Welcome to Minegolia

How the land of Genghis Khan became a new 
Gold Rush San Francisco on the steppe.


BY RON GLUCKMAN | JANUARY/FEBRUARY 2011

View a slide show of Gucci in the land of Genghis Khan.

For the first time in as long as anyone can seem to remember, there have been traffic jams in Ulan Bator -- a place previously known mainly either as the answer to a trivia question (Which capital city has the coldest average temperature?) or as a historical curiosity: Asia's Timbuktu, the fabled homeland of Genghis Khan. Until recently, the Mongolian capital had more horses than cars.

No longer. Mongolia is in the middle of an epic gold rush -- think San Francisco in 1849 -- but it's copper and coal that have enticed businessmen, investment bankers, and miners from London, Dallas, and Toronto by the planeload. Today, Ulan Bator is abuzz with talk of options and percentages, yields and initial public offerings. Not since the 13th century, when Genghis Khan consolidated the nomadic tribes of these remote steppes and established an empire that eventually spanned from Eastern Europe to Vietnam, has Mongolia seen so much action. The country's stock exchange (though still the world's smallest) rose 125 percent last year, and the IMF forecasts double-digit GDP growth rates for years to come. Others aren't nearly so pessimistic: Renaissance Capital -- an investment bank that specializes in emerging markets, one of many that have recently set up shop in Mongolia -- notes that overall economic output could quadruple by 2013.

"Mongolia is about to boom. Of that, there is no longer any doubt," says John P. Finigan, the Irish CEO of one of Mongolia's largest banks. A veteran of developing markets in scores of countries, he says the only comparable growth potential he has seen has been in the Persian Gulf oil states.

The reason for the boom can be summed up in a word: China. Mongolia has some of the world's largest undeveloped fields of coal, vital for its southern neighbor's hungry steel mills and power plants. Mongolia is also rich in copper, needed for the power-transmission lines being strung at record rates in fast-growing Chinese cities and for the production of batteries, especially those for the booming market in electric cars. China currently consumes nearly 7 million tons of copper each year (about 40 percent of global demand), but it's on track to triple its copper needs within 25 years, according to CRU Strategies, a London-based mining and metals consultancy.

Twenty years ago, when I first visited Mongolia, it had just emerged from seven decades under the Soviet umbrella. Ulan Bator had a shellshocked otherworldliness about it. There were a few grimy hotels fronting Sukhbaatar Square, named for the leader of the 1921 revolution that transformed Mongolia into the world's second socialist state. After decades of decline, the city looked like a set for an apocalyptic movie, especially in the crush of winter, when the sky was a perpetual charcoal gray.

Nowadays, Ulan Bator looks increasingly like a Chinese boomtown, with all the same trappings -- exploding property prices, huge capital inflows, rising concerns about corruption, widening gaps in income disparity, and a flood of flashy automobiles on the roads. A year ago, a Louis Vuitton boutique opened for business in the posh Central Tower building near Sukhbaatar Square. A glass cabinet holds a horse saddle encrusted in gems. "It's one of a kind, custom-made for Mongolia," the manager notes. Downstairs, the offerings are more conventional. A crocodile purse fetches $20,000; watches run $17,000. The sums are astounding in a country that is still among the world's poorest. Per capita GDP in 2008 was about $3,100, making Mongolia the world's 166th-poorest country -- just ahead of the West Bank. Yet that hasn't stopped Ermenegildo Zegna, Hugo Boss, and Burberry from opening up. "There's lots of new money here," says Zoljargal, marketing manager for Shangri-La Ulaanbaatar, which is rushing to finish a new shopping plaza, along with Mongolia's first luxury hotel.

The luxury disappears as soon as you leave the capital. On the town's outskirts lie ger camps, nomadic tent communities where tens of thousands of people live in poverty; beyond, there is little sign of civilization, just the vastness of the Gobi Desert. The harsh conditions and lack of infrastructure have hampered habitation and development for centuries.

But this inhospitable terrain is also key to the boomtown future. For here is Ovoot Tolgoi, a coal mine 30 miles from the Chinese border run by a Canadian company called SouthGobi. The company has invested $200 million in a state-of-the-art facility that is on pace to sell 4 million tons of coal to China annually, with plans to double production by 2012. "Mongolia: the Saudi Arabia of Coal," reads the slogan on the firm's website.

