The List

Mossad's Most Dastardly (Alleged) Plots

From Munich to the Mabhouh assassination, the secretive Israeli intelligence agency has pulled off some pretty elaborate operations in its time. But lately, Middle Eastern media outlets and politicians have been getting a bit carried away.


Country: Saudi Arabia

The plot: Israeli scientists are training vultures to spy on Arab countries.

The evidence: This week, Saudi Arabian security forces took into custody a live vulture who was found near the rural town of Hayel wearing a bracelet marked "Tel Aviv University." While Israeli scientists say the bird was part of a migration study, local residents told the Saudi media that it was most likely part of a "Zionist plot." Speculation then took off on Saudi websites that Israeli intelligence was training the birds as part of an espionage mission.

Researchers at Tel Aviv University say that a number of the tagged vultures have reached Saudi Arabia since the study began. Most are now presumed dead, but one bird is still flying around the country -- no doubt gathering vital intelligence for the Zionist entity -- and thus far, the captured "R65" has shown no willingness to give up his comrade.


Country: Egypt

The plot: Mossad set sharks loose in the Red Sea to destroy Egypt's tourist industry.

The evidence: Ever since noted Zionist director Steven Spielberg released Jaws in 1975, nothing has been able to put a damper on a tourist season faster than a shark on the loose. That's exactly what happened this winter when five swimmers were attacked (one fatally) by a shark on Egypt's Red Sea coast near Sharm El Sheik, a popular tourist destination.

As if that wasn't enough, some expected this might not be an ordinary shark. Speaking on the popular television program Egypt Today, an expert identified as "Captain Mustafa Ismail, a famous diver in Sharm el-Sheikh," claimed that ocean sharks don't naturally live off of Egypt's coast and that someone must have introduced them to those waters. Ismail claimed that a diver friend in the Israeli resort city of Eilat had recently found a small shark with a GPS tag on its back, indicating that it was being sent to infiltrate the Egyptian coastline.

The governor of Egypt's South Sinai region added fuel to the fire, saying, "What is being said about the Mossad throwing the deadly shark in the sea to hit tourism in Egypt is not out of the question. But it needs time to confirm."

However, Egyptian marine biologists dismissed the reports, saying it was "sad" that state television had helped spread the conspiracy theory. As for the shark itself, another (dubious) press report several days later suggested it was killed by a drunken Serbian tourist who landed on its head after cannonballing into the water from a diving board.



The plot: Mossad stages a headbanger's ball featuring German shock-rockers to embarrass Turks.

The evidence: The 2010 Sonisphere festival in Istanbul was a dream come true for Turkish metalheads, featuring performances from the likes of Metallica, Slayer, Megadeth, Anthrax, and Rammstein. But unfortunately, because of the festival's sponsorship and timing, what should have been an innocent celebration of power chords and screeching vocals became a political flashpoint.

The concert took place the same month as the Gaza flotilla raid, in which nine Turkish activists were killed. Moreover, the concert was organized by the German-based company Purple Concerts, which is run by Israelis. An article in the Turkish daily Vakit sensed the hand of Mossad, arguing that the concert "means to make fun of our citizens who lost their lives at the hands of the Israeli government."

In particular, the article objected to the serving of alcohol at the event and the presence of the German band Rammstein, which, according to the paper, "encourage[s] violence, masochism, homosexuality and other perversities." (Because nothing says Zionist conspiracy like angry Germans screaming in front of a big crowd.) Never mind that the Sonisphere tour was also unleashing these same perversities on 10 other countries in 2010.


Country: Iran

The plot: Facebook founder Mark Zuckerberg is an asset of Western intelligence agencies, passing information on to the U.S. and Israeli governments and plotting to destabilize the Islamic Republic.

The evidence: The recent Hollywood film The Social Network suggests that Zuckerberg's frustration over a college breakup led to his creation of Facebook. But according to an Iranian TV segment that went viral online in November, he had far more sinister motives. The producers did their homework. They note, "According to a report on the website, which belongs to the American government, [Zuckerberg] is originally a Jew." The video argues that the real purpose of Facebook is "locating people to engage in special operations for Western intelligence agencies." A photoshopped, nonexistent article from Britain's Independent newspaper is also cited, claiming that "Facebook is an Israeli spying web site which has a duty to atract [sic] spies in favor of Israel and the U.S."

Given the attention lavished on Facebook's role in the 2009 Iranian election protests, it's not surprising that Zuckerberg would attract some attention from conspiracy theorists in Tehran. But Zuckerberg also received some unwanted attention in Pakistan this year, when a prosecutor launched a blasphemy investigation against him for allowing cartoons of the Prophet Mohammed to be hosted on Facebook. The site was also briefly blocked in the country. The cartoons are still on the site.


Country: Iran

The plot: Mossad agents, in cooperation with India's Research and Analysis Wing arranged Umar Farouk Abdulmutallab's attempted Christmas Day plane bombing in 2009.

