Not Your Father's Cuba

What Marco Rubio and Ileana Ros-Lehtinen don't get about the new generation of Cuban-Americans.

BY ARTURO LOPEZ-LEVY | NOVEMBER 5, 2010

Neither Ros-Lehtinen nor Rubio speaks to the aspirations and outlook of this new majority -- and indeed, if you look closely at the voting patterns in exile community, you can see cracks in the foundation of the bloc beginning to emerge. According to exit polling in the 2008 election by Bendixen & Associates, 84 percent of Cubans in the Miami area over the age of 55 voted for John McCain, a traditional Republican Cuba hawk -- but Barack Obama, the first major presidential candidate with a record of opposition to the embargo, garnered 55 percent of the under-30 vote. This year's election also saw the second serious challenge in as many elections from a Cuban-American politician running in a Florida House race on a platform of engaging with Cuba. Joe Garcia, a former leader of Mas Canosa's Cuban American National Foundation who has reinvented himself as a Cuba policy reformer, got 42 percent of the vote against Cuba-hardliner David Rivera -- a loss, but in an exile-heavy district and an election year that favored Republicans, a hopeful sign for the future.

But there are other means besides Congress of breaking the exiles' monopoly on Cuba policy. Most foreign policy, after all, is made by the executive branch, not the legislative one, and considerable reforms to the embargo can be managed through executive orders alone. Obama's policy toward Cuba has so far consisted only of improvements around the margins: giving Cuban Americans unrestricted rights to visit the island and send unlimited remittances to their relatives there, and a smattering of cultural exchanges. But the chances that Obama -- who, as a state legislator in Illinois, declared that the embargo had "utterly failed" -- will do more are greater now than in the first two years of his presidency. This week's Republican electoral rout means that Florida Democrats have less to lose from a Democratic president supporting loosened travel restrictions; the Cuban government's recent political prisoner releases and accelerated economic reforms have increased international pressure on the United States to change course. None of Obama's most Cuba-relevant foreign policy officials -- soon-to-be-National Security Advisor Thomas Donilon, Obama's senior advisor on Latin America Dan Restrepo, Secretary for Hemispheric Affairs Arturo Valenzuela, and Valenzuela's senior advisor for Cuba, Dan Erikson -- have ever defended the embargo as an effective policy. The circumstances are ripe for Obama to put U.S.-Cuba relations on the path to de-escalation. And no one should be surprised if, an election or two down the road, Cuban Americans vote their approval.

AFP/Getty Images

 

Arturo Lopez-Levy is a lecturer at the Colorado School of Mines and a Ph.D. candidate at the Josef Korbel School of the University of Denver.

REY

12:19 AM ET

November 6, 2010

If true, then so what?

Okay, it looks like your article boils down to so some Cubans want the embargo and other don't and politicians don’t always listening to their constituents. I agree with everything you said, but really how is this news? Wow Cubans are not monolific thought robots who automatically support policies just because large numbers of their own group do. That was so enlightening, what’s on tap for next month, not all blacks support Obama. Come on, really nothing else was happening in the world this month that this was deemed worthy of inclusion in FP?

 

CUBANO LIBRE

9:36 AM ET

November 6, 2010

I'm a new generation

I'm a new generation of Cuban-Americans. I arrived to this country 2 years ago, and Ileana Ros, Marco Rubio, and David Rivera, Bod Menendez, Albio Osiri represent my ideas, represent me, represent my fight for freedom Cuban...I don't know what generation Mr. Levy talk about. My friends new arrived Cuban exile and new generation of Cuba-American think like me. We support the embargo.

 

CUBATODAY

1:26 PM ET

November 6, 2010

RE: "I'm a new generation"

Cubano, first of all, allow me to congratulate you for your speedy command of the English language after merely two years living in the US. Even more astonishing is your details' grasp of US internal politics _ you are truly amazing. And, let's not even talk about your spelling; it is flawless.

However, and despite your brilliant aptitude for languages, I must disagree with you. Ileana, David, Bob, and Albio may represent you, but they do not represent all of the Cubans in the US, and that includes me. Perhaps you are the exception, but statitistics prove that you are not the rule. My father may have agreed with you if he were still alive today, but he died waiting for Castro to be deposed by the Marines. My father was in Bay of Pigs, and he also became disillusioned by the greed and inhumanity our exile leadership began to excibit against our own brothers and sisters in Cuba.

