The Coffee Republic

A dangerous drift in postwar Abkhazia.

BY THOMAS DE WAAL | DECEMBER 29, 2010

View a slide show of postwar Abkhazia.

ABKHAZIA — Post-conflict zones are eerily quiet places. Nowadays, with the border closed since the August 2008 war, the only way to cross from western Georgia into the de facto Republic of Abkhazia, a territory of 3,250 square miles by the Black Sea, is by foot. When I left behind the Georgian military checkpoint and walked across the bridge over the Inguri River last month, it was a gloriously sunny day; the white peaks of the Caucasus Mountains sketched out hazily on the horizon to the north. But the silence was deathly.

Frogs are the main inhabitants of this no-man's land. Apart from the sound of my suitcase wheels skidding over the bumpy road, all I could hear was frogs croaking in the riverbed. I kept pace with a friendly group of Georgian women, some of the many thousands who go back and forth between Zugdidi, a town in western Georgia, and Gali, the southern region of Abkhazia. These Gali Georgians eke out a precarious existence with family and property on both sides of the border.

A few years ago, I might have enjoyed the spy-novel quality of this walk across a bridge in an international twilight zone. But this time my feelings were more in tune with those of the unfortunate Georgian women, whose lives had been divided by the checkpoints between western Georgia and would-be independent Abkhazia, and who have to regularly make this long walk rain or shine. "When will this ever end?" I wondered as I approached the uniformed guards on the other side of the bridge, manning the cement-and-steel gateway to Fortress Abkhazia.

For More

The Limbo State

Scenes of life in
postwar Abkhazia.

The Republic of Abkhazia, geographically speaking, occupies a much-coveted slice of subtropical Black Sea coastline. But since 1993, it has not had a proper place on any political map. Having won a bitter civil conflict with the Georgian government in Tbilisi in the early 1990s, the indigenous Abkhaz and their allies, mainly Armenians and Russians, have built a de facto state with a functioning government, institutions, and media.

The Abkhaz state-building project received a boost following the 2008 war between Georgia and Russia over the other breakaway territory of South Ossetia. When the conflict ended, Russia recognized Abkhazia as an independent state and dramatically increased its military presence there. But to most of the world, the Republic of Abkhazia is still part of sovereign Georgia and therefore an illegitimate entity, particularly as 200,000 of its prewar Georgian inhabitants are still prevented from returning home. Quasi-state, de facto entity, partially recognized territory -- take your pick of the terms on offer -- it is a land whose inhabitants say they have left Georgia behind, but who have not, so far, arrived anywhere else.

I had not been back to Abkhazia since 2008. On my trip last month I found Sukhumi, the capital city (which the Abkhaz call Sukhum), to be tidier and more prosperous than it was two years ago. Shops and cafes were open and doing business; there were periodic traffic jams on the central streets. The crime rate was down. But I would hardly call the city "bustling." The central square is still dominated by the burned-out hulk of the 13-story old Communist Party headquarters, which was ravaged in the final bout of fighting before the Abkhaz and their allies recaptured the city in 1993.

My mood improved as I strolled along the promenade by the Black Sea, past whitewashed hotels, shops, and rows of palm trees and dwarf pines. In lovely mid-70s temperatures, I ended up doing most of my business in the seafront cafe known either as Akop's Place (after its late Armenian owner) or by the Russian slang term brekhalovka, loosely translating to "gossipery." Here, in a pleasant throwback to Abkhazia's Ottoman past, men in flat caps play dominoes, backgammon, or chess and smoke incessantly while sipping Turkish coffee and catching up on the political news. If you sit here long enough, most people you want to talk to will come by. Even the president, Sergei Bagapsh, stops by from time to time.

My first observation from my conversations here was that the Abkhaz do not want to talk about Georgia. From their perspective, the conflict has been resolved -- in their favor -- and it is just a matter of waiting for the rest of the world to catch up.

Abkhaz officials reject the Georgian government's recent strategy on engagement, which aspires to restore people-to-people contacts, as a hapless PR stunt. Of course, the Abkhaz cannot pretend forever that Georgia and the claims of its displaced people do not exist. But another initiative of the Georgian government has arguably made their life easier in this regard. By insisting that Abkhazia is a place "under Russian occupation" -- a formula supported in July by U.S. Secretary of State Hillary Clinton -- Tbilisi suggests the Abkhaz are mere tools of Russia without any agency of their own, and that diminishes any incentive they might have had for dialogue with the Georgians.

 SUBJECTS: RUSSIA, GEORGIA, CAUCASUS
 

Thomas de Waal is a senior associate at the Carnegie Endowment for International Peace in Washington and author, most recently, of The Caucasus: An Introduction.

MCRM

11:01 AM ET

December 30, 2010

Good to know that not

Good to know that not everyone has forgotten about the Georgiar/Russia war.

 

VLADIMIR VOINA

2:00 PM ET

December 30, 2010

Dealing with Sukhumi is absolutely useless

The most urgent, immediate and absolutely necessy step is to return 200,000 Georgian refugees back home to Abkhazia. They are homeless and mostly unemployed, and their life will remain horrible unless they return home.
Their return will create a new political climate in Abkhazia establishing a new power balance: After they get voting rights, their voice will be heard.
There is no sense in dealing - directly or indirectly - with the Sukumi regime because it is only fulfilling Moscow's orders.
The only solution of the problem is the strongest pressure on Moscow by using all available means, including the threat to abrupt trade, cultural, economic and political relations, and to boycot the Sochi Olympics.
"Moscow does not believe in tears." And people in Sukumi believe in nothing except what their masters say.

