Who Are the Knights of Malta -- and What Do They Want?

They're a secretive religious order with a long and bloody history and unique status under international law, but that doesn't mean they run the world.

BY JOSHUA E. KEATING | JANUARY 19, 2011

In a speech in Doha on Monday, veteran New Yorker journalist Seymour Hersh alleged that the U.S. military's Joint Special Operations Command (JSOC) had been infiltrated by Christian fanatics who see themselves as modern-day Crusaders and aim to "change mosques into cathedrals." In particular, he alleged that former JSOC head Gen. Stanley McChrystal -- later U.S. commander in Afghanistan -- and his successor, Vice Adm. William McRaven, as well as many other senior leaders of the command, are "are all members of, or at least supporters of, Knights of Malta." What was he talking about?

Not exactly clear. There's not much evidence to suggest that the Knights of Malta are the secretive cabal of anti-Muslim fundamentalists that Hersh described. (For the record, when contacted by Foreign Policy, McChrystal said that he is not a member.) But they are certainly an anomalous presence in international politics and have provoked their share of conspiracy theories over the years.

The Sovereign Military Hospitaller Order of Saint John of Jerusalem of Rhodes and of Malta is a Roman Catholic organization based in Rome with around 13,000 members worldwide. The group was founded in 1048 by Amalfian merchants in Jerusalem as a monastic order that ran a hospital to tend to Christian pilgrims in the Holy Land. At the height of its power, the order was also tasked by Rome with the additional military function of defending Christians from the local Muslim population. The Knights of St. John were just one of a number of Christian military orders founded during this period -- including the fabled but now defunct Knights of Templar.

When the Sultan of Egypt retook Jerusalem in 1291, the Knights of St. John went into exile, settling in Rhodes 20 years later. In 1523 they were forced from Rhodes by the Sultan's forces and settled in Malta, which they ruled until they were dislodged by Napoleon's army in 1798. The order settled in Rome in the mid-19th century, where it remains to this day.

Despite its name, the Knights haven't had any military function since leaving Malta. Instead, the order has gone back to its charitable roots by sponsoring medical missions in more than 120 countries.

When the order was founded, knights were expected to take a vow of poverty, chastity, and obedience upon joining. Nowadays, obedience is enough. Membership is still by invitation only, but you no longer have to be a member of the nobility. In recent years, the organization has become increasingly American in membership. The leader of the order, referred to as the prince and grand master, is elected for life in a secret conclave and must be approved by the pope.

Despite having no fixed territory besides its headquarters building in Rome, the order is considered a sovereign entity under international law. It prints its own postage stamps and coins -- though these are mostly for novelty value -- and enjoys observer status at the United Nations, which classifies it as a nonstate entity like the Red Cross. The Knights maintain diplomatic relations with 104 countries. The order does not have official relations with the United States, though it has offices in New York, for the United Nations delegation, and Washington, for its representation at the Inter-American Development Bank.

Because of its secretive proceedings, unique political status, and association with the Crusades, the order has been a popular target for conspiracy theorists. Alleged members have included former CIA Directors William Casey and John McCone, Chrysler Chairman Lee Iacocca, and GOP fixture Pat Buchanan, though none have ever acknowledged membership. Various theories have tied the Knights to crimes including the Kennedy assassination and spreading the AIDS virus through its clinics in Africa.

In 2006, a newspaper article in the United Arab Emirates claimed that the Knights were directly influencing U.S. policy in Iraq and Afghanistan, reprising their role in the Crusades. Following the article, Islamist websites in Egypt urged followers to attack the order's embassy in Cairo, forcing the organization to issue a statement denying any military role.

To be fair, the Knights have been involved in their fair share of political intrigues. In 1988, the charge d'affaires at the order's embassy in Havana confessed to being a double agent, reporting to both the CIA and Cuban intelligence. According to journalist Jeremy Scahill's book Blackwater, Joseph Schmitz, a former executive at the company who also served as inspector general for the U.S. Department of Defense, boasted of his membership in the Knights in his official biography. The defense contractor now known as Xe's chief executive, Erik Prince, reportedly espoused Christian supremacist beliefs, and its contractors in Iraq used codes and insignia based on the order's medieval compatriots, the Knights of the Templar. However, there's no evidence to suggest the Knights of Malta had any direct influence over the company.

So while the group is, for the most part, a charitable organization with little resemblance to the sinister portrait painted by its detractors, an image-makeover might be in order as it finishes off its 10th century.

ALESSIA GIULIANI/AFP/Getty Images

 SUBJECTS:
 

Joshua E. Keating is an associate editor at Foreign Policy.

ZONEMIND

11:53 PM ET

January 19, 2011

Knights Templar

The order of the Poor Fellow-Soldiers of Christ and the Temple of Solomon are commonly referred to as the "Knights Templar" or just "the Templars". Sometimes they're the "Order of the Temple". I have never seen them named the "Knights of Templar" before.

