NastyLeaks

Far from a triumph for transparency, the Palestine Papers are a victory for the enemies of peace in the Middle East -- but only if Palestinian leaders embrace Al Jazeera's narrative.

BY ROBERT M. DANIN | JANUARY 24, 2011

The Palestine Papers -- more than 1,600 internal Palestinian documents summarizing negotiations with Israel over the past decade -- are no "Palestinian WikiLeaks" aimed at bringing transparency and good government to the Palestinian Authority. Rather, they are a direct attack on the leadership of the Palestine Liberation Organization (PLO), its negotiators, and the very idea of negotiating peace with Israel.

The documents were apparently provided to Al Jazeera by disgruntled Palestinians who set out to harm the PLO leadership and their peaceful path toward realizing Palestinian national goals. The Qatar-based satellite network has played along, insinuating that the documents show that the Palestinian leadership has proved weak and willing to capitulate to Israeli desires. On the documents pertaining to Israeli settlements in East Jerusalem, it laments that Palestinian negotiators "gave away almost everything to the Israelis, without pressuring them for concessions or compromise."

Palestinian leaders have done a lamentable job of preparing their public for the types of concessions necessary for an enduring Israeli-Palestinian settlement. Accordingly, the far-reaching compromises that were under discussion will likely come as a shock to many on the streets of Ramallah and Hebron. The ensuing outrage, unfortunately, makes it possible that the leakers could sabotage the peace process, as they seem to have intended.

It would be mistaken, however, to draw conclusions about the course of Israeli-Palestinian negotiations from the documents released so far. This is not the equivalent of the National Archives opening up the public record for scholars to reconstruct the diplomatic narrative. Only a few documents have been publicly released to date, which means that any context for the discussions is absent. According to my Palestinian sources, more documents are likely to be posted online in piecemeal fashion over the days ahead.

The first batch of documents focuses largely on the 2008 final-status negotiations between the PLO and Ehud Olmert's government that followed the Annapolis peace conference in November 2007. They are meant to demonstrate that Palestinian negotiators are desperate quislings, willing to cooperate shamelessly with the Israeli occupiers, while selling out sacrosanct Palestinian positions on the status of Jerusalem and the "right of return."

However, the documents actually show that the Annapolis process had succeeded in bringing Israelis and Palestinians together, under U.S. leadership, to discuss the most sensitive issues that divide them. They show flexibility, agility, and candor on both sides of the debate. "It actually makes me proud of my leadership. It showed that they are smart, subtle, and know what they are doing," one non-affiliated Palestinian told me today. "I just wish they let us know that this is the case."

Negotiations are conducted confidentially for a reason. A degree of secrecy allows parties to explore positions without necessarily locking themselves into a particular stance. But readers of these documents should keep in mind that these discussions operate under the principle that nothing is agreed until everything is agreed.

Uriel Sinai/Getty images

 

Robert M. Danin is the Eni Enrico Mattei senior fellow at the Council on Foreign Relations. From April 2008 until June 2010, he headed the Jerusalem mission of Quartet representative Tony Blair. Prior to that, he served for 20 years at the U.S. State Department and National Security Council in a variety of senior Middle East positions.

THEHAIRMAN

8:52 PM ET

January 24, 2011

NastyLeaks

What a apology for truth by the writer. Having read some of the papers I found no where that Israel was willing to negotiate with the Palestinians to settle the 43 year occupation.
Although the Palestinians were willing to sell their people out, Israel still refused to negotiate any agreement and the US went along with Israel.
The writer also made a misstatement of the facts regarding the negotiations. After they were cancelled it was not because the Olmert Government failed because of corruption, but due to Israel starting the war in Gaza .

 

DELAO

1:17 PM ET

January 25, 2011

Agreed

I absolutely agree with TheHairMan on this issue. It seems that if Palestine could only be recognized as a state, then many of their problems would be solved. Israel continued to strangle the Palestinians through the entirety of their negotiations. Furthermore, have we already forgotten Israel's economic controls over Palestine by keeping it on the verge of total collapse? Didn't FP recently comment on this?

 

SABABA03

7:09 PM ET

January 25, 2011

The Killer deal for Israel was, is, and will be the RoR for Pals

The Palestinians instance to flood the state of Israel with 6M Pals, which would make them overnight the majority population there, is the real deal killer for the Israelis.

Israeli population is made of 7.3M inhabitants. 5.9M of which are Jews. The rest are Arab-Christians and Arab-Muslims.

