Watching the Watchers

Al Qaeda's bold new strategy is all about using our own words and actions against us. And it's working.

BY JARRET BRACHMAN | NOVEMBER 2010

On July 21, the U.S. Justice Department indicted Zachary Adam Chesser on charges that he twice tried to join al-Shabab, the fast-growing Somali terrorist group that has become a close ally of al Qaeda. On October 20, he pleaded guilty to three counts of providing material support to terrorists, communicating threats, and soliciting crimes of violence: He faces upwards of 20 years in jail. Chesser, a 20-year-old Virginian turned radical convert to Islam better known by his Internet sobriquet Abu Talhah al-Amrikee, had become a minor online celebrity in April when he issued a threat against Trey Parker and Matt Stone, the creators of the cartoon series South Park. Parker and Stone, Chesser warned, would probably be killed after airing an episode depicting the Prophet Mohammed wearing a bear costume.

It is tempting to dismiss Chesser as just another suburban white kid lashing out at the world. But his story is not the irrelevant absurdity it appeared, not merely another terrorist folly like exploding underpants and the undetonated bomb in Times Square. Chesser, in fact, was the real thing: a significant al Qaeda propagandist for a new moment, South Park fatwa and all. In less than two years, under various identities, Chesser had promoted an extensive collection of radical papers, videos, and blog posts to an astonishing array of online outlets, from the hardest-core al Qaeda discussion forums to mainstream Islamic websites to social-networking tools like Facebook and Twitter. He even recorded his own jihadi war tunes.

I know all this because I stumbled upon Chesser five months before his arrest: We became improbable pen pals. I first met Chesser virtually, after he posted a comment to my al Qaeda-monitoring blog correcting what he believed to be a mistake I had made. He was bothered by my depiction of his hero, Anwar al-Awlaki, the American-born Yemeni cleric who has been tied to a growing number of terrorist plots in the United States. I dismissed that post and Chesser's next one as the usual splenetics of a low-level al Qaeda supporter. It was not until his third post to my website in mid-March, commenting on rifts he saw within the U.S. counterterrorism community, that I suspected "Abu Talhah al-Amrikee" might be different from my typical jihadi critic. Out of curiosity, I emailed him -- and surprisingly, he responded. From there we became what you might call hostile friends, sparring over a wide array of topics, including U.S. domestic politics, recent terrorist plots, al Qaeda personalities, and even my own counterterrorism colleagues. We had been discussing the possibility of holding an in-person, public debate just before his arrest.

Under the banner of Abu Talhah al-Amrikee, Chesser's goal was breathtakingly ambitious: He was trying to make al Qaeda's radical ideology more accessible to Americans -- and thus inspire more people like the Times Square bomber to take up the jihad at home. And Chesser thought he was on his way to doing that, offering his readers a guide to what he called "Counter Counter Terrorism" in a long series of articles he penned and posted to al Qaeda websites before his arrest. His starting premise was that al Qaeda's online supporters were easily fooled, lazy, and in need of direction. "How are we so gullible that we fall for tricks that our enemy admits are tricks before he tries them on us? This is nonsense and we should not be like this," he wrote, before going on to offer detailed guidelines for outsmarting the watchers.

In one of our March exchanges, Chesser bragged about his success as a jihadi web publisher; he was, he believed, Americanizing violent jihadi thought:

For More

Al Qaeda Wants to be Friends
An insider's tour of electronic jihad in the Facebook era.

The Internet Jihad
Zach Chesser's how-to guide. 

In 2010 both my youtube page and several others have seen more traffic than in all of 2009. In my case 2010 is 80% of my views so far. Also, the UK was formerly where most of my views were located, but now the United States is on top with Canada closing in.… The growth of my page and some others I pay attention to is looking to hit a rate that would produce more than 1,000,000 views per year. There are currently no jihadi youtube pages with even that many total views.

