Revolution in the Arab World
Dispatches from Tahrir Square Middle East Channel Latest Scenes from Egypt

Getting on the Right Side of History

It seems that every autocratic regime that Washington has backed for decades -- save for the monarchies of the Persian Gulf -- is on the outs.

BY PARAG KHANNA | FEBRUARY 3, 2011

Right now, things don't look so good in Cairo. President Hosni Mubarak refuses to step aside, and the conspiracy rumor mill is incensed that U.S. President Barack Obama, despite a clear speech calling for Egypt's transition to "begin now," seems to still back Mubarak's remaining in power until September.

But sooner or later, Mubarak will go -- and so too will Yemeni President Ali Abdullah Saleh, who just announced that he won't see reelection either. If America's stalwart allies in waging the "war on terror," making peace with Israel, and keeping the flow of oil open are falling across the region, how can the United States possibly come out ahead in the Arab version of Eastern Europe's 1989?

The "Arab Spring" is as important as the fall of communism two decades ago. Then America was on the right side of history; now, it's not so clear. But in the Middle East, it's still not too late to get on it. For the past three decades, political inertia has gotten the better of diplomatic creativity in the Middle East. Washington has backed a host of autocrats in the name of stability. Successively corrupt regimes have presided over nothing but overpopulation, economic stagnation, and literally cutthroat politics. Never has a set of dominoes so deserved to fall.

Today, the Arab order that has stubbornly persisted since decolonization three generations ago appears to be finally crumbling, allowing its most populous country, Egypt, to wake up to the 21st century. Now the antiquated rules governing Western thinking about the Middle East -- stability over democracy and anything for Israel -- can be jettisoned as well.

People power is a lot more complicated than having one son of a bitch who answers the West's calls. But Egyptians aren't stupid, and even before the present crisis, notable figures ranging from feminist writer and physician Nawal El Saadawi to Mohamed ElBaradei have been potential candidates to lead the country. Like Tunisia, Egypt will quickly embrace better governance. Presidential or executive powers will be curtailed. Cronyism and clan-based dealings will be replaced by more technocratic leadership that will answer to the people as well as to global markets.

Egypt won't become a perfect democracy anytime soon, but it will likely have more accountability than it has seen in most of its population's living memory. Westerners don't need to worry about any new ideology triumphing the way Islamist theocracy emerged out of the chaos of Iran's 1979 revolution. Yes, the Muslim Brotherhood has grown in influence in Egypt, but not so much because of its religious preaching as its promotion of anti-corruption measures and its call for the repeal of Mubarak's draconian emergency laws. Even if it comes to power, in a democratic Egypt it could only stay if it practiced what it preached.

Egypt, the once proud anchor of the Arab world, has seen the spectacular success of Dubai and Doha and knows it must do better. Once the locus of the Middle East, it has been eclipsed by Saudi Arabia, Qatar, and the United Arab Emirates, which have put their natural resources to work in ways Egypt has not done with its human resources. Across the region, the tired old Arabism of anti-colonial rhetoric and Sunni unity has failed -- replaced by a new Arabism led by Qatar's Al Jazeera, Lebanese bloggers, and Dubai investors. It is their entrepreneurship, know-how, and capital that are reshaping the vast young Arab generation's outlook on the world. This is the kind of fresh, youthful secular Arabism the West should get behind, liberating them from the squeeze between autocrats and would-be theocrats.

All this is good for the United States. Instead of prizing a false stability that inevitably culminates in chaos, as we most recently witnessed in Pakistan, the United States can ally with a young population that wants American companies to build factories, American consultants to reform their ministries and stock markets, and American universities to expand their campuses. Instead of Faustian bargains, there's no reason that Washington can't greet the dawning of the Arab Spring and normalize relations with the Egyptian people -- instead of their rulers.

A domino effect doesn't have to be a bad thing. Replacing autocracy with democracy and ideology with pragmatism would be a big step forward for much of the Arab world. And Washington would be wise to welcome this new era.

MIGUEL MEDINA/AFP/Getty Images

 

Parag Khanna is a senior research fellow at the New America Foundation and author of the just released How to Run the World: Charting a Course to the Next Renaissance.