Remember my friend, one cannot teach freedom with restrictions _ and that is exactly what we are doing with the Island.

 

CUBANO LIBRE

7:47 PM ET

November 6, 2010

Thanks

I live in Europe too. I learned English there. I believed in freedom and democracy, and I think is important to know politic and what about you faith for.

 

CUBATODAY

2:59 PM ET

November 6, 2010

Arturo, as good as yours

Arturo, as good as yours article is and with all due respect, I think it misses several points. One, the Cuban Americans in Congress do not give a flip about what the majority of Cubans in this country think or want for Cuba _ they have the power and the money, so the rest can jump in a lake as far as they are concerned. Second missed point is the fact that Executive Orders can be rescinded by the next President, just like it happened with Bush. So, whatever Obama may do on his own in the future (I doubt it will be much) can be taken down by his successor with the stroke of a pen. In my opinion, the story remains and seems that it will be the same for a long, long, time. If nothing is done by this lame-duck Congress, we can kiss it good-bye. And, let's not even think about what will happen if Rubio takes the White House in years to come.
I am proud of my compatriots for their achievements, but I am profoundly ashamed of what they are doing to Cuba.

 

CUBATODAY

3:02 PM ET

November 6, 2010

Arturo: "Your views are very

Arturo:
"Your views are very insightful. I disagree with some of them but I cannot dismiss them. Why don't you share them at the Foreign Policy website? It is important to show that there are many voices in the Cuban American Community and it is not correct to say that the policy toward Cuba responds to the desire of our Community. Our community has many goals, attitudes, desires, views about Cuba. Thank you for your comments."

"I said that I would prefer to have this conversation where the article was published because more people can share our thoughts.I will give you an example of things we disagree but I cannot dismiss . Your skepticism about what Obama will do is more realistic than my hope at the end of the article. I see the reasons you have this view. I have read about Obama's life and he has taken the principle road at some important moments. The evidences of the last two years seem to be more coherent with your statement but given the evidences I know from other periods of his life, I prefer to be moderately optimistic that at least more people to people would be promoted in the next year."

 

CUBATODAY

3:17 PM ET

November 6, 2010

It is not skepticism, Arturo,

It is not skepticism, Arturo, it is the reality of our political system. Obama is well intentioned, but he is only one individual who is surrounded by many whose interests may not exactly be as idealistic. Obama knows what is the right thing to do, but so do 99% of Washington's politicos. However, while they are in office, not a single one of them will risk any controversy for fear of losing votes or money, even image. In the meantime, we have a policy on the Island that is as stale as last year's bread, even giving a worse taste to the rest of Latin America.

Not too long ago, there was a rumor that Washington was getting ready to do something about Cuba travel, just right before the elections. I knew it wouldn't happen then, and for the same reason that I stated above. We all know that the present situation with Cuba is fruitless and a total waste, but we continue it. Clearly, it is not in our best interest as a nation to sustain the embargo, and it certainly would help our economy if in a very small way that we reestablish relations with the Island. However, we keep the status quo in spite of all the facts. So, it is evident that we lack what it takes to get it done, and when I say "we" I mean our government.

Perhaps, I am too pessimistic or I have been bitten by that bug before, but I do not see much progress happening any time soon.

 

WHAT PLANET

8:30 PM ET

November 6, 2010

Marco Rubio

Well at least he can show a birth certificate if he ever runs for president

 

ADJUST_THE_SAILS

6:34 PM ET

November 8, 2010

Good job idiot embargo supporters, you've kept Castro in power.

The only reason a Castro/Communist regime is still in power is Cuba is the embargo.

How has the embargo ever weakened the Cuban government? It hasn't, not in any way, it has only made it stronger.

The only way to undermine a closed, communist regime is with open trade and free exchange of ideas. With open trade and free exchange ideas the better products and ideas win, but with the embargo Cubans do not get to see the better products and ideas, and the Castro regime gets to scapegoat the US as the evil power oppressing ordinary Cubans with the embargo.

The pro-embargo scumbags have not hurt Castro in any way, but have destroyed the lives of the ordinary people living in Cuba by keeping them poor and isolated.