The evidence: According to a report on Iran's state-owned Press TV, an Israeli security company arranged for Abdulmutallab to board a plane in Amsterdam without a passport. An "Indian man" was evidently instrumental in arranging Abdulmutallab's passage, which is no surprise since "Israel and India are very close business partners, especially via their military contracts." Once onboard the plane, according to the account, another passenger spent the entire flight filming Abdulmutallab, even after he tried to ignite his crotch rocket.

The report, citing the Mathaba news agency, also posits that Abdulmutallab's home country of Nigeria is "clandestinely controlled by the Israeli army and Mossad" and quotes noted "military analyst and counterinsurgency specialist Gordon Duff, " (who also believes that WikiLeaks is an Israeli plot) opining that Yemen, where the would-be bomber reportedly trained, has no al Qaeda presence aside from "phony operatives" released by former U.S. President George W. Bush from Guantánamo.

Why arrange for such a plot? The article suggests the goal was to spread "Orwellian-style trauma and project Yemen, as well as the African continent, [as] the brand-new focus of the American so-called 'war on terror.'" But why Israel and India would want to focus U.S. attention on Yemen and Nigeria rather than on the Palestinians and Pakistan is a little unclear.

MENAHEM KAHANA/AFP/Getty Images; Ryan Pierse/Getty Images; Chris Weeks/Getty Images for Activision; Justin Sullivan/Getty Images; U.S. Marshals Service via Getty Images

The List

The Stories to Watch in 2011

For every totally out-of-the-blue crisis that seizes the international agenda, there are some that everyone should have seen coming. Here are five foreign-policy stories to watch in 2011.

Triple-digit oil prices strangle the economic recovery

The global economy seems to be moving in the right direction, but that tenuous recovery could come quickly undone if the price of oil continues to rise. The price of a barrel of oil has been trending steadily upward at the conclusion of 2010: It stood at $91 as of Wednesday, Dec. 29, up 22 percent from a year earlier. With memories still fresh of the slowdown that accompanied the oil shock in 2008 -- when the price of a single barrel shot up to $145 and gasoline cost $4 a gallon in the United States -- you can bet that political leaders around the world will be keeping a close eye on the natural resource markets.

There's good reason to believe that prices won't rise quite as high as they did two years ago. Unlike then, a cushion of surplus oil wells stand ready in Saudi Arabia and elsewhere to fill almost any demand spurt in the coming year. In addition, oil companies are currently working furiously to expand the total supply of available oil even further: As FP's Steve LeVine has pointed out, the world's biggest oil companies are increasing their spending on international projects in 2011 by 17 percent. And according to the Wall Street Journal, the price increases are being driven less by insatiable economies than by financial investors, who are betting on higher future prices. Those speculators say they'll have a stabilizing effect on potential oil shocks, since they've created an incentive to buy oil now and store it for future use.

Still, energy costs are taking an ever-larger bite out of Americans' pockets, accounting for 5.5 percent of personal budgets in October 2010 -- up from 4.8 percent a year earlier, and uncomfortably close to the 6 percent share that's generally acknowledged to have a negative effect on consumer spending.

Justin Sullivan/Getty Images

Merkel grabs final, destructive control over the euro

That the euro currency didn't entirely dissolve this past year is largely due to the monetary heroics of Jean-Claude Trichet, president of the European Central Bank. But with his final term coming to a close in October of next year, he won't be around much longer to defend his legacy. In fact, it increasingly seems that the greatest repudiator of that legacy, Bundesbank chief Axel Weber, will be the person tapped to replace him. That could spell renewed and deepened turbulence in the European Union, and might even trigger a second global recession and an unraveling of the eurozone.

Trichet was quick to realize that the nature of the crisis -- and the nature of the continent's byzantine political arrangements -- demanded that he unilaterally broaden his institution's narrow mandate: Rather than simply "maintain price stability," the Frenchman worked feverishly to keep Greece, Ireland, and other debtor nations from defaulting by keeping interest rates low, buying bonds from beleaguered countries, and contributing to a massive ad hoc bailout fund.

Those maneuvers may have kept the continent's currency from falling off the precipice, but they were controversial among the orthodox monetarists who have their base in Germany, and from among whom Angela Merkel is likely to select a candidate to become the new ECB chief. The favorite is assumed to be Weber, an academic economist who has been advising Merkel for years and was her choice to lead Germany's national bank. Weber has been running an unusually undiplomatic campaign for higher office, mincing few words in stating his opposition to Trichet's loose-money policies of the past several years.

Expect smaller European countries -- which stand to lose out if Weber were in a position to push through higher interest rates on the euro -- to put up a fight against his nomination. (The ECB president is selected in a majority vote by the leaders of those countries that use the euro.) And even some Germans have made it clear they think it would be a mistake: Former chancellor Helmut Schmidt recently warned that German central bankers were dangerous dogmatists. "In their innermost heart, they are reactionaries. They are against European integration," he told German newspaper Handelsblatt.

But Weber may be coming regardless: By continental convention, it's Germany's "turn" for a high-level European post. We should begin preparing to hear a lot more nein coming from Frankfurt next year.


