In Other Words: The FP Book Channel
Book Club Latest Excerpts From the Magazine FP Authors

Irony Is Good!

How Mao killed Chinese humor ... and how the Internet is slowly bringing it back again.

BY ERIC ABRAHAMSEN | JANUARY 12, 2011

"Socialism is great!" Was there ever a statement riper for ironic mockery than this erstwhile catchphrase of the infant Chinese republic? How could a thinking people accept this and a host of other bald statements at face value, without so much as a raised eyebrow or a silently murmured really? And why, 60 years later, when the Chinese government calls the Dalai Lama a "devil with a human face," do none of its citizens seem to feel the urge to giggle?

Irony, put simply, is a gap between words and their meaning, a space across which speaker and listener exchange a knowing wink. For this knowingness to be mutual, a web of common experiences and beliefs must exist, within which language adopts deeper echoes and associations. In China, however, the Communist Party has made quite clear that there is no commonality but that of the party and its people, and certainly no shared language beyond that handed down by national leaders. The Chinese government has spent decades ensuring that public discourse has remained "public" only in the sense of "government owned."

As early as 1942, seven years before the founding of the People's Republic, Chairman Mao was explaining to government leaders and intellectuals that the purpose of art and culture was to serve political ends. But the real damage to the Chinese language was done during the Cultural Revolution, when all music and theater were outlawed except for eight politically correct "Model Operas" and public discourse was reduced to what could be shouted through a PA system. Words were hammered flat into instruments of power and violence. Songs, in particular, were seen as effective tools. One of the most popular, "The Great Proletarian Cultural Revolution," began with this catchy intro:

The Great Proletarian Cultural Revolution is good,
It is good,
It is good,
It is good.

In the decades following, China's educational policy and official pronouncements did not stray far from this pattern of value statements mindlessly repeated and the discouragement of independent thought -- hardly fertile ground for humor or subtlety. The end of the Cultural Revolution and Mao's death in 1976 occasioned a sort of national sigh of relief: While official language evolved only slowly, civil society was once again given space to develop on its own, leading to the culturally fertile 1980s. Writers, not surprisingly, were at the forefront of a slow resuscitation of nuance and irony in the Chinese language during this time. The author Ah Cheng, for example, in his three King novels, dismantled the political language of the Mao era and reintroduced the older voices of traditional Chinese literature and philosophy.

Wang Shuo, on the other hand, struck out in anger. His 1989 novel Please Don't Call Me Human is a bitter satire on the worthlessness of the individual in the eyes of the totalitarian state. In one scene, a local functionary receives a higher-up with a litany of ritual praise that begins with absurdity and ends in collapse: "Respected wise dear teacher leader helmsman pathfinder vanguard pioneer designer bright light torch devil-deflecting mirror dog-beating stick dad mum grandad grandma old ancestor primal ape Supreme Deity Jade Emperor Guanyin Bodhisattva commander-in-chief...." By the end of the multiple-page passage, the ripest Chinese clichés of obsequiousness have been piled so high that even the most hard-calloused sensibility would begin to suspect that there was something fishy going on.

But it was really the Internet that salvaged Chinese humor, and especially irony of the embittered sort that Wang Shuo had pioneered. In the late 1990s, the Internet was still entirely uncensored (it would remain that way as late as 2004 or 2005), and it became, at last, a public space for writers and thinkers, who had been stifled by the government-controlled mainstream media, to explore new kinds of voices. Wang Xiaoshan was the founder of the "Black Humor Wire Service," a parodic news service reminiscent of the Onion. The wire service, founded in 1999 and still in operation today, in gentler form, gave journalists and writers a desperately needed outlet. "Xinhua was fake," shrugs Wang, referring to the official Chinese wire service. "We were fake, too."

The moment of freedom was short-lived. By the time blogger Wang Xiaofeng started posting his humorous entries in 2004, the government was waking to the dangers of online discussion. Wang's blog was originally titled "Wears Three Watches," a play on the Chinese title of former president Jiang Zemin's intellectually bankrupt theory of "The Three Represents." The blog was periodically pruned and shuttered by authorities, and in 2006 they told him that the name had to go. His response was to change it from an ironic statement to a statement about irony itself: "Don't Take the Hint."