The optimism becomes understandable as I tour the site, where an ocean of coal covers the surface of the sandy earth. The seam averages more than 50 meters wide -- one of the world's thickest -- and 250 meters deep, though portions of it go down at least 600 meters. Ovoot Tolgoi has proven initial reserves of 114 million tons, enough to last up to 16 years, but that's a conservative estimate and that's just the one mine in production. SouthGobi also has licenses for two other sites. Layton Croft, a vice president at SouthGobi, compares the rush to the heady days of the dotcom era. "It is a bit like Minegolia.com," he says. "The difference is, this boom is for real, and it's going to last a long, long time."

There are obstacles in the way, not least a government that is prone to corruption and more accustomed to reeling from regular shortages of fuel and food than managing a sudden windfall. "Of course, the worry is this revenue will lead to bad political decisions," says S. Oyun, a member of parliament and head of the Zorig Foundation, a government watchdog group. But President Tsakhia Elbegdorj brushes away concerns that Mongolia could end up the next poster child of the resource curse. "We are very much aware of the Nigeria case, the Dutch disease phenomenon, and so on," Elbegdorj tells me. "Mongolia is a democratic country of educated people. Our people and democracy are the guarantees that our country will not become another Nigeria."

It's hard to root against a people who've long had so little finally getting a slice of the pie. But in this stark land of fabled warriors, something will inevitably be lost if Mongolia becomes north Asia's Saudi Arabia. Genghis Khan wouldn't be caught dead wearing Prada.

Timothy Fadek

 SUBJECTS: EAST ASIA
 

Ron Gluckman is a Beijing-based correspondent.

DR. JONES JR.

9:43 AM ET

January 3, 2011

Forgot some A's?

It's Ulaanbaatar, not Ulanbatar.

Also, it's a bit of a stretch to say that "beyond, there is little sign of civilization, just the vastness of the Gobi Desert." There are a few other cities and towns (but no large ones) in Mongolia, and the Gobi just comprises the southern third-or-so of the country. This description will be a bit misleading, I think, for people who have never been to Mongolia. The vast wilderness is indeed vast and mostly empty of modern development and paved roads, but also quite refreshing in comparison with China, particularly its province of Inner Mongolia (overgrazed, government mandated destruction of traditional nomadic lifestyle, grim industrial developments, etc).

Can Mongolia take advantage of its resource blessing/curse without destroying its unique culture and environment? Best of luck to the Mongolians in the attempt, regardless.

 

T1

7:29 PM ET

January 4, 2011

Good article. I am not quite

Good article.

I am not quite sure what you mean, though, by saying that Chinggis wouldn't be caught dead wearing Prada. There is no reason Mongolia has to abandon its cultural values to become a wealthy and developed country. If things go well, I expect Mongolia will become highly developed while remaining very Mongolian. Mongolia may aspire to the wealth of a country like Saudi Arabia, but in terms of social and cultural attitudes, it is already far more modern.

I would also question how much Ulaanbaatar looks like a "Chinese boomtown". It is certainly a boomtown, but I can hardly think of any city that looks and feels less Chinese.

 

JIMINY CRICKET

7:34 AM ET

January 5, 2011

I'm not quite sure...

...how you ride a horse carrying a Prada bag, or why you'd want to. One thing for sure, it's "fascinating" to watch the decimation of indigenous culture in real time, and now with the added benefit of real time rationalizations that go along with it. It becomes an argument of "don't deny people their right to wealth" which is fine, save for the foreign companies cashing into it and largely determining its development. That Irish bank president sure sounds happy, doesn't he?

I myself would like to know where is the modern Edward Curtis documenting it, so that in 50 years we can all have coffee table books bemoaning the loss of a once proud culture?

 

T1

4:45 PM ET

January 5, 2011

Jiminy

And I'm not quite sure why you think Mongols have to ride horses all the time. Or who told you Mongolian culture is being "decimated", or losing its pride. You don't have enough respect for Mongolian culture to believe it is capable of undergoing extraordinary transformations while remaining true to itself. Which is, though you don't know it, exactly what it is doing. Few cultures have shown more extraordinary resilience in the face of unimaginable hardships and assimilatory pressures. So thanks but no thanks for your patronizing concern; Mongolia is far from a helpless victim, and its cultural identity is far too deep to be defined by the trappings of pastoral nomadism. Which is alive and well, by the way; only some people are into Gucci.

And Mongolia doesn't need some orientalizing foreigner to document the changes the country is undergoing and make a coffee table book out of it. What an idea. Mongolians themselves are quite actively both celebrating their culture and looking critically at its future.