Whatever his actual traffic, Chesser had become the newest incarnation of a dangerous online phenomenon al Qaeda has inspired over the last several years -- one that is helping the group transcend its image as a brutal terrorist organization and attract a much broader spectrum of followers, particularly in the West. In full view of us, al Qaeda is cultivating a nimble, sophisticated global network of Internet activists, amateur pundits, and general well-wishers working to bring al Qaeda to the masses.

This is no longer the original al Qaeda, the highly centralized organization of Osama bin Laden and his closest acolytes, or even its post-9/11 incarnation as a network of affiliates, but a global, fluid, and adaptive amoeba: a kind of collectively self-aware organism, one that closely monitors what Western experts are saying about it -- and plots ways to turn those ideas against the United States. The process goes something like this: 1) The U.S. government does something that garners international media coverage, like announcing a new military strategy in Afghanistan or failing to adequately respond to a domestic catastrophe; 2) Self-styled jihadi intelligence analysts, like Chesser, read the coverage and start spinning it to their advantage, either to prove how bad Americans are or to give their movement a heads-up about an impending shift in U.S. approach; 3) America's al Qaeda media-monitoring machine spots those jihadi analysts talking about us and writes about it, spinning up the U.S. government; 4) The jihadists, who monitor us monitoring them, then post links and/or translations about us watching them watching us.

In short, they watch us, we watch them, and then they watch us watching them. Rinse, repeat. This is the new al Qaeda.

Illustration by Sean McCabe for FP

 SUBJECTS: AL QAEDA, TERRORISM
 

Jarret Brachman is a professor at North Dakota State University and managing director of Cronus Global, a security consulting firm.

JKOLAK

10:41 AM ET

October 12, 2010

"anyone can repost videos,

"anyone can repost videos, write articles, create Facebook and Twitter accounts, and start blogs filled with content intended to show the world how awful the United States is."

This article, while long, needs to be a little longer because it leaves us hanging without resolution.

There needs to be some analysis, and maybe a related tie-in to the entire state of contemporary journalism which seems to have lost objectivity and has bought into the enemy propaganda and leftist political correctness which also believes how bad the United States is.

We need this analysis to come up with possible solutions, not just articulate the problem.

 

KODI

2:31 PM ET

October 12, 2010

And yet...

“A problem well defined is a problem half-solved.” – John Dewey

 

ORMONDOTVOS

1:12 PM ET

October 12, 2010

The Subtext:

Nice work. I read it as a sub rosa plea for censorship, of the Internet, and of media in general.

By simply stating that the "enemy" is using the internet, Freedom of Information Act releases by other media, and freedom of speech against the United States, it ultimately appeals to the same American exceptionalism laid out so well in the other article in FP about dangerous metaphors.

There's another way out of this conundrum: supporting Obama's policies of making the USA a benefactor of the world, rather than a cruel overseer with Puritan overtones.

We could be spending a trillion dollars a year on building instead of destroying and threatening. It's only 7% of our GDP!

The Marshall Plan is an idea whose time never ends. Share, or die, is the Iron Law of empires, and we're definitely an empire.

Change is also a historical facet of America. Change for the better would be a nice change... Note that Bill Gates and Warren Buffet are leading that change. Broadcast the behavior in the marketplace of ideas.

After all, Islam is attractive partly because charity is one of the Five Pillars. The USA could point out that religion is not necessary for charity and cooperation. Secularism is the real enemy that Islam sees. Islam just says what plays well, that the USA is Zionist Crusaders.

Secular charity is the real weapon we have against Islamist maniacs.

 

CEOUNICOM

12:26 AM ET

October 21, 2010

re: "Secular charity: the real weapon we have against Islamists"

Nonsense.

