A Very American Conspiracy Theory

Forget right or left: Jared Loughner's worldview puts him in the ugly center of American paranoid tradition.

BY KATHRYN OLMSTED | JANUARY 11, 2011

Whether or not Jared Loughner is mentally ill, it's clear that his shooting rampage last weekend, which took six lives and critically injured Rep. Gabrielle Giffords, was motivated, at least in part, by his conspiratorial views of the U.S. government. According to his friends, he believed that Washington faked the moon landing and orchestrated the 9/11 attacks; that the Federal Reserve was a Jewish plot; and that the government was trying to control his brain through grammar.

Wacky as they may seem, the anti-government conspiracy theories that appear to have partially inspired Loughner have a long tradition in the United States. Conspiracy theories may be a globalized phenomenon, but Loughner's particular brand of government paranoia is purely all-American.

In the 18th and 19th centuries, Americans primarily worried that their republic was vulnerable to foreign conspirators. They particularly feared Masons, Catholics, Mormons, and Jews, viewing them as seditious groups that followed the instructions of an alien power.

These conspiracy theories produced some powerful political movements in the United States: The Anti-Masons dominated New England politics in the 1830s, and the anti-Catholic American Protective Association boasted hundreds of thousands of members in the 1890s. Sometimes, conspiracy theories had lethal consequences: Some paranoiacs lynched alleged plotters and burned their churches.

Suspicion of other races, religions, or ethnicities is still the common currency of conspiracy theories elsewhere in the world -- the anti-Semitic conspiracy theories that thrive in Arab countries are a case in point. In the 20th century, however, American conspiracy theories underwent a fundamental transformation. No longer were conspiracy theorists chiefly concerned that alien forces were plotting to capture the federal government; instead, they began to argue that the federal government itself was the alien force.

Some Americans had very legitimate reason to believe that the government was conspiring against them. Beginning in World War I, the U.S. government began to create and expand the agencies it needed to carry out secret operations. The modern surveillance state was born during World War I, as the government criminalized dissent with the Espionage Act and Sedition Act and empowered Bureau of Investigation agents to spy on potential dissidents. As the government grew, it gained the power to conspire against its citizens, and it soon began exercising that power.

After the end of World War II, new, more powerful secret agencies -- including the CIA -- sprang up to wage the trench battles of the Cold War. Locked in an existential struggle with the Soviet Union, the country's secret warriors believed in using any means necessary to fight the forces of godless communism. But because the government plotters were not accountable to anyone except their fellow agents, their plans sometimes distorted into bizarre form.

By the height of the Cold War, government agents were plotting with the mafia to kill Fidel Castro, dropping hallucinogenic drugs into the drinks of unsuspecting Americans at random bars, and debating the possibility of launching fake terrorist attacks on Americans in the United States. Public officials denied potentially lifesaving treatment to African-American men in medical experiments, sold arms to terrorists in return for American hostages, and faked documents to frame past presidents for crimes they had not committed.

Given the U.S. government's commitment to openness and democracy, light was eventually cast into the dark corners of the secret state. In 1975 and 1976, the special Senate investigating committee chaired by Sen. Frank Church of Idaho, known as the Church Committee, exposed and documented crimes and abuses by the CIA and FBI. For many Americans, the most popular and most distressing revelations involved the CIA program of drug-testing and mind-control experiments known as MKULTRA. The news of these experiments inspired generations of psychotics to wonder whether the voices in their heads really came from CIA headquarters.

The Church committee spurred a series of congressional and journalistic investigations of other secret government conspiracies. Many Americans were now ready to believe their government could be involved in nefarious plots. Church and his successors had hoped to restore faith in government by revealing its mistakes, but instead they helped accelerate Americans' post-Vietnam spiral into apathy and cynicism.

By the 1990s, conspiracy theories about the government transcended race and ideology. Suspicions about long-hidden government plots appealed to black separatists and white supremacists, to left-wing activists and right-wing militias, to anarchists and neofascists. Conspiracism bent the political spectrum and fused its extremes into an endless circle of paranoia.

The Internet allowed conspiracy theorists to find and link to one another's ramblings, giving hope to those who believed, in the words of The X-Files, that "the truth is out there." To spread their theories, skeptics in the early 20th century needed to crank hand-operated printing presses and, in one famous case, fling their tracts from the windows of tall buildings. But by the late 20th century, anyone with a computer could potentially address an audience of millions.

