, and the car currently costs north of $100,000. Both the American and Chinese governments are offering generous rebates to make their domestically manufactured electric cars more affordable, but even with the government discount, General Motors' soon-to-be-released Chevy Volt will still cost a steep $33,500.

That's why the future of the electric-car industry belongs not to the scientists and engineers who perfect the batteries we have now, but the ones who figure out what comes next, in the 2020s, the 2030s, and beyond. The holy grail is a battery powerful and safe enough to challenge the energy density of gasoline and the freedom of the internal combustion engine -- if such a battery could be made, consumers would presumably flock to cleaner, quieter electric cars. Which is why scientists at Argonne and around the world are working feverishly to develop what comes next.

Consider the potential: Just the currently expected advances in lithium-ion technology will allow hybrid-electric and electric cars to take over up to 15 percent of the world's new-car sales by 2020, estimates research firm IHS Global Insight; by 2030, the figure could rise to about 50 percent, according to U.S. Energy Information Administration projections. The 2020 prediction works out to about 7.5 million cars a year at today's production rates. Let's say that economies of scale bring the cars' average cost down to $30,000 by then. That's a $225 billion-a-year business, just under the entire global sales last year of Toyota, the world's largest carmaker. By 2030, it could be more than three times that.

No one can accurately project the market for a product that doesn't exist yet, of course. But these estimates matter because they are believed, to a greater or lesser degree, by the leaders of most of the world's industrialized countries. And most of them seem to agree with Spanish Prime Minister José Luis Rodríguez Zapatero's call to get in on a competition "not to be missed." The appeal isn't hard to grasp: The possible windfalls are tantalizingly large at a time when nearly everyone's economy has taken a beating. And the breakthrough is far away enough, and the terms by which victors will be decided are vague enough, that everyone can envision winning.

ON THE AFTERNOON OF JULY 21, Wan Gang and about a dozen other Chinese engineers paid a visit to Argonne National Laboratory. The secure research campus is the direct descendant of the University of Chicago lab where Enrico Fermi conducted the first nuclear chain reaction in the early days of the Manhattan Project; today it is home to the vanguard of the U.S. government's advanced battery research. The Argonne scientists in charge of the work, along with Sandalow, the U.S. assistant energy secretary, had gathered in a conference room to meet Wan and his team.

"You have made remarkable achievements here," Wan told the Argonne researchers. "So today I have many questions for you."

"That's why I am sweating," replied Al Sattelberger, a senior Argonne scientist. The room erupted in laughter -- mostly from the Americans, who were acutely aware that they were the underdogs in their race with Wan and his team.

Although the U.S. government began promoting battery development during the George W. Bush years, its interest in the technology began in earnest after the pre-recession spike in oil prices, which reached an unprecedented $147 a barrel in July 2008. The following month, the newly nominated Obama declared in his Democratic National Convention speech, "For the sake of our economy, our security, and the future of our planet, I will set a clear goal as president: In 10 years, we will finally end our dependence on oil from the Middle East."

Eightfish/Getty Images

 

Steve LeVine is a contributing editor at Foreign Policy and an adjunct professor at Georgetown University's Security Studies Program.

BUDAHH

7:21 PM ET

October 14, 2010

 

IAN

11:22 AM ET

October 15, 2010

Excellent article

Informative about one of the biggest movements in this era. Showing both the scientific point of view including their needs and desires and the foreign political view and how governments are feverishly working openly with companies, throwing money at them in order to provide a possible new economic boom for their country. Well written, interesting.

I like it.

 

STEVELEVINE

3:29 PM ET

October 15, 2010

Response

Many thanks to you both. We will be seeing more on this topic. A  main question -- perhaps the main question -- will be who has the tenacity to stick it through a probably two- or three-decade long race.

 

TOM G

4:05 PM ET

October 17, 2010

why does humanity always do this.........

why do we always do this, we have an opportunity to develop a totally new form or energy generation using an infinite fuel source called hydrogen and in the process end both the dependence on the limited supplies of oil and reverse man's impact on the environment while maintaining our current way of life and instead people are thinking again to go for the relatively easy option batteries which are even worse as they still need power generated by fossil fuels and maintain even increase the current output of dangerous emissions causing us to screw up more and force us backwards its insane when you think about it , seriously why doesn't FP ask that question and see what answer they get?

