Why Do Currency Wars Start?

Because when one country plays with its exchange rate, everyone else has to.

BY JOSHUA E. KEATING | OCTOBER 14, 2010

Responding to Japan's unilateral intervention to weaken the yen, followed by similar moves from Colombia, Thailand, South Korea, and other countries, Brazilian Finance Minister Guido Mantega recently declared that the world is "in the midst of an international currency war." In an effort to recover from the global economic crisis, these countries are attempting to stimulate their exports by making their currencies cheaper. These efforts add to the longstanding tensions between Western nations and China over the latter's monetary policy, which many say keeps the yuan artificially low. Could things be getting out of hand?

IMF Managing Director Dominique Strauss-Kahn, among others, has also warned against countries using currencies as "policy weapons." French Finance Minister Christine Lagarde has urged countries to talk about "peace and not war." But U.S. Treasury Secretary Timothy Geithner has denied that there's a currency war going on and says there's "no risk" of one breaking out.

So what exactly is a currency war and how do we know when we're in one, anyway?

We are when we say we are. A "currency war" is more of a political than an economic condition. Governments frequently intervene in their currency markets, increasing the money supply to stimulate trade and reduce unemployment, or decreasing the supply to combat inflation. The problem is that in an interlinked global economy, currencies don't rise or fall in a vacuum. When China keeps the yuan artificially low versus the U.S. dollar, it keeps the cost of Chinese goods low in the United States, contributing to a trade imbalance. That provides a steep incentive for the United States to retaliate by lowering its currency as well. Of course, becuase two countries can only have one exchange rate, this race to the bottom isn't likely to benefit either party.

When many countries devalue their currencies at the same time in an effort to make their exports more competitive, it forces other countries -- Brazil for instance -- to join in to prevent their currencies from rising. Countries often see currency wars as a zero-sum game -- one wins and the others lose. But the widespread devaluation can have a devastating effect on all. Unstable exchange rates can deter international investment, slowing the pace of global economic recovery. And of course, currency wars can have secondary political effects. When countries are fighting over currency, they're less likely to agree to bilateral trade. Additionally, currency pressures could make China less likely to go along with U.S. efforts to contain Iran or North Korea.

Unlike real wars, currency wars don't have defined start dates, but they can be ended with something like peace treaties. In 1936, Britain, France, the United States signed the Tripartite Agreement to address the currency imbalances that had resulted from Britain and the United States leaving the gold standard in the midst of the Great Depression. On the eve of World War II, with an even greater enemy on the horizon, the three countries agreed to refrain from devaluing their currencies.

In 1985, when Japan not China was the rising Asian economic power,  the governments of Britain, France, Japan, the United States, West Germany signed the Plaza Accord, under which the dollar would be allowed to depreciate against the yen.

Some are now calling for a new international agreement to stabilize the current round of depreciation. But, obviously, the world economy has changed quite a bit in the last 25 years. The growing power of emerging economies such as Brazil, China, India, and South Korea make it much harder for a few finance ministers in a hotel room to hammer out a deal. Moreover, previous efforts at stabilizing global exchange rates have caused the parties involved to lose faith when they're ultimately undermined by domestic policies.

So as with real wars, declaring one is often far easier than ending it.

Thanks to Barry Eichengreen, professor of economics and political science at the University of California, Berkeley.

VANDERLEI ALMEIDA/AFP/Getty Images

 SUBJECTS:
 

Joshua E. Keating is an associate editor at Foreign Policy.

MARTY MARTEL

6:53 PM ET

October 15, 2010

US businesses are hooked to cheap Chinese products

China’s trade surplus with US is more because US businesses are hooked to cheap Chinese products.

That is why US Congress is having a hard time imposing any meaningful tariffs on Chinese imports. US business lobby in Washington in favor of trading with China is way too powerful to allow any meaningful tariffs against China.

Every country seeks advantages to sell its own products, China being not different.

Witness how DOHA talks broke down because US would NOT agree to end subsidies to its big farmers which put India’s small farmers at disadvantage.

In the end, free trade can work only as long as some countries want to prop up other countries and so allow cheap imports at the expense of their on producers.

US willingly imported cheap Chinese products to promote Chinese economy because US wanted to prop up China as a counterbalance to Soviet Union. It is just that US did not realize but that got US businesses hooked to huge profits that cheap Chinese products generate for them as a walk through any Walmart, Home Depot, Sears or Macy’s filled with cheap Chinese goods proves.

 

DEFANNIN

3:43 AM ET

October 16, 2010

Coolie Wages for All

The devaluation of the dollar is a ham fist-ted attempt at bring jobs to the US. But what are those jobs going to pay? To be competitive do we have to pay workers here the same as workers in China? Are workers here going to have the same standard of living as workers in China? We are told there is no inflation, but over the past couple of weeks the dollar has lost value. The dollar is a paper currency. Its only value is what it will buy. If it buys less oil or gold or any other commodity we have inflation de facto what ever you call it. And even if we have the same amount of money to spend our standard of living has fallen.

 

LAZLO JAMF

12:41 PM ET

October 19, 2010

Disciplining Your Labor Force

For nearly thirty years wages in the US have stagnated. Yet the trade deficit continues to grow. And for nearly thirty years the answer to the sphinx's riddle echoes, "we must deprive our workforce in order to stay competitive." But is it logical to believe that by cutting wages, we can turn the American labor into a productive dynamo, more machine than man, ceaselessly contributing to the hive-state.

The image of a merciless pharoahs comes to mind, commanding an austere slave-state not realizing his civilization is waning. However this thought is unfairly prejudiced. When the pharoahs needed a pyramid to stand the test of time, they increased the beer rations of the most productive laborers, who were not in fact, slaves.

The US monetary gurus, on the other hand, won't be satisfied until the the labor force has returned to a subsistence-level of living, techno-sharecroppers. What remains is blank-collar workforce of maladaptive mutants who can only hope for a cataclysm that wipes out their neighbors and increases the real value of their hourly toil, ala the aftermath of the bubonic plague.

 

MARLA NEWMAN

2:04 PM ET

November 13, 2010

Why Do Currency Wars Start?

Because when one country plays with its exchange rate, everyone else has to. The devaluation of the dollar is a ham fist-ted attempt at bring jobs to the US. But what are those jobs going to pay? To be competitive do we have to pay workers here the same as workers in China? Are workers here going to have the same standard of living as workers in China? We are told there is no inflation, but over the past couple of weeks the dollar has lost value. The dollar is a paper currency. "Unlike real wars, currency wars don't have defined start dates, but they can be ended with something like peace treaties. In 1936, Britain, France, the United States signed the Tripartite Agreement to address the currency imbalances that had resulted from Britain and the United States leaving the gold standard in the midst of the Great Depression gahanna whole life insurance. On the eve of World War II, with an even greater enemy on the horizon, the three countries agreed to refrain from devaluing their currencies. " In the end, free trade can work only as long as some countries want to prop up other countries and so allow cheap imports at the expense of their on producers. US willingly imported cheap Chinese products to promote Chinese economy because US wanted to prop up China as a counterbalance to Soviet Union. It is just that US did not realize but that got US businesses hooked to huge profits that cheap Chinese products generate for them as a walk through any Walmart, Home Depot, Sears or Macys filled with cheap Chinese goods proves.