As the 20th century neared its end, the anti-government skeptics infused their theories with a millennial sense of urgency. "The wolf," said popular conspiracy writer Milton William Cooper, "is at the door." The X-Files' many devoted fans agreed with one character's assessment of the federal government in the show's fifth season: "No matter how paranoid you are," she explained, "you're not paranoid enough." No one could say that about Jared Loughner, cluttered with a toxic jumble of left- and right-wing conspiracy theories, his sources ranging from Marx to Hitler to heavy metal.

In fact, Arizona has, by some measures, become a ground zero for anti-government conspiracy theories. Loughner lived in a politically polarized state in which the federal government's policies, from health care to immigration, were excoriated by mainstream politicians as evidence of a tyrannical plot against liberty. And these theories took root beyond Arizona's borders. Throughout the United States, conspiracists rage against the alleged subversion of their country by "un-American" forces that reside in the U.S. government itself.

Conspiracy theories may seem to thrive on the margins of American politics: When historian Richard Hofstadter diagnosed a "paranoid style" in American politics in the 1960s, these views were easily characterized as fringe. But they become central when they gain powerful sponsors in the media and politics who inject their paranoid theories into the body politic. These conspiracy theories can be ridiculed in pop culture, but they will eventually lash out against reality -- as they tragically did last Saturday.

Kevin C. Cox/Getty Images

 SUBJECTS: CULTURE
 

Kathryn Olmsted is a professor of history at the University of California, Davis, and the author of Real Enemies: Conspiracy Theories and American Democracy, World War I to 9/11.

HURRICANEWARNING

11:50 PM ET

January 11, 2011

all together now...G L E N B

all together now...G L E N B E C K...

 

MRTEA

5:59 AM ET

January 13, 2011

glenn beck

Glenn Beck is the only place where anyone on a cable news channel has cited the facts about Woodrow Wilson: a racist who segregated the D.C. post office and showed "Birth of a Nation" at the White House, a fascist who imprisoned people for speech crimes. Take a looka the slop that is fed to high school (or even college) students, somehow Wilson is always considered one of the "great" presidents, always by way of his heroic efforts for the League of Nations--the first effort to sell out our sovereignty, now accomplished. (He promised that the income tax would only apply to the top 1% too).
I don't particularly care for Beck's style, but he cites history that is otherwise edited out of TV(the lone exception being Cspan). My only complaint is he won't mention the John Birch Society, whose writers have turned out to be the most prescient of any of their contemporaries (try comparing an issue of Foreign Affairs from the 60s with anything the Birchers published.) I never cease to be amazed at the ignorance of these matters exhibited by people even holding advanced degrees, and I have yet to find one who actually knows who John Birch was (but of course they know the JBS is paranoid/crazy/etc.)

 

LAIRD WILCOX

3:52 AM ET

January 12, 2011

Jumping to conclusions

Excuse me, but there has been no evidence that Loughner's behavior was caused in any way by belief in any conspiracy theory. Neither is there any evidence that this terrible tragedy was motivated, abetted or directed by any political organization or ideology.

According to high school friends, Loughner had vague leftist sympathies in the past. In the 2004 election he had been a dedicated John Kerry supporter and critic of George Bush, as were many of his acquaintances. He later authored a web posting that shows the burning of an American flag – hardly something you would associate with right-wingers, and his pattern of heavy drug use puts him sharply at odds with conservative values.

Loughner was also a fan of the counter-culture punk rock band, Anti-Flag. This group focuses on criticism of the U.S., anti-war activism and calls whatever it doesn’t like racism or fascism. But even these facts don’t combine sufficiently to suggest a political act, nor is there any evidence that any political "climate" or anyone’s rhetoric or divisiveness contributed to his behavior.

Everybody has jumped to conclusions in this case. The vague references in Loughner's ramblings to language and mind-control were not specific enough to identify with any conspiracy theory. Reality itself was a conspiracy to him and he could barely write a coherent paragraph. He was a deeply emotionally ill person who became too confused to entertain any complex political abstractions.

The only political implications of this terrible event have to do with the incredible attempts to spin and frame it in a direction congenial to critics of the tea parties and conservative politicians. In many ways this has backfired and that has been the teachable moment here. This case will be cited by right wingers from now on to illustrate media bias against them.