The rise of the rest at the IMF: Strauss-Kahn moves out, emerging economies move in

Polls show that only one prominent figure in French public life could handily defeat sitting president Nicolas Sarkozy in his re-election bid in 2012. Fortunately for Sarkozy, that person is otherwise occupied, for now: Dominique Strauss-Kahn is busy running the International Monetary Fund (IMF) in Washington, D.C., where his term as managing director runs until late 2012 -- after the conclusion of the French vote.

And it's an especially hectic time at the IMF. The organization has been called in to help keep a growing number of countries from going bankrupt, including Greece, Hungary, Iceland, Ireland, Pakistan, and Ukraine. Strauss-Kahn is generally acknowledged to have done a commendable job throughout the crisis; whereas earlier IMF interventions routinely triggered protests, the most recent bailouts have been generally been embraced by the bailed-out countries.

If Strauss-Kahn does indeed depart the IMF next year, whoever takes over won't only be responsible for overseeing the organization's active programs around the world -- he or she would also be responsible for managing the delicate negotiations over the political composition of the multilateral institution. Over the past year, emerging economies have expressed their intent to challenge Europe's dominance over the 24-member board that governs the IMF. Indeed, if the top slot is open next year, other countries may formally object to Europe's traditional, informal prerogative to name a replacement. (Strauss-Kahn has acknowledged that such a challenge is inevitable, saying at the beginning of December that "the so-called agreement between the US and Europe whereby the IMF head was European and World Bank president was an American is over.")

Economists have warned that given the continued fragility of the international economy, this is no time for a succession crisis. "If turmoil continues on the markets, it won't be the time to have a huge diplomatic debate in the midst of a financial crisis," says Adam Lerrick of the American Enterprise Institute. That's why Strauss-Kahn may be under pressure from his fellow Europeans to stay put, the better to forestall institutional upheaval.

Strauss-Kahn has so far given few clear signs that he's decided to run against Sarkozy. But it's no secret that he's previously had the ambition to sit in Elysee Palace, and he has coyly declined to deny he's considering it this time around. ("It's not a given that the day when I have an answer to this question, I'm going to give it through the media," he told French public radio France Inter on November 15.) To take on Sarkozy though, he'd have to convince France's Socialist Party to select him as its candidate. That may be the toughest challenge of all: Though he's a long-time Socialist Party member, it won't be easy to convince the French left to vote for someone who has spent the last several years working to save the reigning capitalist order.


Cuba's Iron Curtain slips

Next year may bring perestroika to one of the world's final communist holdouts. Or not. But at its April 2011 meeting, the Cuban Communist Party is expected to approve a 32-page document that describes "guidelines for economic policy" in the face of Cuba's wealth of problems, which include a heavy reliance on food and energy imports, an inefficient export sector, crumbling infrastructure and a rampant black market. President Raúl Castro has already announced that the country should expect state-worker layoffs, agricultural reforms, and the creation of new licenses for some types of self-employment.

The Cuban government will also be looking to attract new foreign investors -- not least, so that the country's creaking energy and transportation infrastructure can be refurbished. Already countries like Brazil, China, and Venezuela have responded with bids to upgrade Cuba's ports and oil refineries. Other countries are also trying to get a head start in the new Cuban market: South Africa has forgiven $137 million in debt in order to improve relations, and France has restored its bilateral cooperation with Cuba after a seven-year freeze. (The United States, however, is unlikely to get in on the act: The incoming Republican chair of the House Foreign Affairs Committee, Ileana Ros-Lehtinen, has made it clear she intends to work to further isolate Cuba.)

It's an open question whether the Cuban government, much less Cuban society, is really ready for a major shift in the economic status quo. Foreign investment will pose a challenge to the autocracy that has reigned in Cuba for decades, as investors inevitably work to shape Cuba's future policy decisions. And after decades of being entirely dependent on the state for jobs (as well as nearly everything else, including food, education, and health care), Cubans may not make the transition to market-based thinking entirely seamlessly. Indeed, it's easy to imagine that they will respond to government layoffs not with entrepreneurial verve but with angry protests.


Iran races toward Israel's deadline

According to Jeffrey Goldberg's September 2010 cover story in The Atlantic, next year could very well be a decisive one in the protracted Iran nuclear crisis. Israeli officials told Goldberg that their deadline for seeking a peaceable end to the Iranian enrichment program is the middle of 2011 -- after which they will presumably set into motion a series of military air strikes to destroy Iran's nuclear infrastructure. And that, Goldberg writes, could easily lead to "a full-blown regional war that could lead to the deaths of thousands of Israelis and Iranians, and possibly Arabs and Americans as well." With Iran showing little inclination of arriving at a negotiated solution, that ominous result may not be far off.

Of course, that fate may still be avoided. The sanctions regime organized by the United States might convince Tehran to change its strategic calculus; Israel might eschew military attacks in favor of a combination of cyber warfare and covert operations, which seem to have proven successful over the past year; or it might be the White House that insists on conducting a military campaign of its own against Iran. What's clear is that in the year ahead leaders in Israel will be keeping a close eye on both Tehran and Washington.