Allowing this massive number of Pals to move into Israel, it would transformed Jews into minorities in their own country. No Israeli government will ever receive any mandate from its people to allow such development.

Despite that Saeb Arikat is recorded saying, "there is no way 5.5M Pals will return to their former homes in Israel". Publicly the Pals always insist on the clause. For the simple reason - They figured, if their big heads did not get the Job (of Arab takeover of Israel), sure enough, the little heads will do it through demographic one.

 

CODY101

10:14 AM ET

January 26, 2011

I also agree....

and would like to add that: in no way is it acceptable for any leaders to conspire with others to assassinate their own people. They should not even "explore" these options.

And there are many problems with laying this at the feet of the "al Jazeera narrative." When Kristof helped to break some of Sudanese stories, did we say that it was the NY Times narrative to expose systematic injustice, murder, and displacement? I don't want to say that Israeli colonization amounts to genocide, but it does amount to more than a pariah news organization's supposed narrative. And leaks concerning back-door dealing are, it seems to me, welcome and effective for transparency.

 

ROEEORLAND

10:34 PM ET

January 24, 2011

Very easy for Al Jazeera

They sit in Saudi Arabia and criticize those who actually have to deal with all the suffering.
Like Khaled Mash'al sitting in Damascus and ordering Hamas to be strong while they get bombarded in Gaza.
This has been typical of many of the Arab factions: demanding strength from the Palestinians while they themselves aren't the ones suffering.

 

JOHN1

4:42 AM ET

January 25, 2011

Apparently you don't know Al Jazeera

Roeeorland writes of Al Jazeera:
They sit in Saudi Arabia and criticize those who actually have to deal with all the suffering.

Actually Al Jazeera is based in Qatar, which isn't on good terms with Saudi Arabia. And actually Al Jazeera often gleefully pokes the eyes of Saudi Arabia in their coverage.

It wouldn't surprise me if Saudi Arabia eventually comes out looking bad in these papers, as Saudi is often working in tandem with the U.S. concerning Israel-Palestine and Lebanon.

 

ROEEORLAND

5:16 AM ET

January 25, 2011

Thank you, John, so I'll rephrase

Very easy for Al Jazeera
They sit in Qatar (!!!) and criticize those who actually have to deal with all the suffering.
Like Khaled Mash'al sitting in Damascus and ordering Hamas to be strong while they get bombarded in Gaza.
This has been typical of many of the Arab factions: demanding strength from the Palestinians while they themselves aren't the ones suffering.

 

XENOPHON

10:40 AM ET

January 25, 2011

RE: Very Easy

Yes, just the way our Neocons sit in their think tanks and bay for war while our soldiers and their families do all the suffering.

 

SAMI JAMIL JADALLAH

11:43 PM ET

January 24, 2011

Saving the leadership from its own death call.

The write should not apologize for the stupid criminally reckless leadership and negotiators. The one who should apologize and leave the Occupied territories are the leadership of the PLO, Abbas & Co and the entire PLO Executive Committee. This is not negotiations this is a sell out, self serving sellout. It is time for the Palestinian people under Occupation and in the Diaspora to understand what Oslo is all about, what the PLO is all about and what all of these so called leaders are all about. I am one of those who all along since Arafat took over the PLO believe and convinced that the PLO and the leadership in particular Arafat was nothing but a lie and a big fraud. The so called PLO was never a liberation organization but a self serving organization set up to finalize the deal that will end any hope for the right of return and for sure end the Israeli Occupation of 67 and East Jerusalem. Oslo as negotiated by not so brilliant Trio of Arafat, Abbas and Qurai has nothing to do with ending the Occupation. The guys were desperate to save themselves and save an organization whose aim and objective all along to conclude a deal that end any hope of liberation or even ending the Occupation, The leaked papers proved once again the leadership has nothing but contempt for the people and rightly so. Any people who put up with this kind of corrupt, incompetent and reckless leadership for so long... since Arafat took over deserve to be treated with contempt. The salaries of the Executive Committee and the jobs for over 150,000 who are serving and working for the Occupation is much more important than ending the Occupation. Oslo and its leadership are there to perpetuate the Occupation so that they can negotiate until end of time, and then pass the jobs to their sons and grandsons until such time there is nothing to negotiate. If the Palestinian leadership was an Israeli leadership I am sure they will be chased out of the country if not killed. Rabin was killed for even agreeing to allow the Palestinians to contract to manage the Occupation letting Israel off the hook for paying for the occupation, He kept Jerusalem he kept the settlements, he kept over 58% of the land, he kept the water, and he got himself a security contractor paid by third party and he was killed for even considering a peace with the Palestinians. Arafat and his Oslo team gave Israel all, and are paying for their own occupation. True, no doubt about it the Palestinians leadership is simply brilliant at at perpetuating a fraud and a lie... Time for the people to chase these guys out and sue a One State where Jews can live in Ramallah and Palestinians can return to Tel-Aviv. Time to put the PLO and the leadership out of business... Members of the Executive Committee all of them have no sense of shame... Like Abraham Lincoln once said " you can fool some people some of the time but you could not fool all the people all the time".. Without doubt the Palestinian people are the biggest fools on this earth and they deserve it.