 

RANDY MCDONALD

2:03 AM ET

December 31, 2010

The most urgent step ...

... is to make sure that until Abkhazia is settled, the two hundred thousand refugees from Abkhazia are able to lead dignified lives, with the same access to quality education, health care, housing, and employment than their non-IDP counterparts also enjoy. The apparent decision of past Georgian governments since the 1992-1993 displacement of these people to keep the lives of these people on edge, trying to avoid doing anything to settle them for fear that Georgian claims to the disputed territories would be harmed if the IDPs could move on, is unconscionable.

Anyway. Demanding the return of the refugees as a _precondition_ for talks--rather than an outcome--is a pretty clear sign of a fundamental unwillingness to try to come to some arrangement with the Abkhaz and their governments, as opposed to trying to dominate them.

 

AR

6:56 PM ET

December 31, 2010

I strongly agree with Randy,

I strongly agree with Randy, and strongly disagree with Vladimir.

Maybe if the Georgians had not be such chauvinists after the break up of the USSR, and had agreed to build a multi ethnic federation, Georgia wouldn't be in this mess. Furthermore, how long can the Western puppet in Tiflis stay in office? Sooner or later somebody with a brain and some relative independence from Western meddling will come to power, and then maybe an acceptable agreement can be found.

 

NANA BERUASHVILI

12:05 PM ET

January 2, 2011

Don't forget that Abkhazia was and is a part of Georgia.

Don't forget that Abkhazia was and is a part of Georgia. The major Object, why Abkhazia is separated from Georgia is a factor of Russia!
Of Course absolutely necessary step is to return 200,000 Georgian refugees back home to Abkhazia, but we know that Abkhazia wont make this decision, because Sukhumi's regime is only fulfilling Moscow's orders, it's very clear !

 

RICHARD MILLER

5:44 PM ET

January 3, 2011

Return of Georgian refugees to THEIR homes in Abkhazia

"Whatever the future holds in terms of long-term status and a deal with Georgia.."

Only PEOPLE can decide the future of Abkhazia..but not so called "abkhazian government"

Dear THOMAS DE WAAL, Do you know that Abkhazia a homeland of more than 250.000 Georgians is?? Everywhere in Georgia can you see Georgian refugees from Abkhazia. Abkhazia doesn't agree with return of Georgian refugees to THEIR homes..in all of Abkhazia, not only in Gali..

Thomas, Do you know what the Democracy, Human Rights, Freedom and equality are?

Abkhazian will be left with nothing and just empty dreams. But they will have bread and circuses in abundance. They should not even ask for anything else. Bread in this case is several social programs financed by Russia. For example, according to information in 2010-2012 Abkhazia will get 3 billion Rubles from Russia. And as for circuses there are plenty of this too starting from exercises of Russian militaries and finishing with playing of the Abkhazian national football team in the second Russian league. But the main thing is for them not to interfere into Russian intentions to take roots into this indigenous Georgian land, not to break free from Russia and fulfill tasks that were laid upon them by members of the Russian State Duma - to serve Russian citizens that holiday in Abkhazia. The rest will stay on the puppet level and if they stay inside framework provided by Russia they might even become exemplary servants.

ONLY ONE SOLUTION FOR ABKHAZIA AND "SOUTH-OSSETIA"(REAL NAME SAMACHABLO) IS:

1. Totaly deoccupation of Abkhazia and South Osetia (withdrawal of Russian troops)
2. 500.000 Georgian refugees return to their homes in Abkhazia and "South-Ossetia"(Samachablo).
3. Democratic elections are held and a referendum to decide the future status of Abkhazia and"South-Ossetia"(Samachablo)

Until this happens get Russia very big problems in the Caucasus and the any independence of Abkhazia or "South_Ossetia" is a fake.

 

RICHARD MILLER

5:48 PM ET

January 3, 2011

The Ethnic Cleansing of Georgians in Abkhazia

The population of Abkhazia before the Abkhazian war 1992-1993 was: 540.000

Georgians: 45,7% of population - 246.800,

Abkhazs: 17.5% - 94.500.

It means, that in Abkhazia there lived three times more Georgians than Abkhazs.

The Ethnic Cleansing of Georgians in Abkhazia, also known as the Massacres of Georgians in Abkhazia and Genocide of Georgians in Abkhazia — refers to ethnic cleansing, massacres and forced mass expulsion of thousands of ethnic Georgians living in Abkhazia (de jure an Autonomous Republic within Georgia) during the Georgian-Abkhaz conflict of 1992-1993 and 1998 at the hands of Abkhaz separatists and their allies (possibly, including volunteers from Russia). Roughly 200,000 to 250,000 Georgian civilians became Internally displaced persons (IDP). The ethnic cleansing and massacres of Georgians has been officially recognized by the OSCE conventions in 1994, 1996 and again in 1997 during the Budapest, Lisbon and Istanbul summits and condemned the “perpetrators of war crimes committed during the conflict.” On May 15, 2008, the UN General Assembly adopted (by 14 votes to 11, with 105 abstentions) a resolution A/RES/62/249 in which it “Emphasizes the importance of preserving the property rights of refugees and internally displaced persons from Abkhazia, Georgia, including victims of reported “ethnic cleansing”, and calls upon all Member States to deter persons under their jurisdiction from obtaining property within the territory of Abkhazia, Georgia in violation of the rights of returnees”.