AFP/Getty Images

 SUBJECTS: CHINA, CULTURE, EAST ASIA
 

Eric Abrahamsen is a freelance translator in Beijing and a contributor to Paper Republic.

FLOATINGPOINT

10:20 PM ET

January 12, 2011

A typical American who thinks he can teach Chinese how to think

His Chinese informants obviously share his views too.
The truth, however, is that only a small portion of people in any society can consistently think in a meaningful way. Some Chinese believe that most Westerners are smart and "creative." Well, I have seen my share of dumb Americans. There are a lot of super high quality discourses happening among Chinese intellectuals. But most poeple, even those participating intellectuals, still believe Westerners have the sole claim on the intellectual highland. For reference, look at the situation of Japan. Until pretty recently she was the 2nd largest economy. But her intellectuals are automatically downgraded by East Asians, following the "order" of Western bosses. But deep inside the same East Asians know that Japanese pop culture is superior to the Western counterpart when it comes to their own taste.

Conclusion: if you ask the Chinese emigrant workers, chances are they will not link Japanese past invasion with Chinese presence in Tibet or XinJiang. Why should they? They are still struggling with living a manageable life. But don't underestimate China's intellectual power and pretend that a typical American can play as an emancipator in the middle kingdom.

 

XTIANGODLOKI

12:24 PM ET

January 13, 2011

Nothing wrong with non-Chinese trying to help china

The problem with people like this author is that they tend to distance themselves from anyone who doesn't think like they do, which would be most Chinese people. This is obvious in the lack of depth in this author's writings (Chinese people should revere Dalai Lama like they do in the West, really?!) They somehow came to the conclusion that they know the best way to help the same ordinary Chinese people, people which they distanced themselves from in the first place.

What usually end up happening is they becoming increasingly bitter as they are being rejected in China. Instead of realizing that their ideas and efforts are being rejected because they are simply ineffective, their insecurities will make them think it has something to do with the race or nationality. Then they come on mediums such as this one to vent their own anger, and sometimes declare all Chinese people are brainwashed and hopeless. Watch, they will show up in the comments section too.

 

BOXUAN

2:14 AM ET

January 13, 2011

devil with a human face?

Nobody has ever heard of this 'official' comment about Dalai Lama. He is well-known in China as a prestigious religious leader with an intent to divide the country, nothing more or less. Is that another fabrication to frame CCP? How could such acts make you more convincing than the Chinese government? As to socialism, there're many European countries look more like a Socialist country than China right now. China is a different country since the end of cultural revolution, you don't know it or simply want to make a fool of western audiences?

 

THEHOLEINTHEWORLD

12:12 PM ET

January 13, 2011

Blind faith...

Next time you could do a little research before claiming that "Nobody has ever heard of this 'official' comment about Dalai Lama. He is well-known in China as a prestigious religious leader with an intent to divide the country, nothing more or less."

This is the complete statement of the secretary of the Tibet Autonomous Region Communist Party Regional Committee: “The Dalai is a wolf in monk’s robes, a devil with a human face but the heart of a beast. We are now engaged in a fierce blood-and-fire battle with the Dalai clique, a life-and-death battle between us and the enemy.”

Arguing like this against an article criticizing the ideological indoctrination of the CCP doesn't look very well.

 

THMAN

9:50 AM ET

January 14, 2011

I'm pretty sure this rhetoric

I'm pretty sure this rhetoric has been used. Just how widely remembered this phrase is however another matter. As in most country, people are generally apolitical and don't read every statement poured out from the government or the press.

I wouldn't call the Chinese presence in Tibet and Xinjiang 'a blindingly obvious correlations to the Japanese invasion in WWII'. It's a bit far fetch - a better comparison might actually be the Austria-Hungary Empire or the Ottoman Empire back in times. It really is the imperialism of the older kind, not the Japanese / Germany expansionism in the 20th century.

