The Tea Party's Vendetta

After two years of Obama's foreign policy pragmatism toward Latin America, Republicans in Congress are threatening to turn back the clock to Cold War times. That would be a disaster for the United States and its neighbors.

BY BERNARDO ÁLVAREZ HERRERA | DECEMBER 7, 2010

The recent midterm election in the United States didn't just put the Republican Party in a greater position of influence over U.S. domestic policy -- it also gave a small section of southern Florida significant power over the country's diplomacy toward Latin America. The new Congress's influential House Committee on Foreign Affairs will likely be chaired by Rep. Ileana Ros-Lehtinen (R-Fla.), who represents the Miami area, while the Subcommittee on the Western Hemisphere will likely be led by Rep. Connie Mack (R-Fla.), who represents the nearby Fort Myers area. Both lawmakers are throwback Latin American cold warriors, catering to their Cuban-American constituents with belligerent policies toward any neighboring government that seeks independence from U.S. influence. Needless to say, what's satisfying for this narrow segment of Floridians won't be in the United States' greater national interest.

The duo's intransigence will be most felt in terms of the five-decade-old embargo against Cuba, on which Ros-Lehtinen and Mack have refused to compromise, though most objective analysts have questioned the policy's strategic and tactical sense. They have also indicated that they will push President Barack Obama's administration to end its attempt at nuanced diplomacy in Latin America and replace it with the George W. Bush administration's simplistic policy of dividing the region into "friends" and "enemies." Obama seemed to acknowledge the folly of this black-and-white approach to the region when he spoke of an "equal partnership" with the region and said that "we cannot let ourselves be prisoners of past disagreements" in a 2009 speech at the Summit of the Americas.

But if certain members of Congress think they can drive a wedge among the countries of the region, they are mistaken. Latin American countries have been expanding their ties with one another -- including a recent rapprochement between Venezuela and Colombia -- and there is a deepening consensus that their differences should be worked out in an atmosphere of mutual respect. (The inaugural co-chairs of the Community of Latin American and Caribbean States, a regional organization set to be founded in 2011, are Chile and Venezuela, two countries that don't see eye to eye on everything, but are willing to cooperate.) For instance, even though the United States opposed Cuba's entry to the Organization of American States, the group last year approved its readmittance. If Washington, instead of accepting this new reality, relies on antagonistic foreign-policy dogma to placate local constituencies, it will only lose in regional and global influence.

Now is an especially inopportune time for the United States to alienate its southern neighbors. Latin American countries are gaining in confidence and increasing their political and economic connections with the rest of the world, both regionally through organizations like UNASUR and bilaterally with countries in Europe, Africa, Asia, and the Middle East. It's not just Latin America that needs the United States anymore; increasingly, the United States needs Latin America.

Unfortunately, Ros-Lehtinen and Mack are hard-line ideologues. Given that she once called for Fidel Castro's assassination, it's no surprise that Ros-Lehtinen is an anti-Cuba hawk. But she has in recent years also become more aggressive toward Venezuela. This year, for example, she made unsubstantiated accusations against Venezuela for serving as a conduit between the rebel group Revolutionary Armed Forces of Colombia (FARC) and al Qaeda. In a March 11 interview with the Council of the Americas, Gen. Douglas Fraser, chief of U.S. Southern Command, debunked those claims in no uncertain terms: "I don't see any evidence of terrorist activity within Latin America or the Caribbean from outside of the region."

Even more disturbing was Ros-Lehtinen's meeting with Venezuelan terrorist Raúl Díaz in Miami several months ago. Díaz had just arrived in the United States after escaping prison in Venezuela, where he was serving a sentence for participating in the 2003 bombings of the Spanish and Colombian consulates in Caracas. It is troubling that Ros-Lehtinen would think it appropriate to use the powers of her office to extend legitimacy to a violent criminal simply because he opposes Venezuelan President Hugo Chávez. (Venezuela has yet to receive any answers on how Díaz could have been granted a visa to enter the United States in the first place.)

Jose CABEZAS/AFP/Getty Images

 

Bernardo Álvarez Herrera is Venezuela's ambassador to the United States.

FP101

2:33 AM ET

December 8, 2010

Re-balancing

If the US antagonistic foreign policy leads to reduction of US influence in Latin American countries, perhaps that will be good for them. It will allow them to build closer relationships with Asia, Europe A/ME as you say. It may not be good for the US in the short/medium term but the US will be able to adjust its foreign policy as it comes to realise it is a relatively less important global player in commerce than it once was..as the rest of the world especially Asia forges ahead.

 

EBOGRAN

12:07 PM ET

December 8, 2010

Venezuela's Harvest

The Venezuelan Ambassador to the US should remember that you reap what you sow. Chavez's foreign policy is based on hatred of the US. A reaction against that hatred and a desire to nullify that threat is a predictable outcome.
Chavez cannot have the US a a commercial partner and a sworn enemy.