And if you're still not convinced, what's your alternative? Arrest the country's economic development just so you can be satisfied that the "proud culture" of the horsemen of your cherished imaginary Mongolia is being preserved? Maybe you'd like to go herd cashmere goats at -40 degrees and forgo all the security and opportunities the developed world provides. Easy for you and Ron Gluckman to be nostalgic.

 

KATIE HOLDER

11:50 PM ET

January 4, 2011

"Little sign of civilization outside UB"???

Too bad Mr. Gluckman didn't bother to travel 6 hours to the northern city of Erdenet where I live. If he had, he would have seen another growing city (with a population close to 100,000) with most of the amenities that UB has to offer. Next time you make such sweeping statements Mr. Gluckman, try getting out and seeing the actual country before passing judgements.

Aside from that, I believe that this article rings true concerning the precipice on which this country is standing. The foreign investments are bringing up the standard of living in the country, however, they are also rapidly widening the gap between the rich and poor. These investments could do so much for the country (fix crumbling schools, build roads, build universities, update hospital technology, etc) however, there is a very real threat that most of the money could just line government officials' pockets.

I see a bright future for this country as long as the people keep an eye on their government and have a say as to how this money is used.

 

T1

5:07 AM ET

January 5, 2011

Something

Actually, maybe this isn't a good article. The portrayal of Mongolia's economic situation is fair, but it has a misleading spin put on it, particularly in the final paragraph.

Cliched stereotypes abound regarding Mongolia, and this article dutifully presents us with all of them. Stark landscape, fabled warriors, Genghis Khan, Gobi Desert, absence of civilization, yurts, nomads, grime, poverty, remoteness, etc. None of these images do anything to inform, and all serve to fill the void of ignorance by reinforcing pervasive, false notions.

With these stereotypes in mind, the reader is then sensationally surprised to read that these grimy, poverty-stricken, fabled warrior descendants of Genghis Khan are graced with shops selling Gucci and Prada in their stark and remote midst. Unless they already heard Stephen Colbert make sick racist jokes about it.

Spend a little time in UB, and the presence of Land Rovers and designer fashion labels seems the most natural thing in the world. Mongolians are pretty normal, and are living firmly in the 21st Century. Mongolian culture, like many ancient cultures that have undergone transitions to modernity, is thriving.

But presenting the reality makes for a less tidily intriguing article, so the author tells instead the story of the "nomadic tribes" in "Asia's Timbuktu", and how they are threatened with the "inevitable" loss of "something". "Genghis Khan wouldn't be caught dead wearing Prada" implies "Mongolians can't be modern and still be Mongolian", a notion which makes perfect sense if the reader accepts the vague stereotypes the author presents as accurate.

He goes further to present what is most modern and cosmopolitan in Mongolia, the capital, Ulaanbaatar, as "Chinese". He supports this only by describing what could be any economically booming city anywhere. But the damage is done: Mongolia being already inaccurately associated with China in myriad ways in the popular imagination, he now leaves his readers thinking that Mongolian modernity is Chinese in character.

At least it isn't a hysterical alternate-reality piece about how Mongolia's children all live in sewers or how the country is under the control of neo-Nazis. But still, what a stupid article.

 

BAAGII

10:31 PM ET

January 6, 2011

Gluckman - sinocized Westerner?

In general, this article is OK - neither very accurate nor misleading. I am a Mongolian living in the US for many years now. And this article has a slight sino-centric flavor. I do know several white men and women who are married to Chinese in China. They seem to have very similar views and attitudes towards Mongolia and Mongolians to that of Gluckman.

Mr Gluckman - you should know that we-Mongolians have nothing to do with your billion-plus Chinese and their rice-cultivating culture of Polinesian-Pygmy origin. Mongolian culture is in essence a very old Eurasian culture that is composed of steppe nomadism, Eurasian cultures, Tibetan buddhism, and Eastern European - Russian elements.