On the article itself, it seems the author believes this renew sense of irony among Chinese netizen is a positive trend that might eventually lead to the toppling of CCP. I read it a bit differently. It seems to me that the CCP has succeed in managing - containing - criticism at a lower / local level. Criticising the Central Government remains an off-limit and most people accept that. The central government is also trying to use the internet to control the local party officials / moguls that get too powerful.

I urge everyone who read this article also to read Richard McGregor's "5 Myths About the Chinese Communist Party".

 

XTC283

2:49 PM ET

January 19, 2011

China's invasion of Tibet

At least one version of China's invasion of Tibet documents significant atrocities committed by Chinese troops. Just read Joseph Campbell's Masks of God volume 2 and the chapter on Tibet. If true it is horrifying.

 

FRANKLIN17

3:43 AM ET

January 13, 2011

Confusion says

it's the economy?

 

DAVEKLJ

3:57 AM ET

January 13, 2011

nonsense

"Japan's World War II invasion and occupation of northern China is continually rehashed in the media, yet the blindingly obvious correlations to the Chinese presence in Xinjiang and Tibet are never drawn. "

What nonsense, Xinjiang was a province of China since 1884, states such as Alaska or Hawaii only became states in the 20th century.

You could also say:German World War II invasion and occupation of Europe is continually rehashed in the media, yet the blindingly obvious correlations to the French, Brittish or Russian colonialism in Corsica, Brittany, French Catalonia, Northern Ireland, Chechnya, Yakutia, Dagestan etc etc etc in are never drawn. "

 

XTIANGODLOKI

12:00 PM ET

January 13, 2011

Chai Ling said something similiar

"After the government crackdown on the Tiananmen protests of 1989, Liu wrote, "the central government's fight against Westernization and a peaceful transition meant that serious topics could no longer be discussed within civil society, and people could only relieve their oppression by turning to entertainment." He noted that many intellectuals today fear that the spread of political humor might defuse the sense of anger that could lead to real reforms. "

Chai LIng, one of the 4 major student leaders of the TAM was caught on tape saying that she wished for the government to kill more students because the bloodshed is what will get people to change. Ling later on came back to sue the reporter who caught her on tape saying this so she would be seen in a better light.

But Ling and Liu are right. People will not change if they are happy and comfortable. This is exactly why they (along with the author of this article) hope the worst for China. They hope that people will be oppressed by the government and be angry. The angrier the people get the better, because then they can feel better about their cause and about themselves. These people want Chinese to suffer as much as possible, so they can have their revolution and satisfy their egos.

The problem with their thinking is that for a nation stability is good. Evolution is good, but revolution while sounding all great, is not good because the results are unpredictable. In the case of China, a revolution is even more terrible at this point because the nation under the existing government has made incredible improvements in the last few decades. Why would people want change when things are going well? The author mentions Mao quite a few times in the article because Mao represents the nadir of China in recent times. The author's subtle agenda is to remind the readers that today's China becoming more like Mao's china. That's silly on many levels. When China in the future becomes like Mao's China where millions have died from starvation, then more people will accept the author's point.

 

ARTFUL AID WORKER

3:29 PM ET

January 13, 2011

What a humourless lot you are!

Classic article - I have some reading suggestions for 2011! Thanks.

For the sake of (re)inflicting more irritation and nerdy sniping, I'll repeat that hysterical sentence:

"Respected wise dear teacher leader helmsman pathfinder vanguard pioneer designer bright light torch devil-deflecting mirror dog-beating stick dad mum grandad grandma old ancestor primal ape Supreme Deity Jade Emperor Guanyin Bodhisattva commander-in-chief...."

It is good,
It is good.

 

BOXUAN

3:40 AM ET

January 14, 2011

"My father is Li Gang"

But its awareness is apparent through what is forbidden: "My father is Li Gang" has made the list of "sensitive" phrases.

To test the authenticity, I just searched the Chinese version of "My father is Li Gang" in Baidu, and there're 6,580,000 results, with the first comes from Baidu Baike (encyclopedia). So I can only say you're lying.

