Whispers Behind the Welcome

Indians are looking forward to Obama's arrival, but worry that he won't live up to Bush's legacy of substantive engagement.

BY SADANAND DHUME | NOVEMBER 4, 2010

On the face of it, Barack Obama has much to look forward to when he visits India this weekend. His poll numbers at home may be at a low ebb, and his party may have been shellacked in Tuesday's midterm elections. But the U.S. president remains popular in the world's largest democracy, if not his own. According to the Pew Research Center, three out of four Indians say they have confidence in Obama (only two out of five Americans said the same in a July Washington Post-ABC News poll). The president will likely receive rapturous applause when he addresses India's Parliament, an honor denied to President George W. Bush on his visit in 2006. One of New Delhi's best known restaurants promises to unveil its much-anticipated "Obama platter," and the president's hotel in Mumbai is keeping a $11,250 bottle of Scotch handy, just in case.

But among India's commentariat, the lack of enthusiasm in the run-up to the president's visit is palpable. Some are disappointed by Obama's decision not to visit Sikhism's holiest shrine, the Golden Temple in Amritsar. The White House blames this on a packed schedule, but the popular view in India suggests a president fearful of covering his head with a cloth, as custom demands, lest he bolster the persistent myth in red-state America that he is a Muslim. According to one prominent commentator,  TV anchor and columnist Barkha Dutt, Obama's presidency has traveled from "audacity to anxiety."

Nor are Indians thrilled by what many see as the United States' pampering of Pakistan, which received a $2 billion injection of military aid last month. A spate of newspaper stories and op-eds have suggested that Washington did not pass on intelligence about the Pakistani-American Lashkar-e-Taiba operative David Headley that could have helped prevent the November 2008 Mumbai terrorist attacks, which killed 166 people. Against this backdrop, Indians are bristling in advance at the thought of being asked to make nice with their Western neighbor. "Do we ask [the Americans] to kiss and make up with Osama bin Laden?" the widely read columnist Vir Sanghvi asked.

On Afghanistan, Obama's decision to announce the withdrawal of U.S. troops beginning in July 2011 and to back negotiations with elements of the Taliban hasn't earned him many friends in New Delhi. Simply put, Indians worry that they'll be left to bear the brunt of resurgent Pakistan-backed radical Islam in the region.

The United States and India's economic relationship is strained as well. On paper, the two countries are fast becoming close friends: Counting both goods and services, the United States is India's top business partner, with trade between the countries more than tripling between 2002 and 2008 from $19 billion to $66 billion, a whisker ahead of India's trade with China. But Indians are still smarting over an immigration bill passed by the U.S. Congress in August that makes work visas more expensive for software professionals, who are the symbol of India's economic rise. Not surprisingly, the president won't be visiting Bangalore, India's software capital. According to the Times of India, the (private) American organizers of a business summit for the president in Mumbai upset Indian CEOs by asking whether their companies were involved in outsourcing, a politically sensitive subject in job-starved America. Some detect a snub in Obama's perceived eagerness to keep a distance from anything that might play poorly with voters back home.

MANPREET ROMANA/AFP/Getty Images

 

Sadanand Dhume is a Washington- and New Delhi-based columnist for the Wall Street Journal online. Follow him on Twitter @dhume01.

CARDENAS697

11:22 AM ET

November 5, 2010

Bush and Obama are they really that different

I remember the first issue of Foreign Policy that I read. The front cover had President Bush and the title was “Lonesome Cowboy”. President Bush knew that a strong economic and military partnership with India was vital in the strategic chess game that we play with China.
The United States should continue to foster strong economic and military partnerships with countries like Chile, Colombia, India, Israel, Georgia and Poland to name a few as a median to ensure regional stability and to form a counter balance to Brazil Russia and China. It is because of Brazil Russian and China that Iran and North Korea are allowed to develop their nuclear program. Countries like Venezuela and Ecuador allow terrorist organizations to reside with in their border.
Maybe Teddy Roosevelt had it right, “Speak softly and carry a big stick.”
History will claim Bush to have been a good president that made mistakes and Obama a good president that was just like Bush when it comes to Foreign Policy.