 

JBROCKLE

4:46 AM ET

January 25, 2011

Well...

I'm not arguing with the content of your post, though I don't necessarily agree with it. All I want to say is that the one state solution simply is never going to happen; it isn't a viable alternative. There are so many reasons why it can't happen now, any time soon or ever without massive changes in the situation.

 

BASE

9:31 AM ET

January 25, 2011

Viable?

Please define viable. In my opinion it is a very viable option for a state that claims it is a democracy, as Israel does every day.

If Israel was indeed a democracy it should have no trouble absorbing the Palestinian population that lives under occupation just as easily as they have the Israeli Arab population today.

Sure, there would be changes to Israel as a result but that is the benefit of democracy. The will of the people being reflected in the policies of their government. No?

 

BIG THINK

2:52 PM ET

January 25, 2011

we're getting tired of this BS

Well, you infer that Israel is a democracy and that Palestinians living under their government should be accepted and integrated. This is a very nice hope and dream, but unfortunately, it is not reality.

Reality is that Israel is a Police State - it is not a democracy. Oh yes, it has elections, but no matter who wins - it stays a Police State. No one is allowed to think or promote anything for themselves unless it is the ultra-orthodox view of the Jewish people and the opinion that it is divine right to have complete control of that piece of the earth only for people of Jewish origin.

Palestinians that live inside Israel have elected representatives that sit in the Knesset, but do you seriously think that they have any real influence or power to make a difference?

I can empathize with the Jews. What Hitler and the Nazi Germans did has left a very deep scar on their collective social conscience. And this was only the culmination of being hated everwhere they have been displaced. They have become mentally obsessed with protecting themselves and are using religion and history as a means to excuse anything they want and feel to do. I have little confidence that Israelis who have political and/or religious power are righteous at all in their views of how Isreal as a nation should interact with non-Jewish humanity that are under their governmental control.

On the other hand, do you really think that anti-Israeli Palestinians are going to say anything positive about trying to negotiate with Israel?

I really feel sorry for the average Palestinian. In my opinion, they are probably the same as most any human being on the planet - just want to have decent employment, a good quality of life, a good family, see their children get a good education and grow up to have a better life than they had. Israel is largely responsbile - Hamas and the "blame Israel" crowd are even more responsible. The anti-Israeli Palestinian leadership doesn't give a s**t for the people who they would have to govern. Do you really think Hamas has the average Palestinian as their primary interest in the power struggle with the PLO leftovers?

As long as everyone (Palestinian et al) is dumb enough to just keep on trying to eradicate Israel from existence, this thing will never end. And as we all know that the Jewish scriptures are probably some of the oldest accounts of how these tribes in this region have tried to live together, anyone who keeps holding the extreme lines on either side is only insuring the old addage that man is destined to repeat history.

 

SABABA03

7:37 PM ET

January 25, 2011

That so-called "One-State Solution" have been tried before.

Sami,
Promoting the "one state solution", for Jews it means (yet again) end up living as minorities in Muslim majority state.

Habibi, let me remind you and others. Jews have already tried that formula before. For over 1350 years Jews did just that, and tried it in 57 Arab or Islamic state. All had failed.

Case in point. As of 1947, there were more then 1.2M Jews living throughout the Middle east, Gulf region and N. Africa. By 1960, more then 1M of them were gone. Expelled from their homes, land, and made refugees - forced to leave only with their personal possessions. After which they all were absorbed into their newly established state of Israel, or moved on to Europe, and N. America. An ugly fact which Arabs don't want the outside world to know.

So you see!, we have already tried this formula. There is no way on earth, the Israelis will subject themselves, yet again to a life of Islamic fundamentalism, oppression, Burkha, or be treated as second rate citizens. That's is not going to happen.