The dislike for Chavez's regime is growing, and Honduras proved that it can be stopped. Democracy and the rule of law has to prevail for Latin America to develop its potential. Strongmen like Chavez, Ortega,and Morales who trample on political opponents and basic rights should be a thing of the past, alas they are our reality.

 

ZORRO

3:50 PM ET

December 8, 2010

About Reaping

Could it be that Chavez is hostile to the US because the US supported a coup against his (then democratic) government?

 

PUBLICUS

2:34 AM ET

December 9, 2010

Coups

While Chavez was a general in the Venezuela army he attempted a coup against the democratically elected government. This guy is unreliable, fickle, out only for himself. While a general Chavez was pro coup, now that Chavez is president he is against coups. The one consistent and predictable trait of Chavez is that he is a hater of the United States.

Because of his hate of the US Chavez is chumming up and cozying with China, which predictably will vitalize opposition to him in the United States. And rightly so.

 

ALFRED E. NEUMAN

1:12 AM ET

December 14, 2010

@Zorro Chavez hates the USA

@Zorro Chavez hates the USA since long before he took power. He's a closet communist who adores Fidel and hates the USA. He visited Cuba before he was elected for the first time and gave a very belligerent speech. Shortly after winning elections he rejected US's humanitarian aid after the mudslides in 1999 that killed +10,000 people along the coast. To this day, the region hasn't recovered from that tragedy.

Ironically, 12 years later,after wasting and stealing $100,000,000,000 the country is flooded and in shambles.

 

ALFRED E. NEUMAN

1:25 AM ET

December 14, 2010

Coups

@Publicus

Chavez was a Lieutenant Colonel, not a general, and a mediocre officer to say the least. He flunk his main advanced degree course, and was put in charge of a cafeteria that he mismanaged. The highlights of his military career included playing baseball and acting (You can tell by his pathetic clownish performances when he's in front of cameras, at least 5-6 hours every Sunday). During the failed 1992 coup he hid in the Military Museum until the danger had passed then came out like a rooster in heat, bragging in front of the cameras saying that "the objectives hadn't been achieved *for now*). The majority of the poor and disfranchised by decades of corrupt parties alternating in power ate the Chavez (a.k.a. Cowardante Failure) histrionic B.S. hook, line and sinker.

Today (December 14th, 2010), the National Assembly, the subservient peons of The Cowardante, are rushing to approve before the end of the year, a series of communist laws that bypass their own N.A. putting power in the of puppet communes under direct control of the Tropical Furher and a totalitarian censorship law to muffle the internet like in Cuba, Iran and North Korea. A new chapter in the saga of Cmdr. Failure begins, but his days in power are numbered.

 

FREAK.DOM

1:51 PM ET

December 8, 2010

Venezuela-FARC Connection

Venezuela's connection to the FARC is not as outlandish as the author claims. Hugo Chavez's regime is in fact accused by Colombia of arming, supporting and giving sanctuary to FARC guerillas.

 

EVOSI

2:53 PM ET

December 8, 2010

No lets think back to what

No lets think back to what Bolivia, Venezuela were before Morales and Chavez, crony capitalist kelptocracies, yes it may have made the US rich but what sort of world do we live in if the money talks louder than human need?

 

PUBLICUS

3:42 PM ET

December 16, 2010

South American Kleptocracies

So EVOSI, you'd prefer a communist/socialist dictator kleptocracy in S America rather than an evolving modern capitalist system that respects democracy such as in Brazil, Argentina, Chile, Colombia and which, because it is more capitalist than fascist, is evolving to regularly scheduled elections that are not threatened by the grudge and revenge driven egomania of one man at the top, as is occurring in Venezuela by Comrade Chavez, and also in Bolivia? It clearly seems to be so.

Chavez is tight with the Politboro in Beijing, Castro and any government anywhere, to include Iran especially, which is the sworn enemy of the United States (which also drags Canada into it). You are creating a more dangerous world than has ever previously existed. You advocate dictatorship, and your demands are immediate, i.e, you and your Light Colonel Chavez want dictatorship before the new year of 2011. You and the Politboro in Beijing want this along with the ayatollahs of Iran. We're talking South America here.

You are begging for another 1962 Cuban Missile Crisis as these foreign dictator governments hone ever so stupidly on certain countries of South America, the coming dictatorship of Chavez in Venezuela intended to be their first great trophy.

We are talking dictatorship in Latin America, which until Chavez had become an ugliness of the Cold War past. You and your Comrade Chavez are forcing a new Cold War on the world. You need to think about that for a while, seriously so.