UNAID, UNICEF, Red Cross, UNDP, FINCA, Medicines Sans Frontiers, and a multitude of other foreign-aid organizations have had zero impact in changing either the views of islamic radicals or even the average citizens of countries that are beneficiaries. It is not too difficult to do a correlation analysis of the top recipient countries and their respective opinions of the US; there is basically none. You'd think Somalia would be a bunch of Stars&Stripes waving, baseball playing fanbois. Surprisingly, through history, many of the countries that have evolved into our BFFs are places we, like, bombed to smithereens (e.g. Japan, Germany), or basically did nothing for and regularly ignored (e.g. Poland?). The idea of "if we only built schools and roads and wells, everyone would be more friendly to us and have a positive attitude, etc." has been completely debunked. The fact is, the most important element in any country is development of its own functioning, classical-liberal civil institutions (e.g. rule of law, a pluralistic political system, basic technocratic bureaucracy, civil rights, a transparent economy, etc). "Aid" doesn't do shit in places where there is no concept of aspiration to Western-classical-liberal institutions. It sometimes doesn't even do it in places where there are, but there also exists pervasive resistance to and conflict with the existing power-structure. Eric Hoffer's "the true believer" is the most important text in helping to understand this kind of mass-movement ideology - it has much less to do with material well-being than it does with the predominant psychology of a group, and the level of/lack of self-esteem and or sense of self-empowerment that dominates. Note that the 9/11 hijackers were not from the slums of Saudi Arabia and Egypt - they were from the upper-middle classes and were well educated. Bin Laden? Scion of a billionaire. The mentioned "Jihobbiest" in this article? From the D.C. suburbs...

A case study in Hoffer's insight: (from the WaPo profile of Chesser)

http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2010/07/24/AR2010072402497.html?sid=ST2010072106133

"""Zac" to his high school friends, "Abu Talhah Al-Amreeki" to those he met after converting to Islam, he seems to have spent his adolescence looking for a place to belong.

"He was always trying to find himself," said Drew Harrington, a friend from high school.""

Read the whole thing. It's a classic case of, "person in need of something larger than himself, because he is ultimately unsatisfied with his own person"

No amount of American largesse on the poor and disadvantaged of the world will do anything to counteract this timeless phenomenon. I'm not saying we *shouldn't* be involved in international aid, of course: just pointing out it's a useless tool for the problem you want to apply it to.

What do I think is the best way to counteract radical, violent islamic terrorism? Go for hearts and minds. Preferably with a .338 Lapua Magnum. Or whatever, airstrikes are fine too. So messy though, and expensive.

 

DPSCHNEIDER

2:57 PM ET

October 13, 2010

I have no idea what this is about

My take away from the article is that AQ is now using our words against us and therefore has entered a new phase in regards to its information campaign against the West. Haven't they been doing this all along? Why is this news?

I thought Dr. Brachman advocated using the jihadis words against them (I believe he refers to it as "jihadi jujitsu"). I just want to know who is winning this jujitsu match and if they are using BJJ or Vale Tudo rules.

Lastly, I agree with the above post. This article is like a long book report with no recommendations for solving the problem. In addition, Dr. Brachman mocks the frivolous spending on CT programs (with which I agree) as well as condemning independent CT pundits who hype the threat for profit. However, he is doing the same. He is the CEO of Cronus Global which is an independent, CT analysis company. I'm sure he refuses any GOV money which comes his way, and does his CT work purely to serve his country. Not likely.

.

 

ANTIMKO

9:15 AM ET

October 23, 2010

propaganda to scare the masses

I cant help but think that the writer is trying to make Al Qaeda more competent and threatening that it actually is. take this bit for example in describing the terrorist group: "a global, fluid, and adaptive amoeba: a kind of collectively self-aware organism".

I mean really? are we supposed to fall for that so you can pocket more tax payer money for "defense" needs?

 

N.MOHAMMED

6:51 PM ET

November 18, 2010

Islam and extremism

please check out http://www.islamicsolutions.com/if-it-is-extreme-it-is-not-islam/

 

ROMMANTIC_ANDREY

5:12 PM ET

November 19, 2010

I have no idea what this

You'd think Somalia tatil would be a bunch of Stars&Stripes waving, tvshop baseball playing fanbois. Surprisingly, through history, many of the countries that have evolved into our sinema BFFs are places we, like, bombed to smithereens (e.g. Japan, Germany), or basically did gazeteler nothing for and regularly ignored (e.g. Poland?)