How Does the Vatican Decide What's a Miracle?

Some theology, a little science, and a whole lot of politics.

BY JOSHUA E. KEATING | JANUARY 14, 2011

The Vatican announced Friday that Pope John Paul II will be beatified on May 1, meaning it has been decided that he has performed at least one miracle. If he is found to have performed a second miracle, he will be canonized as a saint. The miracle in question concerns a French nun, who was diagnosed with an aggressive form of Parkinson's disease but was reportedly cured in 2005, one morning after writing the pope's name on a piece of paper. (John Paul II had died of the same disease just two months earlier.) But how does the Catholic Church decide what constitutes a miracle?

It's a multistep process including an investigation by a specially designated Vatican office culminating in a final decision by the pope himself. Global celebrities like John Paul II or Mother Teresa -- beatified in 2003 -- aren't particularly representative examples of the process. Most beatifications (the church carries out around 30 every year) are granted to people who were little known outside their communities.

In an ideal version of the process, a grassroots movement grows in a community as people come to the conclusion that the person lived a saintly life. The local bishop then "opens a cause" and performs his own investigation. If he's satisfied, the cause is then referred to Rome. The investigation is then taken up by the Congregation for the Causes of the Saints, a Vatican office tasked with "approving results on miracles, martyrdom and heroic virtues of various Servants of God." As with much of the Vatican hierarchy, the criteria for membership in the Congregation is a bit opaque, but the head prefect -- currently Cardinal Angelo Amato -- is directly appointed by the pope.

Theoretically, miracles can be of any type. But in recent years, the vast majority of cases have been miraculous healings of deadly medical conditions. The church is still extremely traditional in the types of deeds it considers miraculous and has shown little inclination toward including political accomplishments, so don't expect to see John Paul II canonized for his role in the downfall of Soviet communism.

When the Congregation begins its investigation, it first seeks the advice of a panel of doctors that it maintains throughout the world. For a recovery to be declared miraculous, it must be "complete," "instantaneous," and "durable" -- meaning the cured condition doesn't return -- as well as scientifically inexplicable. (Improvements in medicine and scientific understanding of the body don't seem to have slowed down the pace of beatifications much.)

After the doctors have signed off, it goes to a panel of theologians who then have to judge whether the miracle is the sort of thing that God would do. After that, it goes before the cardinals and bishops of the Congregation for the Causes of the Saints, who are entrusted with ensuring that the beatification is in the church's best interest -- a particular beatification may or may not be politically opportune any given time. Finally, it is referred to the pope himself, who has the final say. 

The second miracle, needed for sainthood, can come a few months or a few centuries after the first. This is partly because it can take a while for new miracles to occur, but also because political realities change. Holy figures can become increasingly popular or influential, or less so, over the years, leading the congregation to reopen their causes. Causes are never permanently closed. The Congregation keeps a file of all those considered for beatification on record in the Vatican archives, but the vast majority of those who are beatified will never become saints. The last new saints were a group of six -- including the first ever Australian -- canonized by Benedict XVI on Oct. 17. There are currently over 10,000 named saints.

Normally, individuals are only considered for beatification after they've been dead for five years, but in John Paul's case, the process was fast-tracked. There are a few likely reasons for this. The late pope is a globally known and loved figure, so there's no reason to wait for support to build. Because of his popularity among Catholics, his eventual sainthood is generally considered a foregone conclusion. The 83-year-old Benedict, who worked at John Paul's side for years, is believed to want to see through his mentor's canonization himself. Plus for the Catholic Church, in the midst of a number of political, financial, and sexual scandals, some good publicity couldn't hurt.

Thanks to John L. Allen Jr., senior correspondent at the National Catholic Reporter.

MASSIMO SAMBUCETTI/AFP/Getty Images

 SUBJECTS:
 

Joshua E. Keating is an associate editor at Foreign Policy.

MARTY MARTEL

7:31 AM ET

January 15, 2011

Miracle is ALL politics in this age of science and logic

Miracle is ALL politics in this age of science and logic just as declaration of divinity of Jesus Christ (purely a fictional name given to a Jewish priest named YESHUA) was all politics in 325 AD when Council of Bishops at Nicea in Italy decided by vote that Jesus (really YESHUA) was not just a mere mortal but a GOD.