 

RON GLUCKMAN

9:38 AM ET

January 9, 2011

Mongolia

I’m the reporter who contributed this story. I don’t mean to damper the discussion, but did want to respond to a couple comments. First off, I never compared Mongolia to China, or Mongolians to Chinese. I simply noted that modern Ulaanbaatar “looks increasingly like a Chinese boomtown, with all the same trappings -- exploding property prices, huge capital inflows, rising concerns about corruption, widening gaps in income disparity, and a flood of flashy automobiles on the roads.” As noted, these aren’t necessarily problems exclusive to Chinese boomtowns (the article also compares it to the California Gold Rush of the 1840s), but it is the same rapid growth, and impact, seen more often in China (where I am based) nowadays than anywhere else on Earth.
Some readers said I had biased, or Sino-centric views; another said it was too bad I didn’t travel to Erdenet (I actually visited Erdenet twice on this trip, and have been there many times before). These opinions are certainly valid, but I believe the concerns expressed in the article are that of Mongolians, at every level. In UB, everyone talks about the traffic congestion, air quality, crime, rising costs and disparity of wealth. Outside the capital, there are varied concerns, but the distribution of wealth from the (fingers-crossed) mining windfall and fears about corruption and mismanagement, seem high on everyone’s list.
I’m obviously an outsider, but don’t think I have a clichéd view of the country. I’ve been living in Asia since 1990, and visiting Mongolia since 1991. It’s one of my favorite places. Like everyone I talked to from the President to watchdog S. Oyun (of the Zorig Foundation), I’m cautiously optimistic about the prospects.

 

BAAGII

5:50 PM ET

January 10, 2011

meaning of "Chinese" in Mongolian

http://www.asiafinest.com/forum/index.php?showtopic=237918

Here is one person's view.

July 17, 2010 at 10:19 pm

... Mongols and Mongolians always looked down on the Chinese as a inferior race of rice-cultivating peasants. Mongols regarded and regard themselves as an Eurasian race of horsemen and hunters and think that they always superior to the Chinese, in particular, in war and battle field. There is a certain thruth to it, and the proof of that is the Chinese Great Wall. Of course, the Chinese also looked down on Mongols as northern barbarians who know only to kill and savage.

The two nations (Chinese and Mongols) even today use extremely offensive words and terms to describe each other. The Chinese call Mongolia as Meng gu, and the original meaning of these two characters is “ancient barbarians”. Therefore, everytime Chinese today say Menggu Guo (Republic of Mongolia), they mean the Republic of “Ancient Barbarians”.

The term Mongolians use to describe China and Chinese are even worse than this: In Mongolian, China is Hyatad Uls, and Chinese is Hyatad hun. The original and modern meaning of “Hya” is castrated male slave or eunuch, and tad is plural. Therefore, China is called Republic of “castrated male slaves or eunuchs” in Mongolian. This term is still used to describe China and Chinese. For example, Mongolians often say that Hu jintao is the Chairman of the People’s Republic of China, and the Mongolian meaning’s literal translation is actually “Hu jintao is the Head Eunuch of the People’s Republic of castrated male slaves-eunuchs”, in Mongolian. I’m writing all these to make a point that the relationship between Chinese and Mongols as old as human race, and the conflict is as deep as the sea. Therefore, it is very hard to see how China and Mongolia may have trusted relationships of neighbors.

Another point about Mongolians’ attitudes towards Southern (Inner) Mongolians: The perception of Mongolians about Southern Mongolians is not as bad you described. If anything, the perception is getting much better and Mongolians regard Southern Mongolians as their brothers and sisters who are exploited by China and Chinese. The latest opinion surveys of adults in Mongolia by Sant Maral Foundation (the most professional, independent polling agency in Mongolia) consistently show that 85 percent of Mongolians in Mongolia regard Southern Mongolians as their brothers and sisters who should be liberated from the Chinese colonization and occupation. As you can guess, 95 percent of Mongolians dislike and distrust Chinese, and even 50 percent said that they even hate the Chinese and China. With this problem, it would be very hard for both Mongolia and China to have trusted relationships. As for Chinese characters, Mongolia never ever used it, and even during Qing, there were not allowed to use in Mongolia. My own feeling is that the question of Southern Mongolia is getting more and more attention of Mongolians, Mongolian politicians, writers, and so on. There are very lively debates about Southern Mongolia and Southern Mongols in Mongolia today. This debate in particular is getting very hot after 2008 Tibet riots and 2009 Xinjiang riots. Many Mongolians are asking why the world is paying so much attention to Tibetans and Uighurs but not much attention to Mongols in Southern Mongolia. And many Mongolians think that it is their eternal obligation to publicize the sufferings of Southern Mongolians under the Chinese colonization. The important difference between Tibetans and Uighurs, on the one hand, and Mongols in Southern Mongolia, is that Mongols have an independent state next to them. Therefore, this question of Southern Mongolia will come up. When and how – the God only knows!