Like the Templars, the Knights of Malta (née Knights Hospitaller) have had so many imitators and successors as to provide a lovely crackpot smörgåsbord of various fruits and nuts. As a conspiratorial meme, though, the Hospitallers come in second to the Templars. Perhaps it's because they didn't have the good fortune to get murdered by a greedy French king and a colluding Pope. I suppose it's the same as with painting. You only really get famous when you're dead.

 

COUNTCHOCULA1011

12:32 AM ET

January 20, 2011

Hmm....

....so one of the heads of Blackwater claims he was a member of the order, and other "knights" have confessed to have been intelligence operatives. Wow! If you were looking for a way to discredit Hersh, you took a horrible path.

Why is it so hard for the people at foreign policy to recognize what we've all come to see: the military is infested with Christian fundamentalists, many of whom see it as their God-given goal to destroy Islam. Again, it may not be official policy, but you cannot deny such elements exist and that they have power.

How does it not worry you that the head of Blackwater--a group which has significant operational roles in both wars--says such things?

How does it not worry you that military generals have said such things (Boykin)?

What's so hard to believe about it? Did you not notice that considerable swaths of Bush's cabinet members and officials were self-proclaimed born-again Christians? Do you really have such little knowledge of the Evangelical community to not realize the pervasive anti-Islamic sentiment that exists within it? Did you not notice that a radical Christian pastor who explicitly called for Islam to be destroyed was THE OFFICIAL spiritual advisor to the president!? For God's sakes, have you people been living under a rock!?

 

PANDIEBEAR

3:22 PM ET

January 23, 2011

Bush also had the neo-con

Bush also had the neo-con jewish groups who held their nose but still crawled into bed with the end=of=times believers (Bush believes this and expressed this belief to foreign heads of state while president- eg. french minister), there is some truth to the whole thing

 

COUNTCHOCULA1011

12:41 AM ET

January 20, 2011

Franklin Graham: The Pentagon's Pastor

Hmmm...let's see what the man who the Pentagon had preach at the Good Friday service on April 18, 2003 and who they would have had give the speech at the National Day of Prayer event at the Pentagon had it not been for external pressure has to say about Islam:

Islam is "a very evil and wicked religion."

"True Islam cannot be practiced in this country,"

Speaking on the differences between Christianity and Islam, he remarked: "You can't beat your wife. You cannot murder your children if you think they've committed adultery or something like that, which they do practice in these other countries."

On Iraq, Graham says he is, "poised and ready" to send representatives of the charity he runs to Iraq as soon as possible. While the purpose is humanitarian aid, Graham also admits, "I believe as we work, God will always give us opportunities to tell others about his Son. ... We are there to reach out to love them and to save them, and as a Christian, I do this in the name of Jesus Christ."

I wonder where anyone would get the idea!!?

 

ZAOTAR

5:14 PM ET

January 20, 2011

Uhh ... last time I checked

Uhh ... last time I checked -- and I did take a course on Islamic law in law school -- it was in fact perfectly okay under Sharia to beat your wife and, moreover, the punishment that must be imposed for adultery is stoning to death. I mean, it just is. In black-and-white.

Just because it's extremely unpleasant doesn't mean it ain't true. Very strange that saying the truth about Islamic law is considered offensive. Go to a country that openly practices strict Sharia, and they will feel no compunction about explaining to you what Islamic law requires in these regards.

It is, in fact, entirely correct that Muslims cannot fully apply Sharia in most nations, including the United States. Thank Allah. Instead they must usually defer on criminal law to the secular justice system. Otherwise heads and hands would be getting lopped off left and right.

 

PANDIEBEAR

3:10 PM ET

January 23, 2011

Your point is..

that both Islam and Christianity at root are cruel patriarchal religions- I agree, no number of Red Crescents or World Visions charities change that point. The West should not have religion in government (including the military, especially the military, hopefully a dramatic piece like Hersh's will draw attention to a growing, if not as great as, problem as he points out-) also, I wonder if there are increasing fundamentalist influences in Canadian, Australian, and European forces? I bet there is not, this reflects America's scary fundamentalist religious roots.

 

PEONYTIGER

4:34 AM ET

January 20, 2011

Who are the Knights of Malta----and what do they want?

For all you doubters:
First they ignore you, then they laugh at you, then they fight you, then they are afraid of the truth that you tell.
Remember when Sec of Defense Gates fired forthwith the Air Force Academy top brass?
Goddess Bless Sy Hirsch and Julian Assange

 

HURRICANEWARNING

1:19 PM ET

January 20, 2011

we are an evangelical

we are an evangelical country. As a result, we have an evangelical military. It's messed up. Get over it. It's not official policy. Hersh was being irresponsible when he said this stuff...it will only serve to feed irrational muslim conspiracy theories, and further alienate Afghans and Pakistanis from the coalition forces who are truly trying to help them. Thanks alot Hersh, good job. Why dont you climb back into retirement, and save face before you say something else really irrelevant and stupid.

