All Roads Lead to Istanbul

Turkey is more popular now than it has been since the Ottoman Empire. But can it please all of its new friends at the same time?

BY JAMES TRAUB | OCTOBER 15, 2010

ANKARA, Turkey - It's great to be Turkey just now. The economy, barely scathed by the global recession, grew 11.7 percent in the first quarter of this year, and 10.3 percent in the second.  Like the Ottoman Empire reborn, Turkey has sponsored a visa-free zone with Syria, Jordan, and Lebanon, and is moving toward creating a free trade zone as well. And Turkey is a force not just in its neighborhood but, increasingly, in the world. It's the next president of the Council of Europe, an observer of the Gulf Cooperation Council, and a new friend of ASEAN and Mercosur. And the world is beating a path to its doorstep: When I was in Ankara this week, the Sudanese foreign minister was in town; the French, the Austrians, and the Poles had just visited. Senior Iraqi politicians were making regular pilgrimages. Turkey has become a net exporter of diplomatic services. "For the first time," says Selim Yenel, the highly Americanized deputy undersecretary of foreign affairs responsible for relations with Washington, "they're asking us for advice."

Like its fellow emerging powers Brazil and South Africa, Turkey was once a right-wing state that the West could safely pocket during the Cold War. And like these countries, the Turks now have the self-confidence to feel that they no longer need belong to anyone. Such states are now a force unto themselves, as Turkey and Brazil demonstrated -- to Washington's chagrin -- when they reached a deal with Iran this past May to ensure that Tehran would not produce weapons-grade nuclear fuel. Intriguingly, Turkey, Brazil, and Nigeria currently serve on the U.N. Security Council, and South Africa and India will next year -- a murderers' row of emerging powers, and a glimpse of a post-hegemonic, polycentric world.

But diplomatically, Turkey matters more than the others do. Among them, only Turkey is overwhelmingly Muslim and located in the Middle East, within hailing distance of practically every crisis zone on the planet. And thus the question of what kind of force Turkey will be matters more as well. Turkish diplomats, well aware that the eyes of the world are on them, are quick to give assurances that they are a liberal, secular, and, above all, responsible influence in their neighborhood and beyond.

The question arises, of course, because of the events of this past spring, when, in dismayingly rapid succession, Turkey delivered the unwanted gift of the Iranian deal and voted against a U.S.-sponsored U.N. resolution to impose sanctions on Iran -- and then erupted in outrage when Israeli commandos, determined to stop a flotilla sailing from Turkey to Gaza, killed eight Turkish citizens in the course of a terribly botched operation. The accident of timing left the toxic impression that Turkey viewed Iran as a friend and Israel as an enemy. Turkey's policy of "zero problems with neighbors" seemed to mean that it was prepared to alienate its old friends in the West in order to mollify countries in its own backyard, including the worst among them. The New York Times' Thomas Friedman wrote that Turkey seems intent on "joining the Hamas-Hezbollah-Iran resistance front against Israel."

I think that's a bum rap. On Israel, virtually everyone I've spoken to here, including harsh critics of the ruling AKP, has said that popular opinion was so outraged by the event -- the first time since the Ottomans, as one is constantly told, that Turkish civilians had ever been killed by a foreign army -- that no government could have preserved its popular legitimacy without demanding an apology (though whether leading figures had to describe the incident as state terrorism is another matter). Turkey is still waiting for that apology. As for Iran, it's clear that Foreign Minister Ahmet Davutoglu and his team really did believe that the West would welcome the deal they struck, by which Iran would agree to transfer 1,200 kilograms of uranium out of the country to be enriched for civilian purposes. The fact that they were wrong probably says as much about U.S. President Barack Obama's ambivalence about engaging Iran as it does about Turkish tone-deafness or disingenuousness.   

MOHAMMED ABED/AFP/Getty Images

 

James Traub is a contributing writer for the New York Times Magazine and author of, most recently, The Freedom Agenda. "Terms of Engagement," his column for ForeignPolicy.com, runs weekly.