The US government should put all the pro-embargo Cuban exiles on rafts back to Cuba, the US does not need bitter, closed minded counter-productive people like them.

The embargo supporters don't support the embargo because it hurts Castro and the communist regime, they support it because they don't want the world to see how quickly Castro and the communist regime would crumble once the embargo was lifted, and what idiots the embargo supporters are.

 

CHABELA

12:01 PM ET

November 10, 2010

Excelent article....

The pro-embargo supporters are less and less popular everyday. The Lehtening-Rubio duet are far way removed from the Cuban sensibility. The Balart brothers always missed the point as well. They don't know how Cubans in the island think, because instead of putting their supposed "love" from their Patria first, they chose to cultivate their remorse-hate for the loss of their dear "Republica." Had they traveled more to the island at least once, had they danced with the Van Van at the Tropical at least once, or had they visited the University of Havana classrooms, would be able to be more in touch with today's sensibility of Cubans in the island. By contrast, they are so disconnected that don't even know that the transition plans they are advocating for in a post-Castros Cuba, is completely foreign to cubanos de Cuba.
Great article. Congratulations to FP for this publication.

 

PLINIO

6:40 AM ET

November 11, 2010

Arturo López-Levy doesn´t get it!

Although for many years I have maintained that the US embargo on Cuba should be lifted, in his article Arturo López-Levy shows that it is he (rather than Ileana Ros Lehtinen and Marco Rubio) who doesn´t "get it." Why?
1. López-Levy assumes that both politicians, together with their respective constituencies are single-issue oriented. He finds it somewhat baffling that two pro-embargo politicians are elected and reelected by constituencies that are not necessarily majority pro-embargo, and makes the mistake of suggesting that they may face increased future electoral risk.
2. López-Levy conveniently ignores the "dynamics," or lack thereof, of intransigence. Intransigence tends to beget intransigence. The intransigence of the Castro brothers leads directly to the intransigence of many Cuban-Americans -- this is why we witness what otherwise would be considered strange activities, such as a "March For Intransigence" held in Miami.

 

PLINIO

1:12 PM ET

November 11, 2010

Arturo López-Levy doesn´t get it (contd.)

3. The EU´s "Common Position" on Cuba has lasted many years, with many countries -- especially formerly Soviet bloc countries -- opposing efforts led by Spain to soften their stance on Cuba. This is because they too recognize the Castro brothers´ intransigence and do not wish to respond with flexibility. While the Common Position is far softer than the US embargo (and does not violate international law) it illustrates Cuba´s increasing pariah status in the international community beyond the US. Perhaps in López-Levy´s next article -- since he is becoming prolific on this subject -- he should attempt to make the case that Europe´s parlamentarians "don´t get it" either in regard to Cuba.

 

ACKERLEY111

11:16 AM ET

November 15, 2010

Arturo López-Levy doesn´t

Cuban American tatil Community and it is not correct to filmcin say that the policy toward gazeteler Cuba responds to the desire of our Community. Our community has many klip izle goals, attitudes, desires, views about Cuba. Thank you di? beyazlatma for your comments."

 

MILANOCHIL

4:11 PM ET

November 15, 2010

Arturo López-Levy

Perhaps you are klip izle the exception, but statitistics prove that you are not the rule. My father may have agreed with you if he were still alive today gazeteler This is because they too filmcin recognize the Castro brothers´ tatil intransigence and do not wish to respond dis beyazlatma with flexibility

 

RACOSTA

12:43 PM ET

November 27, 2010

The embargo?

What embargo? I always find it fascinating all the discussions about the embargo without a definition of what it imeans. Specially the people who oppose the embargo. Castro is able to buy mostly everything from the US and everything that Cuba needs from other countries...usually cheaper. They could buy from "friends." Why will Castro want to buy cereals, buses etc, from the US when he can buy them from friendly Argentina....

Listen well when they oppose the embargo what they really mean is FREE MONEY in the form of credit. Funds to a tyrant who has been in power for more than 50 years and has no respect for human rights .... but they don't tell you that what they mean is the US should fund the Castro dictators. Cuba is failed ruinous state that CAN NOT pay back. Free $$$$ to continue the enslaving of the cuban people.

The next time the talk about lifting the embargo ask what they mean by that.it