 

AR

4:26 AM ET

January 14, 2011

Overall Mongols are cool

Overall Mongols are cool people and Mongolia is an interesting country.
This article wasn't half as bad as some of the posters make it out to be, just look at it for what it is, one man's observations on the current 'boom' going on in Mongolia. Nothing more, nothing less than this.

 

KM.PROV

10:57 PM ET

January 16, 2011

Strattling multiple worlds

Having lived in UB for a couple of years, 1992-1994, what stands out to me in the photos, and the text, is that the post-Soviet country that I fell in love with is still there. I can see the cleaned-up version of those wild years it in the photos. I know it's lurking around the corners from the Vuitton stores and upscale eateries. To maintain respect for what Mongolians endured for the past century and to ease into new found luxuries, or at least the idea of such, is the real need. I would imagine that the friends I have there, none of great wealth, pass a curious eye over these new blatantly, western, luxury options and then get on with their day, And their day includes the habits, needs, rituals that I saw 20 years ago and that they were continuing from the decades before when they were set in motion.

 

BOXUAN

7:49 AM ET

January 20, 2011

@BAAGII

You're totally mistaken about the Chinese name for Mongolia. 'Menggu' is simply the translation of 'Mongol' by pronunciation, and it's correct to say 'gu' means 'ancient', but I have no idea how 'meng' is connected with 'barbarian'. FYI, I'm a Chinese born and raised in China, and I highly doubt your level of Chinese. So either you prove your Chinese is better than mine, then you have to stop distorting the facts. There're actually more ethnic Mongols in China than in Mongolia, there's no way we'd use a derogative name for our ethnic minorities. Do better homework next time!

BTW, I know the word 'Mongol' actually has some connection with people who have Downs syndrome in English and other European languages. It seems we're not the biased one.

 

BAAGII

8:02 PM ET

January 20, 2011

@boxuan

Here is another person's view of the Chinese and China.

http://www.asiafinest.com/forum/index.php?showtopic=205687&st=1020&start=1020

Yes, Mongolians do call Chinese as "stupid, obedient and frightened sheep' and call themselves as brave, smart and powerful wolf. You can read Jiang Rong's Wolf totem novel where he describes in detail how Mongols do not trust the Chinese peasants.

I never trusted China, Chinese government and Chinese. But after learning that Chinese people eat fetuses, placenta, and human poop as medicinal food, I have very negative feelings about Chinese culture. How one can call China and Chinese as civilized if they eat dog, cat, snakes, monkey brain, rats, and cockroaches! This is the main reason many Mongols do not trust Chinese people!

 

BOXUAN

7:02 AM ET

January 25, 2011

@baagii

You didn't answer my question. I don't know any Monglolian language so I can't tell what Mongolian name for China really means, but I can tell you that the Chinese name for Monglolia and Mongol people are nothing derogative. If on the contrary, Monglolians couldn't show the same respect to other ethnic groups, then there's something wrong with themselves.

Whatever you listed, if ever and still existed, are far from mainstream cultural aspects in China. If you insist that's what you want to believe as the whole picture, then that's your own problem. Sane people don't call a country murderous if a few serial killers occur. If you have the courage to tell me your cultural background, I'll assure you to find out some of your cultural dark sides. The only thing I won't do is to use it against the whole culture or ethnic group. If you have really learnt anything about cultures of the world, you'll find there're always dark sides in each of them, but they do evolve with the time.

 

AQUARIUM

9:13 AM ET

February 1, 2011

The original and modern

The original and modern meaning of “Hya” is castrated male slave or eunuch, and stavkove kancelarie tad is plural. Therefore, China is called Republic of “castrated male slaves or eunuchs” in Mongolian. This term is still used to describe China and Chinese. For example, Mongolians often say that Hu jintao is the Chairman of the People’s Republic of China, and the Mongolian meaning’s literal translation is actually “Hu jintao is the Head Eunuch of the People’s Republic of castrated male slaves-eunuchs”, in Mongolian. I’m writing all these to make a point that the relationship between Chinese and Mongols as old as human race, and the conflict is as deep as the sea. Therefore, it is very hard to see how China and Mongolia may have trusted relationships of neighbors.

 

4234567

3:28 PM ET

February 1, 2011

You see. Try to call any

You see. Try to call any country "castrated male slave" other than China. When Chinese are strong, they build a great wall and sent 100,000 sailers in a friendly visit during 15 centary. It will only happen in China. Hope this generation will not repeat it.