 

STEVELEVINE

4:54 PM ET

October 17, 2010

Hydrogen

Hydrogen poses numerous problems of its own that many experts believe won't be surpassed. In terms of its use in a fuel cell in a vehicle, one major problem is its volatility.

Natural gas-burning power stations produce less than half the CO2 as both oil and coal. That in itself would satisfy much or all of the greenhouse gas-reduction goals currently under discussion.

As for whether fossil fuels as a whole can be bypassed as a fuel, no one can point to a currently known alternative with a chance of becoming this across-the-board substitute any time soon, and perhaps not this century.

That is a big reason why batteries are currently considered a holy grail.

 

CARDSHARP

7:27 AM ET

October 19, 2010

Exactly, hydrogen is NOT a "free" source of energy.

Hydrogen is produced by electrolysis of water which requires electricity. It is not a energy source persay so much as a way electricity can be stored in gas form.

 

CARDSHARP

7:32 AM ET

October 19, 2010

Another problem is

portable storage. Hydrogen is incredibly hard to compress in tanks. It has very little van der waals forces holding the molecules close to each other.

 

RK683

11:46 AM ET

October 18, 2010

Energy Density Gasoline vs Batteries

The reason we use gasoline in our automobiles is really very simple.

Gasoline is incredibly energy dense, easy to transport, easy for the customer to use in his vehicle. & cheap to store.

Batteries have so far lagged behind on all these important qualities. They hold relatively small amounts of energy per volume, take a long time to recharge & suffer from low service life.

If these problems are solved, adoption of electric vehicles will become a no-brainer. In addition, such improved batteries could be used at wind farms & solar power stations to reduce the variability inherent in those means of power-generation.

I am very interested in the concept of Battery-Leasing & Battery exchange stations, since they appear to address some of the issues regarding, range, ease of use etc with current technology.

Excellent article, I hope to see more reporting on political efforts to direct money and attention to this research.

Thanks.

 

AMA2002

12:32 PM ET

October 18, 2010

LITHIUM

I am working on a huge lithium ore reserve in Upstate New York, one that is 3X that of typical crustal abundances.

Please visit Great Sacandaga Lake Deepening Project.

 

LEEDO TOELG

4:47 PM ET

October 18, 2010

Another strategy

We should let the Chinese spend billions perfecting new battery technology, and NOT follow suit. Then, when they roll out the new batteries, we simply copy the technology and make millions of pirate copies. The irony would be delicious.

 

CARDSHARP

7:31 AM ET

October 19, 2010

Sorry but China won't be perfecting technology so much as

figuring out how large scale implementation work. The majority of leading edge battery research is still done in the states (albeit probably by Chinese post-grad).

 

JOE PALUSKA

9:03 PM ET

November 9, 2010

battery switch technology

From our perspective, the key to making electric cars a mass market reality is by separating ownership of the battery from the car. Change the business model so that consumers pay for electric miles much like they do today with gas miles and treat the battery as a consumable and as part of the infrastructure.

Our company is Better Place, and we're seeking to displace gas miles with electric miles by building charging infrastructure across entire markets that enables consumers to drive long distances in electric cars by swapping out depleted batteries for fully charged ones.

You can check out our Tokyo electric taxi project here:

http://www.betterplace.com/the-company-multimedia-videos-detail/index/guid/ac58e4e7-0461-4e26-b771-2ceb72dcb5c8

We'll replicate the Tokyo project in the SF Bay Area next year.

Even more importantly, we're deploying our infrastructure across all of Israel and Denmark - our first two markets - for commercial launch next year.

To the author's point, there is indeed a great race on, which we've influenced since our founding three years ago.

We can confirm that China is moving faster than the US and is expected to name EV as one of its seven industrial pillars in its next five-year plan. China is also evaluating battery switch technology as they understand the impact it has on the economics of electric cars as well as the electric grid.

The US still has time to act to be competitive with China, but time is of the essence as the industry won't be up for grabs for long.

Regards,

Joe