 

PUBLICUS

1:27 PM ET

November 7, 2010

Nixon and Obama

Actually, it's Nixon-Kissinger and Obama.

Just as the N-K team used the PRC-CCP to help leverage the downfall of the USSR, Obama needs to advance one of the very few things Bush got right, i.e., a US-India relationship that can effectively check the gross and klutz misuse of the growing economic power of the PRC/CCP.

The government and the elites of India well know that the PRC/CCP teach in their schools and propagandize in mass media that India is an awful place, a terrible abomination and, besides, has all of those darker skinned (inferior and also small) people. And India knows that many of its best sharpies go to the United States to become entrepreneurs and to gain both market economy skills and to contribute to the vitality of the US economy, culture and society. Few if any Indians go to the PRC/CCP to pursue their dream and to achieve in a model developmental society, culture, economy. The PRC/CCP hasn't any such attraction of 'soft power.'

The people of India haven't any love lost for the Han in China or for the aggressive in Asia PRC/CCP. The US and India each and mutually have much to gain as democratic societies and powerful economies by joining to provide a regional arrangement of checks and balances against the aggressive dictatorial PRC and its ever emboldened fascist CCP.

It is a most encouraging sign in this direction that Pres Obama is spending three days in India, to date the longest visit to a foreign country of his presidency. I think this demonstrates to India - and to all of East and South Asia - that the United States considers a partnership in the region with India as a crucial, pivotal mutually beneficial development.

Still, this is not a foregone conclusion or any nature of natural expectation. Each China and India are countries of the world that are in a class and situation of their own. Each has a population of 1 000 000 000 or more. No other country even remotely approaches this politely stated anomaly of human society, culture, civilization. As a consequence of its bizarre history, China lives in a truly extreme world of its own. This also can be said of India, except that because of the horrors and the concomitant legacy of colonization, India is a democracy, a democratic society, a pluralist culture society and civilization - vital factors of progress that the PR/CCP haven't any idea of. Inconceivable to the PRC/CCP and the sheeple it commands and oppresses.

However, each of the two countries of more than a billion people are in a category of their own which is distinctly apart from the world of some 200 'normal' nations of a reasonable population. Consequently, even tho India is a democracy, India is somewhat quirky too.

 

VODKA

12:10 PM ET

November 5, 2010

Common wealth Games

Really impressive SHOW put forward by India on CW Games!! I think Obama will appreciate that as well. Too bad first lady has a scheduled visit at RED LIGHT district and not to the BIGGEST SLUM IN THE WORLD? I love u too India.

 

TYPEE123

9:47 AM ET

November 7, 2010

Obama & India

And now we continue to Kowtow to everyone. Obama really needs to concentrate on having the courage to go after what he values. He is wimpy and has a weak wrist and is perceived that way because he does not say screw you sue me to his enemies. He merely perpetuates and encourages repubs and right-wing crazies. Remember how he backed off the single payer insurance? He has pedaled backwards since then on all fronts. Remember the first five speeches? You hear him today and it's the same talking points. He has not developed any themes with "how" and why; rather he states the obvious: "We need jobs; we need to get back to work; we need...blah blah. We need to build an advertising campaign for raising the taxes of the 2 per centers (those who are the wealthies). Certainly this can be developed. Start with a guy who owns his own bridge and won't let us drive on it (who needs taxes) show pics of the Two Percenters on holidays on yachts on shopping trips. Paint the Two Percenters as the ugly reality of capitalism gone wild. In fact, how is the distribution of wealth in India? Do they have Two Percenters as well?

 

RU_STASYE

3:51 PM ET

November 15, 2010

Obama and India

I think this tatil demonstrates to India - and to gogus buyutucu all of East filmcin and South Asia - that the United States considers a partnership in the region with India as a gazeteler crucial, pivotal mutually beneficial klip izle development.