Really Bad Week: Egypt Edition

The world leaders (outside of Egypt) who are freaking out the most.

BY DAVID J. ROTHKOPF | FEBRUARY 2, 2011

While the political earthquake rumbling through the Middle East began in Tunisia, when the people took to the streets in Egypt, unrest became a trend rather than an isolated event. In addition, Egypt's unique role among states in the region -- historically and due to the size of its population -- amplified the importance of the demonstrations that have filled the streets of Cairo, Alexandria, and the rest of the country for this past week.

Even before President Mubarak's decision to end his 30-year rule, Egypt's crisis had earned the undivided attention of leaders across the Middle East. King Abdullah of Jordan's sacking of his cabinet and Yemeni President Ali Abdullah Saleh's announcement that he too was not going to seek to extend his three-decade-long tenure in office indicated that both men recognized the fuse that was lit in North Africa was connected to stacks of dynamite on which they were sitting.

But it could well be that the forces unleashed by these unlikely people-power revolutions are just starting to be felt. Countries and leaders around the world are wondering aloud what this means for them. Some more than others. Here are the 10 people (outside Egypt and Tunisia) most unsettled by the past week's developments.

MARCO LONGARI/AFP/Getty Images

 SUBJECTS: EGYPT
 

David J. Rothkopf, a Foreign Policy blogger, is president and chief executive of Garten Rothkopf, a Washington-based advisory firm specializing in energy, climate, and global risk-related issues. He is a visiting scholar at the Carnegie Endowment for International Peace and author most recently of Superclass: The Global Elite and the World They Are Making.

TECHGUY222

4:22 AM ET

February 3, 2011

No Obama? Really? You'd think

No Obama? Really? You'd think he'd been concerned with the toppling of one the staunchest American allies in a very anti-American region.

 

TECHGUY222

4:23 AM ET

February 3, 2011

one of the*

one of the*

 

NICOLAS19

4:27 AM ET

February 3, 2011

about time

Yeah, it was about time FP had another "world's bad leaders" photo essay with the same people every time.

Seeing this list makes me feel that the Arab world needs another Saladin to wipe out all these little despots (with the exception of Ahmadinejad and Netanyahu of course - they should be enough for each other).

 

JOSEP

6:21 AM ET

February 3, 2011

Give the King of Jordan his marching orders!

No need for this worldwide anxiety about the crony of Jordan! Jordan’s King Abdullah is more dispensable than Mubarak and he must go. The Hashemites have ruled Jordan for around 90 years now and they have not made a single serious attempt at genuine democratic reform or strengthening of civil institutions. They have survived on foreign aid and maintained stability through repression of freedoms and brutal police force. This is a great opportunity for the USA to capitalise on its recent and most welcome endorsement of the rights of the Egyptian people which is winning the USA a lot of support in the Middle East even amongst the “Islamists”.

Disposing of this dictator means disposing of the resentment that Arabs have held against the USA who for a long time favoured thise corrupt authoritarian leader over his people. Obama is now sending the right, moral and timely message; and he is winning the minds and hearts of Arabs everywhere.

President Obama should give King Abdullah his marching orders because that would be to the benefit of everyone including Israel. The main reason that the peace treaty between Israel and Jordan has not amounted for much is that it was a treaty between Israel and the Hashemites – not between two peoples. A democratic Jordan means a stronger peace with Israel, economic reforms and benefits to all stakeholders – not just the corrupt Abdullah and his cronies!

 

TECHGUY222

7:10 PM ET

February 3, 2011

"democratic Jordan means a

"democratic Jordan means a stronger peace with Israel"
So, overthrowing a pro-Western dictator with diplomatic ties to Isreal means... a stronger peace with Israel? I think the opposite would be the result.

 

JOSEP

5:29 AM ET

February 4, 2011

Democracies rarely attack democracies

Yes, a democratic Jordan is good news for Israel. While Israel might have some apprehension about having neighbouring democratic arab nations, the risks are manageable. Generally, democracies rarely attack democracies! When Israel neogtiates with a legitimate democratically elected President and government, the story would be much different than when it negotiates with a despot who does not speak for his people. Remember that when the late King Hussein of Jordan signed the peace treaty with Israel, he gave the Parliament a recess! The treaty was never ratified by a democratically elected parliament!

Democracy also brings transparency and economic reform. People would have jobs and dignity and will no longer complain that Israel is getting all the economic benefits of a peace treaty.

 

JEMIMA SANDHU

12:22 PM ET

February 8, 2011

The repercussions may be felt in the most unlikely places...

...far from Tunisia:

http://open.salon.com/blog/jemima_sandhu/2011/02/07/tunisiaburma_how_facebook_transformed_the_domino_effect