Why Is Osama bin Laden Going After the French?

There's a few reasons why al Qaeda’s most wanted is trying to stir up trouble in France.

BY ANDREW LEBOVICH | OCTOBER 28, 2010

Yesterday, in an audio recording released to Qatar-based news station Al Jazeera, al Qaeda Central leader Osama bin Laden for the first time singled out France as a target of attack, saying, "The equation is very clear and simple: as you kill, you will be killed; as you take others hostages, you will be taken hostages; as you waste our security we will waste your security."

Excoriating France for its participation in "Bush's loathed war" in Afghanistan (where France has around 3,750 troops in combat, training, and support roles) and its ban on full-body covering garments such as the burqa and niqab last month, bin Laden also claimed some manner of credit for the kidnapping last month of five French and two non-French nuclear energy workers in Niger by al Qaeda in the Islamic Maghreb (AQIM). He noted, "The taking of your experts in Niger as hostages, while they were being protected by your proxy [agent] there, is a reaction to the injustice you are practicing against our Muslim nation." He also attacked France for its "intervention" in North and West Africa, and the taking of wealth from Muslim nations.

While statements from al Qaeda Central leaders and affiliates have in the past singled out France, this statement marks a distinct escalation in rhetoric, one that has added credibility in the wake of nearly a month of warnings about possible terrorist attacks in Europe, including France. Foreign Minister Bernard Kouchner dismissed bin Laden's threats, calling them "opportunism," though Kouchner's spokesman subsequently added that the tape "only confirms the reality of the terrorist threat" to France. (Defense Minister Herve Morin told Agence France-Presse today that France would begin withdrawing its troops from Afghanistan in 2011, but said that date was linked to NATO timelines and not bin Laden's tape.)

But why is bin Laden taking on the French now?

For one thing, the mention of these controversial headlines -- the bans and the kidnappings -- shows that bin Laden is not only alive and kicking, but attuned to the news cycle. More specifically, this latest tape could be an attempt to stir up the French public over the already unpopular war in Afghanistan while simultaneously preying on fear among French and other European Muslims about restrictions on their religious practice, even if very few French Muslims actually wear the garment in question.

In a broad sense, though, this kind of statement fits neatly into one of al Qaeda Central's historical goals: fusing anger at Western governments for occupation in Muslim countries with perceived slights against Muslims everywhere. In doing so, the organization justifies its attacks against Western countries' or their allies, on the grounds that they have attacked the "Muslim nation" (umma in the original Arabic) as bin Laden referred to it. Bin Laden made the connection between restrictions on Muslim freedoms and anti-occupation violence explicit, saying, "If you unjustly thought that it is your right to prevent free Muslim women from wearing the face veil, is it not our right to expel your invading men and cut their necks?"

According to my New America Foundation colleague and al Qaeda expert Brian Fishman, "Al Qaeda has always tried to conflate two phenomena that other jihadis have historically seen as distinct: the direct occupation of Muslim countries by 'Infidels' and the oppression of Muslims in the Muslim world or in the West. By doing this, al Qaeda hopes to leverage popular anger and commonly accepted religious justifications for armed opposition to generate support for its terrorist attacks against the West."

THOMAS COEX/AFP/Getty Images

 

Andrew Lebovich is a program associate with the New America Foundation's American Strategy Program and its National Security Studies Program. He writes a twice-weekly brief with Foreign Policy, The Legal War on Terror, and is a co-editor of the AfPak Channel.

DMOLONEY

7:32 AM ET

October 29, 2010

Bin laden is such a tool, if

Bin laden is such a tool, if he cares so much about the right of women to dress as they want to dress why didnt he take issue with the taliban who enforced a strict dress code on afghan women

 

SPOONLESS_EDDIE

8:25 AM ET

October 29, 2010

"free Muslim women"

In this, OBL is accidentally correct. In the West, Moslem women are free from having their faces cut off by their family members.

 

BRUNODIDEROT

9:10 AM ET

October 29, 2010

he hates them for their ... croissants and espressos

Why is OBL goin' after them Frenchy-folks ?

He hates 'em for their croissants and espressos. That's for sure.

. . . oh, and maybe he (for some reason) hates them for their, uh ... "colonialism" (entirely well-intentioned and altruistic ... same for ALL Western colonialism) ?

H m m m . . . what do other contributors think ? I'm pretty sure 'bout those croissants and espressos (so secular and decadent, doncha know), but I'm not so sure about the whole "colonialism resentment thing". . . .

 

SPOONLESS_EDDIE

9:22 AM ET

October 29, 2010

Condiments?

He asked for ketchup and they pretended not to understand him?

 

JKOLAK

9:43 AM ET

October 29, 2010

Low self-esteem and a need to

Low self-esteem and a need to feel relevant?

 

MARTY MARTEL

1:01 PM ET

October 29, 2010

French had the audacity to ban burqa

The French have been helping US in Afghanistan since 2003 or so without ever drawing a French-specific warning from Osama. It is the audacity of the French to pass a law banning burqa that really riled up Osama. That goes against the very grain of political correctness practiced by main stream media and many a Western governments. Because Osama knows that what the French did today, rest of the Europe can follow tomorrow and many non-Islamic countries can follow there after.

The very fact that after almost ten long years, Osama bin Laden is still enjoying the hospitality of America’s supposed closest ally in its fight against terrorism speaks volumes about America’s choice of allies.

Not only that but US has tried umpteen times to varnish this fact any which way it can, to protect this indispensable ally but has failed miserably of course.

Some day US has to realize that it is NO use to keep pouring billion after billion in that terror center of the world.

Some day US has to realize that it has no option but to invade and occupy the nation of Pakistan to end this terror threat safely operating from that land.

 

NAG

4:42 PM ET

October 29, 2010

Not Really

Hervé Morin did not say that the pullout would start in 2011 just that some NATO troops could be reorganized or pulled out with the transfer of responsability to the Afghan forces. The exact sentence is:

"A ce moment-là, il pourra y avoir les premiers déplacements ou retraits des forces alliées d'Afghanistan"

At this time (2011), there could be the first reorganization or withdrawals of allied forces in Afghanistan."

The press is so eager to have a date that they though that meant that French Troops would leave in 2011. In fact the ministry of defense said the opposite the next day and battallions have been assigned for depoyment until May 201 2.

 

JOES_FRON

10:11 AM ET

November 19, 2010

He hates them for their

It is the audacity of the French to tatil pass a law banning burqa that really riled up Osama. That goes against klip the very grain of political correctness gazeteler practiced by main stream media and many a fix it pro Western governments

 

KUMHO

4:30 AM ET

November 22, 2010

kumho

He asked for ketchup and they pretended not to understand him?parça kontör