 

LEEXIAOQIANG

12:08 PM ET

January 14, 2011

Getting it wrong

In a typical imperialist effort to cast false calumnies and aspersions on the CCP (okay, not exactly a blood libel of the Alaskan sort) the author seems to have (deliberately?) mistranslated the phrase "devil with a human face" when actually the common English equivalent is "devil with a blue dress."

 

MARTY MARTEL

3:38 PM ET

January 14, 2011

U. S. helped strengthen Communist rule in China

Eric Abrahamsen does NOT realize it but US helped strengthen Communist Party’s hold on Chinese society when Nixon-Kissinger embraced China’s Communist dragon to counter Russia’s Soviet bear in 1972.

Afterall China was a pariah country in the world just like today’s North Korea until Nixon’s 1972 visit. All the West European and East Asian countries stayed away from China following the US lead until 1972 and embraced China after Nixon’s visit. While US would not give MFN status to Soviet Union (remember Jackson-Vanik amendment?) unless Russia shed Communism, it had no problem giving it to China’s Communist dictators with a capitalist mask. Trade with China expanded by leaps and bounds during 12 years of Republican rule beginning in 1981. After campaigning against butchers of Beijing in 1992 elections, even Bill Clinton became enthusiastic supporter of trade with China once he took lessons in foreign policy from Nixon in early 1993 during a special Whitehouse-arranged meeting. US also promoted Communist China to a super power status by accepting it as a permanent UNSC member.

Had it not been for that Nixon embrace in 1972, China’s rise to super power status would have been far more slower with all the US, West European and East Asian markets closed to cheap Chinese products. Had it not been for that Nixon embrace, China’s technological progress would have been far slower in the absence of West’s technology transfers. Had it not been for that Nixon embrace, China’s military progress would have been far slower in the absence of huge forex reserves that China accumulated from the massive exports of cheap Chinese products and China used those forex reserves to acquire latest military technology.

US and EU have helped Communist Party of China tremendously by opening up their huge consumer markets to cheap Chinese products which employed millions of Chinese, thereby taking pressure off the one party dictatorship to democratize.

So this is just a swan song for Mr. Abrahamsen.

 

TECHGUY222

9:22 PM ET

January 14, 2011

Comparing the Japanese

Comparing the Japanese invasion of China to China's relationship with modern Tibet is in poor taste, and is no different than the idiotic anti-Israel ignoramuses that try to compare Israel's relationship with Palenstine to the German genocide of the Jews.

For an article on irony, it's disturbing that this gratuitous oversimplification was spoken without any. This is an article on humour that is more condescending than humourous.

 

FEYNMANFANGIRL

12:36 AM ET

January 19, 2011

Amen.

But commentators just can't resist the beautiful symmetry.

 

TIGRO73

6:03 AM ET

January 21, 2011

Journalism these days

Whatever it is, I found the article a bewildering admixture of prejudice, insight, information, misrepresentation and - IRONY!

 

LUVLONGTIME

11:27 PM ET

January 18, 2011

No sense of humor?

"I wash my dick with cunt" - Mao Zedong

Need I say more?

 

FILE124528

6:53 PM ET

January 25, 2011

"How could a thinking people

"How could a thinking people accept this...."

That is a theme that is consistent in the China run by the CCP.

The fact is the CCP has been successful at performing a massive lobotomy on the Chinese people. The Chinese justifiably fear their 'government'. The CCP has murdered infinitely more Chinese than the Japanese and other foreign imperialists put together.

Yes, there are some thoughtful and brave ones, but not many. And some honest ones who are critical can hide behind online anonymity, but that won't last long in the world's largest police state.

Comparing Japan's invasion of Manchuria and China with the CCP's invasion of Tibet and East Turkestan is quite right. The phrase 'China's Peaceful Rise' is no different than WWII Japan's 'East Asian Co-Prosperity Sphere'.

And there are some Chinese people who have a problem with Westerners that know China well and write about it and the Chinese. Some will note the Chiense posters who are irked at Abrahamsen, they'll be collecting their five mao + a bonus for posting in a foreign language.

Poster Marty Martel is quite right; Nixon & Kissenger are to blame for this monster. Though China run by the CCP will never be a 'super power'.

@luvlongtime..... Perfect.