 

ETHIX

12:18 PM ET

January 12, 2011

Conclusions revisited

I'd just like to make the point that people change over the years. During high school for Loughner (2004) he would have been under the influence of a lot of people, including his parents still. I know personally, my political views and many others changed from when they were in high school to when they entered the work force and/or went through college. Also, if you look at his "conspiracy" or obsession with grammar, his online posts go from terrible grammar to perfect grammar at complete random.

Also, conspiracy theories don't tend fall on the political spectrum, mostly just because they're illogical or crazy. I know of a lot of intellectual and quite sane people who completely believe that 9/11 was an inside job, or that the Illuminati control world government for a new world order. I believe that is what the author is trying to point out is that Loughner was more prone and vulnerable to these conspiracy theories.

ps-- I bet plenty of conservative values politicians snort some blow on the side :)

 

RIHTER

9:11 AM ET

January 12, 2011

Negative Stigma

I find it a bit unnerving that conspiracy theories, mental illness, and Loughner are being grouped together.

Loughner mentioned monetary policy. Ron Paul, Peter Schiff, and a host of other economists speak out against our current monetary policy. (Fractional Reserve Banking coupled with FIAT currency)

Am I to believe that the experts who object to our current monetary policy are mentally ill? Conspiracy driven madmen? This is troubling. I fear we may end up associating negative thoughts with with discourse surrounding currency policy.

 

NICK PHYSICS

9:40 AM ET

January 12, 2011

it is a conspiracy to

it is a conspiracy to question authority

 

KIRBANG

9:58 AM ET

January 12, 2011

conspiracy

Sometimes when I am in traffic and I see someone do something incredibly dumb, thoughtless or inept, I have a compulsion to get a look at them. Do they have strange lumps on their head, are they shouting and waving their arms about. .... You know what I mean?

This is the feeling t I get when I read posts denying any connection with the blatant and pervasive "take them out" / "in the cross hairs" rhetoric spewed from the supporting ideology.

What are you thinking?

Yes he seems mentally ill, but he got through high school and admitted to college. So he is not so totally unhinged as to be a total outcast. Words have consequence and no message has been more loudly proclaimed than "its them or us boys"; "water the tree of liberty..."; they must be eliminated.

One cannot parse the thinking of this man but one can easily look at the messages he received (as do you and I) hourly. They have effect and one only need look at the near past to see this tragic event is the culmination of a trend fostered by this hateful ideology.

 

MRTEA

6:06 AM ET

January 13, 2011

actually he dropped out of

actually he dropped out of high school. You don't get "admitted" to junior college, they have to take you once you're 18, although they can make you take qualifying tests for certain classes. There's a post on Slate claiming that his best friend from high school said he was obsessed with "Zeitgeist" an atheistic screed, which doesn't sound too "conservative" to me. If it's true he was smoking Salvia, that might be the key, as people I know who have taken a lot of drugs say the stuff is hideously dangerous and likely to induce psychosis all by itself.

 

SRH1177

10:50 AM ET

January 18, 2011

Indeed. I know of someone who

Indeed. I know of someone who smoked Salvia and woke up with thumbtacks and nails on the floor in front of all his windows and a dead bird on his weather vain outside.

 

COUNTCHOCULA1011

11:41 AM ET

January 12, 2011

Just another way to avoid the issues....

Why do people distrust the government nowadays? Hmm....let's see:

1. Warrantless wiretapping of US citizens.
2. Arrests and intimidation of people the government distrusts (antiwar activists, Muslims, Ron Paul supporters, etc.)
3. The Patriot Act and numerous other recent acts of legislation that have traded our liberties away simply because Americans pussed out.
4. Stealing our money via bailouts.
5. The fact that the Bilderberg Group IS REAL, and meets secretly to discuss issues relating to our country. Americans have always disliked secret meetings of high level officials, and this is no different.
6. The government lied to get us into Iraq, so why should I trust them now?
7. NSA monitoring of phone calls for "suspicious" activity.
8. The giant private corporate centers all across the country (forgot their specific stupid name), that gather info on US citizens.
9. The definition of material support for terrorists is so vague that one could easily go to jail for simply asserting a peoples right to resist occupation.
10. Gitmo, Bagram, and Abu Ghraib have demonstrated the sadistic nature of our government officials when pent up with fear and xenophobia. That torture has become accepted is even more disturbing.
11. Now they're trying to pass legislation that would make it illegal to put crosshairs or other such things on government officials--another abridgment of free speech.
12. Extraneous renditions.
13. Americans being detained and tortured abroad by order of our government (i refer to the ongoing Gulet Mohammed case).
14. Secret torture facilities in Lithuania and other states.
15. Now they want to have an internet ID card--I am sure that won't get abused (*rolls eyes).
16. The fact that the Treasury Department is literally run by Goldman Sachs executives who simply want to secure their own interests at the expense of the public.