AR

7:17 PM ET

October 15, 2010

Another propaganda piece from

Another propaganda piece from the pro turkish side. Some things the author fails to mention:

Turkey does not respect international law, rather it is one of the best examples of a nation that flaunts it. 1) illegal occupation of Cyprus 2) illegal blockade of Armenia 3) denying of the Armenian, Greek, and Assyrian Genocides during WW1 4) mistreatment of national minorities i.e. Kurds, etc.

The only reason turkey receives any support is because since the mid 1800s, it has been the stooge of London, and now Washington; acting as a buffer against the Russians and Persians. Now that Turkey is again somewhat back on its feet, the Anglo-American establishment will see what Turks are capable of, sadly they will not be the ones who's blood is shed.

 

SIDROCK23

7:14 AM ET

October 16, 2010

more cry babying

seems like AR is continuing israel's whinning while ignoring the facts. one of the best moves by turkey was to resolve some its long running internal and external conflicts. 1.) on the point of cyprus, the turks have been actively pursuing talks with officials from cyprus on mending the past conflict, with the president of Cyprus even going as far saying that turkey should be allowed in the EU and it would be an important player in the EU. 2) they have also been working for a while now on a gran baragin with armenia and various treaties and agreements have already been signed in route to a long term resolution. 3) turkey's so called "denial" is no different the israel's denial of a humanitarian crisis in gaa, its slow extermination of the palestinian people or the U.S denial of its crimes against humanity in vietnam, iraq and afghanistan. 4.) turkey's most recent national referendum actually included laws that would give its minorites (yes that includes the Kurds) more rights and more freedoms.
so unlike the "white boys" of the world, at least turkey is a mature enough nation to start working on resolving its conflicts and issues as compared to some of the mass murderes from UK, US, and israel who are walking around talking about how much they love "peace & democracy". its obvious that some in the "white world" just can't stand seeing a muslim nation standing on the same level as them and staring them in the face.

 

ALSEF

10:22 AM ET

October 16, 2010

Nice Sid

I think it's quite odd that people are complaining about the "Armenian Genocide" from WW1 yet are absolutely silent when discussing Stalin's own "genocide" of the Armenians.

My guess: AR is reaching for a justification for his anti-Muslim stance.

 

AMERICAN DREAMER

10:32 AM ET

October 16, 2010

James Traub is a Revisionist.

" As for Iran, it's clear that Foreign Minister Ahmet Davutoglu and his team really did believe that the West would welcome the deal they struck, by which Iran would agree to transfer 1,200 kilograms of uranium out of the country to be enriched for civilian purposes. The fact that they were wrong probably says as much about U.S. President Barack Obama's ambivalence about engaging Iran as it does about Turkish tone-deafness or disingenuousness. "
.
Umm, Actually, the deal that Brazil-Turkey proposed was virtually identical to the deal Obama team proposed to Iran only a few months earlier.
.
James Traub, would you please get your facts straight; The failure of the Turkey-Brazil failed deal was based on US reversing itself, not Turkey's "tone-deafness".

 

DAVE23

2:38 PM ET

October 16, 2010

Coincidence?

I was going through this interesting and insightful article when I thought that some arguments used in this piece sounded very familiar.
This is not an attempt to delegitimize any of the arguments used by Mr. Taub, but I find it interesting that a number of them have appeared in a piece by Toby Vogel in the September/October issue of the English language edition of the German magazine “Internationale Politik” (published by the German Council on Foreign Relations) that I had read this morning.

The article “Realpolitik Turkish-style” (http://www.ip-global.org/archiv/volumes/volume-11-2010/eastern-approaches/realpolitik-turkish-style.html ) is longer, more in-depth and also mentions Turkey’s growing role in the Balkans and both article use the same Thomas Friedman quote, among others.

Both articles are worth reading but I can highly recommend Mr. Vogel’s piece.

 

ROZBAT

9:10 AM ET

October 19, 2010

our economy fastest groving

i agree that article because im Turkish too. Turkey is one of the fastest groving economy of Middle - East region.