Best solution is rather the 3-state solution.
- State of Israel
- State of Palestine, which includes the West Bank.
- Republic of Gaza

 

ANTIMKO

3:14 AM ET

January 25, 2011

NastyLeaks for obstructionists only, for the cause of peace? no

Only those who have something to hide will hate these leaks.

 

BWORK

4:59 AM ET

January 25, 2011

What concessions from Israel?

With respect, Mr. Danin, your claim that the Al Jazeera documents contain no evidence of Olmert's "ambitious compromises" is false. Included in the leaks is a map of Olmert's offer to withdraw from 89.4% of the West Bank--which, unfortunately, you could only call generous if you were fooled by large numbers. Because the map includes Ariel and Maale Adumim--the practical equivalent of sticking both your hands in a pie and then asking why nobody wants it--Erekat, for all his weakness, was right to reject it, and Al Jazeera is similarly right to characterize his "biggest Jerusalem in history" counter-offer as an embarrassment. There was no partner for peace, there certainly isn't now, and your defense of the ongoing sham isn't helping.

 

ZAFARZ

11:57 AM ET

January 26, 2011

Sticking fingers in the Pie on the Nasty Leaks

BWORK, I loved your analogy. Extremely well said.

Zafar Khan
http://www.SilentConscience.org

 

GUYVER

9:11 AM ET

January 25, 2011

Best part!

Guardian reports that Condoleezza Rice suggested shipping the Palestinian refugees to South America. Priceless.

 

KASEMAN

6:21 PM ET

January 28, 2011

Condi

Ms. Condyloma Lice ...

check the dictionary for the Condyloma

So what were the Israeli concessions?

Gaza is a concentration camp (Jews know all about such things) and the West Bank is like a cheek with smallpox, with the settlements pox spreading relentlessy. While the US applies soap.

Avigdor Libermann, that former brothel bouncer, in 10 years time will see that there will be no Palestine on the West Bank. As for the US, 75+% of Congress, 100% of the Beltway and 100+ million Christian fundos will cheer him and his supporters on. And our debt will balloon.

Lieberamnn will lead the Israeli elite to ensure that the Palestinians be pushed out of the West Bank. They then are destined for the scrap heap of history. Before we even lived in caves, the strong alway suppressed the weak and given half the chance wiped them out. So how many enemies will Libermann (and AIPAC) spawn for us? Bear in mind that Al Qaeda at peak in 9/111 numbered a mere 800, now 50, Wahabi terrorists. And look what a mess they got us to get into. Tells you someting about the American psychology. Given the record of the past 10 years, looks like the American Empire will carry on flagellating away on behalf of 500,000 land grabbing Russian (!) speaking Jews wanting to build theri Macmansions. Funded by guess who.

The Holocaust was the doing of Christians, tgo be precise white German speaking European Christians. Every member of the Nazi Party, the SS, the Gestapo and Wermacht officer Corps was baptized and confirmed a Prot or Papist. Ponder there on.

 

PJW5552

9:27 AM ET

January 25, 2011

Failure of Peace favors conflict!

One thing is clear, the failure of peace efforts do little to help Abbas or Palestinians and do much to facilitate conflict, where Israel is better armed and has the upper hand. Abbas is much wiser to use the major advantage he has now, non-violent resistance, to oppose Israeli settlement actions. This is a path where Israeli power will do it absolutely no good and its use of force will diminish it in the eyes of the world while it strengthens the Palestinian efforts.

Abba’s present efforts in the UN may end of gaining more for the Palestinians than their direct negotiations with Israel ever could. In fact, Israeli intransigence now favors the Palestinian efforts more than Israel. As the world sees a corrupt and insincere Israeli government, the tendency is for the world to punish that corruption and insincerity, not reward it. The worse Israeli behavior gets, the more likely the world will turn against Israel and their occupation of the entire West Bank.

Don't ignore the fact that 14/15 countries on the UN security council have already openly stated they support the present Palestinian UN resolution. Even the US does not say it will VETO that resolution. This now opens the way for further condemnation and even sanctions against Israel should Israeli hardliners decide to ignore UN actions as some have indicated they would.

The WikiLeaks documents show the Palestinian leadership was sincere about negotiating for peace. The failure of the peace negotiations did not rest with a Palestinian side that was clearly willing to think outside the box to resolve their issues with Israel. One now has to question whether both the West Bank and the Syrian Peace negotiations were not both scuttled purposely by Israel so it might delay the peace process awhile longer in order to gain more advantage. Israeli efforts to up the ante and to try and facilitate conflict in the region (flotilla incident; bombing of Gaza to encourage further attacks; enhanced West Bank settlement activity to incite more violence) by Israel as an excuse to not negotiate. By not playing their game, the Palestinians could ultimately end up the larger winners in it.