Jesus Christ! Do I have to go on!?

 

HURRICANEWARNING

12:19 PM ET

January 12, 2011

yeah, and.........?

yeah, and.........? Look, this "list" doesnt really mean anything. get it? YOU see all this nefarious, organized conspiracy, while others may not. The reality probably lies in the middle ground, there is no way that there is enough coherent organization within our government in order to facilitate a large conspiracy. So, with regards to this list...who cares. Not all the things you mentioned are really ALL bad anyway. I get how psychos could see a list like that and just run rampant with it, which was the point of the above article, and the other point is that when people like Beck and others legitimize this type of stuff on their programs they are feeding the crazy people out there. This isnt a lib v.s. cons. type thing, this is a sane v.s. crazy thing. NEWS organizations shouldnt be allowed to cater to paranoid schizos.

 

COUNTCHOCULA1011

1:44 PM ET

January 12, 2011

I didn't say there was a conspiracy

I was simply pointing out that there is plenty of reason why Americans are distrustful of their government.

 

MRTEA

6:25 AM ET

January 13, 2011

Frontline reported that the

Frontline reported that the NSA was listening to the bin Laden cell that landed in San Diego before 9/11 talking to their safe house in Yemen. They just didn't bother to tell the FBI. Also they monitored the email between the Muslim Major at Ft. Hood and the jihadi cleric back in Yemen. Also didn't tell anybody.
According to the writings of Peter Lance, (who was covering the jihad before 9/11 happened) the 9/11 commission didn't even call any witnesses who could have identified the figure at the center of the case, named Ali Mohammed, a bin Laden operative who penetrated the center of our counter-terrorism forces. NY Times seems to have missed this.
It's interesting: I used to walk around the Berkeley campus and see all the lefty wannabes with their Che T-shirts and their "Question Authority' buttons; now all of a sudden if you don't believe the Warren Commission/John Doe#2 never existed (McVeigh's accomplice on the cover of every newspaper the day after)/Flight 800 blew up "by itself"/no advance knowledge of 9/11 (except for the Israeli "art students" who were following the terrorists around)......you're a nut/extremist/teabagger (notice how they can't resist the crude slur). Oh, and somebody gave away our most advanced weapons technology to the Chinese. I live in a state overrun with illegal aliens with convictions or warrants out and they have more rights than I do (thanks to the "sanctuary" cities and the Civil Rights Division of the U.S. Department of "Justice".
I'm no longer in a trusting mood.

 

ROBOCOP

12:13 AM ET

January 16, 2011

yo

9/11 commission was a total white wash, youre right not to trust them

 

PALMER

12:06 PM ET

January 12, 2011

Bailouts

4. Stealing our money via bailouts.

This is a popular urban myth, but the record on most of the "bailouts" is that the government made money. The Fed gave tens of billions to the government yesterday from profits on so-called bailouts. The federal government made money on the GM rescue. In the long run, the TARP program was revenue neutral because eventually the government sold most of the assets and repaid the Treasury.

So let's be accurate.

If the federal government had not rescued these companies, the recession and its impact would have been much, much worse. They were extraordinary actions for an extraordinary situation, and were appropriate given the gravity of the situation.

So let's be grown-ups and recognize that government intervention is sometimes warranted and appropriate. The myth that markets are perfect and never need government oversight or intervention is simply false.