 

JKINISB

11:14 AM ET

January 15, 2011

The need for Church-"States" separation

It is ironical that the Church denounces miracles and mysticism as mumbo-jumbo followed by "animist" and "pagan" natives when it aggressively proselytises in Africa and Asia, while using the same miracles to beatify its own- including nonsense about Yeshua walking on water

Equally, it is puzzling that the Church's beatifications are closely tied with the countries that United States and Western Europe has strategic and resource related interests in- it almost appears that Christianity and Missionaries are a 5th column for the Western World to penetrate developing countries, create civil unrest within and eventually divide them - of course, with the rump new state being the resource rich one, predominantly Christian and largely under teh control of Western "AID agencies" and peacekeepers.

The Vatican's recent interest in India poses a good example. Clearly, the Western states have decided to weaken, if not break up India into several provinces, and access the resource rich areas such as East Godavari District (Floating on Oil), Jharkhand (Rich in ores) - hence the aggressive proselytization, supported by "beatification" of Teresa, and others.

The Vatican would willingly play a role in the creation of many more Southern Sudans to remain politically and financially relevant, and the Western powers, notably the United States benefits symbiotically.

 

MAROUN2

3:14 PM ET

January 18, 2011

Canonization process

It is true that in times past the Christian religion and temporal governments were intimately connected-examples are the Czar and the Russian Orthodox Church, Byzantium, and the Church of England; however, the Vatican, apart from the city state itself, leads by moral authority in its representation of the branch of christianity called Catholocism; as far as a 'fifth column', while this may have been the case in the past, especially in South America (where the Vatican drew the lines of influence between the Spanish and Portuguese territories, or Brazil and the rest of South America), it is no longer the case. In fact, while the hierarchy of the Catholic Church has been concerned about the survival of the Church in the political context (i.e. the recent sex abuse scandals and protection of priests), the priests and other clergy have exposed themselves in many cases to great personal danger (i.e. leprosy colonies, liberation theology in South America on behalf of the poor that resulted in the asassination of priests and bishops, working with the poorest of the poor in India as Mother Theresa and her followers have done). The actions of the Christian faith and the political realities of the Church hierarchy have not always been reconciled, and the hierarchy has sometimes overlooked the moral issues for 'the greater good', or political expediency.

However, currently, if the 'fifth column' argument were to be believed, then the Vatican (and the U.S.) should be helping the Christians in the Middle East, which they would then use as an excuse for invading and occupying the Holy Land. This has not been the case, and Christians in the Middle East are being persecuted today as a result of our latter day 'Crusade'. The clash of cultures instigated by fundamentalists on both sides of the Christian/Islamic divide has driven the Christian communities in the Middle East into exile. Also, note that the U.S. sided with the Islamic Albanians and against the Christian Serbs in Yugoslavia-not exactly a defense of Christendom that created a 'fifth column'; rather it created an Islamic state in Europe.

 

CEPHAS1229

4:55 PM ET

January 15, 2011

Miracles

@Marty
It looks as if you were trying to pack in as many falsehoods as possible in your short post. Jesus was called the Christ and was not a priest, though people called him Rabbi. Also, Nicea is in modern day Turkey and not in Italy. The Church always believed in the divinity of Jesus. Just read the New Testament for starters and take a look at some of the Church Fathers i.e. Ignatius, Polycarp, etc. The Council of Nicea did not convene to declare that Jesus was a God, but to refute Arius and demonstrate that the Church consistently believed in His divinity. Marty, there really is no excuse for your lack of charity and your ignorance. You obviously have access to the Internet. Try finding out what scholars have to say on these things.

 

MARTY MARTEL

12:06 PM ET

January 16, 2011

miracles or magic?

The Church had a vested interest in proclaiming divinity of rabbi Yeshua in Nicea where council of bishops met in 325 ad. Fact is Church did not believe in divinity of rabbi Yeshua until 325 ad and did so only to attract pagans to Christianity.

Rabbi Yeshua does NOT have to be divine for humans to help one another or care for the needy. If it is really interested in serving humanity, Church can do so without insisting on conversion from other religion to Christianity. Belief in 'Christian G O D' does not have to tied to help an unemployed get a job.

New testament is but a document agreed to by same bishops. Whole generations of theologian scholars have built their careers around bible to continue the church propaganda.

Why would Yeshua perform a miracle for such a banal purpose like converting water to wine when he could have performed miracle (or magic?) to manufacture bread to feed hungry?