 

BASE

9:34 AM ET

January 25, 2011

Agreed

Very nice posting. I agree wholeheartedly.

 

JIM2445

9:47 AM ET

January 25, 2011

Transparancy

The best thing that has happened in American foreign relations has been Wiki-leaks and the Palestine Papers.
I think rewarding the leak of so-called secrets would be an excellent step in improving the functioning of our democracy.

 

GUYVER

10:10 AM ET

January 25, 2011

"peace processors ran out of time"

And yet Olmert still found time to bomb Gaza before leaving office. I guess he wanted to get it out of his system.

 

FORLORNEHOPE

12:25 PM ET

January 25, 2011

A modest proposal

It would appear, from their behaviour to date and from the revelations in the documents that the Israelis are not prepared to compromise to a degree that would allow a real Palestinian state to exist. The logical conclusion is that they are hoping that conditions will be sufficiently intolerable that the Palestinians will gradually find opportunities to go away and leave the land to Israeli settlers. This leaves the US with a great opportunity to solve the problem. Just give every Palestinian a green card. Of course there will always be some who will spurn such an opportunity but, I suspect, that the vast majority will be across the Atlantic just as soon as they can get on an aeroplane. After all, if the US wants to give the Zionists Palestine, it's only reasonable that they should give the Palestinians an alternative.

 

ANNA-MARIA

1:09 PM ET

January 25, 2011

Poor Israel

You see, it is Mr. Danin’s job description is to explain that the black is actually white and the white is actually black.
Considering that the Palestinian papers are available on the Internet, Mr. Danin’s naked appearance could be rather funny if the matters that he is perverting were not so deadly serious.
In contrast to Mr. Danin concoction, the following is an example of decent journalism: http://www.counterpunch.org/christison01252011.html

 

TANTAWI1992

1:23 PM ET

January 25, 2011

The Last Great Act

The last great act of resistance that the PLO can do is to disband itself, and abolish its associated entities. Effectively ending the so-called "peace process".
The PLO, especially Fatah are so infected with Israeli politics, have grown so corrupt, have become so complicit, that their continued existence is an existence which is collaborative with the Israeli occupation.

For Israel, they are doing brilliant, they are doing simply brilliant considering the circumstances and times that they are in. For them, to have the leaders of their victims become so concessionary, so feeble in its vision, is the best thing next to the creation of Israel.
So much so that negotiations with such leadership has become in of itself, a way for Israel to actually buy more time to create more "facts" on the ground. Meanwhile, Fatah has been reduced to a meaningless function, and has even developed what the PLO`s Salam Fayyad himself called "collaborative institutions". Essentially, to take foreign aid money that comes to support infrastructure and social services and spend it on a security apparatus specifically tasked with aiding the occupiers and eliminating ALL armed resistance groups.

The militant factions that once served as a bulwark for the PLO against the Israelis have all died with Arafat, they are now nothing more than a token existence of a past gloried with resistance.
Now, settlements are being built in an unrepentant pace, the Aparthied Wall is nearing completion, Gaza is still under siege, and Palestinians are slowly losing hope. Why? How did this happen?

The collaboraters. Fatah, Mahmoud Abbas, Salam Fayyad, Saeb Erekat, Ahmed Qurei. They speak with fork-tongues. There is no peace, Israel is building an Aparthied Wall, settlements and blockading Gaza, not to achieve peace. But to achieve the dream of a Greater Israel, from Judea to Samaria.

After abolishing the cancerous PLO, grassroots international support ought to be drummed up, and in a slow momentum mobilize Palestinians in one climax of frustration. Then see what Israel will do. Peace or Apatheid then, as a former US President said.

 

TANTAWI1992

1:23 PM ET

January 25, 2011

The Last Great Act

The last great act of resistance that the PLO can do is to disband itself, and abolish its associated entities. Effectively ending the so-called "peace process".
The PLO, especially Fatah are so infected with Israeli politics, have grown so corrupt, have become so complicit, that their continued existence is an existence which is collaborative with the Israeli occupation.

For Israel, they are doing brilliant, they are doing simply brilliant considering the circumstances and times that they are in. For them, to have the leaders of their victims become so concessionary, so feeble in its vision, is the best thing next to the creation of Israel.
So much so that negotiations with such leadership has become in of itself, a way for Israel to actually buy more time to create more "facts" on the ground. Meanwhile, Fatah has been reduced to a meaningless function, and has even developed what the PLO`s Salam Fayyad himself called "collaborative institutions". Essentially, to take foreign aid money that comes to support infrastructure and social services and spend it on a security apparatus specifically tasked with aiding the occupiers and eliminating ALL armed resistance groups.

