The Historical Blindness of Turkey's Detractors

Prime Minister Recep Tayyip Erdogan is not destroying the country's democracy -- he's building it up after an era of military repression that was far worse.

BY ALIZA MARCUS | NOVEMBER 24, 2010

But the current wave of anti-AKP commentators avoid looking back, which is why they get Turkey's present so wrong. Take the so-called mass trial under way in Turkey against 152 Kurdish politicians accused of working for the PKK rebels, as well as the Ergenekon trial. Supposedly, such mass trials are "becoming the norm" -- yet another sign of creeping authoritarianism in Turkey.

But these are modest affairs compared with the trials against leftists, Kurds, trade unionists, and others following the 1980 coup. One case against members of the leftist Dev-Yol group opened in 1982 with 700 defendants. Eighteen years later, the trial is still continuing. Two other Dev-Yol trials, since concluded, each had about 900 defendants. The trial against the DISK trade union had more than 1,400 defendants. The fact that Turkish law allows mass trials -- and schedules hearings so that cases drag on for years -- has nothing to do with Erdogan and everything to do with the deliberately imperfect system the former military junta bequeathed to Turkey's current leadership.

These critics profess shock at those who believe the Ergenekon trial may have validity. The real surprise is not that some members of the armed forces might have been planning a coup, but that Erdogan was courageous enough to challenge the military. The military, after all, has made a habit of staging and planning coups -- it seized power in 1960, 1971, and 1980, and engineered a "soft coup" in 1997, when it forced the resignation of Prime Minister Necmettin Erbakan. Whether those on trial are all guilty is impossible to know. But to claim that the case portends an "ominous future for the country's democracy" ignores the fact that the military itself is responsible for some of the worst abuses of democracy in Turkey's history.

There are good reasons why some still find Turkey's judiciary and policymaking bodies wanting. Erdogan has not fully upended the faulty and easy-to-abuse judicial, civil, and political systems he inherited. And Turkey is not a Western, liberal democracy just yet. But it is moving in the right direction. Over the past eight years, Turkey has improved its civil rights protections, strengthened its free market economy, and moved closer to fulfilling the demands for EU membership. Erdogan has also pushed Turkey's military out of the political decision-making process and pressed the judiciary to investigate military officers implicated in extrajudicial executions of Kurds in the 1990s. These are positive changes, though you'd never know that by reading the new wave of anti-AKP commentators, many of whom seem to think that another military coup is needed to put Turkey back on the right track.

Of course, the situation in Turkey could change. Reforms could stall. Erdogan could become too power-happy. But one thing is for sure: The only real fiction here is that Turkey was a freer and more democratic place before Erdogan's AKP party took office.

Brendan Smialowski/Getty Images

 

Aliza Marcus is a writer in Washington, D.C. and author of Blood and Belief: the PKK and the Kurdish Fight for Independence.

MEDOLOSS

8:56 PM ET

November 24, 2010

I love this man...

I love this man, no matter what some ignorant people say about him what he have done will be reported in the history of turkey and I hope it will be reported in the history of humanity in general.

 

OGUNM

7:41 AM ET

November 26, 2010

Suicide attack wounds 32 in Istanbul

Turkish media are reporting that an explosion in Istanbul's main square has injured some 15 people.

 

AR

10:57 PM ET

November 24, 2010

Yes, today's turkish

Yes, today's turkish government has been more inclined towards democracy and human rights. However, as long the government continues to help in the occupation of Cyprus, the illegal blockade of the border with Armenia, the denial of the Christian Genocide committed against the native Christian population of Asia Minor (Armenians, Assyrians, and Pontic Greeks) during WWI, and its continued harassment of the Kurds, turkey will never become a democratic country.

 

GPSADVOCATE

3:43 AM ET

November 25, 2010

You have got to be kidding

I am not in any way a supporter of any violence that has been committed in the past. let me just start by saying that.

Now, what I cant seem to understand is why the armenian community especially in the US, is so hell bent on bringing up an issue that happened 100 years ago! its unbelievable, instead of whining and moaning about that, why not actually do something, all armenians can do is cry about what happened 100 years ago. Well then why dont we just put the entire egyptian parliament and half the egyptian population in prison and fine them for enslaving jews 1000 years ago for making them build the pyramids?

To be honest, my opinion is you have to come to the table as a big wig to bargain at that table, have some force. Some people do it by being dictator (ahmedinejad, Jong il).

but as of now , to me all the armenians have is kim kardashians big behind.

anyway i find it not only incredibly rude, but just stupid that armenians are constantly commenting on "genocide" under an article that has nothing to do with it.

Listen buddies, nobody is going to listen to you especially right now when turkeys the second fastest growing economy, 16th largest in the world, and is increasing its regional power, so yeah i guess all you can do is comment about genocide under articles thatre irrelevant to that subject. go you !

 

DR. JONES JR.