 

TRANSTRIST

3:55 AM ET

February 4, 2011

Here's the rub

Muslim Brotherhood promises to cancel the peace treaty with Israel and "prepare for the final jihad" (words of their spokesman to the Japanese television yesterday). I accept that we can't stand athwart Egyptian popular sentiment screaming "stop!", and that the only way to keep Mubarak in power (by encouraging the Egyptian army to put the protesters down by force) is unacceptable to us. But what message does our behavior send to Israel? That we don't give a damn if the new rulers in Cairo go to war with them? That the democracy in Egypt (that brings to power anti-Israeli and simply anti-Semitic forces) is more important to us than Israel's security? You seem to answer this question in affirmative, and there're others who think that our "special relationship" with Israel is long overdue. But how do you think Israel will react? There's no "peace deal" with Palestinians that can satisfy Muslim Brotherhood. Israel will become even more stringent on the issues of security, and the principle of "land for peace" will be fatally compromised (not for nothing, most hysterical voices of criticism against Obama for his "abandonment" of Mubarak came from the Israeli Left). Also, if the "new Egypt" becomes a friendly turf for Hamas, and the whole Sinai border turns into a Kassam zone, Israel will react, and where will we be? Finally, with Egypt behind it, Hamas might make a new push for power against the Palestinian Authority, and it will win unless either Abbas or Israel drown it in blood. What if the new democrats in Egypt use this as a pretext to declare war on Israel? And how do you think Israel will wage war against an American-trained army of half million, equipped with Abrams tanks and F-16?
Truth is, of course we will not abandon Israel. Of course, in case of a military conflict we will stand with Israel. Of course we will not let the moderate Palestinian government to fall. So let's tell Egyptians all those things right now, and not let them think that if only they elect an anti-Israeli government by popular choice, we will let them do what they want.

 

THIRDWORLDCHARLIE

9:49 PM ET

February 4, 2011

Will not abondon Israel

You will not abandon Israel, but abandon Democracy in Egypt. We have heard your lectures and moralizing for long long time. It was all a lie. So please STOP pontificating to us about Democracy.

 

THIRDWORLDCHARLIE

9:42 PM ET

February 4, 2011

It is American Way

To ask America to refrain from supporting Dictators is akin to asking a drug addict to give up his favorite drug. American Empire has always used surrogate rulers to impose its will on the subject nations. This method was perfected in Latin America in early 1900's. It is attractive as it allows America to pontificate high minded ideals such as Democracy, Free Speech, Human Rights, while curtailing the very same for her conquered nations. The perpetrator is the agent. Previous Empires occupied the conquered lands and kept the business environment favorable for corporations to do the wealth gathering function. The control was local and the repression was done by the Empire itself. In American model the management was subcontracted to a surrogate. He does the Imperial biding but without implicating it. Thus Americas maintained dozens of Dictators in its stable.

To ask America to change will require major rehabilitation, or even to give up on Empire. Such action is not possible.

 

NICOLAS19

4:17 AM ET

February 7, 2011

the 1989-2011 comparison is spot on

The people of various Arab states are fighting to overthrow the dictators that a superpower installed and supported to keep the population in check.That is exactly what happened in 1989 in European states.
The 1989 superpower was the USSR, its modern day equivalent is the US. Naturally it isn't that simple, but that's not my point.

I wish some emerging regional power (or superpower-aspirant) would take the opportunity. Turkey has started something, but their rhetoric is not consistent enough. They should take the opportunity to weight in on the side of the protesters. I'm talking about loud and unmistakable rhetoric, arms sales, motions for UN resolutions and direct coverage of the happenings. Would the government bold enough, China should do the same, but I doubt their leadership is confident enough. It would do a world of good on their reputation in this strategic region.

The US would breathe fire of course. They wouldn't like their puppets fall. They wouldn't want others look the good guys. The media would be full of hatred - just as expected from rivals.

 

JOHN MILTON XIV

1:48 AM ET

February 8, 2011

I like the ideas outlined in

I like the ideas outlined in the above. I like them a lot.

Turkey could well have the sort of moral authority that could bring in outside help. So could, more distantly, parts of Latin America eg. Brazil and India with their respective histories of anti-colonial struggle. These are the geo-political entities who may have some claim to moral integrity and authenticity.

The USA would do the world a very great favor if it LOUDLY and PUBLICLY told the truth about Empire - both theirs and the British/European before theirs - shouted a saving-grace MEA CULPA to both Heaven and Earth, and then STFU!!!!

Their blood-tithes would be very welcome.

Their hypocritical and Pharisaic sermons would not.

"Our talk of justice is empty until the last battleship has foundered on the forehead of a drowned man"

Paul Celan.

 

JOHN MILTON XIV

1:19 AM ET

February 8, 2011

Our talk of justice is empty

Our talk of justice is empty until the last battleship has foundered on the forehead of a drowned man.

Paul Celan.