 

COUNTCHOCULA1011

1:57 PM ET

January 12, 2011

Reply

Pleasant little excuses will never justify unjustifiable actions. Theft is theft; the American people overwhelmingly rejected the bailouts, but congress weaseled it in at the last minute, based in large part on threats of Marshall Law put out by banking heads. Not to mention, your little "oh but it could have been worse" spiel is completely unprovable, so the idea of taking this as literal fact is absurd. How do you know it would have been worse? How do you know that some other credit service who didn't majorly screw up wouldn't have stepped in to provide the same services that groups such as Goldman Sachs were providing? Since when was it the government's responsibility to make sure corporations who perform poorly don't fail? It's the same thing with the auto bailouts. GM should have tanked--they produced crappy cars. Capitalism isn't capitalism if the government steps in every time some crappy company is about to fail.

 

WNEWELL

3:45 PM ET

January 12, 2011

The FED gave out billions in

The FED gave out billions in dollars that is totally unaccounted for and also by inflating the money supply they have stolen money from every holder of dollars. Just because TARP is "revenue neutral" doesn't mean that the whole policy wasn't in fact regressive to the poor(living on fixed incomes) and to the economy as a whole by propping up companies that produce substandard products. We cannot keep doing this forever and so when the real crash comes it will not be as pleasant, the market was telling us that there are not enough resources to continue the economy as it goes and to do otherwise is to doom us to false expectations the lead to a let down in both economic and human terms. False hope is worse than the truth. We cannot simply gloss over the realities of scarcity with the political needs of the few.

 

MAOSAYTONGUE

1:05 PM ET

January 12, 2011

Don't Dismiss Laughner's Insight

Laughner's beliefs about gov't-control-of-thought-through-control-of-language are right on point: look at the word 'terrorist." It was originally coined to describe the method used by gov't to keep the People in line (Tolstoy?); sometime in the past century it became a term to describe the People who fight against gov't. In his writings, Laughner even touches on the "terrorist" sign/signifier example in his online writings.

Laughner wasn't completely educated in the terminology and basic linguistic theory, but he has obviously been influenced somehow by high-order thought--from the likes of Althusser, Saussure (sp?), Barthes, and Foucault. It's interesting that he didn't list any books by these guys, leading me to wonder if he didn't stumble on the stuff organically.

I bet the guy's IQ tests at somewhere above 150, easily. If he goes away for life instead of getting death, Jared Laughner will be a very important thinker on the intellectual landscape one day. I look forward to reading his future musings.

 

MAOSAYTONGUE

1:09 PM ET

January 12, 2011

Mormons Foreign?

Pray tell, dear writeress, what "alien power" did people think Mormons took orders from? Did the writeress just add them into the list thinking that her dummy readers wouldn't notice?

 

BLUE13326

2:14 PM ET

January 12, 2011

Tuskegee

Tuskegee

 

GDE

2:46 PM ET

January 12, 2011

Intent of this article?

I find it interesting that a significant fraction of this article is allocated to listed government conspiracies that proved out to be true. Yet, Olmsted seems to be linking other conspiracy hypotheses, hardly proven true or false, with Loughner and mental illness, and uses the word wacky.

Is Olmsted's intent to discredit unproven hypotheses with false reasoning, despite strong evidence that many government conspiracies are true?

 

MARTY24

4:14 PM ET

January 12, 2011

Conspiracies

The real problem is that many Americans believe in vast conspiracies, involving hundreds, if not thousands of people, extending over generations, but don't believe that two people could conspire to pick their pocket.

Small-scale conspiracies happen all the time, in fact, any time two or more people agree to do something, that is a conspiracy, even if the something isn't illegal. As the size and duration of a conspiracy grow, it become harder to do and more prone to exposure; that is why we know about the government conspiracies mentioned in the article and by some of the respondents. That should be encouraging because it means the really large-scale conspiracies we hear about, mainly involving allegations about Jews, are almost certainly false. After all, they require an ongoing influson of people and effort over years if not centuries, and no-one ever spills the beans.

Against this backdrop, what are we to make of the lack of attention to how Mr. Obama funded his 2008 campaign? His website was, in ever other respect, the most advanced ever put up by a politician, but it made no provision to determine whether a contributor was legally able to donate, a feature of every other candidate's on-line fund-raising. Even before the election, there were reports of people using obvious fake names, like Mr. Good Will, who made hundreds of small donations, often dozens per day, using prepaid credit cards purchased for cash, i.e. totally untraceable. Now consider that Obama had a field office in every county in Iowa during the caucus season, the first time a candidate had ever attempted this. That cost a bundle, and had he lost, if this had been paid using loans, they would have been his personal responsibility. It seems obvious that someone assured him that the money would be there. We don't know who this was and the Obama-friendly media has made no effort to find out. Conspiracy? How about the link between this money and the policies he has pursued?