7:41 AM ET

November 26, 2010

Illegal what?

You lost me at "illegal blockade of the border with Armenia". Turkey blocked border trade with Armenia following the Armenian annexation of Azeri territory. Last I checked, countries are allowed to close their borders if they decide they want to.

Perhaps you were thinking of the closure of Turkey's ports and airports to traffic from Greek Cyprus (which is mutual). While not illegal, it does impede Turkey's efforts to join the EU.

For that matter, the occupation of North Cyprus, while far from an ideal situation, was a response to Greek ethnic cleansing of Turkish Cypriots.

You really do no favors for Cypriots, Armenians, or Kurds with such bias. The Turks are (generalization coming up) a proud, touchy people. Observers--such as myself--would like for them to take pride in the steps they have taken in improving democracy and human rights, and thus to continue on that path.

Lastly: You claim that Turkey will never become a democratic country without accepting these claims. Perhaps the fact that Turks vote in elections does not qualify it for status of a democracy? As mentioned in the article, Turkey is a flawed democracy, but is headed in a liberal democratic trajectory. Many countries that claim the title 'democratic' do not do as well.

 

GLOBALVIC

8:01 AM ET

November 26, 2010

@GPSADVOCATE

Turkey has been offered full EU membership and of course Aliza is right in highlighting Turkish progress on HR issues but:-

A. The Kurdish problem
The Kurdish problem is ongoing! It goes back 100+ years ! Shouldn't that make a difference? What does that say about the Turkish republic's frame of reference?

B. The Cyprus problem
Oh the Turkish "intervention" in Cyprus goes back 35 odd years ago and as far as I know there are ongoing talks to resolve the problem! Does it matter that the Cyprus problem goes back 60 odd years ago ... oh and even longer when the Greeks were living under Turkish occupation and were treated as .. dimmies!?? Sure it does! Even the Young Turks were not happy with the Sultan!

Oh the TSK peace operation in Cyprus stopped after it ethnically cleansed and divided the island into two. Sure the Greeks themselves committed atrocities and the Greek junta overthrew a democratically elected president with 97% of the vote. Does that justify capturing just c. 37% of the island (??!). It was a big chunk my friend and... oh the TSK stopped when the Americans started asking questions otherwise, the TSK might have captured more ground! Oh and TODAY there are more settlers from the Turkish mainland than there are Turkish Cypriots! I trust that you appreciate American, UK, EU, etc. insistence that Israel should confront the settlements issue!

C. Armenia
Oh and about Armenia and irrelevance (!) please next time spare us the comments on Kim Kardassian!

The fact is that the Armenians took up arms in Nagorno-Karabagh partly because they did not want a repetition of what they suffered 100 or 200 years ago in the hands of the Turks (see I didn' t even call it "genocide" to avoid hurting the Turks' reputation!). Turkey responded by blocking the Armenian-Turkish border and will not open it UNTIL AFTER their Azeri "brothers" have resolved the Azeris' problem with Armenia. I assume that you know how Erdogan led Turkish FP on this subject ...

The fact is that modern Turkey ITSELF thinks--and rightly so--that it is the successor of the Turkish nation and that the "genocide" charge hurts today' s Turks and their PRESENT reputation. SEE for yourself how the Turkish republic has been detracting Kurdish aspirations in Aliza's OWN book on the Kurds. Not too long ago the Kurds were mere "mountain Turks" ... they did not EVEN exist! It’ s not a case of Vaclav Havel' s velvet divorce or Tony Blair’ s referendum on devolution!

Contrast Turkish behaviour with the Germans' contrition on the way they treated the Jews. Sadly the Turks are earning THEMSELVES a reputation ... Of course there is a degree to which their enemies and the enemies they themselves have created during the long dark years of Turkish occupation, oppression, denigration of Christians, and denial of genocide are maligning THEIR name. At least IN TURKEY they may deal with malignment because insulting "Turkishness" is a crime under even the CURRENT Turkish criminal code!

Nevertheless, Aliza herself and others are blindsided by the following:

(1) Erdogan' current commitment to full EU membership is no proof of democratic credentials. It would be naive to miss the point that without the EU accession process Erdogan, Gul and AKP would find it very difficult to deal with the generals and the Kemalist establishment.

(2) Today's liberal democratic models are not a panacea for FP and security escapades: case-in-point, the Turkish National Security Council has cross-haired Israel! It has been officially pronounced as a threat to Turkey! This indicates that the top echelons of the Kemalist elite have been decapitated by AKP. Israel itself and its settlement policy--as you know--have been publicly faulted by the US and the EU notwithstanding the fact that Israel is widely regarded as a liberal democracy.

You will recall how secretary Albright and the EU reacted to the election results in Austria in the 1990's! Democracy will not of itself heal societal miasmas such as oppressing the foreigner or the poor, suppressing free speech, religious discrimination, lack of the rule of law, etc.