The militant factions that once served as a bulwark for the PLO against the Israelis have all died with Arafat, they are now nothing more than a token existence of a past gloried with resistance.
Now, settlements are being built in an unrepentant pace, the Aparthied Wall is nearing completion, Gaza is still under siege, and Palestinians are slowly losing hope. Why? How did this happen?

The collaboraters. Fatah, Mahmoud Abbas, Salam Fayyad, Saeb Erekat, Ahmed Qurei. They speak with fork-tongues. There is no peace, Israel is building an Aparthied Wall, settlements and blockading Gaza, not to achieve peace. But to achieve the dream of a Greater Israel, from Judea to Samaria.

After abolishing the cancerous PLO, grassroots international support ought to be drummed up, and in a slow momentum mobilize Palestinians in one climax of frustration. Then see what Israel will do. Peace or Apatheid then, as a former US President said.

 

TANTAWI1992

1:35 PM ET

January 25, 2011

sorry for the second post, I

sorry for the second post, I don't understand why it did that.

 

ZAFARZ

11:52 AM ET

January 26, 2011

Nasty Leaks not so Nasty?

Mr Danin, with all due respect you confuse yourselves. In the opening paragraph you call the Palestine Papers “a direct attack on the leadership of the PLO”. First of all, news flash, it is not the PLO, unless you meant to call it that. Now, about your confusion, somehow you go on to praise the documents “..However, the documents actually show that the Annapolis process had succeeded in bringing Israelis and Palestinians together, under U.S. leadership, to discuss the most sensitive issues that divide them. They show flexibility, agility, and candor on both sides of the debate.” Again, the way I read them, they show flexibility only on the Palestinian side, not on the Israeli, unless your “sources” know better. Certainly if Israel made any concession whatsoever, I would expect it would make headline news all over the world.
No one has to take sides here. We all need to commit to upholding the truth.
Regards.
Zafar Khan
http://www.SilentConscience.org

 

JBIRDMENJ

2:09 PM ET

January 26, 2011

No concessions

Israel has already pulled out of Gaza. They have offered to pull out of most of the West Bank and dimantle the Jewish communities in those areas. They have offered to put the holiest sites in Judaism into play.

It is actually nice to see the the Palestinians were offering concessions; I really didn't think they were offering anything except their own maximalist positions. Based on what the Palestinians offered and what Israel has offered, they are not that far apart. It should be possible to negotiate a treaty.

Of course, if the goal is to destroy Israel or stand up for "principles" (you can't keep land you conquer in a defensive war, all the great-grandchildren of the Palestinian refugees of 1948 must be allowed to return to the places where their great grandparents lived) that have never been implemented in human history, then you should admit that it is the existence of Israel you have a problem with, and you can't expect Israel to participate in a peace process that is expected to lead to the end of its existence as a Jewish State and its replacement with Palestine "from river to sea".

 

MARKTHOMASON

10:15 AM ET

January 28, 2011

What is really important about the disclosures

This article completely ignores what is really important about the disclosures. The Israelis were intransigent, so completely intransigent that it proves they had no good faith in the so-called negotiations in the so called process. There was nothing the PA could offer, and nothing the PA could prepare its public for, that could possibly have made a difference.

The US government knew exactly what was going on, and was complicit in it. The only goal seems to have been to hide the truth from the world so the Israeli could continue their abuse of the Palestinians with less outside pressure.

It was shameful. We may have suspected it, but without proof nobody would believe it. Now we know.

The "Peace Process" was a fake, and always meant to be a fake, for the sole purpose of abusing the Palestinians and enabling Israeli crimes already expressly condemned by the Security Council.

That you could fail to mention it at all, and blather on about how the PA could not get its public to go along with its offer, shows either you are so partisan as to be completely blind, or you are just spreadling manipulative propaganda for your side.

This article is disgusting. Totally disgusting and without any excuse.

 

DAWASON

9:52 PM ET

February 22, 2011

It seems that if Palestine

It seems that if Palestine could only be recognized as a state, then many of their problems would be solved. Israel continued to strangle the Palestinians through the entirety of their negotiations. Furthermore, have we already forgotten Israel's economic controls over Palestine by keeping it on the verge of total collapse? Didn't FP recently comment on this?