 

PANDIEBEAR

3:15 PM ET

January 23, 2011

Sticking one's head in the sand is not good strategy

...I think they already know the US is predominately a christian country, Hersh's article is more for our consumption and consideration, the rabid fundamentalists would cut Mother Teresa's head off if given the chance, what they think is actually irrelevant.

 

PALMER

2:04 PM ET

January 20, 2011

Sure, and the Da Vinci code is factual, too

I don't disagree that there are many Christian fundamentalists and evangelicals in uniform. But, in the United States Armed Forces, the oath is to support and defend the Constituion, not to any church or medieval order of former knights. The assertion that the Knights of Malta have a significant, malign influence on JSOC or any other military organization is ludicrous beyond belief. Yes, there was a significant evangelical presence in the Bush administration. But, um, hello, the Knights of Malta are a Catholic organization. Evangelicals are not known for their wild enthusiasm for the Catholic church. It is unlikely that a lot of Knights of Malta are also secretly Baptists or non-denominational evangelical Christians.

As for: " 'Speaking on the differences between Christianity and Islam, he remarked: "You can't beat your wife. You cannot murder your children if you think they've committed adultery or something like that, which they do practice in these other countries.' " I have been to Saudi Arabia where executions for things like adultery are carried out in the public square. It is not just an evangelical fantasy. There are, indeed, practices in Islam that people have a right to object too. That, however, does not translate into a "vast right-wing [Catholic-Evangelical Christian] conspiracy."

So, folks, grow up. The idea that the Knights of Malta or any other Christian organization has a stranglehold on the DoD is exceptionally farcical.

Seymour Hersh has done some great work. It is truly sad that he would trot out something so ridiculous.

 

JONAS FOUNDS

7:45 PM ET

January 20, 2011

The differences between Christianity and Islam

There are only two countries in the Middle East where this archaic Shariaa stuff is still practiced. Those are Saudi Arabia and Iran. If it makes you feel better, the two are arch foes.

As far as your moral superiority of the Bible over the Koran is concerned, you may want to open up your Bible and take a look at Deuteronomy 21:18-21

“If a man has a stubborn and rebellious son who will not obey the voice of his father or the voice of his mother, and, though they discipline him, will not listen to them, then his father and his mother shall take hold of him and bring him out to the elders of his city at the gate of the place where he lives, and they shall say to the elders of his city, ‘This our son is stubborn and rebellious; he will not obey our voice; he is a glutton and a drunkard.’ Then all the men of the city shall stone him to death with stones. So you shall purge the evil from your midst, and all Israel shall hear, and fear.

Yep that is a stoning.

Therefore could we agree that both of those books, along with a bunch of other archaic relics should be taken with a whole pound of salt, a grain will not do. The real problem are people who are trying to live out their hatred whilst fronting their religion.

 

AR

9:54 AM ET

January 23, 2011

Jonas: The Deuteronomy

Jonas:

The Deuteronomy applies more to Jews than Christians.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Book_of_Deuteronomy

Orthodox Judaism and strict forms of Islam have more in common than their fundamentalist Christian counterparts.

 

MARIK7

12:15 PM ET

January 21, 2011

Secret?

If it's a secret organization, no one will admit to membership, even when asked by a famous journalist.

If it's an effective secret organization, few accusations against it will be proven.

That's the nature of a secret organization, unless it's a secret organization of clowns (no offense intended).

I'm not saying that this order is nefarious; I'm simply noting that secrecy is the nature of a secret organization.

 

PANDIEBEAR

3:17 PM ET

January 23, 2011

Question

If there are only 13000, where are they getting all the money to operate in 13 countries etc, doesn't make sense. Does the Catholic church fund them directly still?

 

CAVALIEREWC

2:17 PM ET

January 25, 2011

How are they a secret society

How exactly are the Knights of Malta secretive? Because they elect their leader by secret ballot? When we vote for our union officials I mail in a secret ballot in a blank envelope, does that make us a "secret society?" In the American Association of the Order of Malta we submit press releases with pictures of all our new members to local media outlets. We also regularly submit articles involving the activities of members to same outlets. Our annual Mass of Investiture is held at St. Patrick's in NY and the doors are not closed to the public. Every religious order in history has elected its head privately. The same could be said of most private membership clubs. I'm sure you could contact any country club in the country and ask if so and so is a member and they would tell you that they can't give out that information.

A point of further clarification in the article. It was mentioned that knights no longer take the three religious vows but merely one of obedience. In fact there are 3 classes of Knights. The first are Professed Knights who like the original knights of the Order are religious and still take the vows of poverty, chastity and obedience. A second class is for Knights in Obedience who do not make a formal vow of obedience but rather a promise of obedience. The third class to which most members belong make no formal promises or vows other than striving to live their lives in accord with the teachings of the Catholic Faith and the rule of the Order, copies of which are publicly available.

JD - Communications Liaison - SMOM American Association