Aliza should focus on societal needs, actual policies, impact and INTENTION, and the worldview and circumstances that have birthed the policies.

(3) The present ills of liberal democracies (e.g. high unemployment; sovereign debt; drugs; crime; STDs; home-brew terrorism; family breakdown; social disintegration; low birth rates and demographic deficits; illegal immigration; the unravelling of public education, social security and public health systems; huge consumer debt, etc.) are a lot!! Liberal democracies merely facilitate free discussion of social and economic and political problems... they do not necessarily deliver solutions! In fact demagoguery impedes solutions. In point of fact a lot of people in the Turkey and the ME & NA fault the liberal democracies for creating or fostering such problems. They even accuse liberal democracies for liberachio morals or even the lack of them. Earlier generation liberals including Gladstone (!) would agree with them!! The problem with today's «liberals» is that they are extremely secular and militant to the point of intolerance of other people’ s views. Moreover, at the individual adult level almost anything goes at the . This is anathema to people in the ME & NA and they just will not accept it. In fact the secular void is part of the reason for the delegitimization of secularism and the ascendency of Islam in Turkey!

There is always a difference between the normative and the real. Of course Armenians and Turks or the French and the Germans for that matter, should forgive and seek to help each other ... but what beggars belief is that one is not even being real let alone normative by not facing the legacy of damage and by denying the fact that it happened!

 

ABLITZ

5:55 AM ET

November 25, 2010

Read this article carefully.

Read this article carefully. The evidence for the argument being made, that Erdogan is not an authoritarian ruler who is trying to consolidate power can be summed up in one sentence "The last regime was worst". Besides the constant examples about the abuses of the secular military regime before Erdogan there is really no other evidence. "Ok, but he's better than what we had before" is not a solid foundation for any argument of democratic consolidation or even a step in the right direction.
In fact the reforms aimed at solving the Kurdish issue have been dramatically scaled back over the past few years. The government is also teetering towards the integration of more Islamic law in society which is very dangerous if the balance tips towards theocratic institutions. So which way is it really going?

The writer professes to their own subjective views because they were persecuted under the last regime, and yes there is a skewed view by the West of "we'd rather have a secular government than any type of religiously affiliated party rule" and they tend to ignore how bad human rights were under the military regime. This however is not proof that Erdogan is any kind of reformer or will lead Turkey to democratic consolidation.

 

ASCHOPS

7:39 AM ET

November 25, 2010

Turkey's has only one

Turkey's has only one problem: that she no longer defends US interestes as her own. Thus she is subject to denigration by the American intelligentsia. I'd like to have something less simplistic to add on the issue - but it all comes down to this: whenever a country opposes the US foreign agenda in meaningful way, it will be maligned by the US media.

 

BUDAHH

6:06 PM ET

November 25, 2010

Ardugan is playing that democracy card and he is doing what

He appoints different people to high offices who are loyal to him, he arrested a ridiculous amount of people with some kind of a conspiracy theory that you only hear about in movies. The kurds and others claim that turkey is using chemical weapons against them.
He is taking a lot of power and is planing to do what with it, definitely not giving it back to the people.

 

RESHOYE SILO

10:55 PM ET

November 25, 2010

Democracy

The question is does mr Erdogan believe in democracy? To me nobody knows so far. I think the only what he desire is to bring Ottoman empire back. Can he do that? we need time t make common on it.
In the Kurds stand point, as a Kurd I think he is not honest to solve kurdish issue.He uses religion to keep religious Kurds in his side and to tell world look Kurds are with me, but this is not true. We will never trust on Turks again I am not nationalist, but I am not out of mind about what they did in recent history.
I mean he tries to do something different in turkey to accomplish his goal NOT to bring democracy and prosperity for his fellow citizens.

 

KURDISTANA AZAD

11:15 PM ET

November 26, 2010

@khalid Mufti

I think today Gaza situation is much more better than Kurds in Turkey, syria and Iran.
Israel recognizes their culture , language and may recognize their own state, but neither country recognize Kurds culture and language. Whole world support Gaza, but no country support Kurds.
Iraq did genocide against Kurds. In syria kurds still can not own anything and some of them even do not have ID.
Turkey many time did genocide (Dersim, zilan, sirnak and many) even no country criticized.
You just look at world at the religion window my friend come on where is human right and civilization.
We Kurds are very unlucky, you know why we are muslim and muslim(turks, arab, persian) kill us and western people say they are muslim and kill others that is not our problem. Because still the major factor in the world is religion. That is why Kurds and gaza are not the same to you. yes they are not the same Kurdistan is under occupied and genocide as well and much more worse than gaza.

 

CYRUS SAFDARI

9:56 AM ET

November 27, 2010

Israel

There's one reason one reason alone that US pundits are tearing down Erdogan: because he spoke out against Israeli atrocities and impunity.