 

CEPHAS1229

8:44 AM ET

January 18, 2011

Miracles

Marty
Your comments demonstrate that you have probably never opened up any credible document. This is most likely because you fear the truth and would prefer to believe what others have told you in whatever belief system you're in. If you seriously studied the New Testament you would see that much of what you said is so far off base that I wouldn't even know where to start. As far as what people believed as far as the divinity of Christ goes.
The Divinity of Christ is mentioned in the following Biblical passages among many others:
Compare Ex 3:14 with John 8:59
John 5:18
John 20:28
Phil 2:6

Here is just a sample of what history says. You could find this as well if you wanted.
Ignatius of Antioch

"Ignatius, also called Theophorus, to the Church at Ephesus in Asia . . . predestined from eternity for a glory that is lasting and unchanging, united and chosen through true suffering by the will of the Father in Jesus Christ our God" (Letter to the Ephesians 1 [A.D. 110]).

"For our God, Jesus Christ, was conceived by Mary in accord with God’s plan: of the seed of David, it is true, but also of the Holy Spirit" (ibid., 18:2).

"[T]o the Church beloved and enlightened after the love of Jesus Christ, our God, by the will of him that has willed everything which is" (Letter to the Romans 1 [A.D. 110]).

Aristides

"[Christians] are they who, above every people of the earth, have found the truth, for they acknowledge God, the Creator and maker of all things, in the only-begotten Son and in the Holy Spirit" (Apology 16 [A.D. 140]).

Tatian the Syrian

"We are not playing the fool, you Greeks, nor do we talk nonsense, when we report that God was born in the form of a man" (Address to the Greeks 21 [A.D. 170]).

Melito of Sardis

"It is no way necessary in dealing with persons of intelligence to adduce the actions of Christ after his baptism as proof that his soul and his body, his human nature, were like ours, real and not phantasmal. The activities of Christ after his baptism, and especially his miracles, gave indication and assurance to the world of the deity hidden in his flesh. Being God and likewise perfect man, he gave positive indications of his two natures: of his deity, by the miracles during the three years following after his baptism, of his humanity, in the thirty years which came before his baptism, during which, by reason of his condition according to the flesh, he concealed the signs of his deity, although he was the true God existing before the ages" (Fragment in Anastasius of Sinai’s The Guide 13 [A.D. 177]).

Irenaeus

"For the Church, although dispersed throughout the whole world even to the ends of the earth, has received from the apostles and from their disciples the faith in one God, Father Almighty, the creator of heaven and earth and sea and all that is in them; and in one Jesus Christ, the Son of God, who became flesh for our salvation; and in the Holy Spirit, who announced through the prophets the dispensations and the comings, and the birth from a Virgin, and the passion, and the resurrection from the dead, and the bodily ascension into heaven of the beloved Christ Jesus our Lord, and his coming from heaven in the glory of the Father to reestablish all things; and the raising up again of all flesh of all humanity, in order that to Jesus Christ our Lord and God and Savior and King, in accord with the approval of the invisible Father, every knee shall bend of those in heaven and on earth and under the earth . . . " (Against Heresies 1:10:1 [A.D. 189]).

 

SAM-E

8:34 PM ET

January 31, 2011

miracles

You are reading a comic book and trying to glean universal truths from it...works about well as finding the science needed to get to the Moon in the bible.

 

MALICEIT

11:20 PM ET

January 15, 2011

He also performed a miralce...

...of molestation ?

 

O-DOG

1:13 PM ET

January 17, 2011

Is the 2005 cured nun still alive?

So the old lady was cured miraculously in 2005. How is she doing now?

If she died of a heart attack or something a year or so later, does the miracle still stand?

 

NSC LOS ANGELES

3:43 PM ET

January 18, 2011

What utter nonsense.

The miracle is that the right-thinking western world hasn't bombed the Vatican and sold it's many gold trinkets to pay for Catholicism's victims. Not to mention the thousands of ancient texts stored in the Vatican that are being intentionally kept from scrutiny.

Also, a very interesting policy angle from one of the posters above.

 

CEPHAS1229

11:11 PM ET

January 18, 2011

Miracles

@NSC LOS ANGELES
The only nonsense I see on this page is your leftwing hate speech. How nice that you would like to have anything bombed tells more about your need to be institutionalized than about the Vatican. Tell me which group you belong to that takes better care of the poor around the world? You are also probably the only one that would call something like the Sistine Chapel "a gold trinket" And actually based on fact (which it looks as if you would prefer to ignore) many studies have demonstrated that it is family members most likely will produce victims rather than clergy. Perhaps you have something to hide? Why don't you try using facts and logic instead of hate speech.

 

SAM-E

8:40 PM ET

January 31, 2011

Miracles

You want to talk nasty? Read Carl Sagan's A Demond Hauted World...lets talk about all the innocent people the Church killed or had killed...the Church is nothing more than a company willing to do anything for profit.