 

C.S. BARRIOS

10:17 AM ET

January 13, 2011

"waiter, there's a terrorist in my soup!"

Let's consider the entire field of literature devoted to waging war on one-fifth of the world's population based on the actions of 20 or so (followers of the 200 year old Wahhabi cult; the Cromwellian wing of Islam, i suppose ..). One recent bestseller is "The Twelfth Imam" by Joel C. Rosenberg. Might as well call it "Protocols of the Elders of Persia" for all the difference it would make. As a Thought Experiment, is it really a stretch to compare America's invasions to "liberate" Iraq and Afghanistan with Nazi excursions into Czechoslovakia and Poland? I dunno, but consider Germany's rhetoric: their campaign against Jews (and others) was marketed as a *defensive* one .. to "save civilization" (cf, Cal Thomas, Diana West, Robert Spencer, ad nauseam). We ask, "how did Nazi Germany happen?" Well, the suspicion of/hostility towards Jews had become more normal than abnormal. And at the same time, anti-Semitism wasn't uncommon among public intellectuals in the Anglo-American world (T.S. Eliot's speech at the U. of Virginia is but one example). Fast forward to today, where the "common sense" pronouncements of Charles Krauthammer are taken as well-reasoned and "brilliant." He was one of the guys who signed the open letter to George Bush urging the invasion of Iraq based on the actions of 20 or so Wahhabi-inspired non-Iraqis. He is the same guy who insists on a clash with one-fifth of the world's population. If his madness is less obvious than the Arizona Shooter's, it is because it comes across as less desperate: he is, after all, *accepted*.

 

PETRBUBEN

12:08 AM ET

January 14, 2011

911 controlled demolition scientific evidence

one thing, one fact, is for sure. An irrefutable scientific evidence proving that 911 is controlled demolition, therefore an inside job.

a sudden explosion, midair pulverization, symmetric collapse of 3 towers wtc.

www.ae911truth.org
www.twitter.com/911news
www.krunchd.com/911

 

ROBOCOP

12:05 AM ET

January 16, 2011

9/11

I endorse this message. Also see "The Truth and Lies of 9/11." 9/11 was orchestrated by a criminal elite with Richard Cheney at the helm. Please wake up America.

 

ERIK WASSENICH

10:32 AM ET

January 14, 2011

A very American conspiracy

Unfortunately, the people in the US who commit such crimes many times have a very poor background and no education to speak of. Of course, the shooting of the Arizona congresswoman is big news and the media has a field day analyzing this shooting from every angle. This man Loughner has a serious mental problem and should have never been given a gun. The right for American people to bear arms, in todays world and society, is completely outdated, for example, the shop owners should not be able to sell guns and issue gun permits. There must be a an office people go to in order to apply for a gun permit which is only issued after a thourough physical and psychological examination.
Because of her inferior level of education, Sarah Palin should not be granted a gun permit!
As stated in the beginning, a major American problem is the low level of education of its general population.

 

ROBOCOP

11:58 PM ET

January 15, 2011

9/11

On 9/11, the US used Al Queda as a tool in order to implement the long standing war plans with Iraq/Afghanistan. The Federal Reserve is a den of vipers and scorpions, designed to keep us in debt. Until the Fed and its fractional reserve lending policies are abolished, there will be no tangible change.

Oh, and JLL was a psycho SOB, all there is to it.

 

WEI LARK

4:53 PM ET

February 10, 2011

Jared Loughner

I'm really waiting for people to figure out the truth about what happened in Arizona. John McCain has always been a thorn in NASA's side, accusing them of mismanagement and subterfuge. Word is McCain filled Giffords in after she was elected and told her some rather unbelievable things. Unbelievable until her husband, the astronaut, broke the wall of silence and filled her in. If you think that this whole thing is anything other than a charade orchestrated by JPL to keep their pork satellite projects well funded mortgage loan , then you are sadly mistaken. This was a hit to protect business interests and I think we'll find some rather disconcerting evidence out when this case goes to trial. Do not be surprised if we have a Jack Ruby situation on our hands soon.